Skip to main content

Table 3 Risk bias included studies

From: Effects of antioxidants on diabetic kidney diseases: mechanistic interpretations and clinical assessment

Study, year

Random sequence generation

Allocation concealment

Blinding of participants and personnel

Blinding of outcome assessors

Incomplete outcome data

Selective reporting

Other sources of bias

Gaede et al. (2001) [95]

Unclear (not stated)

Unclear (not stated)

Low risk (double blind)

Unclear (not stated)

Low risk (no drop-out)

Unclear (not stated)

Unclear (not stated)

Farvid et al. (2005) [96]

Low risk (block randomization procedure)

Low risk (the supplement and placebo capsules looked identical)

Low risk (double blind)

Unclear (not stated)

Low risk (two drop-out)

Unclear (not stated)

Unclear (not stated)

Giannini et al. (2007) [89]

Unclear (not stated)

Low risk (Vitamin E and placebo were capsules of the same size, shape, and color)

Low risk (double blind)

Unclear (not stated)

Low risk (no drop-out)

Unclear (not stated)

Unclear (not stated)

Parham et al. (2008) [92]

Low risk (card-shufflfling randomization)

Low risk (the same as the zinc capsules, in size, shape and color.)

Low risk (double blind)

Unclear (not stated)

Low risk (eight drop-out: four in the control group; four in the intervention group)

Unclear (not stated)

Unclear (not stated)

Khajehdehi et al. (2011) [97]

Unclear (not stated)

Low Risk (three capsules identical in colour and size, containing starch)

Low risk (double blind)

Unclear (not stated)

Low risk (no drop-out)

Unclear (not stated)

Unclear (not stated)

Fallahzadeh et al. (2012) [98]

Low risk (sequence generated by Random Allocation Software)

Low Risk (similar in size, shape, weight, color, and taste.)

Low risk (double blind)

Unclear (not stated)

Low risk (four drop-out: two in the control group; two in the intervention group)

Unclear (not stated)

Unclear (not stated)

Noori et al. (2013) [99]

Unclear (not stated)

Unclear (not stated)

Low risk (double blind)

Unclear (not stated)

Low risk (no drop-out)

Unclear (not stated)

Unclear (not stated)

Haghighat et al. (2014) [90]

Low risk (participants were assigned into two groups randomly by using a random number table)

Unclear (not stated)

Low risk (double blind)

Unclear (not stated)

Low risk (five drop-out: three in the control group; two in the intervention group)

Low risk (all the specifified outcomes have been reported)

Unclear (not stated)

Zhu et al. (2016) [93]

Low risk (randomization sequence was created using SAS version 9.2

Unclear (not stated)

Low risk (double blind)

Unclear (not stated)

Low risk (20 drop-out: 13 in the control group; 7 in the intervention group)

Unclear (not stated)

Unclear (not stated)

Bahmani et al. (2016) [100]

Low risk (computer- generated random Numbers)

Low Risk (placebo capsules (starch), including colour, shape, size and packaging, was identical to Se capsules)

Low risk (double blind)

Low risk (concealed from the researchers and participants until the fifinal analyses were completed.)

Low risk (eight drop-out: four in the control group;four in the intervention group)

Unclear (not stated)

Unclear (not stated)

Borges et al. (2016) [101]

Low risk (website Randomization.com was used to Generate)

Low Risk (All drugs and placebo tablets were similar in size, shape, weight, and color.)

Low risk (double blind)

Unclear (not stated)

Low risk (five drop-out: three in the control group; two in the intervention group)

Unclear (not stated)

Unclear (not stated)

Elbarbary et al. (2018) [102]

Low risk (computer-generated randomization sequence)

Low risk (drug pharmacy with allocation concealment by opaque sequentially numbered sealed envelope)

Low risk (double blind)

Unclear (not stated)

Low risk (five drop-out: three in the control group;two in the intervention group)

Unclear (not stated)

Unclear (not stated)

Aghadavod et al. (2018) [103]

Low risk ( using a random number table)

Low Risk (similar in shape and size to vitamin E capsule)

Low risk (double blind)

Unclear (not stated)

Low risk (six drop-out: three in the control group; three in the intervention group)

Unclear (not stated)

Unclear (not stated)

Gholnari et al. (2018) [104]

Low risk (computer-generated random numbers)

Unclear (placebo (cellulose))

Low risk (double blind)

Unclear (not stated)

Low risk (three drop-out in intervention group)

Unclear (not stated)

Unclear (not stated)

Tan et al. (2019) [105]

Low risk (computer-generated random sequence)

Low Risk (investigational products was kept Confidential)

Low risk (double blind)

Unclear (not stated)

Low risk (no drop-out)

Unclear (not stated)

High Risk (tocotrienol measurements were not accurate.)

Sattarinezhad et al. (2019) [106]

Low risk (randomized list generated by Microsoft Excel software)

Low Risk (identical shapes, sizes and colours of the resveratrol and placebo containers)

Low risk (double blind)

Unclear (not stated)

Low risk (four drop-out: two in the control group; two in the intervention group)

Unclear (not stated)

Unclear (not stated)

Satari et al. (2021) [107]

Unclear (not stated)

Low Risk (Melatonin and placebo capsules were produced in the same shape and Package)

Low risk (double blind)

Unclear (not stated)

Low risk (eight drop-out: four in the control group; four in the intervention group)

Unclear (not stated)

Unclear (not stated)

Koay et al. (2021) [94]

Low risk (computer-generated random sequence)

Low risk (identical looking capsules (tocotrienol-free palm oil capsules)

Low risk (double blind)

Unclear (not stated)

Low risk (two drop-out)

Unclear (not stated)

Unclear (not stated)

Jaafarinia et al. (2022) [108]

Low risk (Microsoft Excel software with a block randomization method)

Low risk (Both intevention and placebo tablets were similar in size, shape, weight, and color)

Low risk (triple-blind)

Low risk (triple-blind)

Low risk (four drop-out: three in the control group; one in the intervention group)

Unclear (not stated)

Unclear (not stated)

  1. The quality of each article was independently assessed using the Cochrane bias risk assessment tool