Skip to main content
Download PDF

Transcriptome analysis reveals the molecular mechanism of Yiqi Rougan decoction in reducing CCl4-induced liver fibrosis in rats

Chinese Medicine volume 16, Article number: 142 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Liver fibrosis develops from various chronic liver diseases, and there is currently a lack of specific treatment strategies. Yiqi Rougan decoction (YQRG) is a traditional Chinese medicine that has shown durative effects in the treatment of liver fibrosis; however, the mechanism associated with YQRG-related improvements in liver fibrosis remains to be experimentally determined. This study evaluated the therapeutic effect of YQRG on carbon tetrachloride (CCl4)-induced liver fibrosis in rats and its molecular mechanism.

Methods

We used low-, medium-, and high-dose YQRG to treat CCl4-induced liver fibrosis in rats, followed by assessment of liver injury and fibrosis according to liver appearance, body weight, liver mass index, histopathologic examination, and serum testing. Additionally, we performed transcriptome analysis using RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) technology, including cluster, Gene Ontology (GO), and pathway analyses, to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs), and protein and gene expression were detected by immunofluorescence (IFC), western blot and real-time quantitative PCR.

Results

The results showed that YQRG effectively alleviated CCl4-induced liver injury and fibrosis in rats, including observations of improved liver function, decreased activity of hepatic stellate cells (HSCs), and decreased extracellular matrix (ECM) deposition. Moreover, we identified downregulated and upregulated DEGs in the model group relative to the control and YQRG-treated groups, with GO analysis revealing their enrichment in biological processes, such as endoplasmic reticulum stress (ERS), apoptosis, and autophagy. Furthermore, pathway analysis showed that YQRG treatment downregulated the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and phosphoinositide 3-kinase/Akt (PI3K/AKT) signalling pathways and upregulated other signalling pathways, including those related to peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors(PPAR) and AMP-activated protein kinase(AMPK), with these findings subsequently verified experimentally.

Conclusion

These findings showed that YQRG improved CCl4-induced liver fibrosis through multiple mechanisms and pathways, offering critical insight into the YQRG-related therapeutic mechanism and promoting further research into its potential application.

Background

Hepatic fibrosis is an abnormal wound-healing process in which hepatic parenchymal cells (HPCs) transform into fibrous tissue of ECM [1,2,3], which is detrimental to human health. Liver fibrosis can subsequently evolve into liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma, which account for 3.5% of annual global mortality [4]. It is difficult to accurately calculate the prevalence of liver fibrosis [5, 6], and it is generally believed that the condition is reversible. Therefore, actively reversing liver fibrosis is particularly important to the prevention and treatment of chronic liver disease. Notably, there is no specific anti-fibrosis therapy [7], making research supporting the active development of safe and effective anti-fibrosis drugs a significant undertaking to reveal their molecular mechanism.

Activation of resting hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) represents the critical mechanism associated with liver fibrosis formation [8,9,10]. Additionally, endoplasmic reticulum stress (ERS) describes the response to continuous aggregation of unfolded or misfolded proteins in the ER, which alters ER homeostasis [11], induces HPCs apoptosis, and reportedly promotes the formation of liver fibrosis [12, 13]. Moreover, apoptosis of HPCs, which can promote the transformation of HSCs from a static to an activated state, supports fibrotic initiation [14, 15]. Previous studies report that increased autophagy and levels of unfolded proteins can occur after the loss of cellular homeostasis, with these processes also implicated in the occurrence of fibrosis [16]. Furthermore, recent studies show that continuous ERS can activate autophagy, which subsequently promotes the activation of resting HSCs and induces liver fibrosis [17, 18].

Current treatment modalities for liver fibrosis mainly focus on eliminating the risk factors that are known to progressively develop into end-stage liver fibrosis, and treatment of end-stage liver fibrosis mainly involves liver transplantation, which carries the risk of trauma and rejection. Recently, the use of mesenchymal stem cell therapy for hepatic fibrosis has emerged, although there exists a risk of carcinogenesis. Therefore, it is particularly important to identify safe and effective anti-fibrosis therapies.

Traditional Chinese medicine has unique advantages in the treatment of chronic liver disease, especially in reducing hepatocyte damage, inhibiting inflammation, and promoting anti-fibrosis effects [19]. Yiqi Rougan (YQRG) decoction is a traditional Chinese medicine. Due to the complexity of traditional Chinese medicine prescriptions, the mechanism of action of YQRG in treating liver fibrosis remains unknown, including associated changes in gene expression. Transcriptome analysis using RNA-seq technology can potentially elucidate the molecular mechanism of disease occurrence [20]. In the present study, we analysed the main components of YQRG by ultra-high performance liquid chromatography with quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (UHPLC-QTOF-MS), evaluated its effects on liver function and fibrosis in a rat model of CCl4-induced liver fibrosis, and identified DEGs in rat liver following YQRG treatment.

