Open Access

Treatment of menopausal symptoms by an extract from the roots of rhapontic rhubarb: the role of estrogen receptors

Chinese Medicine20105:7

DOI: 10.1186/1749-8546-5-7

Received: 2 September 2009

Accepted: 19 February 2010

Published: 19 February 2010

Abstract

A dry extract from the roots of rhapontic rhubarb (extract Rheum rhaponticum (L.); ERr) has been commercially available in Germany for over two decades to treat menopausal symptoms. However, the molecular basis of its clinical effectiveness remains obscure. This article reviews the in vitro and in vivo data of its estrogenic actions, particularly those mediated by estrogen receptor-β (ERβ).

Background

A dry extract from the roots of rhapontic rhubarb (extract Rheum rhaponticum (L.); ERr; Dahuang) consists mainly of rhaponticin (<90%) and aglycones (5%) of rhaponticin and desoxyrhaponticin (Figure 1). In plants, these natural hydroxystilbene compounds share a common biosynthetic pathway with resveratrol which is the first stilbene compound produced from p-coumaroyl-CoA catalysed by a selective stilbene synthesis. All other hydroxystilbenes in Rheum rhaponticum are derivatives of resveratrol [1].
Figure 1

Structure of hydroxystilbenes.

No adverse events have been observed in human applications of ERr although the synthetic estrogen diethylstilbestrol with a structural similarity of hydroxystilbenes exerts deleterious transplacental effects in humans [2, 3]. In both sexes of the dogs, a dosage of 1000 mg/kg body weight per day produced no adverse events [4].

Effectiveness of ERr in treating menopause

Since 1993 when ERr was first used in human to treat menopausal symptoms, and before when it used to treat women with child bearing potential suffering from oligomenorrhea or amenorrhea, no severe adverse events have been reported [5]. Ovarian failure during menopausal transition evokes a variety of symptoms. Postmenopause is established after 12 months of amenorrhea [6]. Perimenopause is the period of time (up to five years) prior to the last menstruation. About 80% of menopausal women suffer from hot flushes, sweating, heart complaints, sleep disturbances, depression, anxiety, physical/mental exhaustion, sexual problems, urinary tract complaints and vaginal dryness.

While hormone therapy (HT) effectively relieves menopausal symptoms, many women seek alternative treatments due to increased risks for breast [7] and endometrial cancer [8] associated with HT, as well as venous thromboembolism. The effectiveness of ERr to treat menopausal symptoms was validated by a 3-month prospective randomized controlled trial on 54 perimenopausal women with climacteric complaints receiving a daily dose of 4 mg of ERr. The treatment with ERr after 12 weeks significantly reduced the Menopause Rating Scale II symptoms as compared to control. After four weeks of treatment, the number and severity of hot flushes were decreased. After 12 weeks the overall menopause-related quality of life was significantly better in ERr-treated women than in those who received placebo. Importantly, no difference was observed in gynecological findings including endometrial biopsies, bleeding weight, blood pressure and tested laboratory safety parameters. No adverse events were detected in relation to ERr intake [9]. ERr is effective in reducing anxiety in perimenopausal women according to the Hamilton Anxiety Scale [9].

Continued intake of ERr for 48 and 96 weeks demonstrated long-term safety of ERr as no endometrial hyperplasia was detected, and no adverse events related to ERr occurred [5].

ERr reduces the occurrence and severity of climacteric symptoms during perimenopause in women and improves their health-related quality of life [9, 10].

