Flavonoids with α-glucosidase inhibitory activities and their contents in the leaves of Morus atropurpurea
Chinese Medicine volume 8, Article number: 19 (2013)
This study aims to isolate the α-glucosidase inhibitory compounds from mulberry leaves (Morus atropurpurea Roxb., Moraceae) and to develop an analytical method for quantification of the compounds.
Four flavonoids, rutin (1), isoquercetin (2), kaempferol-3-O-rutinoside (3) and astragalin (4), were isolated by column chromatography from mulberry leaf water extracts (MWE). The α-glucosidase inhibitory activities of MWE and the four isolated compounds were evaluated by a microplate-based in vitro assay. The content of the isolated flavonoids in M. atropurpurea leaves purchased from different local herbal stores or collected in different locations was determined by high performance liquid chromatography.
The four flavonoids (1–4) showed α-glucosidase inhibitory activities, with rutin (1) and astragalin (4) showing high α-glucosidase inhibitory activities (IC50 values of 13.19 ± 1.10 and 15.82 ± 1.11 μM, respectively). The total contents of the four flavonoids were different among eight samples examined, ranging from 4.34 mg/g to 0.53 mg/g.
The four flavonoids in M. atropurpurea leaves could inhibit α-glucosidase activity.
Postprandial hyperglycemia is one of the earliest abnormalities of glucose homoeostasis. The production and absorption of glucose can be decreased through the inhibition of a carbohydrate hydrolyzing enzyme, α-glucosidase. Water extracts from some species of mulberry leaves (Moraceae) show potent antihyperglycemic activities via α-glucosidase inhibition[3–5]. It was subsequently found that this α-glucosidase inhibition was attributed to the actions of iminosugars such as 1-deoxynojirimycin (1-DNJ) and N-methyl-1-deoxynojirimycin (N-methyl-1-DNJ)[6, 7]. Flavonoids, which are widely distributed in the plant kingdom, have also been shown to decrease blood glucose levels[2, 8].
This study aims to isolate the α-glucosidase inhibitory compounds from mulberry leaves (Morus atropurpurea Roxb., Moraceae) and to develop an analytical method for quantification of the compounds. The α-glucosidase inhibitory activity of M. atropurpurea leaf water extracts (MWE) was evaluated. Four flavonoids, rutin (1), isoquercetin (2), kaempferol-3-O-rutinoside (3), and astragalin (4), were isolated from M. atropurpurea Roxb. leaves purchased from different local herbal stores or collected in different locations. The content of individual flavonoids in M. atropurpurea leaves was determined by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC).
Materials and chemicals
Acetonitrile (HPLC grade) and acetic acid (HPLC grade) were purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany), and methanol (AR grade) was purchased from Kaitong (Tianjin, China). Sodium carbonate was purchased from BDH Laboratory Supplies (Poole, Dorset, UK). α-Glucosidase type 1 (EC 22.214.171.124 from Saccharomyces cerevisias) and 4-nitrophenyl α-D-glucopyranoside (pNPG) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Ultra-pure water was purified using a Millipore Milli Q-Plus system (Billerica, MA, USA). Reference compounds of rutin (1), isoquercetin (2), kaempferol-3-O-rutinoside (3), astragalin (4) were isolated from M. atropurpurea. Silica gel (200–300 mesh) was purchased from Qingdao Haiyang Chemical Co. Ltd. (Qingdao, China). Macroporous absorption resin (D101) was purchased from Haiguang Chemical Industrial Co. (Tianjin, China). Sephadex LH-20 was purchased from GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences AB (Uppsala, Sweden), and the Millex® nylon membrane syringe filter was purchased from Millipore (Billerica, MA, USA).
Samples of M. atropurpurea (10 kg of leaves of the sample for separation and 500 g of each of the samples for analysis) were purchased from local herbal stores or collected arbitrarily in Guangdong Province, China. The botanical origin of the raw materials was authenticated by Professor Guang-Xiong Zhou at the College of Pharmacy, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China by morphological identification[9, 10]. Voucher specimens (ICMS20110421) were deposited in the Institute of Chinese Medical Sciences, University of Macau, Macau SAR, China.
Electrospray injection mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) was performed on an Agilent 1100 LC/MSD Trap Mass Spectrometer (Agilent, USA), and 1H 13C NMR spectra were obtained using a 300 MHz NMR spectrometer (Bruker, Germany). HPLC analyses were performed using an Agilent 1200 HPLC (Agilent, USA) system. Extraction was carried out using the Syncore Polyvap Analyst and Reactor (BUCHI, Switzerland). The absorbance readings in enzymatic assays were recorded by a SpectraMax® M5 multi-mode microplate reader (Molecular Devices, USA).