Methods

Drugs and materials

YQRG was purchased from the Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine at the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University (Chongqing, China). CCl4 (batch NO. C805329) and olive oil (batch NO. O815210) were purchased from Shanghai Macklin Biochemical Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Kits for assessing the levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT; batch NO. S03030) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST; batch NO. S03040) were purchased from Shenzhen Rayto Life Technology Co., Ltd. (Shenzhen, China); hydroxyproline (HYP; batch NO. A030-3-1), from Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute (Nanjing, China); and colchicine (batch NO. H20113208), from Guangdong Pidi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (Guangdong, China). Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits for hyaluronic acid (HA; batch NO. QZ-25723), laminin (LN; batch NO. QZ-25677), type IV collagen (IV-C; batch NO. QZ-25741), type III procollagen (PC-III; batch NO. QZ-25749), rat caspase 12 (CASP12; batch NO. QZ-20065), C/EBP homologous protein (CHOP; batch NO. QZ-25805), activated transcription factor 6 (ATF6; batch NO. QZ-25812), inositolase 1 (IRE1; batch NO. QZ-25833), phosphorylated (p)-extracellular signal-regulated kinase (PERK;batch NO. QZ-25829), and immunoglobulin-binding protein (BiP; batch NO. QZ-25818) were obtained from Quanzhou Jiubang Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Quanzhou, China). Trizol (batch NO. 108–95-2), the Primescript RT kit, and gDNA eraser (batch NO. RR047A) were obtained from Takara Bio (Shiga, Japan). Primers for quantitative (q)PCR were provided by Tsingke Biotechnology (Beijing, China). Antibodies against α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA; 19245), p38 (8690), p-p38 (4511), AMPK (2532), p-AMPK (2535), and β-actin (4970) were obtained from Cell Signaling Technology (Danvers, MA, USA). Antibodies against light-chain (LC) 3-I/II (ab128025) and LC3-II (ab192890) were obtained from Abcam (Cambridge, UK). Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labelling (TUNEL) staining kits (batch NO. G1501) were purchased from Wuhan Servicebio Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Wuhan, China). Acetonitrile, methanol, and formic acid (LC–MS grade) were obtained from CNW Technology (Dusseldorf, Germany).

YQRG preparation

YQRG contains eight herbs: Astragalus mongholicus Bunge, Atractylodes Macrocephala Koidz, Salvia miltiorrhizae Bunge, Curcuma longa L, Paeonia lactiflora Pall, Cyperus rotundus L, Sargassum fusiforme Setch and Trichosanthes Kirilowii Maxim. The herbal information and composition ratio are shown in Table 1. According to the surface area conversion ratio between rats and humans (6.3), we calculated the low-, medium-, and high-dose YQRG concentrations for use in rats at 4.95 g/kg, 9.9 g/kg, and 19.8 g/kg, respectively. According to this dosage, the Chinese herbs described were submerged in distilled water for 30 min, decocted three times, filtered, and concentrated three times to create YQRG decoctions at low, medium, and high dosages [21]. The composition of YQRG was determined by UHPLC-QTOF-MS for quality control.

Table 1 Composition of Yiqi Rougan decoction
Full size table

UHPLC-QTOF-MS analysis

A methanol:water extract (4:1, v/v) was added to the YQRG decoction (150 µL) and vortexed for 30 s, followed by sonication for 1 h in an ice water bath and sitting at − 40 °C for 1 h and centrifugation at 12,000 rpm at 4° for 15 min. The supernatant was then passed through a 0.22-μm filter membrane for UHPLC tandem MS (MS/MS) analysis (Infinity 1290; Agilent Technology, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Mobile phases A and B comprised water with 0.1% formic acid and acetonitrile with 0.1% formic acid, respectively, and were passed at a flow rate of 400 µL/min. The sample (5 µL) was injected onto the Waters C18 column (1.7 × 2.1 µm × 100 mm; Waters Corp., Milford, MA, USA), followed by gradient elution: 0–3.5 min (5–15% B), 3.5–6 min (15–30% B), 6–12 min(30–70% B), 12–18 min (70–100% B), and 18–25 min (100% B). High resolution MS/MS was performed using a Q precision mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), with the data analysed using Xcalibur software (Thermo Fisher Scientific).

Animal experiments

Male Sprague–Dawley rats (n = 68; 180–220 g) were purchased from the Experimental Animal Center of Chongqing Medical University. Animal experiments were conducted in a specific pathogen-free animal laboratory (SYXK 2018–0003) at the Experimental Animal Center according to the Guidelines for the Care and Use of Experimental Animals from the National Institutes of Health (Bethesda, MD, USA). The experiments were approved by the Ethics Committee of Chongqing Medical University. After 1 week of adaptive feeding, the rats were randomly divided into two groups: the control (n = 8) and the CCl4-treatment group (n = 60). Rats in the CCl4-treatment group received intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection of 50% CCl4–olive oil solution (1 mL/kg) twice weekly for 9 weeks. At the end of the 4th week, rats in the CCl4-treatment group were randomly divided into five experimental groups: low, medium, and high-dose treatment groups (n = 12) that received YQRG at 4.95 g/kg/day, 9.9 g/kg/day, and 19.8 g/kg/day, respectively; positive control group (n = 12) that received colchicine at 0.1 mg/kg/day; and the model group (n = 12) that received saline for 5 weeks. At the end of the 9th week, the rats were anaesthetized by i.p. injection of 2% pentobarbital sodium and asphyxiated with high-concentration CO2. Blood was collected from the abdominal aorta, the liver was removed immediately, and the weight was recorded. Liver tissue was quickly cut into pieces for subsequent liver haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and Masson staining, immunohistochemistry (IHC), immunofluorescence staining, and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analysis. The remaining tissues and serum were stored at −80 °C until further use.

Liver index, Serum biochemical and liver HYP analyses

During the animal experiments, all rats were weighed and recorded every 2 weeks. Following liver removal and weighing, the liver index was calculated according to the body weight and the liver weight to evaluate liver injury, as follows: Liver index = (liver weight / body weight) × 100. According to the respective manufacturer instructions, Serum ALT, AST levels and liver HYP content were measured using kits. An automatic biochemical analyser (Shenzhen Rayto Life Technology Co., Ltd.) was used for the assays.

