Skip to main content


The efficacy of QingfengGanke granule in treating postinfectious cough in pathogenic wind invading lungs syndrome: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

Article metrics



Postinfectious cough (PIC) significantly affects cough-related quality of life but still lacks effective treatments. This study aims to investigate the efficacy of QingfengGanke granule (QFGKG) in treating PIC induced by pathogenic wind invading lungs syndrome.


A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial was conducted. A total of 180 eligible participants were randomly (1:1:1) assigned to group A (QFGKG 6 g plus QFGKG-matched placebo 6 g), group B (QFGKG 12 g), and group C (QFGKG-matched placebo 12 g). All herbal medications were orally administered twice daily for 10 consecutive days. The primary outcome was time to cough resolution, and secondary outcomes included time to cough alleviation, mean changes in cough symptom score (CSS), visual analogue scale (VAS) score, cough-specific quality of life questionnaire (CQLQ) score, and traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) syndrome score from baseline to Day 10, as well as adverse events.


A total of 173 participants were included in the efficacy and safety analyses (group A, n = 57; group B, n = 57; group C, n = 59). The median time to cough resolution in groups A, B, and C was more than 10 days, 8 days, and more than 10 days, respectively (P < 0.0001), and the median time to cough alleviation was 4, 4, and 6 days, respectively (P < 0.0001). Compared with the placebo condition, groups A and B showed significantly greater improvements in CSS (P = 0.0005, P < 0.0001, respectively), VAS (P = 0.0002, P < 0.0001, respectively), CQLQ (P = 0.0258, P = 0.0003, respectively), and TCM syndrome (P = 0.0031, P < 0.0001, respectively). The time to cough resolution was faster in group B compared with group A (P = 0.0091). The adverse event profiles were comparable among the three groups.


QingfengGanke granule is efficacious in the treatment of PIC induced by pathogenic wind invading lungs syndrome.


Postinfectious cough (PIC), a cough lasting for at least 3 weeks but not more than 8 weeks, is the most common cause of subacute cough, accounting for almost 50% of cases [1]. Respiratory viruses including influenza, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Chlamydia pneumoniae, Moraxella catarrhalis, and Bordetella pertussis have been implicated as causes of PIC [26]. PIC occurs in approximately 10–40% of patients with upper respiratory tract infection (URTI) [2, 3]. During outbreaks of influenza or atypical infections, PIC may affect 25–50% of cases [2, 46].

According to traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) theory, qi is managed mainly by the lungs, which control inspiration and expiration, and is particularly susceptible to pathogenic wind, leading to failure of the lungs to disperse and descend. This results in dysregulation of dispersing and descending lung qi, manifested as coughing symptoms. PIC may be classified into the TCM disease category of “exogenous cough”; clinical practice and TCM syndrome research indicates that the “pathogenic wind (feng) invading lungs (fei)” syndrome is the most common type, which is mainly manifested as cough, throat itchiness, throat dryness, chest tightness, and expectoration, along with pale red tongue, white or yellow tongue coating, and floating pulse [7].

Several pharmaceutical drugs have been used to relieve PIC, including inhaled ipratropium bromide, central acting antitussive agents such as codeine and dextromethorphan, and inhaled or oral corticosteroids; however, drugs with optimal clinical efficacy and safety profiles are not yet available in Western medicine [8]. Evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) treatments of PIC is not yet convincing because of small sample sizes and poor reporting quality [9].

QingfengGanke granule (QFGKG) consists of Mahuang (Ephedra sinica Stapf.), Qingfengteng (Sabia japonica Maxim.), Baibu (Stemona japonica (Bl.) Miq.), and Ziwan (Aster tataricus L. f.), with starch and sucrose excipients. The sources, pharmacological actions, and dosage of each ingredient are listed in Table 1. One preclinical pharmacodynamic experiment indicated the anti-inflammatory and immune modulatory properties of GFGKG (unpublished observation by Jia Jinliang), and preliminary clinical observational studies have shown its potential to relieve cough [10]. In addition, acute and chronic toxicological studies have revealed that GFGKG has no apparent toxic side effects (unpublished observation by Jia Jinliang).

