Skip to main content

Table 3 Components of the volatile chemicals in Angelicae Sinensis Radix and Chuanxiong Rhizoma

From: Chemical changes of Angelicae Sinensis Radix and Chuanxiong Rhizoma by wine treatment: chemical profiling and marker selection by gas chromatography coupled with triple quadrupole mass spectrometry

No. RI1 Components RA2(%) No. RI Components RA (%)
ASR3 WASR CR WCR ASR WASR CR WCR
1 1083 3-Carene - - 0.06 0.08 29 1603 β-Humulene 0.12 0.26 0.14 0.12
2 1204 Sylvestrene - - 0.04 0.03 30 1628 Aromadendrene - - 0.05 0.05
3 1218 3-Ethyl-3-methylheptane 0.02 0.03 - - 31 1640 Butylphthalide 4 3.25 2.98 8.70 7.26
4 1220 2-Methyl nonane 0.22 - 0.08 0.07 32 1645 Pentadecane, 8-heptyl- 0.29 0.17 - -
5 1224 o-Cymene 0.69 0.19 0.05 0.05 33 1651 Z-Butylidenephthalide 4 7.79 6.15 3.28 3.12
6 1228 Limonene 0.63 0.31 0.04 0.04 34 1655 β-Eudesmol 0.13 0.09 0.81 0.55
7 1233 β-Pinene 3.63 1.69 0.25 0.29 35 1661 E-Butylidenephthalide 0.15 0.10 2.05 1.86
8 1246 4-Octanone 0.09 - - - 36 1675 Senkyunolide A 4 3.04 2.81 48.0 40.2
9 1256 β-Myrcene 1.06 0.42 0.07 0.10 37 1678 Muurola-4,11-diene 0.14 0.07 2.86 2.44
10 1260 Heneicosane 1.65 0.60 0.10 0.13 38 1683 Z-Ligustilide 4 48.7 40.7 25.5 25.1
11 1266 Ferulic acid 4 6.38 8.86 3.98 4.26 39 1687 1-Nonadecene 0.46 0.27 - -
12 1285 β-Cedene - - 0.11 0.09 40 1692 Cryptone 0.58 0.33 0.03 0.02
13 1400 Tetradecane 0.13 0.22 0.02 0.03 41 1697 3,9-Diethyl-6-tridecanol 0.21 0.38 0.02 0.02
14 1408 Butanoic acid - - 0.03 0.02 42 1804 5-(2-Thienyl)-4-pyrimidinamine 0.19 0.33 0.03 0.02
15 1423 Caryophyllene 0.14 0.06 0.27 0.32 43 1809 γ-Eudesmol 0.27 0.18 0.10 0.08
16 1429 Pentyl benzene 0.37 0.22 0.02 0.02 44 1816 E-Ligustilide 8.05 6.52 0.48 0.45
17 1434 Eicosane 0.71 0.40 0.10 0.11 45 1849 6,7-Dihydroxyligustilide 0.12 0.08 0.13 0.08
18 1438 Di-tert-dodecyl disulfide 0.41 0.73 0.06 0.07 46 1852 Senkyunolide F 0.18 0.10 0.01 0.01
19 1443 β-Linalool 0.79 0.47 0.07 0.07 47 1866 Hexadecanoic acid 0.01 0.02 0.06 0.03
20 1448 3-Butylidene-4-hydroxyphthalide 0.23 0.12 0.05 0.04 48 1869 1-Octadecanol 0.20 0.13 0.13 0.07
21 1452 α,p-Dimethylstyrene 0.38 0.30 0.04 0.03 49 1898 Methoxsalen 0.22 0.21 0.07 0.05
22 1458 Cis-1,2-limonene epoxide - - 0.36 0.31 50 2022 Ledene - - 0.30 0.26
23 1461 2,5-Di-tert-Butylaniline 0.93 1.37 0.13 0.13 51 2052 Marmesin 0.21 0.21 0.05 0.04
24 1466 Lignocerol 0.12 0.24 0.03 0.02 52 2085 Lomatin 0.70 0.82 0.10 0.08
25 1470 4,8-Epoxyterpinolene 0.55 0.30 0.05 0.04 53 2095 Pentadecanoic acid - - 0.03 0.02
26 1474 7-Hexyltridecan-1-ol 0.49 0.27 0.07 0.06 54 2201 Linoleic acid 0.37 0.19 - -
27 1479 β-Funebrene 0.62 0.32 0.05 0.05 55 2225 Methyl palmitate 0.13 0.07 - -
28 1489 1-Phenyl-1-pentanone - - 0.02 0.01 56 2282 1-Pentadecanol - - 0.05 0.05
  1. 1RI Retention indices calculated against n-alkanes.
  2. 2RA Relative percentages to the total peak areas in the original crude herb. A total of 56 chemicals were identified, and the unknown peaks covered 4% in ASR and 1% in CR (n=5).
  3. 3ASR Angelicae Sinensis Radix, WASR Wine-treated Angelicae Sinensis Radix, CR Chuanxiong Rhizoma, WCR Wine-treated Chuanxiong Rhizoma.
  4. 4Target chemicals.