Table 9 Effect of CM treatment and age on the performance of participants in 6MWT
From: Effects of Chinese medicine for COVID-19 rehabilitation: a multicenter observational study
(A) Type III Analysis of Variance Table with Satterthwaite’s method of approximation for Model 1 of 6MWT distance | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Effect | Degrees of freedom (numerator, denominator) | F-value | p-value |
CM visits | (879.83) | 6.9087 | < 0.001*** |
Age | (142.86) | 4.0511 | 0.046* |
CM symptoms | 1010.59 | 0.2434 | 0.866 |
Prior CM consultations | (140.30) | 3.0396 | 0.083 |
(B) Summary of fixed effects in Model 1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Parameter | Estimate | Test (df) | Pr( >|t|) |
(Intercept) | 430.8429 | t = 15.445 (148.4691) | < 0.001 *** |
V2 | 10.0296 | t = 2.289 (876.4085) | 0.022 * |
V3 | 15.7312 | t = 3.514 (878.5520) | < 0.001*** |
V4 | 20.4666 | t = 4.586 (879.3714) | < 0.001*** |
V5 | 22.5824 | t = 4.924 (879.7408) | < 0.001*** |
V6 | 23.7805 | t = 5.069 (880.7936) | < 0.001*** |
V7 | 21.0785 | t = 4.475 (881.7175) | < 0.001*** |
V8 | 26.5497 | t = 5.509 (895.2496) | < 0.001*** |
Age | − 0.9610 | t = − 2.013 (142.8619) | 0.046 * |
Qi Deficiency of Lung and Spleen Syndrome only | 2.2650 | t = 0.290 (1009.1206) | 0.772 |
Qi and Yin Deficiency only | − 6.1087 | t = − 0.602 (1011.0674) | 0.547 |
Both CM Syndromes | − 1.5165 | t = − 0.236 (1021.3499) | 0.814 |
Prior CM consultations | 3.7064 | t = 1.743 (140.2964) | 0.083 |