Nine kg of air-dried M. atropurpurea leaves were extracted with boiling water (3 × 20 L, 1 h each). The extract was filtered and subjected to a D101 macroporous adsorption resin column, then eluted with H2O, 30% EtOH, 40% EtOH, 60% EtOH and 100% EtOH (v/v, H2O-EtOH) sequentially. The 40% EtOH fraction was concentrated to dryness and then suspended in H2O. The water suspension was partitioned with EtOAc (v/v, H2O-EtOAc = 1:1) 3 times to obtain EtOAc fractions, while the remaining H2O fraction was partitioned with BuOH (v/v, H2O-BuOH = 2:1) three more times to obtain BuOH fractions. The EtOAc fraction was concentrated to dryness and subjected to silica gel chromatography column, using CHCl3-MeOH-H2O (from CHCl3-MeOH-H2O = 20:1:0 to CHCl3-MeOH-H2O = 70:30:5) as eluent to afford 40 fractions (E1–E40). Fractions E25–E29 were further separated by a Sephadex LH-20 column eluted with methanol to afford flavonoid 4 (20 mg). Fractions E30–E40 were further separated by a Sephadex LH-20 column eluted with methanol to afford 20 fractions (Ea1–Ea20). Fractions Ea1–Ea20 were further purified by preparative HPLC (C18, column flow rate = 10 mL/min 45% MeOH 30 min) to afford flavonoid 2 (15 mg). The BuOH fractions were concentrated to dryness and subjected to a silica gel column using CHCl3-MeOH as eluent to afford 24 fractions (B1–B24). Fractions B17–B24 were further purified by a Sephadex LH-20 column eluted with methanol to afford flavonoid 3 (30 mg). Fractions B8–16 were further purified by a Sephadex LH-20 column eluted with methanol to afford flavonoid 1 (15 mg).
The yeast α-glucosidase inhibitory activities of the four flavonoids were determined by a microplate-based method with a slight modification. In the sample group, a total of 80 μL of reaction mixture contained 20 μL each of 100 mM phosphate buffer (pH 6.8), 2.5 mM pNPG in the buffer, experimental drug and 2.4 U/mL α-glucosidase. After incubation of the 96-well plates at 37°C for 30 min, 80 μL of 0.2 mol/L sodium carbonate solution was added to each well to stop the reaction. The 4-nitrophenol absorption was measured at 405 nm. In the control group, the composition of the reaction mixture was the same as in sample group except that solvent was used instead of the experimental drug. In the sample and control blank groups, the composition was same as in the sample group except that α-glucosidase was used instead with buffer. The inhibitory activity was calculated using the following formula:
where AS, ASB, AC, and ACB are the absorbances of sample, sample blank, control, and control blank, respectively.
The leaves of M. atropurpurea were refluxed on a Syncore Polyvap Analyst Reactor under optimized conditions. Dried powder of M. atropurpurea leaves (0.4 g) was refluxed (100°C) in 20 mL of methanol for 1 h. After extraction, solvent was added to the extraction vessel until the final weight equal to the starting weight to counter solvent loss. The extract was thoroughly mixed on a vortex mixer, and filtered through a 0.45 μm syringe filter prior to HPLC injection.
Optimization of the sample preparation conditions
A single factor test was performed by changing one factor, fixing other factors to optimize the sample preparation conditions for the analysis. Five factors, including temperature, extraction time, particle size of raw materials (RM), raw material to solvent ratio (RMTSR), and extraction cycle were examined. For RMTSR, the RMTSR was changed from 1:20 (g:mL) to 1:150 (g:mL), while other factors were set as follows: extraction time 1 h, extraction temperature 100°C, and particle size between 124 and 150 μm. The temperature was changed from 70 to 100°C, while other factors were set as follows: extraction time 1 h, RMTSR of 1:100, and particle size between 124 and 150 μm. The extraction time was changed from 30 min to 2 h, while other factors were set as follows: RMTSR of 1:100, extraction temperature 100°C, and particle size between 124 and 150 μm. The particle size of RM was changed from less than 420 μm to between 124 and 150 μm, while other factors were set as follows: extraction time 1 h, extraction temperature 100°C, and RMTSR of 1:100. For optimization of the extraction cycle, the RM was extracted in 1–3 cycles, while other factors were set as follows: extraction time 1 h, extraction temperature 100°C, RMTSR of 1:100 and particle size between 124 and 150 μm. The yield of the four analytes was the criterion for the optimization procedures.
