Table 4 Reporting quality of 27 items of PRISMA (n = 97)
From: Reporting quality of systematic reviews with moxibustion
Category | Item | Score, n (%) |
|---|---|---|
Title | 1. Title | 83 (85.6) |
Abstract | 2. Structured summary | 84 (86.6) |
Introduction | 3. Rationale | 77 (79.4) |
4. Objective | 88 (90.7) | |
Methods | 5. Protocol and registration | 12 (12.4) |
Results | 6. Eligibility criteria | 92 (94.8) |
7. Information sources | 91 (93.8) | |
8. Search | 49 (50.5) | |
9. Study selection | 83 (85.6) | |
10. Data collection process | 83 (85.6) | |
11. Data items | 69 (71.1) | |
12. Risk of bias in individual studies | 83 (85.6) | |
13. Summary measures | 82 (84.5) | |
14. Synthesis of results | 83 (85.6) | |
15. Risk of bias across studies | 63 (64.9) | |
16. Additional analyses | 45 (46.4) | |
17. Study selection | 92 (94.8) | |
18. Study characteristics | 94 (96.9) | |
19. Risk of bias within studies | 76 (78.4) | |
20. Results of individual studies | 97 (100) | |
21. Synthesis of results | 69 (71.1) | |
22. Risk of bias across studies | 62 (63.9) | |
23. Additional analysis | 31 (32.0) | |
Discussion | 24. Summary of evidence | 94 (96.9) |
25. Limitations | 73 (75.3) | |
26. Conclusions | 97 (100) | |
Funding | 27. Funding | 55 (56.7) |