Histologic analysis

Liver tissue was fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 24 h, dehydrated, embedded in paraffin, and sliced (4 µm), followed by staining with H&E and Masson Staining. For H&E staining, the slices were dewaxed first, soaked with hematoxylin dye solution for 10 min, and then washed with distilled water. After differentiation, the slices were rinsed again, and then rinsed with blue-returning solution. The slices were then soaked in ethanol (85% and 95%) for 5 min, and immersed in eosin dye for 10 min, followed by dehydration for 5 min (ethanol and xylene). Meanwhile, for Masson staining, the dewaxed slices were placed in Masson A for 15 h and rinsed, followed by soaking in the Masson mixture (Masson B:Masson C = 1:1) for 1 min, and washed. The mixture was differentiated with 1% hydrochloric acid alcohol for 1 min and washed. The tissue turned red after Masson D treatment for 6 min. The slices were rinsed, differentiated, dehydrated, and sealed with 1% glacial acetic acid. Eventually, tissue sections were observed and images were obtained using an optical microscope (BX53; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).

IHC analysis

Paraffin sections were dewaxed and soaked in citric acid antigen repair buffer to repair the antigen. The antigen was incubated with 3% hydrogen peroxide solution for 25 min, washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and sealed with 3% bovine serum albumin (BSA) at room temperature for 30 min. The antibody was incubated with anti-α-SMA and HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies, followed by DAB staining, rinsed, sectioned with differentiation solution, dehydrated with ethanol and xylene, and sealed with neutral rubber. These procedures were followed by washing, observation, and imaging using a microscope (BX53; Olympus).

Assessment of ultrastructural morphology

The liver tissue was cut into 1 mm3 sections immediately upon collection of the liver (within 1–2 min), fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde, and washed with 1 M PBS. Subsequently, 1% osmic acid was added to the sections, which were incubated for 2 h, washed, dehydrated, penetrated, dehydrated with ethanol and acetone, and then embedded with 812 embedding agent. The embedding plate was polymerized for 48 h, the resin block was placed in the ultra-thin slicer (60 nm–80 nm), stained, washed, and dried with 2% uranium acetate saturated alcohol and 2.6% lead citrate solution, followed by observation of the ultrastructure of the liver and collection of images via TEM (JEM-1400plus; JEOL, Tokyo, Japan).

RNA-seq analysis

RNA-seq was performed, and sequencing libraries were constructed using the Novaseq 6000 platform and the TruseqTM RNA sample prep kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). Total RNA was extracted with Trizol reagent, and mRNA was separated using oligo (DT) magnetic beads and randomly broken into small fragments. Six-base random primers were used to reverse transcribe cDNA, followed by end repair and sequencing. Changes in gene expression in liver tissue following YQRG treatment were assessed according to the identification of DEGs (fold changes > 2 or <  − 2; false discovery rate < 0.05). DEGs were clustered and analysed using the GO database and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG; http://www.genome.jp/kegg/) pathway analysis.

Network construction and analysis

The STRING database (https://string-db.org/) is a database commonly used to predict protein–protein interaction (PPI). The main DEG was entered into the string database, the interaction score was set to ≥ 0.9, and the species was selected as "Homo sapiens" to create a PPI network. Then, the results were saved and exported in TSV format. Cytoscape (v.3.6.0; https://cytoscape.org/) was used to visualize the PPI networks. The TSV format file is imported into Cytoscape for PPI visualization.

Double immunofluorescence staining

Double immunofluorescence staining was performed to detect colocalization of TUNEL staining and α-smooth muscle actin (a-SMA). Additionally, LC3-II and a-SMA were also examined. For the former staining, the slices were dewaxed in xylene, ethanol, and distilled water, and then circled into protease K working solution and incubated at 37℃ for 22 min, followed by washing with PBS, addition of 0.1% Triton, and incubation for 20 min at room temperature. Then, the buffer was incubated at room temperature for 10 min. TUNEL kit reaction solution (TDT enzyme:dUTP: Buffer = 1:5:50) was added into the ring and incubated for 2 h at 37 °C, and sealed with 3% BSA for 30 min. The sections were incubated with rabbit anti-α-SMA at 4 °C overnight, and then incubated with FITC-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (Wuhan Servicebio Biotechnology Co., Ltd.) for 50 min at ambient temperature in the dark, followed by nucleus staining with 4',6-diamino-2-phenylindole (DAPI; Wuhan Servicebio Biotechnology Co., Ltd.) for 10 min. Additionally, For the latter staining, the sections were dewaxed, immersed in EDTA antigen repair buffer, circled, and sealed with 3% hydrogen peroxide and 3% BSA. Rabbit anti-LC3-II was added, and the sections were incubated overnight, followed by the addition of FITC-Conjugated goat Anti-Rabbit IgG, and incubation with Cy3-TSA for 10 min. The sections were then washed, and antigen repair was performed again, followed by incubation with the primary antibodies (anti-α-SMA), addition of FITC-conjugated goat anti-Rabbit IgG, and DAPI staining. The sections were then observed, and images were obtained by fluorescence microscopy (eclipse CI; Nikon, Tokyo, Japan).

ELISA assay

ELISA was performed according to the manufacturer instructions. The levels of HA, LN, PC-III, IV-C, CASP12, CHOP, ATF6, IRE1, PERK and BiP in liver tissue were quantified. PBS was added to liver tissue for homogenization, followed by centrifugation at 4 °C for 20 min. This process was repeated three times, the supernatant was then used for ELISA detection, in which 50µL of termination solution was used and the absorbance was read at 450 nm, and finally the concentration of the appropriate substance was calculated.

