Table 4 Pairwise meta-analysis of of reduction of RQLQ
Comparison | Number | SMD (95% CI) | I2 (%) | p |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MA VS WA | 1 | − 0.53 (− 1.43, 0.36) | – | – |
MA VS CM | 6 | 0.79 (− 0.05, 1.63) | 92 |  < 0.00001 |
MA VS MA + CM | 1 | − 1.92 (− 1.60, − 0.24) | – | – |
MA VS AM | 1 | − 0.13 (− 1.01, 0.74) | – | – |
MA VS SA | 1 | 0.92 (0.23, 1.61) | – | – |
WA VS CM | 8 | 1.71 (0.87, 2.56) | 94 |  < 0.00001 |
WA VS AM | 1 | − 0.50 (− 0.39, 1.39) | – | – |
Mox VS CM | 4 | 0.14 (− 0.37, 0.64) | 84 | 0.0003 |
CM VS MA + CM | 3 | − 2.06 (− 2.42, − 1.71) | 25 | 0.27 |
CM VS AM | 1 | − 1.87 (− 2.57, − 1.22) | – | – |
CM VS EA | 1 | − 0.13 (− 0.64, 0.37) | – | – |
CM VS SA + CM | 1 | − 0.66 (− 1.06, − 0.27) | – | – |
MA + CM VS SA + CM | 1 | 1.66 (1.28, 2.04) | – | – |