Skip to main content
Download PDF

Transcriptomics‐based analysis of the mechanism by which Wang-Bi capsule alleviates joint destruction in rats with collagen‐induced arthritis

Chinese Medicine volume 16, Article number: 31 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic autoimmune disease accompanied with joint destruction that often leads to disability. Wang-Bi capsule (WB), a traditional Chinese medicine-based herbs formula, has exhibited inhibition effect on joint destruction of collagen-induced arthritis (CIA) animal model in our previous study. But its molecular mechanisms are still obscure.

Methods

CIA rats were treated intragastrical with WB for eight weeks, and the effect of joints protection were evaluated by hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining, safranin O fast green staining, tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) staining and micro‑CT scanning analysis. The transcriptomic of tarsal joints were used to investigate how WB alleviated joint destruction.

Results

The histological examination of ankle joints showed WB alleviated both cartilage damage and bone destruction of CIA rats. This protective effect on joints were further evidenced by micro-CT analysis. The transcriptomic analysis showed that WB prominently changed 12 KEGG signaling pathways (“calcium signaling pathway”, “cAMP signaling pathway”, “cell adhesion molecules”, “chemokine signaling pathway”, “complement and coagulation cascades”, “MAPK signaling pathway”, “NF-kappa B signaling pathway”, “osteoclast differentiation”, “PI3K-Akt signaling pathway”, “focal adhesion”, “Gap junction” and “Rap1 signaling pathway”) associated with bone or cartilage. Several genes (including Il6, Tnfsf11, Ffar2, Plg, Tnfrsf11b, Fgf4, Fpr1, Siglec1, Vegfd, Cldn1, Cxcl13, Chad, Arrb2, Fgf9, Egfr) regulating bone resorption, bone formation and cartilage development were identified by further analysis. Meanwhile, these differentially expressed genes were validated by real-time quantitative PCR.

Conclusions

Overall, the protective effect of WB treatment on joint were confirmed in CIA rats, and its basic molecular mechanisms may be associated with regulating some genes (including Il6, Tnfsf11, Ffar2 and Plg etc.) involved in bone resorption, bone formation and cartilage development.

Introduction

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic, autoimmune disease that is accompanied by persistent inflammation of synovial tissue as well as joint destruction. Joint destruction often interferes with physical function and even results in disability, which further affects productivity and quality of life. Approximately 80% of patients have deformed joints, and 40% lose work due to disability within 10 years of disease onset [1]. Many earlier studies indicated that joint destruction was correlated with signs and symptoms of inflammation, and some patients with RA have benefited from anti-inflammatory therapies. However, joint destruction still occurs with a high incidence after anti-inflammatory treatment. Accumulating evidence in recent years has revealed that inflammatory activity and joint destruction may be dissociated from one another [2, 3]. Thus, anti-inflammatory drugs are not sufficient to protect joints, and agents that can directly inhibit joint destruction are essential for RA patients. Although several biologic agents have exhibited articular protection to some extent, how to effectively block joint destruction and protect joint function in RA is still a great challenge for clinical doctors because of the lack of sufficient joint protection agents to date [4,5,6].

Wang-Bi capsule (WB), approved by the China Food and Drug Administration (approval ID of CFDA: Z20080096), is a traditional Chinese medicine-based herbal formula. It has been used for RA treatment in China for many years. WB displayed joint protective effects in a RA mouse model, and it could regulate osteoclast-osteoblast functions and inhibit bone destruction in joints in our previous study [7]. Icariin and paeoniflorin are both active ingredients of WB. Icariin abrogated osteoclast differentiation in vitro and inhibited bone loss by regulating the coupling process of osteogenic and osteoclastic activity in rats with experimental osteoporosis [8,9,10,11]. Paeoniflorin suppresses osteoclast differentiation by controlling the receptor activator of nuclear factor-κ B ligand (RANKL)/osteoprotegerin (OPG) ratio [12]. Furthermore, icariin and paeoniflorin were also proven to regulate the activity of chondrocytes and inhibit articular cartilage degradation [13, 14]. These studies hinted that WB was a promising candidate drug for joint protection in RA patients. However, it is still unclear how WB inhibits joint destruction in RA. In this study, we aimed to demonstrate the joint protective effects of WB in a CIA rat model and explore the molecular mechanism of action via transcriptomic analysis.

Methods

Animals

Male 6- to 8-week-old Sprague Dawley rats (Vital River Laboratory Animal Technology Co. Ltd., Beijing, China) were used for this study, and all rats were housed in a specific pathogen-free facility with free access to sterilized water and chow. In addition, the experiments were reviewed and approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Institute of Basic Theory of Chinese Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences.

Induction of the CIA model

The CIA model was established in line with the method reported in our previous study [15]. The rats were given an intradermal injection of 200 µl of an emulsified mixture of equal proportions bovine collagen type II and incomplete Freund’s adjuvant (Chondrex, Redmond, WA, USA) on day 1. In addition, the rats were immunized on day 7 by another injection of 100 µl of the emulsified mixture.