Real-time qPCR analysis

We then detected the mRNA levels of the genes Acta2 (encoding α-SMA), Hspa5 (encoding BiP), Eif2ak3 (encoding PERK), Atf6, Ern1 (encoding IRE1), Chop, Casp12, B-cell lymphoma-2 (Bcl-2), Lc3b, unc-51-like autophagy-activating kinase 1 (Ulk1), tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 1 (Timp1), metalloproteinase 9 (Mmp9), P38, and Ampk. Initially, 100 mg of liver tissue was weighed, added with 2 mL of trizol homogenate, and centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 10 min, followed by the collection of 700 µL of supernatant to which 140 µL of chloroform (supernatant: chloroform = 1:0.2) was added, mixed well, and centrifuged. Subsequently, 300 µL of the supernatant was withdrawn, added with 300 µL isopropanol, and shook for 1 min. The liquid was then removed, 75% ethanol was added, washed, followed by addition of dH2O, and measurement and adjustment of the sample concentration. cDNA was synthesized by reverse transcription using a PrimeScript RT reagent kit with gDNA Eraser (Takara Bio). PCR amplification was then performed under the following cycling conditions: 95 °C pre-denaturation for 10 min, 95 °C denaturation for 15 s, 60 °C annealing for 1 min, for a total of 40 cycles (CFX96, Bio-Rad). β-Actin was used as the control for normalization of gene expression, and fold changes were calculated using the 2–ΔΔCT method. The primer sequences are shown in Table 2.

Table 2 Primer sequences used for PCR
Full size table

Western blot analysis

Proteins were extracted from liver tissue using a radioimmunoprecipitation buffer containing a protease inhibitor and phosphatase inhibitor and separated by electrophoresis, followed by transfer to polyvinylidene fluoride membranes. Membranes were washed five times with Tris-buffered saline containing Tween-20 (TBST) and incubated overnight at 4 °C with respective primary antibodies [α-SMA (1:1000), LC3-I/II (1:1000), p38 (1:1000), p-P38 (1:1000), AMPK (1:1000), p-AMPK (1:1000), and β-actin (1:1000)]. The membrane was then washed five times with TBST and incubated with HRP-conjugated secondary antibody (Boster Bio) for 1 h. Bands were visualized by enhanced chemiluminescence and images obtained using a chemiluminescence imaging system (Odyssey FC; Licor Biosciences, Lincoln, NE, USA). ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA) was used for data analysis.

Statistical analysis

The data obtained are represented by the mean ± standard deviation. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 25.0 software (IBM, United States) (v.8.0.2; GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA). One-way analysis of variance and a nonparametric test were used to compare the differences between groups. p < 0.05 was considered significant. Image synthesis was performed by the GraphPad Prism 8.0.2 software (San Diego, CA, United States).

Results

Component analysis of YQRG

We analysed the main compounds of YQRG by UHPLC-MS/MS. Positive (Fig. 1a) and negative (Fig. 1b) ion chromatograms represented the YQRG compounds, revealing 10 main compounds (L-Phenylalanine, Paeoniflorin, Bisdemethoxycurcumin, Curcumin, Cryptotanshinone, citric acid, Gallic acid, Protocatechualdehyde, Rosmarinic acid, Salvianolic acid A) (Fig. 1c).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Identification of components of YQRG. Total ion chromatograms of positive (a) and negative (b) ion modes of YQRG samples were obtained using UHPLC–MS/MS. c Molecular structure of constituents

Full size image

YQRG improves liver injury in vivo

To evaluate the effect of YQRG on liver fibrosis, we established a rat model of liver fibrosis according to the reported protocol [22]. During animal experiments, compared with the model group, the weight of the rats that received low, medium, or high concentrations of YQRG (YQRG-L, YQRG-M, and YQRG-H) or colchicine increased significantly (Fig. 2a). The liver weight ratio (LW: BW) used to evaluate liver injury showed that the LW: BW ratio decreased significantly in the YQRG treatment group (Fig. 2b). Next, we measured the levels of serum ALT and AST in rats to evaluate liver function. The results showed that the levels of ALT and AST in the model group increased significantly. Surprisingly, after YQRG treatment, the levels of ALT and AST decreased and were consistent with the normal levels (Fig. 2c and d). Then, we evaluated the morphological changes of cells in liver tissue from different angles by renal appearance, H&E staining and TEM. In the normal group, the liver looked ruddy and smooth, with sharp edges and a soft texture. In the rats that received CCl4, the appearance of the liver was lacklustre, the edge was blunt, and the surface was granular, rough, and hard. Compared with the model group, the livers of the YQRG group and the colchicine group were shinier, the edge was clearer, and the texture was soft and smooth (Fig. 2e). HE staining showed that the hepatocytes were arranged radially, centred on the central vein, and the structures of hepatic lobules and portal areas were clear. In the model group, the structure of hepatic lobules was damaged, the hepatocytes were degenerated and necrotic, and vacuolar changes and disordered arrangement appeared. In the YQRG-L, YQRG-M, YQRG-H, and the colchicine groups, the structure of hepatic lobules was improved and the vacuolar changes in hepatocytes were reduced and arranged neatly. Then, we observed the ultrastructure of the liver. Transmission electron microscopy analysis showed that the hepatocyte structure was damaged after CCl4 treatment, including mitochondrial swelling, endoplasmic reticulum damage, and bile duct dilatation. The tissue images of the YQRG groups and the colchicine group showed an improvement in pathological damage. The damage in hepatocyte structure was reduced, the swelling of mitochondria was improved, and the expansions of the endoplasmic reticulum and the bile duct were not obvious. These results suggested that YQRG can effectively resist the liver injury in rats induced by carbon tetrachloride.