Estrogenic activities of ERr

Clinical observations suggest that the mode of action of ERr is similar to that of hormones (i.e., estrogens). Estrogenic activities of ERr were assessed at biochemical, molecular and cellular as well as organism levels. Ligand binding assays and uterotrophic assays are two major methods to investigate the estrogenic activities of ERr. Bound estrogen receptors (ERs) usually modify transcriptional activity of target genes in a target cell. This process may be investigated by reporter gene assays in which a target cell is transfected by an expression plasmid for the ER of interest and a reporter gene construct, e.g. luciferase, whereby functional activity of ERs is quantified in target cells [11]. Finally, an organism as a whole has a high metabolic capacity. A compound given to an organism may be subject to its metabolism thereby rendering its activity. Therefore, results obtained in vitro must be verified in vivo. Ovariectomized female rodent is the recommended animal model for estrogen-related studies [12, 13]. If a compound is administered to ovariectomized rodents and exhibits estrogenic activities, uterine growth will be stimulated [14, 13].

Ligand binding assays of ERr

Ligand binding affinity for rhapontigenin and desoxyrhapontigenin, the aglycones of the major constituents of ERr, was determined by fluorescence polarisation according to Mueller et al. [15]. As the assay does not tolerate complex substance mixture of the entire extract, the ligand binding affinity of the total extract cannot be determined. Both substances exhibit a weak binding affinity to either estrogen receptor α (ERα) or estrogen receptor β (ERβ) with a slight preference for ERβ (Table 1) which is typical in a number of phytestrogens [11].
Table 1

Relative binding affinities of major constituents of ERr and estradiol

Substance

IC50 ERα

IC50 ERβ

Fold preference for ERβ

Estradiol

8 × 10-9

6.7 × 10-9

0.84

Trans-rhapontigenin

1.2 × 10-5

5.6 × 10-6

2.14

Desoxyrhapontigenin

2.6 × 10-5

2.8 × 10-5

1.1

Note:

Relative binding affinities of trans-rhapontigenin and desoxyrhapontigenin were assessed by a fluorescence polarization assay. IC50 values of compounds in comparison to estradiol and relative preference for the receptor subtypes are shown.

This weak binding preference suggests that the stimulation of cell-based reporter genes is equally potent for both receptors. Rhapontigenin and desoxyrhapontigenin almost only act on ERβ. ERr extract activates reporter gene activity through ERβ in HEC-1B endometrial adenocarcinoma cells and an endometrial specific reporter gene construct (mC3-tk-Luc) [16]. In a study using bone-derived U2OS cells and a reporter gene construct ((ERE)2-t-Luc), a weak activation of the reporter gene through ERα by the ERr extract and the two hydroxystilbenes was detected, whereas a strong activation of ERβ-dependent reporter gene by the ERr extract and the two hydroxystilbenes was observed [17].

The strong ERβ specificity observed in cell-based assays cannot be explained by the weak binding preference. A reasonable explanation might be due to recruitment of co-factors upon ligand binding [18]. Moreover, two other factors may be attributed to the differences in ligand binding and transcriptional activation. Firstly, there is a second binding site for substances such as tamoxifen in the co-activator groove of the ERβ, and thus direct antagonistic co-activator receptor interaction is possible [19, 20]. Whether this effect can be mimicked by ERr or its constituents remains to be investigated. Secondly, ligand binding does not affect the mobility of ERβ, but significantly influences the mobility of ERα, in the studies using pure anti-estrogen fulvestrant or the selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) raloxifen [21], whether and how ERr and/or its constituents influence(s) nuclear mobility upon binding is still not clear.

Rodent uterotrophic assays of ERr

The absence of an increased uterine wet weight in the in vivo uterotrophic assay for estrogenicity [14, 13] in ovariectomized rats indicates the safety of herbal extracts in terms of proliferative stimulation within the uterus. However, the assay data should not be directly extrapolated to human because ovariectomized rodents after a hormonal decline of 10-14 days are almost void of estrogens, while women in menopausal transition and postmenopause, despite the decline of ovarian estrogen production, have measurable estrogen levels in their circulation due to extraovarian estrogen production.