Treatment

WB was provided by Liaoning China Resources Benxi Sanyao Co., Ltd. (Liaoning, China, No. 20180205). The rats were randomly divided into three groups after successful induction of the CIA model, with eight rats in each group: the model group, WB group (WB 0.74 g/kg/d, equal to that used in RA patients) and normal group. The rats in the WB group were intragastrically administered WB for 8 weeks after successful induction of the CIA model. The rats in the normal and model groups were administered an equal volume of double-distilled water in the same way. All animals were sacrificed at the end of the experiment. The sera were harvested for enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The hind limbs were collected for micro-CT analysis, and the ankle joints were removed for histological analysis. The tarsal joints were separated from the hind limbs and used for transcriptomics analysis and real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR).

ELISA

The serum levels of type I collagen N-terminal propeptide (PINP) and C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (CTX-1) were detected using commercially available ELISA kits (Sino-uk bio, Beijing, China). The procedures were performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Histological analysis

The ankle joints of rats were fixed in 10% phosphate-buffered formalin for 3 days and then decalcified in 10% EDTA (pH = 7.2). Section (4 μm) were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) for histopathological assessment, and the histopathological characteristics were scored on a scale of 0–4 using the criteria described in a previous study [15]. In addition, sections were stained with safranin O fast green (Solarbio, Beijing, China) for cartilage observation, and cartilage damage was evaluated with the following criteria: 0 = normal, 1 = mild loss of safranin O staining with no obvious chondrocyte loss, 2 = moderate loss of staining with focal mild chondrocyte loss, 3 = marked loss of staining with multifocal marked chondrocyte loss, and 4 = severe diffuse loss of staining with multifocal severe chondrocyte loss [16]. TRAP staining was performed using a TRAP staining kit (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) to visualize osteoclast formation, and the number of osteoclasts per bone surface around the taluses was determined [17].

Micro‑CT scanning analysis

The hind paws and femurs were scanned for reconstruction into a three-dimensional (3-D) structure with a SKYSCAN 1174 micro-CT (Bruker, Belgium). The hind paws were analyzed to test the bone volume (BV)/tissue volume (TV) ratio, and the femurs were analyzed to determine the bone mineral density (BMD) of the periarticular bone, trabecular number (Tb.N), trabecular pattern factor (Tb.Pf) and trabecular separation (Tb.S) [18].

Transcriptome of the tarsal joints

Three tarsal joints were sampled per group (normal group, model group and WB group) at the end of the experiment. The skin, muscle, tendon and ligament were removed, but bone tissue was included in each sample [19]. The samples were stored at − 80 °C. Total RNA was extracted from the tissues using TRIzol (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the instructions in the product manual. Subsequently, total RNA was qualified and quantified using a NanoDrop (NanoDrop, Madison, USA) and an Agilent 2100 bioanalyzer (Agilent, Santa Clara, USA). The products were enriched with PCR to create the final cDNA library for mRNA sequencing. The constructed library was amplified to make DNA nanoballs (DNBs) with more than 200 copies of DNA per molecule. The DNBs were loaded into the patterned nanoarray, and single-end 100-base reads were generated by sequence-based synthesis. The qualified libraries were subjected to paired-end sequencing on the BGISEQ-500 System (BGI-Shenzhen, China).

The sequencing data were filtered with SOAPnuke (v1.5.2), and clean reads were obtained and stored in FASTQ format. The clean reads were mapped to the reference genome using HISAT2 (v2.0.4). Bowtie2 (v2.2.5) was applied to align the clean reads to the reference coding gene set, and the expression levels of genes were calculated with RSEM (v1.2.12).

Differential expression analysis was performed using DESeq2 (v1.4.5) with a fold change > 2.0 and a P-value < 0.01. To gain insight into the change in phenotype, KEGG (https://www.kegg.jp/) enrichment analysis of annotated differentially expressed genes was performed with Phyper (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypergeometric_distribution) based on a hypergeometric test. The significance levels of pathways were filtered by P-value, with a rigorous threshold (P-value < 0.01) in the Bonferroni test. Network analysis was performed by ingenuity pathway analysis (IPA, Ingenuity Systems).

RT-qPCR

RNA (2 µg per reaction) was reverse transcribed to cDNA using TRUEscript RT MasterMix (Aibosen Biotechnologies Co., Ltd., Beijing, China). qPCR was performed with 2× SYBR Green qPCR Master Mix (Biomake, Houston, TX, USA). PCR was initiated at 95 °C for 5 min, and the cycling conditions were 95 °C for 10 s, 60 °C for 15 s and 75 °C 15 s (40 cycles). Samples were analyzed in triplicate and normalized by subtraction of the sample mean Ct value from the mean Ct value of the housekeeping gene GAPDH. The primer information is shown in Additional file 1: Table S1.

Statistical analysis

GraphPad Prism v.6 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA) was used for statistical analyses. Ranked data including histological scoring were assessed with the Kruskal-Wallis test followed by a multiple comparisons test. Measurement data including RT-qPCR were analyzed by ANOVA, followed by Bonferroni’s multiple comparison test. P < 0.05 was identified significant.