Fig. 2
figure 2

YQRG improves CCl4-induced liver injury in rats. a Body weight in different groups (n = 6). b LW/BW ratio in different groups. c, d Serum ALT and AST activities (n = 6). e Liver pathological changes were analysed by liver appearance (n = 6), H&E-staining (Scale bar = 200 μm, n = 6) of liver sections and transmission electron microscopy (Scale bar = 1 μm, n = 3) of rat livers. Data values are indicated as mean ± SD. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, vs. control group; #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01, ###P < 0.001, vs. model group

Full size image

YQRG resists CCl4-induced liver fibrosis in vivo

Next, we performed multiple experiments to evaluate the effect of YQRG against liver fibrosis. Masson staining showed that collagen fibres (blue) accumulated after CCl4 treatment, resulting in more fibre spacing, while collagen fibres and fibre spacing decreased in the YQRG groups and the colchicine group (Fig. 3a). Because HSCs activation promotes α-SMA expression, we evaluated liver injury and after treatment Changes in α-SMA levels. IHC results showed that the YQRG groups and the colchicine group reduced the positive expression of α-SMA relative to the model group (Fig. 3a). In addition, the fibrosis markers showed that the levels of HA, LN, PC-III, and IV-C in the model group were significantly higher than those in the YQRG groups (Fig. 3b). In addition, the level of HYP, the main component of collagen, increased in the model group but decreased after treatment in the YQRG groups (Fig. 3c). As shown in Fig. 3d–f, the results of α-SMA expression analysis support the results obtained in the immunohistochemical analysis, western blot, and qPCR analysis. Hepatic fibrosis is accompanied by an imbalance in ECM synthesis and degradation. ECM is regulated by TIMPs (promote ECM synthesis) and MMPs (promote ECM degradation) [23]. We analysed the mRNA expression levels of TIMP1 and MMP9 in the liver by qPCR. The results showed that, compared with the model group, the level of MMP9 in the YQRF-H group increased significantly and the expression of TIMP1 decreased significantly (Fig. 3g and h). These data show that YQRG-H processing reduces the accumulation of ECM. In “Conclusion”, these results suggest that YQRG-H treatment reduces CCl4-induced liver fibrosis in rats.

Fig. 3
figure 3

YQRG alleviates CCl4-induced liver fibrosis in rats. a Masson staining (Scale bar = 200 μm, n = 6) of rat livers and α-SMA were detected by immunohistochemistry (Scale bar = 100 μm, n = 6). b Serum HA, LN, PC-III, and IV-C content (n = 6). c HYP contents in liver tissues (n = 6). d Western blot image showing α-SMA expression in liver tissues (n = 6). e Protein concentration analysis (n = 6). f–h mRNA expression of α-SMA, MMP9, TIMP1 were detected by PCR (n = 6). Data values are indicated as mean ± SD. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, vs. control group; #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01, ###P < 0.001, vs. model group

Full size image

Gene expression analysis by RNA-seq

To gain insight into the molecular mechanism associated with the YQRG-mediated improvement in liver fibrosis in vivo, we performed RNA-seq analysis of samples from the control, model, and the YQRG-H-treated rats. We identified 2689 upregulated and 2545 downregulated DEGs in the control versus model groups, whereas the model versus YQRG-H groups revealed 2543 upregulated and 2476 downregulated DEGs (Fig. 4a). Compared with the normal control group and YQRG-H group, the upregulated and downregulated genes in the model group are the DEGs of YQRG in the treatment of CCl4-induced liver fibrosis, that is, 2141 YQRG upregulated DEGs and 2038 YQRG downregulated DEGs (Fig. 4b). Interestingly, these DEGs showed significant intergroup differences (Fig. 4c).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Gene expression analysis by RNA-seq. a Volcanic map of upregulated and downregulated DEGs between groups. b Venn diagram of the overlap of DEGs between groups. c Heat map for hierarchical cluster analysis of DEGs between samples

Full size image

GO/KEGG enrichment analysis and construction of PPI network

After the DEGs of YQRG in the treatment of CCl4 induced liver fibrosis were obtained, we performed go and KEGG enrichment analysis for up-regulated and down-regulated DEGs respectively. GO enrichment analysis of the upregulated DEGs identified roles in biological processes (regulation of L-kynurenine metabolism and fatty acid oxidation, tryptophan metabolism, and branched-chain amino acid metabolism) (Fig. 5a). Downregulated DEGs were mainly involved in the biological processes involving positive regulation of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, response to topological error protein, response to unfolded protein, regulation of ERS, autophagy, and regulation of the apoptotic signalling pathway (Fig. 5b). KEGG pathway enrichment analysis showed that the upregulated DEGs were associated with the peroxisome, complement, and coagulation cascade; cytochrome P450 metabolism of exogenous substances; and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor signalling (Fig. 5c), whereas the downregulated DEGs were associated with protein processing, MAPK signalling, PI3K/Akt signalling, and tumour necrosis factor signalling in the ER (Fig. 5d). Notably, GO analysis identified biological processes related to YQRG treatment of liver fibrosis were observed to be involved with ERS, apoptosis, and autophagy (Fig. 5e). The identified signal pathways and the related genes of the top 10 KEGG pathways closely related to liver fibrosis were plotted (Fig. 4f). The PPI network visualization were performed with the DEGs in biological processes such as ERS, apoptosis, and autophagy (Fig. 5g). The construction of the PPI network identified 33 target DEGs, as shown in Table 3.

Fig. 5
figure 5

GO, KEGG analysis and PPI network. a and b GO enrichment analysis of 2141 overlapping upregulated DEGs and 2038 overlapping downregulated DEGs, including biological process (BP), cellular component (CC) and molecular function (MF). c and d KEGG enrichment analysis of 2141 overlapping upregulated DEGs and 2038 overlapping downregulatesd DEGs. e Interrelationships between genes involved in ERS, apoptosis, and autophagy. f Top 10 major KEGG signalling pathways chord involved in the anti-fibrosis effect of YQRG. Red indicated upregulated DEGs which all were upregulated in the model group relative to YQRG group. and blue indicated downregulated DEGs which all were downregulated in the model group relative to YQRG group. The closer log2FC is to the side, the greater the gene expression difference multiple. The closer log2FC is to the middle, the smaller the gene expression difference multiple. The KEGG pathway information on the enrichment of the first 10 genes with significant differences is shown below. g Visualization of PPI network by Cytoscape. circular nodes represent the major DEGs of YQRG; the size of the DEGs is directly proportional to their degrees in the network

