Table 8 Comparison of TCM effectiveness rates (N/%)
Curative effect index | FAS | PPS | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Experimental group (107) | Control group (108) | Experimental group (91) | Control group (96) | |
Markedly effective | 8 (7.48) | 3 (2.78) | 7 (7.69) | 3 (3.13) |
Effective | 60 (56.07) | 47 (43.52) | 54 (59.34) | 43 (44.79) |
Ineffective | 39 (36.45) | 58 (53.70) | 30 (32.97) | 50 (52.08) |
Total effective rate | 63.55 | 46.30 | 67.03 | 47.92 |
P value | 0.011 | 0.008 | ||