Results

WB inhibited joint destruction in rats with CIA

The joints of rats in the model group displayed severe swelling and deformation, and WB treatment remarkably improved these symptoms compared with those of model group rats (Fig. 1a). To further evaluate the effect of WB on joint destruction in rats with CIA, H&E staining was performed. The results showed no detectable pathological changes in the rats in the normal group. In contrast, the rats in the model group exhibited severe inflammatory cell infiltration and bone and cartilage damage, whereas these pathological changes in the WB group were significantly relieved compared with those in the model group (Fig. 1b, e). Next, safranin O fast green staining was used to further investigate the changes in articular cartilage. The results showed severe cartilage damage in the model group compared with the normal group, represented by a markedly decreased amount of cartilage matrix. However, the cartilage damage in the WB group exhibited obvious mitigation compared with that of the model group (Fig. 1c, f). Finally, TRAP staining was performed to detect the number of osteoclasts. We did not detect positive staining for osteoclasts in the normal group, but a large number of osteoclasts were observed in the model group. In contrast, the number of osteoclasts with positive staining in the WB group was significantly decreased compared with that in the model group (Fig. 1d, g). These results indicated that WB could effectively relieve bone and cartilage destruction in rats with CIA.

Fig. 1
figure 1

WB inhibited joint destruction in rats with CIA. a Representative photographs of ankle joints from each group. Representative images of H&E staining (b), safranin O fast green staining (c) and TRAP staining (d). The black arrows mark bone destruction, cartilage destruction or osteoclast-positive staining. Original magnification ×6.6, the scale bar was 2 mm. Semiquantitative analysis of histology scores by H&E staining (e), cartilage damage by safranin O fast green staining (f) and the number of osteoclasts by TRAP staining (g). Values are the mean ± SD, n = 6. **P < 0.01 compared with the Nor group. #P < 0.05 compared with the Mod group. Abbreviation: Nor normal, Mod model

Full size image

WB increased the PINP/CTX-1 ratio of rats with CIA

PINP and CTX-1 are important biochemical markers of bone formation and bone resorption, respectively. The serum levels of PINP and CTX-1 were all significantly increased in the model group compared with the normal group (Fig. 2a, b). However, the PINP/CTX-1 ratio was higher in the WB group than in the model group (Fig. 2c), which provided evidence that WB could promote bone formation in rats with CIA.

Fig. 2
figure 2

The effect of WB on serum levels of PINP and CTX-1 in rats with CIA. a The serum level of the bone formation marker PINP in different groups. b The serum level of the bone resorption marker CTX-1 in different groups. c The PINP/CTX-1 ratio. Values are the mean ± SD, n = 6. **P < 0.01 compared with the Nor group. #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01 compared with the Mod group. Abbreviation: PINP type I collagen N-terminal propeptide, CTX-1 C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen

Full size image

WB inhibited bone erosion and bone loss in rats with CIA

Micro-CT and 3D image analysis were used to examine the effect of WB on bone erosion and bone microstructure. The CT analysis showed that bone erosion was substantially more severe in the model group than in the normal group. After WB treatment, bone erosion was inhibited (Fig. 3a). Furthermore, the BV/TV ratio in the WB group was significantly increased compared with that in the model group (Fig. 3b). In addition, the distal femur microstructure was reconstituted (Fig. 3c). We found that BMD and Tb.N in the model group were obviously lower than those in the normal group, whereas these two parameters in the WB group were significantly increased compared with those in the model group (Fig. 3d, e). Both the Tb.S and Tb.Pf of the model group increased compared to those of the normal group, and WB treatment significantly decreased the Tb.S and Tb.Pf (Fig. 3f, g). Overall, these results indicated that WB could inhibit bone erosion and bone loss in rats with CIA.

Fig. 3
figure 3

WB improved the bone microstructure of rats with CIA. a Representative bone micro-CT images of the hind paws. The scale bar was 5 mm. b BV/TV of the hind paws. c Representative bone micro-CT images of the distal femur. The scale bar was 1 mm. d BMD, e Tb.N, f Tb.S, and g Tb.Pf. Values are the mean ± SD, n = 6. **P < 0.01 compared with the Nor group. #P < 0.05, compared with the Mod group. Abbreviation: BV/TV bone volume/tissue volume, BMD bone mineral density, Tb.N trabecular number, Tb.S trabecular separation, Tb.Pf trabecular pattern factor

Full size image

WB regulated signaling pathways associated with bone or cartilage

Although WB exhibited a protective effect on joints, the potential mechanism was still unclear. Therefore, we wanted to reveal the mechanism via transcriptomic analysis. A total of 3790 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified in Mod-VS-Nor; 2988 DEGs showed downregulated expression, and 802 DEGs showed upregulated expression. A total of 4139 DEGs were identified in WB-VS-Mod; 3362 DEGs showed upregulated expression, and 777 DEGs showed downregulated expression (Fig. 4a). By KEGG analysis of DEGs in Mod-VS-Nor and WB-VS-Mod, we found 12 obviously enriched (P value < 0.05) signaling pathways associated with bone or cartilage, including “calcium signaling pathway”, “cell adhesion molecules (CAMs)”, “complement and coagulation cascades”, “osteoclast differentiation”, “PI3K-Akt signaling pathway”, “cAMP signaling pathway”, “chemokine signaling pathway”, “NF-kappa B signaling pathway”, “MAPK signaling pathway”, “focal adhesion”, “Rap1 signaling pathway” and “gap junction” (Fig. 4b).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Analysis of DEGs. a Volcano plot of DEGs. A total of 2988 DEGs were downregulated and 802 DEGs were upregulated in Mod-VS-Nor, while 3362 DEGs were upregulated and 777 DEGs were downregulated in WB-VS-Mod. b Twelve signaling pathways associated with bone or cartilage were significantly enriched by KEGG analysis. Abbreviation: DEGs: differentially expressed genes