Full size image
Table 3 The major DEGs and their network degrees
Full size table

YQRG treatment alleviates ERS in vivo

The inhibition of ERS is related to the improvement of liver fibrosis [24]. The formation mechanism of ERS is shown in Fig. 6a. Transcriptome analysis of the GO and KEGG pathways showed that they were enriched in endoplasmic reticulum stress-related genes and pathways. BiP, PERK, ATF6, IRE1, and CHOP are considered to be important markers of ERS [24]. To evaluate the effect of YQRG treatment on ERS, we detected the changes in the expression of ERS-related markers BiP, ATF6, PERK, IRE1, and CHOP by ELISA and qPCR. Consistent with the RNA-seq results, BiP, PERK, ATF6, IRE1, and CHOP protein and mRNA levels in the model group were significantly higher than those in the control group, indicating that CCl4 administration induced ERS. However, YQRG-H treatment reversed these changes, resulting in levels similar to those in controls (Fig. 6b–k), and leading to reductions in ERS. These findings suggested that YQRG-H treatment effectively alleviated ERS.

Fig. 6
figure 6

YQRG regulates ERS. a Mechanisms of ERS. b–f Levels of BiP, ATF6, IRE1, PERK, and CHOP were detected by ELISA in liver tissues (n = 6). g–k mRNA expression of BiP, ATF6, ERN1, PERK, and CHOP were detected by PCR (n = 6). Data values are indicated as mean ± SD. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, vs. control group; #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01, ###P < 0.001, vs. model group

Full size image

YQRG treatment regulates cell apoptosis

Cellular apoptosis promotes the occurrence of liver fibrosis, and this process is very complex (Fig. 7a). We performed TUNEL and α-SMA (a marker for the activation of HSCs [25]) double immunofluorescence staining in liver tissues to evaluate the effect of YQRG treatment on cellular apoptosis. The results showed an increased number of apoptotic cells in the model group relative to the control group along with a significant increase in the expression of α-SMA. However, YQRG-H treatment significantly reduced the number of apoptotic cells and a-SMA expression levels in the model group (Fig. 7b). Next, the expression of apoptosis-related proteins in liver tissue was detected by ELISA and qPCR. CASP12 and BCL-2 are apoptosis-related markers and play an important role in apoptosis [26]. From the ELISA and qPCR analysis, it was observed that, in the CCl4-induced group, the expression of CASP12 increased significantly. In contrast, YQRG-H treatment decreased the expression level of CASP12 (Fig. 7c, d). Similarly, compared with the model group, the expression of BCL-2 in the YQRG-H group increased (Fig. 7e). These results suggested that YQRG-H treatment inhibits apoptosis.

Fig. 7
figure 7

YQRG regulates apoptosis. a Mechanisms of Apoptosis. b TUNEL and α-SMA double immunofluorescence staining in liver tissues (Scale bar = 50 μm, n = 3), green fluorescence indicated the apoptosed cells, red fluorescence represented α-SMA. c Levels of caspase 12 were detected by ELISA in liver tissues (n = 6). d, e mRNA expression of caspase 12 and Bcl2 were detected by qPCR (n = 6). Data values are indicated as mean ± SD. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, vs. control group; #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01, ###P < 0.001, vs. model group

Full size image

YQRG treatment regulates autophagy in vivo

Autophagy is a metabolic process that is closely related to liver fibrosis (Fig. 8a). To determine whether YQRG-H treatment affects autophagy, we evaluated the autophagic flux by double immunofluorescence staining, western blot, and qPCR. LC3-II is a marker for autophagy [27], and double immunofluorescence staining of LC3-II and α-SMA revealed that YQRG-H treatment reduced the fluorescence signals of LC3-II and α-SMA in the model group (Fig. 8b). This result suggested that autophagy activation was closely related to HSCs activation in the model group. Additionally, western blot and qPCR analyses confirmed the increased expression of the LC3-II protein and mRNA in the model group, whereas these levels were decreased following YQRG-H treatment (Fig. 8c–e). ULK1 is also an important indicator that regulates autophagy [28], and qPCR analysis showed that the expression of Ulk1 was significantly lower in the model group than in the control group and the YQRG-H group (Fig. 8f). These results suggested that CCl4 can promote autophagy and that YQRG treatment inhibits this process.

Fig. 8
figure 8

YQRG regulates autophagy. a Mechanisms of autophagy. b Double immunofluorescent staining was performed to determine the colocalization of LC3II (red) and α-SMA (blue) in liver tissues (Scale bar = 50 μm, n = 3). c Western blot image showing LC3I/II expression in liver tissues (n = 6). d Protein concentration analysis (n = 6). e, f mRNA expression of LC3B and ULK1 were detected by qPCR (n = 6). Data values are indicated as mean ± SD. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, vs. control group; #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01, ###P < 0.001, vs. model group

Full size image

Effects of YQRG treatment on cell signalling pathways

To further evaluate the mechanism associated with the YQRG treatment of liver fibrosis, we evaluated the markers related to the pathways identified by KEGG analysis. Western blot analysis of liver tissue samples from the control, model, and YQRG-H groups revealed the expressions of P38, p-P38, AMPK, and p-AMPK, with upregulated levels of p-P38 and downregulated levels of AMPK and p-AMPK observed in the model group compared to the control group. Following the YQRG-H treatment, we observed significantly decreased p-P38 levels and increased AMPK and p-AMPK levels in the YQRG-H compared to the model group (Fig. 9a and b). Moreover, qPCR results were consistent with the results obtained from western blot analysis (Fig. 9c and d). These results suggested that YQRG-H treatment inhibited P38-MAPK signalling and activated AMPK signalling.