Table 1 QFGKG formula

This study aims to investigate the efficacy of QFGKG in treating PIC induced by pathogenic wind invading lungs syndrome.


Study design

Written informed consent was obtained from each subject prior to participation (Additional file 1). The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of West China Hospital at Sichuan University (Chengdu, China) (Additional files 2, 3, respectively). This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and Good Clinical Practice ethical guidelines [11]. In addition, the trial was authorized by the China State Food and Drug Administration (No. 2010L00279) and registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTRTRC12002297). All herbs used in this trial are generally regarded as safe for use according to the China State Food and Drug Administration. The trial was reported in accordance with the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) statement (Additional file 4) [12].

The randomization sequence was computer generated in blocks of five in a 1:1:1 ratio by an independent statistician using SAS statistical software (SAS 9.3, SAS Institute, USA). Allocation details were stored in two sealed envelopes. One set of envelopes was kept by QiHuang Drug Clinical Research Center (Beijing, China) and the other set was kept by the institutions at which the study was conducted to be opened in case of emergency. All researchers, participants, and statisticians were masked to treatment allocation throughout the study.

Setting and participants

Potential participants diagnosed with PIC induced by pathogenic wind invading lungs syndrome, aged 18–65 years old, were recruited by respiratory specialists with more than 5 years’ working experience from the outpatient departments of five participating centers across China: West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Tangdu Hospital of the Fourth Military Medical University, the Affiliated Hospital to Liaoning University of TCM, Nanjing First Hospital, and Baotou Central Hospital. PIC was defined as a persistent cough triggered by URTI and lasting for 3–8 weeks [8, 13]. Using the Chinese national criteria for clinical diagnosis and treatment evaluation of cough [14], pathogenic wind invading lungs syndrome was diagnosed in the presence of cough, throat itchiness, cough aggravated by pathogenic wind, and at least one of the other minor symptoms, along with pale red tongue, white or yellow tongue coating, and floating pulse. All participant inclusion and exclusion criteria are listed in Table 2.

Table 2 Inclusion and exclusion criteria


All participants were randomly allocated in a double-blind manner to one of three parallel treatment groups: group A received QFGKG 6 g plus QFGKG-matched placebo 6 g, twice daily; group B took orally QFGKG 12 g, twice daily; and group C took orally QFGKG-matched placebo 12 g, twice daily. The scheduled treatment duration was 10 days and the participants were followed up by scheduling visits to the clinic at baseline (Day 0), Day 5, and Day 10. All participants were treated in an equivalent fashion and instructed to avoid taking any other medication for the relief of cough. Compliance was checked by examining a daily diary card and returned medication at the end of the study. Active and placebo granules that were indistinguishable in taste, color, appearance, and smell were issued in a sealed box and supplied by Baotou Chinese Traditional Medicine Co., Ltd. (China). All medications were dispensed by a specified drug administrator in a separate reception room.

Outcome measures

Cough symptom score (CSS)

The CSS is a validated tool to evaluate the frequency and severity of cough. Participants provided self-rated CSSs ranging from 0 to 3. Each evaluation day was divided into two intervals: daytime (from 8:00 am to 8:00 pm) and nighttime (from 8:00 pm to 8:00 am) [13]. CSS was evaluated every day during the study.

Visual analogue scale (VAS)

The VAS is a 10 cm continuous horizontal line that measures the severity of cough. Participants were instructed to rate their cough severity from “no cough” to “extremely strong cough.” Scores ranged from 0 to 10. VAS score was assessed at baseline (Day 0), Day 5, and Day 10.

Cough-specific quality of life questionnaire (CQLQ)

The CQLQ was designed specifically to evaluate decrements in disease-targeted quality of life caused by cough and consists of 28 items in three domains (physical, social, and psychological) [15]. A recent systematic review [16] showed that the CQLQ can provide valid and reliable outcomes for cough research. The minimum and maximum CQLQ scores were 28 and 112, respectively, with lower scores indicating a better quality of life. CQLQ score was assessed at baseline and Day 10.