Full size image

WB regulated the levels of some genes that controlled bone and cartilage function in rats with CIA

Having identified the 12 signaling pathways that regulated bone and cartilage function, we next focused on the DEGs belonging to these signaling pathways. A total of 373 DEGs from Mod-VS-Nor and 425 DEGs from WB-VS-Mod belonged to the 12 pathways associated with bone or cartilage identified by KEGG analysis, and there were 238 overlapping DEGs between these two groups. These genes were input into IPA, and three functional networks related to bone or cartilage were generated: the bone resorption network, bone formation network and cartilage development network (Fig. 5). Moreover, the levels of genes promoting bone resorption (including Il6, Tnfsf11, Cxcl1, Acp5 and Mef2c) were elevated in the model group but were suppressed by WB treatment, while the levels of genes inhibiting bone resorption (including Ffar2, Plg, Tnfrsf11b, Hcn4, Adrb1, Prkaa2 and Gipr) were decreased in the model group but were increased by WB treatment (Additional file 1: Table S2). The transcript levels of genes promoting bone formation (including Fgf4, Fpr1, Siglec1, Vegfd, Cldn1, Taok3, Grin3a, Tshr, Plcb1 and Ntf3) were decreased in the model group but were increased by WB treatment (Additional file 1: Table S3). Genes involved with cartilage development (including Cxcl13, Chad, Arrb2, Fgf9, Egfr and Clu) exhibited low levels in the model group but higher levels after WB treatment (Additional file 1: Table S4).

Fig. 5
figure 5

The functional networks revealed by gene analysis. The network of genes associated with bone resorption (a), bone formation (b) and cartilage development (c). The red color on the top of the molecule indicates that the transcript level of the gene is upregulated in Mod-VS-Nor, and the green color on the bottom of the molecule indicates that the transcript level of the gene is downregulated in WB-VS-Mod. In addition, the red color on the left indicates that the transcript level of gene is upregulated in WB-VS-Mod, and the green color on the right indicates that the transcript level of gene is downregulated in Mod-VS-Nor. The blue color represents the biofunction

Full size image

DEG validation by RT-qPCR

The top 5 DEGs (according to fold change) associated with bone resorption, bone formation and cartilage development were chosen for validation by RT-qPCR. The mRNA expression levels of genes promoting bone formation (Fgf4, Fpr1, Siglec1, Vegfd, and Cldn1) were remarkably decreased in the model group compared with the normal group, but they were all significantly increased in the WB group compared with the model group (Fig. 6a). The levels of Il6 and Tnfsf11 were much higher in the model group than in the normal group; however, they were significantly downregulated by WB treatment. In contrast, the levels of genes suppressing osteoclast differentiation, such as Ffar2, Plg, and Tnfrsf11b, were markedly elevated by WB treatment (Fig. 6b). Furthermore, the transcript levels of genes controlling cartilage development, such as Cxcl13, Chad, Arrb2, Fgf9 and Egfr, were decreased in the model group, whereas they were markedly upregulated in the WB group (Fig. 6c). The changes in the transcript levels of these genes were consistent with the tendencies observed in the transcriptome analysis.

Fig. 6
figure 6

DEG validation by RT-qPCR. a The mRNA levels of DEGs related to bone formation. b The mRNA levels of DEGs related to bone resorption. c The mRNA levels of DEGs related to cartilage development. Values are the mean ± SD, n = 3. **P < 0.01 compared with the Nor group. #P < 0.05, compared with the Mod group

Full size image

Discussion

Joint destruction is one of the predominant types of damage underlying RA disease. Accumulating evidence has proven a positive correlation between joint destruction and disability, therefore, it is essential to consider whether therapeutic agents have a direct impact on progressive joint damage. Our previous studies revealed that WB not only inhibited the inflammatory response but also alleviated joint destruction [7]. In this study, we mainly focused on WB’s protective effects on joints. WB treatment obviously improved the histopathological manifestations of CIA in rats, including inhibition of bone destruction and cartilage damage. Bone loss often occurs in RA, which increases fracture risk. Rats with CIA displayed high bone turnover and osteoporosis in previous studies [20]. In our study, the rats with CIA also exhibited high bone turnover and presented elevated serum levels of both PINP (a bone formation marker) and CTX-1 (a bone resorption marker). WB treatment increased the PINP/CTX-1 ratio, which indicated that WB could inhibit bone loss in rats with CIA. Furthermore, the protective effect of WB treatment on bone was also evidenced by the micro-CT examination results.