Fig. 9
figure 9

Effect of YQRG on the P38 MAPK and AMPK signaling pathways. a Protein expressions of P38、p-P38、AMPK and p-AMPK were determined by Western blot (n = 6). b Protein concentration analysis (n = 6). c, d mRNA expression of P38, AMPK were detected by PCR (n = 6). Data values are indicated as mean ± SD. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01,***P < 0.001, vs. control group; #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01, ###P < 0.001, vs. model group

Full size image

Discussion

Hepatic fibrosis is a repair response to chronic liver injury. Due to the proliferation of myofibroblasts under the action of different stimuli, hepatocytes initiate the production of various chemokines, which promote myofibroblast proliferation in the liver injury area, resulting in the formation of collagen and other fibre components, ECM accumulation, and fibrosis. Liver injury from various causes leads to liver fibrosis, which is potentially followed by cirrhosis and liver cancer. There is currently a lack of therapeutic options for the prevention of hepatic fibrosis, making it necessary to research and actively develop effective drugs. YQRG, a traditional Chinese medicine comprised of eight herbs, is a mixture of compounds. In this study, we identified YQRG compounds by UHPLC-QTOF-MS (Additional file 1), most of which were previously identified as playing a role in improving liver fibrosis (i.e., Paeoniflorin, Bisdemethoxycurcumin, Curcumin, Cryptotanshinone, Gallic acid, Protocatechualdehyde, Rosmarinic acid, Salvianolic acid A) [29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36] (Fig. 1c). This result suggested that most of the sampled compounds may be the components of YQRG which mitigate liver fibrosis.

The liver can be damaged by infection, excessive drinking, or other factors [37], and various liver injuries can promote the expression of fibrogenic mediators and their receptors in response to liver fibrosis [38]. Because CCl4 exerts hepatotoxicity, its administration can seriously damage hepatocytes [39]. Liver injury is reversible upon the removal of the stimuli [40]; therefore, numerous studies have evaluated the mechanisms associated with CCl4-induced liver injury. In this study, we evaluated the effect of YQRG on rat models of CCl4-induced liver injury. The body weight significantly increased (Fig. 2a) and the LW:BW ratio decreased in the YQRG groups and the colchicine group (Fig. 2b). Moreover, we measured the serum ALT and AST levels (Fig. 2c and d) as markers of hepatocyte integrity [41], and observed significantly increased levels of both enzymes in the model group, whereas these levels were restored to levels similar to that in the control group after YQRG treatment. Additionally, H&E staining and TEM analysis (Fig. 2e) revealed evidence of pathological hepatocyte injury in the model group; however, these characteristics were significantly improved following YQRG treatment and colchicine treatment. These results indicated that YQRG treatment effectively reduced CCl4-induced liver injury.

YQRG has been used to clinically treat liver fibrosis efficiently; however, there is currently a lack of experimental data supporting its efficacy. Here, we established a rat model of liver fibrosis to evaluate the efficacy and mechanism of YQRG against liver fibrosis induced by CCl4 [42]. At present, the gold standard for the clinical diagnosis of liver fibrosis is liver biopsy requiring sections of at least six portal triads. According to METAVIR, liver fibrosis, as observed from liver biopsies, is categorized into five groups namely F0 to F4 (F0 = no fibrosis; F1 = portal fibrosis without septa; F2 = portal fibrosis with few septa; F3 = numerous septa without cirrhosis; F4 = cirrhosis) [43]. H&E (Fig. 2e) and Masson staining (Fig. 3a) showed that the structure of hepatic lobules in the control group was normal, the hepatocytes were arranged orderly, and few collagen fibres existed, but within the normal range (METAVIR F0). In the model group, the hepatic lobule structure was damaged, the hepatocytes were arranged disorderly, a large number of collagen fibres were deposited in the portal area, and the collagen fibres were connected to form a fibre septum (METAVIR ≥ F2), indicating that the rats had fibrosis. Although different degrees of collagen fibres in the portal area were observed in the YQRG-treated group and the colchicine group, the number of collagen fibres and the fibre septum decreased (METAVIR F1-F2). This showed that the YQRG-treated group and the colchicine group had significantly reduced fibrosis. Additionally, we evaluated the serum levels of the fibrotic markers HA, LN, PC-III, and IV-C [44]. HYP, an important component of collagen tissue, comprises up to 13% of collagen [45] and represents another marker of liver fibrosis [46]. In the present study, the levels of serum HA, LN, PC-III, IV-C (Fig. 3c), and HYP (Fig. 3d) in liver tissue were significantly higher in the model group than in the control and the YQRG-treatment groups. Moreover, in liver fibrosis, excessive accumulation of ECM is mainly due to HSC activation [8], and we observed significant increases in α-SMA (a marker of HSCs activation [25]) levels, detected by IHC (Fig. 3a), western blot (Fig. 3d) and qPCR (Fig. 3f), in the model group, while this level decreased after YQRG-H treatment. ECM is regulated by TIMPs and MMPs [23], and a previous study has reported that inhibiting HSC activity can reduce TIMPs secretion and increase MMPs activity, thereby promoting ECM degradation [47]. Consistent with these findings, in the present study, we found that YQRG-H treatment significantly reduced Timp1 expression and increased Mmp9 expression in the model group (Fig. 3g and h). These findings suggested that YQRG treatment effectively improved CCl4-induced liver fibrosis in rats by attenuating HSCs activity and inhibiting ECM synthesis.