TCM syndrome score

Using the Chinese national criteria for clinical diagnosis and treatment evaluation of cough [14], the main and minor symptoms of the TCM syndrome were graded (cough: not at all = 0, mild = 2, moderate = 4, severe = 6; throat itchiness, throat dryness, and chest tightness: not at all = 0, mild = 1, moderate = 2, severe = 3; cough aggravated by pathogenic wind and expectoration: yes = 0 and no = 2). The TCM syndrome score was the accumulated score of the main symptom score and all minor symptom scores. Additionally, tongue proper, tongue coating, and pulse were also assessed but not scored. TCM syndrome score was assessed at baseline and Day 10.

Safety evaluation

Safety evaluations included monitoring of adverse events (AEs), as well as clinical and laboratory findings. Participants were required to record any unexpected symptoms, signs, or feelings during the treatment period. In addition, routine tests of blood, urine and stool, hepatic and renal functions, and electrocardiogram were also performed at baseline and again after the 10-day treatment to assess safety for each group.

The primary outcome was mean or median time to cough resolution, which was assessed as the length of time from the start of treatment until the first point at which cough resolved. Cough resolution was defined as both daytime and nighttime CSS decreasing to 0. The secondary outcomes included time to cough alleviation, mean changes in CSS, VAS score, CQLQ score, and TCM syndrome score from baseline to Day 10, as well as adverse events. Cough alleviation was defined as a reduction in both daytime and nighttime CSS ≥ 1, lasting for 2 consecutive days.

Sample size determination

No clinical trial data existed on the efficacy of QFGKG. Based on our experience and previous studies of other CHM formulae used to treat PIC [1719], the cough resolution rates in the CHM and placebo groups were estimated to be 40 and 15%, respectively. The sample size for each group was calculated to be 53 according to the formula n = (Uα + Uβ)2 × 2P × (1 − P)/(P1 − P0)2 with a power of 90% or greater, assuming a significance level of 0.05. To allow for a dropout rate of approximately 10%, 180 PIC participants were needed for this study.

Statistical analysis

All the efficacy and safety analyses were performed using the intent-to-treat population. All data were documented by two independent individuals and the data files were secured. Statistical analyses were conducted using statistical software (SAS 9.3, SAS Institute, USA). Normally distributed quantitative data were described as mean ± standard deviation and analyzed using analysis of variance. Quantitative data that were not normally distributed were expressed as median and analyzed by the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Qualitative data were presented as frequency and percentage and analyzed using Chi square (χ2) or Fisher’s exact test. The primary outcome was analyzed using the survival method. Kaplan–Meier curves were constructed and differences between curves were tested by the log-rank method. The secondary outcomes were analyzed using analysis of covariance with a Bonferroni correction, or the survival method. A two-tailed P value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.


Participant characteristics

A total of 180 eligible participants were enrolled from five tertiary hospitals across China between April 2011 and March 2012, and randomly assigned 1:1:1 to receive low-dose QFGKG (group A, n = 60), high-dose QFGKG (group B, n = 60), or placebo (group C, n = 60). Of these, seven participants were withdrawn from the study for several reasons, including protocol violation (group A, n = 1; group B, n = 1), lost to follow-up (group A, n = 1; group B, n = 1; group C, n = 1), and refusal to continue (group A, n = 1; group B, n = 1). Overall, 173 participants were included in the efficacy and safety analyses (Figure 1). Compliance measured by daily diary card and returned medication was 96%. Use of concomitant medications including herbal and complementary medicines did not differ across the three groups (P = 0.9378). No differences in demographic or clinical characteristics were observed among the three groups at baseline (Table 3).

Figure 1

Flow chart of participants through study.