The mechanisms by which WB protects joints are complicated because of the intricate ingredients of WB. Accordingly, transcriptomic analysis of the tarsal joints was performed to evaluate the impacts of WB on cartilage and bone. The KEGG analysis of DEGs identified several signaling pathways associated with bone and cartilage. We know that the balance of osteoclasts and osteoblasts is important for bone function, and “osteoclast differentiation” is a core factor that controls osteoclast formation [21]. The KEGG database shows that pathways including the “calcium signaling pathway”, “MAPK signaling pathway”, “PI3K-Akt signaling pathway” and “NF-kappa B signaling pathway” participate in the induction of “osteoclast differentiation”. Some studies have also revealed that these pathways are deeply involved in regulating osteoclast differentiation or activation, which further impacts bone resorption [22,23,24,25]. “Focal adhesion” and the “MAPK signaling pathway” are important parts of the “Wnt signaling pathway”, which plays an essential role in osteoblast differentiation. Furthermore, osteochondrogenitor cells express both Runx2 and Sox9, and “cAMP signaling” modifies these transcription factors and drives differentiation to osteoblasts or chondrocytes [26, 27]. In addition, cAMP induces RAP1 activation, which promotes integrin clustering and cell adhesion to the bone matrix [28, 29]. The migration and maturation of osteoclasts and osteoblasts are important processes in bone remodeling. Pathways including “cell adhesion molecules”, “chemokine signaling pathway” and “gap junctions” all help to facilitate these processes [30,31,32,33,34]. “Complement and coagulation cascades” are seldom reported in the context of regulating bone remodeling in RA. However, several studies have hinted at a role for these pathways. For example, FVIIIKO and PAR1KO mice displayed a lower bone/tissue volume ratio and a smaller number of bone trabeculae than wild-type mice [35, 36]. Overall, we found that WB could regulate these signaling pathways, which helped us understand how WB influenced the joints of rats with CIA.

To further dissect the mechanism by which WB protects bone and cartilage, we analyzed these DEGs (belonging to the signaling pathways mentioned above) from several profiles. Several DEGs (Il6, Tnfsf11, Cxcl1, Acp5, and Mef2c) promoting bone resorption were first identified. Their expression levels were all decreased by WB treatment. IL-6 is a proinflammatory cytokine, and multiple studies in recent years have shown that it is also an important factor for promoting osteoclast differentiation. The inhibition of IL-6 retarded the progression of joint damage in RA independent of its anti-inflammatory effects, which suggested disassociation of the link between inflammation and joint destruction [37, 38]. RANKL (encoded by Tnfsf11) is absolutely necessary for osteoclast differentiation, and both Cxcl1 and Mef2c can enhance RANKL-induced osteoclast differentiation [39,40,41]. Furthermore, Acp5, encoding TRAP (a marker of osteoclasts), was also suppressed by WB treatment. In addition, the mRNA levels of genes (Ffar2, Plg, Tnfrsf11b, Hcn4, Adrb1, Prkaa2 and Gipr) that suppressed bone resorption were elevated by WB treatment. Plasminogen (Plg) is an important regulator of bone metabolism that has not been described in RA. Exogenous Plg suppressed RAW264.7 cell differentiation to osteoclasts. Moreover, Plg-/- mice displayed a low BMD [42]. OPG (encoded by Tnfrsf11b), a soluble decoy receptor for RANKL, can inhibit bone loss by controlling osteoclast differentiation. AMPKα2 (encoded by Prkaa2) could inhibit RANKL signaling [43]. Ffar2 and Hcn4 are both seldom reported in RA studies, but gene knockdown experiments have shown decreased formation of osteoblasts or BMD [44, 45]. Stimulation of the sympathetic nervous system by beta-2 adrenergic receptor (β2AR) plays an important role in mediating bone remodeling [46]. β1AR (encoded by Adrb1) has also been proven to mitigate negative changes in cancellous bone microarchitecture and increase the bone mass of mice [47]. Glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide (GIP), an intestinally secreted hormone, could decrease bone resorption. Excess signaling during GIPR (encoded by Gipr) activation resulted in increased bone mass [48]. In this study, we found that rats with CIA displayed low transcript levels of Ffar2, Plg, Tnfrsf11b, Hcn4, Adrb1, Prkaa2 and Gipr compared with those of normal rats, whereas the levels of all these genes transcripts were significantly increased by WB treatment, which demonstrated that WB treatment could effectively inhibit bone resorption in rats with CIA.

In addition to influencing genes regulating bone resorption, WB also regulated several genes regulating bone formation. Bone morphogenetic protein family members (BMPs) are important signaling molecules regulating bone formation. Fgf4, with a very high transcript level after WB treatment, could cooperate with BMP-2-induced bone formation, and administration of FGF4 could increase bone mass in rats [49, 50]. Similar to FGF4, PLCβ1 can also cooperate with BMPs. Increased expression of PLCβ1 induced by BMP-2 could promote osteoblast differentiation in vitro [51]. Activation of the N-formyl peptide receptor (FPR) can trigger multiple biochemical cascades and eventually lead to cellular activation. Its role during the differentiation of osteocytes has received attention in recent years. Activation of FPR1 could promote osteogenesis and mineralization, but activation of FPR2 or FPR3 could not [52]. The anabolic process is an important process of bone remodeling. For example, CD169 (encoded by Siglec1) could provide pro-anabolic support during the process of bone repair [53]. VEGF-D could promote the formation of mineralized nodules and accelerate bone formation, which provides another option to promote bone formation [54]. Claudins (Cldns) are major components of tight junctions. In addition to functioning as tight junctions, they have been found to play roles in cell proliferation and differentiation. Cldn1 was downregulated during osteoclast differentiation but upregulated during osteoblast differentiation, and Cldn1 knockdown decreased the expression of Runx2 [55]. Proteins encoded by genes such as Taok3, Tshr, Grin3a and Ntf3 could also promote bone formation by enhancing osteoblast differentiation or mineralization [56,57,58,59,60]. The transcript levels of these genes were elevated by WB treatment, which might contribute to bone formation through multiple pathways.

