Skip to main content

Table 3 Components of the volatile chemicals in Angelicae Sinensis Radix and Chuanxiong Rhizoma

From: Chemical changes of Angelicae Sinensis Radix and Chuanxiong Rhizoma by wine treatment: chemical profiling and marker selection by gas chromatography coupled with triple quadrupole mass spectrometry

No.

RI1

Components

RA2(%)

No.

RI

Components

RA (%)

ASR3

WASR

CR

WCR

ASR

WASR

CR

WCR

1

1083

3-Carene

-

-

0.06

0.08

29

1603

β-Humulene

0.12

0.26

0.14

0.12

2

1204

Sylvestrene

-

-

0.04

0.03

30

1628

Aromadendrene

-

-

0.05

0.05

3

1218

3-Ethyl-3-methylheptane

0.02

0.03

-

-

31

1640

Butylphthalide 4

3.25

2.98

8.70

7.26

4

1220

2-Methyl nonane

0.22

-

0.08

0.07

32

1645

Pentadecane, 8-heptyl-

0.29

0.17

-

-

5

1224

o-Cymene

0.69

0.19

0.05

0.05

33

1651

Z-Butylidenephthalide 4

7.79

6.15

3.28

3.12

6

1228

Limonene

0.63

0.31

0.04

0.04

34

1655

β-Eudesmol

0.13

0.09

0.81

0.55

7

1233

β-Pinene

3.63

1.69

0.25

0.29

35

1661

E-Butylidenephthalide

0.15

0.10

2.05

1.86

8

1246

4-Octanone

0.09

-

-

-

36

1675

Senkyunolide A 4

3.04

2.81

48.0

40.2

9

1256

β-Myrcene

1.06

0.42

0.07

0.10

37

1678

Muurola-4,11-diene

0.14

0.07

2.86

2.44

10

1260

Heneicosane

1.65

0.60

0.10

0.13

38

1683

Z-Ligustilide 4

48.7

40.7

25.5

25.1

11

1266

Ferulic acid 4

6.38

8.86

3.98

4.26

39

1687

1-Nonadecene

0.46

0.27

-

-

12

1285

β-Cedene

-

-

0.11

0.09

40

1692

Cryptone

0.58

0.33

0.03

0.02

13

1400

Tetradecane

0.13

0.22

0.02

0.03

41

1697

3,9-Diethyl-6-tridecanol

0.21

0.38

0.02

0.02

14

1408

Butanoic acid

-

-

0.03

0.02

42

1804

5-(2-Thienyl)-4-pyrimidinamine

0.19

0.33

0.03

0.02

15

1423

Caryophyllene

0.14

0.06

0.27

0.32

43

1809

γ-Eudesmol

0.27

0.18

0.10

0.08

16

1429

Pentyl benzene

0.37

0.22

0.02

0.02

44

1816

E-Ligustilide

8.05

6.52

0.48

0.45

17

1434

Eicosane

0.71

0.40

0.10

0.11

45

1849

6,7-Dihydroxyligustilide

0.12

0.08

0.13

0.08

18

1438

Di-tert-dodecyl disulfide

0.41

0.73

0.06

0.07

46

1852

Senkyunolide F

0.18

0.10

0.01

0.01

19

1443

β-Linalool

0.79

0.47

0.07

0.07

47

1866

Hexadecanoic acid

0.01

0.02

0.06

0.03

20

1448

3-Butylidene-4-hydroxyphthalide

0.23

0.12

0.05

0.04

48

1869

1-Octadecanol

0.20

0.13

0.13

0.07

21

1452

α,p-Dimethylstyrene

0.38

0.30

0.04

0.03

49

1898

Methoxsalen

0.22

0.21

0.07

0.05

22

1458

Cis-1,2-limonene epoxide

-

-

0.36

0.31

50

2022

Ledene

-

-

0.30

0.26

23

1461

2,5-Di-tert-Butylaniline

0.93

1.37

0.13

0.13

51

2052

Marmesin

0.21

0.21

0.05

0.04

24

1466

Lignocerol

0.12

0.24

0.03

0.02

52

2085

Lomatin

0.70

0.82

0.10

0.08

25

1470

4,8-Epoxyterpinolene

0.55

0.30

0.05

0.04

53

2095

Pentadecanoic acid

-

-

0.03

0.02

26

1474

7-Hexyltridecan-1-ol

0.49

0.27

0.07

0.06

54

2201

Linoleic acid

0.37

0.19

-

-

27

1479

β-Funebrene

0.62

0.32

0.05

0.05

55

2225

Methyl palmitate

0.13

0.07

-

-

28

1489

1-Phenyl-1-pentanone

-

-

0.02

0.01

56

2282

1-Pentadecanol

-

-

0.05

0.05

  1. 1RI Retention indices calculated against n-alkanes.
  2. 2RA Relative percentages to the total peak areas in the original crude herb. A total of 56 chemicals were identified, and the unknown peaks covered 4% in ASR and 1% in CR (n=5).
  3. 3ASR Angelicae Sinensis Radix, WASR Wine-treated Angelicae Sinensis Radix, CR Chuanxiong Rhizoma, WCR Wine-treated Chuanxiong Rhizoma.
  4. 4Target chemicals.