Table 3 Demographic and clinical characteristics at baseline

Time to cough resolution

The median time to cough resolution in groups A, B, and C was more than 10 days, 8 days, and more than 10 days, respectively. A significant therapeutic effect was noted in both QFGKG groups compared with the placebo condition (group A, P < 0.0001; group B, P < 0.0001), and the time to cough resolution was faster in group B compared with group A (P = 0.0091) (Figure 2).

Figure 2

Time to cough resolution in participants with PIC.

Time to cough alleviation

The median time to cough alleviation in groups A, B, and C was 4, 4, and 6 days, respectively. The between-group differences were statistically significant (group A, P = 0.0003; group B, P < 0.0001), except for the difference between group A and group B (P = 0.1843) (Figure 3).

Figure 3

Time to cough alleviation in participants with PIC.


Significant improvements in CSS (both daytime and nighttime) were observed from baseline to Day 10 in all three groups (group A, 3.84 ± 0.80 to 1.14 ± 1.11; group B, 3.79 ± 0.77 to 0.79 ± 1.19; group C, 3.86 ± 0.84 to 2.22 ± 1.54). Both QFGKG groups showed significantly greater improvements compared with the placebo [group A, −1.07, 95% confidence interval (CI) −1.55 to −0.6, P = 0.0005; group B, −1.41, 95% CI −1.89 to −0.94, P < 0.0001]. Group B showed a greater, though non-significant, improvement compared with group A (P = 0.5406). Similar improvements were observed in both daytime and nighttime CSS (Table 4).

Table 4 Analyses of CSS, VAS, CQLQ scores, and TCM syndrome score


Significant changes from baseline in VAS score were found in all three groups (group A, 6.04 ± 1.44 to 1.81 ± 1.87; group B, 5.90 ± 1.23 to 1.12 ± 1.70; group C, 5.96 ± 1.33 to 3.41 ± 2.11). Both QFGKG groups showed significantly greater improvements compared with the placebo condition (group A, −1.63, 95% CI −2.31 to −0.95, P = 0.0002; group B, −2.26, 95% CI −2.95 to −1.58, P < 0.0001). Group B showed a greater, though non-significant, improvement compared with group A (P = 0.4200) (Table 4).


Significant improvements in the total CQLQ scores were observed from baseline to Day 10 in all three groups (group A, 64.51 ± 9.58 to 48.27 ± 14.30; group B, 64.95 ± 7.31 to 44.82 ± 14.10; group C, 64.78 ± 6.46 to 54.89 ± 10.59). Compared with the placebo condition, participants in either QFGKG group had a better quality of life (group A, −6.17, 95% CI −10.4 to −1.88, P = 0.0258; group B, −9.65, 95% CI −13.9 to −5.4, P = 0.0003), but there was no significant difference between the high- and low-dose QFGKG groups (P = 0.5720) (Table 4).

TCM syndrome score

Again, improvements in the total TCM syndrome score were observed from baseline to Day 10 in all three groups (group A, 12.02 ± 2.60 to 3.49 ± 3.51; group B, 11.46 ± 1.97 to 2.00 ± 3.00; group C, 11.97 ± 2.17 to 6.17 ± 4.00). Both QFGKG groups showed significantly greater improvements compared with the placebo condition (group A, −2.7, 95% CI −3.97 to −1.42, P = 0.0031; group B, −4.05, 95% CI −5.33 to −2.76, P < 0.0001), but the difference between the two QFGKG groups did not reach significance (P = 0.3692) (Table 4).