Articular cartilage damage is a very important pathological change during joint destruction in RA. Cartilage tissue is composed of extracellular matrix (ECM) that is synthesized by chondrocytes. The degradation of cartilage ECM also provides an opportunity for the hyperplastic synovium to directly invade subchondral bone. Although cartilage tissue has limited self-repair ability, recent studies have shown that cartilage contains a population of stem cells or progenitor cells that facilitate cartilage development and repair [27]. Thus, cartilage may benefit from WB treatment through several genes, such as Cxcl13, Chad, Arrb2, Fgf9, Egfr and Clu, that regulate cartilage development. Cartilage homeostasis is disrupted when damage occurs. Chemokines and chondroadherin (CHAD) could contribute to the maintenance of cartilage homeostasis by promoting ECM production or assembly [57, 61]. FGF9 is a member of the fibroblast growth factor (FGF) family, and studies have shown that it could enhance chondrogenesis in dental pulp stem cells [62]. However, the role of FGF9 with respect to the articular cartilage damage underlying RA has not been well described. The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) system plays important roles in multiple processes, such as the differentiation and proliferation of osteoclasts, osteoblasts and chondrocytes [63]. Both beta-arrestin-2 (ARRB2) and clusterin (CLU) could inhibit the inflammatory response of chondrocytes, but CLU could also influence the proliferation and differentiation of chondrocytes [64, 65]. In this study, we found that the expression of Cxcl13, Chad, Arrb2, Fgf9, Egfr and Clu was obviously suppressed in rats with CIA, but WB treatment increased it to a certain degree.

Conclusions

Overall, the protective effect of WB on joints was confirmed in rats with CIA, and its basic molecular mechanisms may be associated with regulation of the expression levels of some genes (including Il6, Tnfsf11, Ffar2, Plg, Tnfrsf11b, Fgf4, Fpr1, Siglec1, Vegfd, Cldn1, Cxcl13, Chad, Arrb2, Fgf9, and Egfr) involved in bone resorption, bone formation and cartilage development.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

RA:

Rheumatoid arthritis

WB:

Wang-Bi capsule

CIA:

Collagen-induced arthritis

RANKL:

Receptor activator of nuclear factor-κ B ligand

OPG:

Osteoprotegerin

PINP:

Type I collagen N-terminal propeptide

CTX-1:

C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen

BV/TV:

Bone volume/tissue volume

BMD:

Bone mineral density

Tb.N:

Trabecular number

Tb.Pf:

Trabecular pattern factor

Tb.S:

Trabecular separation

DEGs:

Differentially expressed genes

References

  1. Aletaha D, Smolen JS. Diagnosis and management of rheumatoid arthritis: a review. Electronic. 2018;25:1538–3598.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Drossaers-Bakker KW, et al. Long-term course and outcome of functional capacity in rheumatoid arthritis: the effect of disease activity and radiologic damage over time. Arthritis Rheum. 1999;42(9):1854–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Scott DL, et al. The links between joint damage and disability in rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology. 2000;39(2):122–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Binder NB, et al. Tumor necrosis factor-inhibiting therapy preferentially targets bone destruction but not synovial inflammation in a tumor necrosis factor-driven model of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2013;65(3):608–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Smolen JS, et al. Rheumatoid arthritis. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2018;4:18001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Smolen JS, et al. Evidence of radiographic benefit of treatment with infliximab plus methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis patients who had no clinical improvement: a detailed subanalysis of data from the anti-tumor necrosis factor trial in rheumatoid arthritis with concomitant therapy study. Arthritis Rheum. 2005;52(4):1020–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cui H, et al. Wang-Bi Capsule Alleviates the Joint Inflammation and Bone Destruction in Mice with Collagen-Induced Arthritis. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2020;2020:1015083.

  8. Jing X, et al. Icariin protects against iron overload-induced bone loss via suppressing oxidative stress. J Cell Physiol. 2019;234(7):10123–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kim B, Lee KY, Park B. Icariin abrogates osteoclast formation through the regulation of the RANKL-mediated TRAF6/NF-kappaB/ERK signaling pathway in Raw264.7 cells. Phytomedicine. 2018;51:181–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Xie Y, et al. Icariin-loaded porous scaffolds for bone regeneration through the regulation of the coupling process of osteogenesis and osteoclastic activity. Int J Nanomedicine. 2019;14:6019–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhang S, et al. Icariin influences adipogenic differentiation of stem cells affected by osteoblast-osteoclast co-culture and clinical research adipogenic. Biomed Pharmacother. 2017;88:436–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Xu H, et al. Paeoniflorin ameliorates collagen-induced arthritis via suppressing nuclear factor-kappaB signalling pathway in osteoclast differentiation. Immunology. 2018;12:58.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Zuo S, et al. Icariin alleviates IL-1beta-induced matrix degradation by activating the Nrf2/ARE pathway in human chondrocytes. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2019;13:3949–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Hu PF, et al. Paeoniflorin inhibits IL-1beta-induced MMP secretion via the NF-kappaB pathway in chondrocytes. Exp Ther Med. 2018;16(2):1513–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Guo Q, et al. Wu-Tou decoction in rheumatoid arthritis: integrating network pharmacology and in vivo pharmacological evaluation. Front Pharmacol. 2017;8:230.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Mukai T, et al. Loss of SH3 domain-binding protein 2 function suppresses bone destruction in tumor necrosis factor-driven and collagen-induced arthritis in mice. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015;67(3):656–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Akagi T, et al., Effect of angiotensin II on bone erosion and systemic bone loss in mice with tumor necrosis factor-mediated arthritis. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21:11.