We performed two versions of the 3-day uterotrophic assay. In version 1, we tested four doses of ERr in comparison to the positive control estradiol with 0.1 mg/kg body weight per day as a therapeutically dose and three pharmacological doses (1, 10 and 100 mg/kg body weight per day) for safety considerations. In version 2, the same dose range of ERr was tested in a combinatorial treatment in the presence of low doses of estrogens (0.5 μg/kg body weight per day) to mimic the hormone levels in menopausal women [22]. Our results demonstrated two key features of ERr in the uterus of ovariectomized rats: (1) none of the tested doses of the extract if given alone stimulated uterotrophy (Table 2) or marker gene expression associated with proliferative events (data not shown); (2) treatment of ovariectomized rats with combinations of low dose estradiol and ERr dose dependently counteracted estradiol induced uterotrophy, i.e., the treatment resulted in a decrease in uterus wet weight (Table 2). This is interesting because both the uterotrophic response itself and the proliferation of the rat uterus are mediated by ERα primarily through a tethering mechanism with activator protein 1(AP-1) transcription factors [23].
Table 2

Relative uterotrophic and anti-uterotrophic activities

ERr 731 (μg/kg BW/d)

Estradiol (mg/kg BW/d)

0

0.5

4

0

100

211.5 ± 42.7***

576.6 ± 220***/623.8 ± 35.6***

0.1

75.5 ± 9.2/97.3 ± 24.9

189.3 ± 46.1***

-/-

1

85 ± 8.7

162.8 ± 35.1***

-/-

10

103.3 ± 15.2

182.5 ± 31.7***

-/-

100

122.9 ± 13.7/104.2 ± 19.6

130 ± 18.1*/++

-/-

Note:

The mean ± SD of uterine wet weights expressed as percentage of untreated controls are shown. If two values are shown, they represent means ± SD from two independent experiments.

*P < 0.05, ***P < 0.001: statistical significance (Student's t-test) if compared to untreated controls

++P < 0.01: statistical significance (Student's t-test) if compared to low dose estradiol treatment (0.0005 mg/kg BW/d)

Both in vitro and in vivo data support that ERr and/or its constituents exhibit(s) SERM-like properties. This hypothesis is supported by the results of a recent study in which three synthetic SERMs were comparatively evaluated. Overall, they exhibited mixed agonistic/antagonistic properties but shared one common feature, namely the reduction of the estradiol-stimulated uterotrophic response [24]. Another study on synthetic SERM discovered groups of compounds which functionally resemble the ERr by exhibiting a binding preference for ERβ and an anti-uterotrophic response in the uterotrophic assay [25]. Thus, it seems justified to associate ERr with functional SERM-like properties.

Plants containing hydroxystilbenes in Chinese medicine

Plants, plant parts or seeds containing hydroxystilbenes are used in Chinese medicine. Semen Astragali (SA) is a traditional Chinese tonic which may improve conditions such as hypertension and liver fibrosis [2628]. Some Chinese herbs such as Polygonum cuspidatum, Rheum tanguticum, Rheum officinale and Rheum coreanum have been used to alleviate menstrual and postmenopausal symptoms. Polygonum cuspidatum exhibited estrogenic activities from the anthrachinone emodin and the modified resveratrol hydroxystilbenes [29]. These studies suggest a positive role of hydroxystilbenes in the management of menopausal symptoms.

Conclusion

Neither clinical nor experimental studies observed adverse events of ERr, e.g., uterine and endometrial growth and proliferation. Moreover, ERr exerts SERM-like activities. For function ERβ seems to be the more important ER which in turn has been proven to mediate e.g., anti-anxiety effects [30].