All experiments were conducted with an Agilent 1200 HPLC system. The mobile phase consisted of water with 0.5% acetic acid (A) and acetonitrile (B). The gradient programs were as follows: 0–25 min, 18–19% B; 25–30 min, 100% B. The chromatographic separation was using a Cosmosil 5 C18-MS-II (4.6 × 250 mm, 5 μm) column with a flow rate of 1 mL/min. The column temperature was maintained at 30°C. All analytes were monitored at 350 nm.
Stock standard solutions of four flavonoids were prepared in methanol and diluted to different concentrations to build calibration curves. The calibration curves were constructed by plotting the peak areas versus the concentrations of each analyte.
Intra-day and inter-day variations were used to determine the precision of the developed method. The intra-day precision or inter-day precision was determined by analyzing replicated samples (MA06) within 1 day or within 3 consecutive days, respectively.
Sample MA06 was analyzed using the developed method to verify the stability of the samples. The stability test was carried out by analyzing the sample at 0, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48 h, and the relative standard deviations (RSDs) of peak areas at different times were calculated.
The accuracy of the developed method was evaluated by spike recovery. Flavonoids 1, 2, 3, and 4 were added into 0.2 g of sample MA06. Then, the mixtures were extracted and analyzed. The spiked recovery was calculated as follows:
The results are reported as the means ± standard derivations (SD) of at least three measurements. Significant variables were assessed using the t test, subjecting results to a simple linear regression in Excel (Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA). Results with P values less than 0.05 were considered to be significant.
Results and discussion
Four flavonoids isolated from the M. atropurpurea leaves were identified as rutin (1), isoquercetin (2), kaempferol-3-O-rutinoside (3), and astragalin (4) (shown in Figure 1) by comparing the MS and NMR data with the literature. The 1H NMR spectra revealed that their purities were all above 98%, which was also confirmed by HPLC.
The α-glucosidase assay used acarbose as a positive control with a 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) of 780.2 ± 1.04 μM. As shown in Table 1, all of the tested flavonoids inhibited yeast α-glucosidase in a dose-dependent manner. The dose-dependent manner was determined by the dose-inhibition relationship experiment. A series sample concentration was tested to determine the IC50. The IC50 for flavonoids 1–4 were determined to be 13.19 ± 1.10, 116.7 ± 1.17, 365.4 ± 1.05 and 15.82 ± 1.11 μM, respectively. The IC50 for MWE was 27.05 ± 1.04 μg/mL.
Optimization of the sample preparation conditions
As shown in Figure 2, the effects of the raw material to solvent ratio (RMTSR), temperature, extraction time, and extraction cycle were investigated. The yield of four analytes increased with RMTSR until a ratio of 1:100. The maximum extraction yield was obtained by the RMTSR of 1:100; nevertheless, there was no significant difference between 1:50 and 1:100. The yield of the four analytes increased with temperature from 70 to 90°C. The maximum extraction yield was obtained at 100°C; nevertheless, there was no significant difference between 90 and 100°C. The maximum extraction yield was obtained at 1 h, suggesting that 1 h is long enough for complete extraction of the analytes. The yield of the four analytes increased with decreasing particle sizes until the sizes were between 124 and 150 μm. The maximum extraction yield was obtained with particle sizes between 124 and 150 μm. The extraction rate of the second extraction was less than 5% of that of the first extraction, indicating that one extraction cycle was enough for complete extraction.
The results of the single factor test indicated that the extraction conditions could be optimized as follows: RMTSR, 1:100; temperature, 100°C; extraction time, 1 h; particle size of RM, between 124 and 150 μm; extraction cycles, 1.
HPLC method development
A series of mobile phases and elution programs were tested to obtain the baseline separation. All four analytes were eluted with baseline separation on the Cosmosil 5 C18-MS-II (4.6 × 250 mm, 5 μm) column (Shown in Figure 3).
HPLC method validation
The method was validated by linearity, the limit of detection (LOD) and quantification (LOQ), precision, stability and accuracy.
Calibration curves, LODs and LOQs
The calibration curves are summarized in Table 2. All calibration curves showed good linear regressions (R2 > 0.9992); [P < 0.001] within the testing range. The LODs and LOQs were less than 0.49 and 1.64 ng, respectively.
As shown in Table 3, the RSD values for overall intra-day and inter-day precision were less than 2.90 and 4.88%, for all analytes, suggesting that the developed method was precise enough for determining these flavonoids.
The overall RSDs of peak areas at different times were less than 4.20%, indicating that the sample was stable for at least 24 h.