  18. Zhao H, et al. Yi Shen Juan Bi pill ameliorates bone loss and destruction induced by arthritis through modulating the balance of cytokines released by different subpopulations of T cells. Front Pharmacol. 2018;9:262–2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Denninger KC, et al. Kinetics of gene expression and bone remodelling in the clinical phase of collagen-induced arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2015;17:43.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang X, et al. Effect of prednisone treatment for 30 and 90 days on bone metabolism in collagen-induced arthritis (CIA) rats. J Bone Miner Metab. 2018;36(6):628–39.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Cho E, et al. PSTP-3,5-Me inhibits osteoclast differentiation and bone resorption. Molecules. 2019;24:18.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lee K, et al. Roles of mitogen-activated protein kinases in osteoclast biology. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19:10.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Mishra R, et al. NF-kappaB signaling negatively regulates osteoblast dedifferentiation during zebrafish bone regeneration. Dev Cell. 2020;52(2):167-82 e7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ding N, et al. Physalin D inhibits RANKL-induced osteoclastogenesis and bone loss via regulating calcium signaling. BMB Rep. 2020;53(3):154–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Chen LL, et al. PI3K/AKT pathway involvement in the osteogenic effects of osteoclast culture supernatants on preosteoblast cells. Tissue Eng Part A. 2013;19(19–20):2226–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Topol L, et al. Sox9 inhibits Wnt signaling by promoting beta-catenin phosphorylation in the nucleus. J Biol Chem. 2009;284(5):3323–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Carroll SH, Ravid K. Differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells to osteoblasts and chondrocytes: a focus on adenosine receptors. Expert Rev Mol Med. 2013;15:e1.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Jeevaratnam K, et al. Regulatory actions of 3’,5’-cyclic adenosine monophosphate on osteoclast function: possible roles of Epac-mediated signaling. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2018;1433(1):18–28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Su X, et al. The ADP receptor P2RY12 regulates osteoclast function and pathologic bone remodeling. J Clin Invest. 2012;122(10):3579–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Kim H, et al. CD44 can compensate for IgSF11 deficiency by associating with the scaffold protein PSD-95 during osteoclast differentiation. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21:7.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Xuan W, et al. Osteoclast differentiation gene expression profiling reveals chemokine CCL4 mediates RANKL-induced osteoclast migration and invasion via PI3K pathway. Cell Biochem Funct. 2017;35(3):171–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Mathieu PS, Loboa EG. Cytoskeletal and focal adhesion influences on mesenchymal stem cell shape, mechanical properties, and differentiation down osteogenic, adipogenic, and chondrogenic pathways. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2012;18(6):436–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Matemba SF, Lie A, Ransjo M. Regulation of osteoclastogenesis by gap junction communication. J Cell Biochem. 2006;99(2):528–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Ilvesaro J, Tuukkanen J. Gap-junctional regulation of osteoclast function. Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Expr. 2003;13(2–4):133–46.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Aronovich A, et al. A novel role for factor VIII and thrombin/PAR1 in regulating hematopoiesis and its interplay with the bone structure. Blood. 2013;122(15):2562–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Nguyen TS, Lapidot T, Ruf W. Extravascular coagulation in hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell regulation. Blood. 2018;132(2):123–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Smolen JS, Avila JC, Aletaha D. Tocilizumab inhibits progression of joint damage in rheumatoid arthritis irrespective of its anti-inflammatory effects: disassociation of the link between inflammation and destruction. Ann Rheum Dis. 2012;71(5):687–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Sims NA. Cell-specific paracrine actions of IL-6 family cytokines from bone, marrow and muscle that control bone formation and resorption. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2016;79:14–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Boyce BF, Xing L. Functions of RANKL/RANK/OPG in bone modeling and remodeling. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2008;473(2):139–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Valerio MS, et al. Critical role of MKP-1 in lipopolysaccharide-induced osteoclast formation through CXCL1 and CXCL2. Cytokine. 2015;71(1):71–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Kramer I, et al. Mef2c deletion in osteocytes results in increased bone mass. J Bone Miner Res. 2012;27(2):360–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Kanno Y, et al. Plasminogen/plasmin modulates bone metabolism by regulating the osteoblast and osteoclast function. J Biol Chem. 2011;286(11):8952–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Kang H, Viollet B, Wu D. Genetic deletion of catalytic subunits of AMP-activated protein kinase increases osteoclasts and reduces bone mass in young adult mice. J Biol Chem. 2013;288(17):12187–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Montalvany-Antonucci CC, et al. Short-chain fatty acids and FFAR2 as suppressors of bone resorption. Bone. 2019;125:112–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Notomi T, et al. Zinc-Induced Effects on Osteoclastogenesis Involves Activation of Hyperpolarization-Activated Cyclic Nucleotide Modulated Channels via Changes in Membrane Potential. J Bone Miner Res. 2015;30(9):1618–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Bonnet N, et al. Alteration of trabecular bone under chronic beta2 agonists treatment. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005;37(9):1493–501.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Swift JM, et al. Beta-1 adrenergic agonist treatment mitigates negative changes in cancellous bone microarchitecture and inhibits osteocyte apoptosis during disuse. PLoS One. 2014;9(9):e106904.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Xie D, et al. Glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide-overexpressing transgenic mice have increased bone mass. Bone. 2007;40(5):1352–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Kubota K, et al. Synergistic effect of fibroblast growth factor-4 in ectopic bone formation induced by bone morphogenetic protein-2. Bone. 2002;31(4):465–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Kuroda S, et al. Anabolic effect of aminoterminally truncated fibroblast growth factor 4 (FGF4) on bone. Bone. 1999;25(4):431–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Ramazzotti G, et al. BMP-2 induced expression of PLCbeta1 that is a positive regulator of osteoblast differentiation. J Cell Physiol. 2016;231(3):623–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Shin MK, et al. N-formyl-methionyl-leucyl-phenylalanine (fMLP) promotes osteoblast differentiation via the N-formyl peptide receptor 1-mediated signaling pathway in human mesenchymal stem cells from bone marrow. J Biol Chem. 2011;286(19):17133–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Batoon L, et al. CD169(+) macrophages are critical for osteoblast maintenance and promote intramembranous and endochondral ossification during bone repair. Biomaterials. 2019;196:51–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Orlandini M, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor-D activates VEGFR-3 expressed in osteoblasts inducing their differentiation. J Biol Chem. 2006;281(26):17961–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Alshbool FZ, Mohan S. Differential expression of claudin family members during osteoblast and osteoclast differentiation: Cldn-1 is a novel positive regulator of osteoblastogenesis. PLoS One. 2014;9(12):e114357.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Su YW, et al. Roles of neurotrophins in skeletal tissue formation and healing. J Cell Physiol. 2018;233(3):2133–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Su YW, et al. Neurotrophin-3 induces BMP-2 and VEGF activities and promotes the bony repair of injured growth plate cartilage and bone in rats. J Bone Miner Res. 2016;31(6):1258–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Boutin A, et al., Beta-Arrestin-1 mediates thyrotropin-enhanced osteoblast differentiation. FASEB J. 2014;28(8):3446-55.