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This paper was stimulated by the work conducted in the frame of the project 32.5.8003.0017.0 by the Robert-Bosch-Foundation.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Molekulare Zellphysiologie & Endokrinologie, Fachrichtung Biologie, Technische Universität Dresden

References

  1. Rupprich N, Hildebrand H, Kindl H: Substrate specificity in vivo and in vitro in the formation of stilbenes. Biosynthesis of rhaponticin. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1980, 200 (1): 72-78. 10.1016/0003-9861(80)90332-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. IARC: IARC monographs on the evaluation of the carcinogenic risk of chemicals to humans. Sex hormones (II). IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risk Chem Hum. 1979, 21: 11-561.Google Scholar
  3. Herbst AL: Diethylstilbestrol and adenocarcinoma of the vagina. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999, 181 (6): 1576-1578. 10.1016/S0002-9378(99)70412-6. discussion 1579View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Kaszkin-Bettag M, Richardson A, Rettenberger R, Heger PW: Long-term toxicity studies in dogs support the safety of the special extract ERr 731 from the roots of Rheum rhaponticum. Food Chem Toxicol. 2008, 46 (5): 1608-1618.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Hasper I, Ventskovskiy BM, Rettenberger R, Heger PW, Riley DS, Kaszkin-Bettag M: Long-term efficacy and safety of the special extract ERr 731 of Rheum rhaponticum in perimenopausal women with menopausal symptoms. Menopause. 2009, 16 (1): 117-131. 10.1097/gme.0b013e3181806446.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Johannes CB, Crawford SL: Menstrual bleeding, hormones, and the menopausal transition. Semin Reprod Endocrinol. 1999, 17 (4): 299-309.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Beral V: Breast cancer and hormone-replacement therapy in the Million Women Study. Lancet. 2003, 362 (9382): 419-427. 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14065-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Beral V, Bull D, Reeves G: Endometrial cancer and hormone-replacement therapy in the Million Women Study. Lancet. 2005, 365 (9470): 1543-1551. 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66455-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Heger M, Ventskovskiy BM, Borzenko I, Kneis KC, Rettenberger R, Kaszkin-Bettag M, Heger PW: Efficacy and safety of a special extract of Rheum rhaponticum (ERr 731) in perimenopausal women with climacteric complaints: a 12-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Menopause. 2006, 13 (5): 744-759. 10.1097/01.gme.0000240632.08182.e4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Kaszkin-Bettag M, Ventskovskiy BM, Kravchenko A, Rettenberger R, Richardson A, Heger PW, Heger M: The special extract ERr 731 of the roots of Rheum rhaponticum decreases anxiety and improves health state and general well-being in perimenopausal women. Menopause. 2007, 14 (2): 270-283. 10.1097/01.gme.0000251932.48426.35.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Kuiper GG, Lemmen JG, Carlsson B, Corton JC, Safe SH, Saag van der PT, Burg van der B, Gustafsson JA: Interaction of estrogenic chemicals and phytoestrogens with estrogen receptor beta. Endocrinology. 1998, 139 (10): 4252-4263. 10.1210/en.139.10.4252.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Kanno J, Onyon L, Peddada S, Ashby J, Jacob E, Owens W: The OECD program to validate the rat uterotrophic bioassay. Phase 2: coded single-dose studies. Environ Health Perspect. 2003, 111 (12): 1550-1558.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Kanno J, Onyon L, Peddada S, Ashby J, Jacob E, Owens W: The OECD program to validate the rat uterotrophic bioassay. Phase 2: dose-response studies. Environ Health Perspect. 2003, 111 (12): 1530-1549.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Diel P, Schmidt S, Vollmer G: In vivo test systems for the quantitative and qualitative analysis of the biological activity of phytoestrogens. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2002, 777 (1-2): 191-202. 10.1016/S1570-0232(02)00494-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Mueller SO, Simon S, Chae K, Metzler M, Korach KS: Phytoestrogens and their human metabolites show distinct agonistic and antagonistic properties on estrogen receptor alpha (ERalpha) and ERbeta in human cells. Toxicol Sci. 2004, 80 (1): 14-25. 10.1093/toxsci/kfh147.