There were neither serious AEs nor participant withdrawal because of AEs during the study. Participants taking QFGKG regardless of dosage reported more AEs than those in the placebo group (7.02 vs. 7.02 vs. 1.69%; P = 0.3313). In group A, AEs were reported in four participants. One participant reported dizziness and a rough tongue (at Day 1), which were resolved within 10 days. One participant complained of arm itchiness (at Day 1), which was resolved within 4 days. Another two reproductive-aged women showed a slightly elevated level of white blood cells in routine urine tests after treatment without any symptoms of urinary tract infection at Day 7 and 10, respectively; the events were resolved after drinking more water. In group B, four participants reported AEs. One male participant had mild hepatic dysfunction with baseline alanine aminotransferase 48 U/L increasing to 60 U/L after treatment, but dropping to normal when measured again 3 days later without any intervention. One participant developed URTI with an elevated level of white blood cells (7.31 × 109/L pretreatment to 11.17 × 109/L posttreatment); the event was resolved 7 days later after the administration of antibiotics. Two reproductive-aged women experienced an elevated level of white blood cells in routine urine tests after treatment without any discomfort at Day 6 and 11, respectively; the events were resolved after drinking more water. In group C, one participant complained of a mild episode of dizziness. All the reported AEs were generally considered mild in severity, manageable, and reversible.


To our knowledge, this is the first randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial of CHM in the treatment of PIC induced by pathogenic wind invading lungs syndrome. QFGKG could shorten the duration of cough, decrease cough severity and frequency, and improve cough-specific quality of life. In addition, this study found QFGKG to be safe and well tolerated. High-dose QFGKG appeared to be superior to low-dose QFGKG in shortening the duration of cough.

QingfengGanke granule improved cough and cough-related quality of life in both QFGKG groups. Similarly, significant improvements were found in the placebo group, most likely because of the self-limiting nature of PIC. In addition to natural recovery, the placebo effects might encompass several other components: regression of cough response toward the mean, true placebo effect, voluntary control, and effects related to expectancy and meaning of the treatment [20].

Although the pathogenesis of PIC remains unknown, airway inflammation, epithelial disruption, and cough hyper-responsiveness are involved [8]. The resurgence of pertussis or whooping cough has prompted wide public and clinical concerns over the last 20 years [2123]. There is an increasing recognition of the presence of Bordetella pertussis infection in PIC, although URTI is the most common cause. Approximately 12–50% of cases with cough duration of 2 weeks or more show evidence of recent B. pertussis infection despite aggressive vaccination [24]. Although some medications are available, there is no proven effective therapy for patients with prolonged cough attributed to pertussis [25]. A recent double-blind, placebo-controlled RCT [26] indicated that nebulized ipratropium bromide in combination with salbutamol could reduce PIC. Another recent placebo-controlled RCT [27] showed that montelukast, a cysteinyl leukotriene type 1 receptor antagonist, was not an effective treatment for PIC. Whether there is a potential therapeutic effect of QFGKG on pertussis-related cough deserves further study.

In terms of safety, no deaths or serious AEs were reported; all AEs reported were of mild severity. Three AEs were categorized as possibly or probably related to the study medication: dizziness, rough tongue, and arm itchiness. An elevated level of white blood cells in routine urine tests, which occurred in four female participants in the QFGKG groups, was considered unrelated to the study medication and probably associated with an increased risk of urinary tract infection in young women of reproductive age. Some mild abnormalities observed in laboratory safety evaluations in the high-dose QFGKG group were judged as unrelated to the study medication. However, Mahuang in QFGKG may have some side effects, such as increased blood pressure, cardiac arrhythmia, excitability, insomnia, nausea, poor appetite, or convulsions [28].

Some potential limitations of the present study should be considered. First, cough frequency was subjectively assessed in this study using a cough diary. There is increasing evidence that acoustic cough-monitoring devices can be valid and reliable instruments with which to assess cough frequency. However, the absence of good responsiveness and inconsistency with other instruments has limited their wide use in cough research [16, 29]. Second, our study protocol specifically excluded elderly people and those with mild cough, limiting the generalizability of the study findings in real-life clinical practice. Third, there was no follow-up after treatment, so the effect of QFGKG on relapse rate after treatment was unknown. Moreover, the accuracy of determining the time to cough alleviation might have been impaired, as 2 days was needed to define cough alleviation.


