Skip to main content

Table 4 Post-treatment triglycerides levels (mmol/L) in randomized controlled trials

From: Chinese red yeast rice (Monascus purpureus) for primary hyperlipidemia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Interventions

No. of trials [references]

No. of participants

Weighted mean difference (95% confidence interval)

P value

RYR vs. no intervention/placebo

    

Zhibituo vs. no intervention

2 [22, 23]

112

-0.54 (-0.77 to -0.32)

< 0.00001

RYR supplement vs. placebo

1 [7]

83

-0.25 (-0.47 to -0.03)

0.03

Xuezhikang vs. placebo

4 [8, 24–26]

323

-0.40 (-0.70 to -0.10)*

0.008

Zhibituo vs. placebo

3 [27–29]

291

-0.55 (-0.99 to -0.10)

0.02

RYR vs. statins

    

Xuezhikang vs. simvastatin

14 [6, 30–42]

1251

-0.08 (-0.25 to 0.10)*

0.39

Xuezhikang vs. pravastatin

7 [44–50]

592

0.04 (- 0.29 to 0.38)*

0.79

Xuezhikang vs. lovastatin

3 [51–53]

168

-0.07 (-0.16 to 0.01)

0.09

Xuezhikang vs. atorvastatin

1 [54]

60

-0.02 (-0.16 to 0.12)

0.78

Xuezhikang vs. fluvastatin

1 [55]

118

0.09 (-0.1 4 to 0.32)

0.44

Zhibituo vs. simvastatin

9 [32, 56–63]

732

0.05 (-0.17 to 0.26)*

0.67

Zhibituo vs. provastatin

1 [22]

62

-0.02 (-0.19 to 0.15)

0.81

Zhibituo vs. lovastatin

1 [57]

45

-0.21 (- 0.61 to 0.19)

0.30

RYR vs. non-statin drugs

    

Xuezhikang vs. inositol nicotinate

7 [65–71]

636

-0.06 (-0.20 to 0.08)

0.38

Xuezhikang vs. fenofibrate

5 [32, 73–76]

337

0.42 (-0.17 to 1.01)*

0.16

Xuezhikang vs. gemfibrozil

3 [77–79]

160

0.41 (0.30 to 0.51)

< 0.00001

Xuezhikang vs. fish oils

2 [80, 81]

112

-0.71 (-0.97 to -0.44)

< 0.00001

Xuezhikang vs. alginic sodium diester

1 [84]

60

0.04 (-0.21 to 0.29)

0.75

Xuezhikang vs.conjugated estrogens

1 [85]

44

-0.82 (-1.31 to -0.33)

0.001

Xuezhikang vs. elastase

1 [86]

107

0.00 (-0.31 to 0.31)

1.00

Xuezhikang vs. biphenalbid

1 [87]

64

-0.43 (-0.8 1 to -0.05)

0.03

Zhibituo vs. inositol nicotinate

7 [88–93, 95]

598

-0.39 (-0.62 to -0.16)*

0.0008

Zhibituo vs. fish oils

5 [97–100, 102]

394

-0.12 (-0.29 to 0.05)

0.17

Zhibituo vs. fenofibrate

2 [32, 104]

248

0.33 (-0.12 to 0.78)

0.15

RYR vs. RTR

    

Xuezhikang vs. Zhibituo

7 [32, 106–111]

727

0.05 (-0.17 to 0.27)*

0.66

  1. * Random effects model