Skip to main content

Table 1 Items used in this study for systematic evaluation

From: Reporting quality of sham needles used as controls in acupuncture trials: a methodological evaluation

Items

Corresponding items in guidelines

Categories

Descriptions

STRICTA

TIDieR

I. Type of sham needle

1a

Type of sham needle. (e.g., Streitberger needle, Park needle, Takakura needle, cocktail picks)

1a

1

1b

Rationale for using the chosen sham needle

1b, 6a

2

II. Details of sham needle

2a

Number of sham needling per subject per session

2a

8

2b

Are the depths of insertion reported?

6 g

 

2c

Response sought (e.g., de qi or muscle twitch response)

2d

6

2d

Sham needle stimulation

2e

6

2e

Sham needle retention

2f

6

2f

Details of other interventions administered in addition to sham needles

4a

6

III. Location of sham needle

3a

Location of sham needling (e.g., acupoints/non-acupoints, exact location of the sites)

2b

6

3b

Is it explicit that the points are unilateral or bilateral?

6e

6

3c

Rationale for the location chosen for sham needling

1b, 6a

2

IV. Treatment regimen

4a

Number of placebo sessions

3a

8

4b

Frequency and duration of placebo sessions

3b

8

4c

Total trial period for placebo group/sessions

3a, 3b

 

V. Practitioner

5a

Is the same practitioner administering both treatment and control groups?

 

5

5b

Did practitioner and the patient have discussions prior to the treatment? (Doctor-patient relationship)

  

5c

Was there any discussion regarding the symptoms during the treatment?

  

VI. Protocol and settings

6a

Instruction and information given by the practitioner to the patients (are the explanations that were given to participants of treatment and control interventions provided?)

6b

3

6b

Was the introduction to participants explained in the paper?

  

6c

Did the instruction and information include the term “placebo” or “sham"?

  

6d

Type of blinding (e.g., only the patients, double-blinding)

  

6e

Was the method of blinding sham needle to patients elaborated?

  

6f

Modification of the needling procedure if there was any, and reason for the modification

 

10

6 g

Assessment of the intervention adherence or fidelity, and blinding

 

12

6 h

Any differences in the settings between treatment and control groups