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Wober J, Moller F, Richter T, Unger C, Weigt C, Jandausch A, Zierau O, Rettenberger R, Kaszkin-Bettag M, Vollmer G: Activation of estrogen receptor-beta by a special extract of Rheum rhaponticum (ERr 731((R))), its aglycones and structurally related compounds. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2007, 107 (3-5): 191-201. 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2007.04.002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Moller F, Zierau O, Jandausch A, Rettenberger R, Kaszkin-Bettag M, Vollmer G: Subtype-specific activation of estrogen receptors by a special extract of Rheum rhaponticum (ERr 731), its aglycones and structurally related compounds in U2OS human osteosarcoma cells. Phytomedicine. 2007, 14 (11): 716-726. 10.1016/j.phymed.2007.09.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Pike AC, Brzozowski AM, Hubbard RE: A structural biologist's view of the oestrogen receptor. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2000, 74 (5): 261-268. 10.1016/S0960-0760(00)00102-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Wang Y, Chirgadze NY, Briggs SL, Khan S, Jensen EV, Burris TP: A second binding site for hydroxytamoxifen within the coactivator-binding groove of estrogen receptor beta. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006, 103 (26): 9908-9911. 10.1073/pnas.0510596103.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Kojetin DJ, Burris TP, Jensen EV, Khan SA: Implications of the binding of tamoxifen to the coactivator recognition site of the estrogen receptor. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2008, 15 (4): 851-870. 10.1677/ERC-07-0281.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Damdimopoulos AE, Spyrou G, Gustafsson JA: Ligands differentially modify the nuclear mobility of estrogen receptors alpha and beta. Endocrinology. 2008, 149 (1): 339-345. 10.1210/en.2007-0198.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Papke A, Kretzschmar G, Zierau O, Kaszkin-Bettag M, Vollmer G: Effects of the special extract ERr 731 from Rheum rhaponticum on estrogen-regulated targets in the uterotrophy model of ovariectomized rats. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2009, 117 (4-5): 176-184. 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2009.09.011.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. O'Brien JE, Peterson TJ, Tong MH, Lee EJ, Pfaff LE, Hewitt SC, Korach KS, Weiss J, Jameson JL: Estrogen-induced proliferation of uterine epithelial cells is independent of estrogen receptor alpha binding to classical estrogen response elements. J Biol Chem. 2006, 281 (36): 26683-26692. 10.1074/jbc.M601522200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Crabtree JS, Peano BJ, Zhang X, Komm BS, Winneker RC, Harris HA: Activity of three selective estrogen receptor modulators on hormone-dependent responses in the mouse uterus and mammary gland. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2008, 287 (1-2): 40-46. 10.1016/j.mce.2008.01.027.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Blizzard TA: Selective estrogen receptor modulator medicinal chemistry at Merck. A review. Curr Top Med Chem. 2008, 8 (9): 792-812. 10.2174/156802608784535066.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Li JX, Xue B, Chai Q, Liu ZX, Zhao AP, Chen LB: Antihypertensive effect of total flavonoid fraction of Astragalus complanatus in hypertensive rats. Chin J Physiol. 2005, 48 (2): 101-106.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Liu CY, Gu ZL, Zhou WX, Guo CY: Effect of Astragalus complanatus flavonoid on anti-liver fibrosis in rats. World J Gastroenterol. 2005, 11 (37): 5782-5786.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Xue B, Li J, Chai Q, Liu Z, Chen L: Effect of total flavonoid fraction of Astragalus complanatus R.Brown on angiotensin II-induced portal-vein contraction in hypertensive rats. Phytomedicine. 2008, 15 (9): 759-762. 10.1016/j.phymed.2007.11.030.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Zhang CZ, Wang SX, Zhang Y, Chen JP, Liang XM: In vitro estrogenic activities of Chinese medicinal plants traditionally used for the management of menopausal symptoms. J Ethnopharmacol. 2005, 98 (3): 295-300. 10.1016/j.jep.2005.01.033.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Imwalle DB, Gustafsson JA, Rissman EF: Lack of functional estrogen receptor beta influences anxiety behavior and serotonin content in female mice. Physiol Behav. 2005, 84 (1): 157-163. 10.1016/j.physbeh.2004.11.002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Vollmer et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.