  59. Li JL, et al. NMDA enhances stretching-induced differentiation of osteoblasts through the ERK1/2 signaling pathway. Bone. 2008;43(3):469–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Li Z, et al. TAOK3 is a MAP3K contributing to osteoblast differentiation and skeletal mineralization. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2020;531(4):497–502.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Batista MA, et al. Nanomechanical phenotype of chondroadherin-null murine articular cartilage. Matrix Biol. 2014;38:84–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Dai J, et al. The effect of co-culturing costal chondrocytes and dental pulp stem cells combined with exogenous FGF9 protein on chondrogenesis and ossification in engineered cartilage. Biomaterials. 2012;33(31):7699–711.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Schneider MR, Sibilia M, Erben RG. The EGFR network in bone biology and pathology. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2009;20(10):517–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Campo GM, et al. Beta-arrestin-2 negatively modulates inflammation response in mouse chondrocytes induced by 4-mer hyaluronan oligosaccharide. Mol Cell Biochem. 2015;399(1–2):201–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Tarquini C, et al. Clusterin exerts a cytoprotective and antioxidant effect in human osteoarthritic cartilage. Aging. 2020;12(11):10129–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This research is supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2018YFC1705205).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Second Clinical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, 510006, China

    Haiyang Shu & Hanxiao Zhao

  2. Institute of Basic Research in Clinical Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100700, China

    Haiyang Shu, Hanxiao Zhao, Yingjie Shi, Cheng Lu, Li Li, Ning Zhao & Xiaojuan He

  3. Shanghai Innovation Center of TCM Health Service, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China

    Yingjie Shi

  4. Law Sau Fai Institute for Advancing Translational Medicine in Bone & Joint Diseases, School of Chinese Medicine, Hong Kong Baptist University, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong

    Aiping Lu

Authors
  1. Haiyang Shu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hanxiao Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yingjie Shi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Cheng Lu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Li Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Ning Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Aiping Lu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Xiaojuan He
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

HS performed the major research. HZ and YS collected samples and analyzed part of the data. CL, LL and NZ provided the technical support. AL and XH designed the study and revised the manuscript. All the authors read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Aiping Lu or Xiaojuan He.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was reviewed and approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Institute of Basic Theory of Chinese Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that there are no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Table S1.

 Primers used for RT-qPCR. Table S2. Fold change of DEGs related to bone resorption regulated by WB. Table S3. Fold change of DEGs related to bone formation regulated by WB. Table S4. Fold change of DEGs related to cartilage development regulated by WB.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shu, H., Zhao, H., Shi, Y. et al. Transcriptomics‐based analysis of the mechanism by which Wang-Bi capsule alleviates joint destruction in rats with collagen‐induced arthritis. Chin Med 16, 31 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13020-021-00439-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13020-021-00439-w

Keywords

Chinese Medicine

ISSN: 1749-8546

Contact us