QingfengGanke granule is efficacious in the treatment of PIC induced by pathogenic wind invading lungs syndrome.



adverse events


Chinese herbal medicine


confidence interval


consolidated standards of reporting trials


cough-specific quality of life questionnaire


cough symptom score


postinfectious cough


QingfengGanke granule


randomized controlled trial


traditional Chinese medicine


upper respiratory tract infection


visual analogue scale


  1. 1.

    Kwon NH, Oh MJ, Min TH, Lee BJ, Choi DC (2006) Causes and clinical features of subacute cough. Chest 129:1142–1147

  2. 2.

    Ishida T, Yokoyama T, Iwasaku M, Saigusa M, Fukuyama H, Nakagawa H et al (2010) Clinical investigation of post-infectious cough among adult patients with prolonged cough. Nihon Kokyuki Gakkai Zasshi 48:179–185

  3. 3.

    Irwin RS, Madison JM (2000) The diagnosis and treatment of cough. N Engl J Med 343:1715–1721

  4. 4.

    Robertson PW, Goldberg H, Jarvie BH, Smith DD, Whybin LR (1987) Bordetella pertussis infection: a cause of persistent cough in adults. Med J Aust 146:522–525

  5. 5.

    Davis SF, Sutter RW, Strebel PM, Orton C, Alexander V, Sanden GN et al (1995) Concurrent outbreaks of pertussis and Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection: clinical and epidemiological characteristics of illnesses manifested by cough. Clin Infect Dis 20:621–628

  6. 6.

    Ryan NM, Vertigan AE, Ferguson J, Wark P, Gibson PG (2012) Clinical and physiological features of postinfectious chronic cough associated with H1N1 infection. Respir Med 106:138–144

  7. 7.

    Yan Y, Yang L, Song Q, Li WC, Li DY, Li YT et al (2014) Study on TCM syndrome of post -infectious cough based on factor analysis. Zhonghua Zhongyiyao Xuekan 32:217–219

  8. 8.

    Braman SS (2006) Postinfectious cough: ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest 129:138s–146s

  9. 9.

    Liu W, Jiang HL, Mao B (2013) Chinese herbal medicine for postinfectious cough: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2013:906765

  10. 10.

    Ma JL, Shi LQ, Xi N (2007) Analysis and study on 60 cases of post-infectious cough treated with eliminating wind and releasing lungs medicines. Beijing Zhongyiyao Daxue Xuebao 30:67–69

  11. 11.

    Goodyear MD, Krleza-Jeric K, Lemmens T (2007) The declaration of Helsinki. BMJ 335:624–625

  12. 12.

    Gagnier JJ, Boon H, Rochon P, Moher D, Barnes J, Bombardier C (2006) Reporting randomized, controlled trials of herbal interventions: an elaborated CONSORT statement. Ann Intern Med 144:364–367

  13. 13.

    Asthma Work Group, Chinese Society, Respiratory, Diseases (CSRD), Chinese Medical Association (2011) The Chinese national guidelines on diagnosis and management of cough December 2010. Chin Med J (Engl) 124:3207–3219

  14. 14.

    Zheng XY (2002) Guiding principle of clinical research on new drugs of traditional Chinese medicine (trial implementation). Chinese Medical Science and Technology Press, Beijing

  15. 15.

    French CT, Irwin RS, Fletcher KE, Adams TM (2002) Evaluation of a cough-specific quality-of-life questionnaire. Chest 121:1123–1131

  16. 16.

    Schmit KM, Coeytaux RR, Goode AP, McCrory DC, Yancy WS Jr, Kemper AR et al (2013) Evaluating cough assessment tools: a systematic review. Chest 144:1819–1826

  17. 17.

    Min CY (2011) Effect of Butu Xuanfei formula for 75 cases of cough induced by common cold. Zhongyi Zazhi 52:572–574

  18. 18.

    Wu W, Wang B, Wang W, Gao F (2011) The clinical research for treatment of post-infectious cough with Shufeng Xuanfei method. Xiandai Zhongxiyi Jiehe Zazhi 20:3051–3052

  19. 19.