As shown in Table 4, the recoveries of flavonoids 1, 2, 3 and 4 were 97.8–100.1, 102.2–104.0, 96.1–104.6, and 97.4–104.6% (n = 3), respectively, and the RSDs were less than 5.51%, indicating that the developed method was accurate for determining these four flavonoids.
The results of quantitative analysis results of eight batches of M. atropurpurea are shown in Table 5. The content of these four flavonoids were different from one batch to another, ranging from 4.31 to 0.67 mg/g, indicating the diverse quality of commercial M. atropurpurea. Raw materials of M. atropurpurea should be collected at a fixed location that enables the assurance of quality consistency, and consequently, consistency of efficacy of this herb.. The content of rutin (1) was highest in MA07, and lowest in MA03, while the content of isoquercetin (2) was highest in MA07, but lowest in MA08. The contents of kaempferol-3-O-rutinoside (3) and astragalin (4) were highest in MA07, but lowest in MA08.
The four flavonoids in M. atropurpurea leaves could inhibit α-glucosidase activity.
High performance liquid chromatography
Mulberry leaf water extract
Electric-spray ionization coupled with mass spectrometry
Nuclear magnetic resonance
Raw material to solvent ratio
Limit of detection
Limit of quantification
Relative standard deviation
WHO: Traditional medicine strategy 2002–2005. 2002, Geneva: WHO Publications
Manaharan T, Appleton D, Cheng HM, Palanisamy UD: Flavonoids isolated from syzygium aqueum leaf extract as potential antihyperglycaemic agents. Food Chem. 2012, 132: 1802-1807. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2011.11.147.
Kim GN, Kwon YI, Jang HD: Mulberry leaf extract reduces postprandial hyperglycemia with Few side effects by inhibiting alpha-glucosidase in normal rats. J Med Food. 2011, 14: 712-717. 10.1089/jmf.2010.1368.
Yatsunami K, Saito Y, Fukuda E, Onodera S, Oshigane K: alpha-glucosidase inhibitory activity in leaves of some mulberry varieties. Food Sci Technol Res. 2003, 9: 392-394. 10.3136/fstr.9.392.
Naowaboot J, Pannangpetch P, Kukongviriyapan V, Kongyingyoes B, Kukongviriyapan U: Antihyperglycemic, antioxidant and antiglycation activities of mulberry leaf extract in Streptozotocin-induced chronic diabetic rats. Plant Food Hum Nutr. 2009, 64: 116-121. 10.1007/s11130-009-0112-5.
Kwon HJ, Chung JY, Kim JY, Kwon O: Comparison of 1-deoxynojirimycin and aqueous mulberry leaf extract with emphasis on postprandial hypoglycemic effects: in vivo and in vitro studies. J Agr Food Chem. 2011, 59: 3014-3019. 10.1021/jf103463f.
Yatsunami K, Ichida M, Onodera S: The relationship between 1-deoxynojirimycin content and alpha-glucosidase inhibitory activity in leaves of 276 mulberry cultivars (Morus spp.) in Kyoto, Japan. J Nat Med. 2008, 62: 63-66.
Yang ZZ, Wang YC, Wang Y, Zhang YF: Bioassay-guided screening and isolation of alpha-glucosidase and tyrosinase inhibitors from leaves of Morus alba. Food Chem. 2012, 131: 617-625. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2011.09.040.
Zhang T, Deng W, Xie T, Hu X, Ye C: Analysis on the correlation of morphological character of mulberry. Guang Dong Can Ye. 2010, 44: 30-37.
Chu Y, Yu M: Study on the ecological distribution of morus germplasm resources in Yunnan province. Can Ye Ke Xue. 2012, 25: 1-7.
Li T, Zhang XD, Song YW, Liu JW: A mircroplate-based screening method for alpha-glucosidase inhibitors. Zhong Guo Lin Chuang Yao Li Xue Yu Zhi Liao Xue. 2005, 10: 1128-1134.
We are grateful to Mr. Leon Lai for his technical assistance. This research is supported by grants from the Macao Science and Technology Development Fund (013/2008/A1), the University of Macau (MYRG191-(Y1-L3)-ICMS11-ZQW), and the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (2013DFM30080 and 2013BAI11B05).
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
QWZ and WCY conceived and designed this study. HCH performed the experiments. XQZ collected the materials. HCH, SLL and QWZ wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.
About this article
Cite this article
Hong, HC., Li, SL., Zhang, XQ. et al. Flavonoids with α-glucosidase inhibitory activities and their contents in the leaves of Morus atropurpurea. Chin Med 8, 19 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1186/1749-8546-8-19
- High Performance Liquid Chromatography
- High Performance Liquid Chromatography Method
- High Performance Liquid Chromatography Grade