    Zhang YP, Chao Y, Miao Q, Zhao D, Lin L, Sun ZT et al (2008) Randomized controlled study on Suhuang Zhike capsule for treatment of post-cold cough. Zhongguo Zhongxiyi Jiehe Zazhi 28:698–701

  20. 20.

    Eccles R (2010) Importance of placebo effect in cough clinical trials. Lung 188(Suppl 1):S53–61

  21. 21.

    Bentley J, Pinfield J, Rouse J (2013) Whooping cough: identification, assessment and management. Nurs Stand 28:50–57

  22. 22.

    Clark TA (2014) Changing pertussis epidemiology: everything old is new again. J Infect Dis 209:978–981

  23. 23.

    Xu Y, Wang L, Xu J, Wang X, Wei C, Luo P et al (2014) Seroprevalence of pertussis in China: need to improve vaccination strategies. Hum Vaccin Immunother 10:192–198

  24. 24.

    Cherry JD (2005) The epidemiology of pertussis: a comparison of the epidemiology of the disease pertussis with the epidemiology of Bordetella pertussis infection. Pediatrics 115:1422–1427

  25. 25.

    Wang K, Bettiol S, Thompson MJ, Roberts NW, Perera R, Heneghan CJ et al (2014) Symptomatic treatment of the cough in whooping cough. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 9:CD003257

  26. 26.

    Zanasi A, Lecchi M, Del Forno M, Fabbri E, Mastroroberto M, Mazzolini M et al (2014) A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial on the management of post-infective cough by inhaled ipratropium and salbutamol administered in combination. Pulm Pharmacol Ther 29:224–232

  27. 27.

    Wang K, Birring SS, Taylor K, Fry NK, Hay AD, Moore M et al (2014) Montelukast for postinfectious cough in adults: a double-blind randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Respir Med 2:35–43

  28. 28.

    Shaw D (2010) Toxicological risks of Chinese herbs. Planta Med 76:2012–2018

  29. 29.

    Leconte S, Ferrant D, Dory V, Degryse J (2011) Validated methods of cough assessment: a systematic review of the literature. Respiration 81:161–174

Download references

Authors’ contributions

HLJ, BM and LW conceived the study. HLJ, BM, LW, FGJ, YLX, JM and QPL designed the study. BM, LW, RMZ and BS performed data analysis. HLJ wrote the manuscript. BM and LW revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.


We would like to thank Ms. Yan Chen, Ms. Lin Tu, Department of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, China, for their care of these participants. Furthermore, we also express our gratitude to all the participants for their participation and to the investigators at the hospitals for data collection and laboratory testing. In addition, we are very grateful to Ms Xiang Diao for her polishing the manuscript. We would like to express our great appreciation to the anonymous reviewers for their comments and suggestions, and Diane Williams, EdanzQC SCM, and the other editors for their efficient and professional processing of our manuscript. We particularly wish to thank QiHuang Drug Clinical Research Center for statistical assistance, Baotou Chinese Traditional Medicine Co., Ltd (Inner Mongolia, China) for providing QFGKG and placebo granules. This project is partly supported by Administrative Bureau of Traditional Chinese Medicine of Sichuan province, People’s Republic of China (No. 2012-B-081).

Compliance with ethical guidelines

Competing interests This study was partly funded by Baotou Chinese Traditional Medicine Co., Ltd, and BM, FGJ, YLX, JM and QPL reported receiving Grant support from Baotou Chinese Traditional Medicine Co., Ltd. However, the funder had no input into the study design or analysis, nor the interpretation of data. The authors declare that there are no other competing interests regarding the publication of this article.

Author information

Correspondence to Bing Mao or Lei Wang.

Additional files

Additional file 1.

Informed consent.

Additional file 2.

Study protocol.

Additional file 3.

Approval of ethics committee.

Additional file 4.

CONSORT checklist.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark


  • Chinese Herbal Medicine
  • Placebo Condition
  • Bordetella Pertussis
  • Pertussis Infection
  • Traditional Chinese Medicine Syndrome