ER is the largest organelle in HPCs and exerts the functions of participating in protein folding and regulating calcium homeostasis [48, 49]. The stimulation of various factors leads to the destruction of ER, promotes the accumulation of misfolded proteins, and then activates the unfolded protein response (UPR) [50, 51]. ATF6, IRE1, and PERK are transmembrane sensors of UPR [52], and ERS is closely related to the increased expression of the UPR-related genes. For instance, Zhan et al. has reported that microcystin-LR can up-regulate the gene levels of PERK and IRE1 in the liver and the ovary, causing ERS [53]. In this study, the levels of liver ATF6, IRE1, and PERK in ELISA and the qPCR analysis increased after CCl4 treatment (Fig. 6c–e and h–j). Under stress-free conditions, BiP, an important member of the heat shock protein 70 family, binds to members of the UPR. Under ERS, BiP binds to members of the wrong or unfolded proteins and separates from UPR, activates these sensors and their downstream signal cascade through dimerization and autophosphorylation, and promotes the apoptosis regulator CHOP [54]. In our study, the levels of BiP and apoptotic transcription factor CHOP in the liver of rats with hepatic fibrosis were higher than those in the YQRG-H group in the ELISA snalysis (Fig. 6b and f, g and k). The Study has shown that inhibiting ERS can reduce liver fibrosis [55]. In this study, transcriptome analysis showed that ERS inhibition was an important mechanism of the YQRG-mediated reduction of CCl4 induced liver fibrosis (Fig. 5b and d). This is consistent with our experimental data and transcriptome analysis results, suggesting that YQRG treatment reduces CCl4-induced liver fibrosis in rats by inhibiting ERS.

HPCs apoptosis is an inflammatory stimulus that promotes HSCs and plays an important role in liver diseases [56, 57]. We observed a significant increase in TUNEL and α-SMA positive cells in the liver of rats in the CCl4 group (Fig. 7b).Under sustained ERS, pro-apoptotic signals are induced by activating several transcription factors [58, 59]. CHOP is a key transcription factor related to the ERS-mediated activation of HPCs apoptosis [60]. Under continuous ERS, the pro-apoptotic factor CHOP inhibits the downstream anti-apoptotic protein BCL-2. In addition, Ca2+ enters the cytoplasm, m-calpain and procaspase 12 are cleaved and activated, and the caspase cascade induces apoptosis [61]. Apoptosis occurs mainly through endogenous and exogenous apoptosis pathways. In the endogenous apoptosis pathway, mitochondrial cytochrome c is released, caspase 9 and caspase 3 are activated in order. In the exogenous apoptotic pathway, caspase 3 is activated by upstream bound caspase 8 and by fas-associating protein with a novel death domain (FADD). Death receptors such as TNF related apoptosis inducing ligand (TRAIL) bind to FADD to further activate downstream caspase 8 and caspase 3, and caspase 3 is the co-executor of the two pathways [62,63,64,65]. In this study, we demonstrated the expression of CHOP, BCL2, and caspase 12 in fibrotic rats (Figs. 6f and k, 7c–e), which implied that apoptosis occurs during the development of fibrosis. These results, when combined with the significant increase in ERS related indexes in the model group, suggested that CCl4 may induce apoptosis by activating ERS.

Autophagy is a metabolic process in which autophagosomes formed by cell membranes phagocytize organelles and cell fragments for subsequent lysosomal degradation [66]. Studies have shown that ERS-mediated autophagy in HSCs promotes the occurrence of liver fibrosis. For instance, Men R et al. reported that after NOGO-B gene knockout, the levels of ERS and autophagy markers were down-regulated and the autophagy level could be regulated by ERS agonists and antagonists. This study results showed that inhibiting ERS could reduce the autophagy of HSCs [67]. Furthermore, overexpression of Ulk1 kinase-dead mutant can inhibit autophagy [28], and LC3-II acts as an autophagy marker [27]. Consistently, we found that prolonged exposure to CCl4 had an impact on the expression of two key autophagy genes (LC3B and ULK1). In the present study, the number of LC3-II and α-SMA positive cells increased significantly (Fig. 8b), indicating that the increased autophagy in the liver fibrosis model is related to HSCs activation. The protein and mRNA levels of LC3II increased in the model group and the mRNA expression of Ulk1 decreased in the model group (Fig. 8c–f). These results suggested that YQRG improves liver fibrosis by inhibiting autophagy.

Pathway analysis suggested that YQRG treatment altered the MAPK and the AMPK signalling pathways. P38 MAPK plays an important role in regulating inflammation, apoptosis, and liver fibrosis [68, 69], and a previous study has reported that ERS activates P38 MAPK signalling [70]. Additionally, ERS-mediated IRE1/P38 MAPK signalling promotes the activation of HSCs in rats [71]. In the present study, we found that YQRG treatment inhibited P38 MAPK signalling (Fig. 9a and d) along with the expression of ERS-related markers, suggesting that YQRG might alleviate liver fibrosis by inhibiting ERS through regulation of P38 MAPK signalling. Moreover, P38 MAPK promotes apoptosis [72] and is associated with autophagy induction. AMPK is an energy sensor that plays an important role in maintaining energy homeostasis [73]. A previous study showed that AMPK exerts an anti-apoptotic effect and can inhibit HPCs apoptosis [74]. Additionally, AMPK activation inhibited autophagy in an HSC line (lx-2) [31]. In the present study, YQRG treatment promotes AMPK signalling (Fig. 9a and d). Moreover, the observed regulation of apoptosis by YQRG suggested that the activation of the AMPK pathway might inhibit apoptosis and autophagy, thereby alleviating the progression of liver fibrosis. However, the precise role of YQRG as a therapeutic agent for liver fibrosis requires further investigation.

Conclusion

In conclusion, as inferred from transcriptome analysis and experimental verification, YQRG can inhibit CCl4-induced liver fibrosis through a variety of mechanisms. This study showed that YQRG improved liver pathological injury and function, inhibited HSC activity, and reduced ECM accumulation in rats with liver fibrosis. The anti-liver fibrosis effect of YQRG might be related to the inhibition of ERS, apoptosis, and autophagy and the regulation of P38 MAPK and AMPK pathways.

Availability of data and materials

I have uploaded the original sequential data in public database of SRA under accession number PRJNA781107.

Abbreviations

α-SMA:

α-Smooth muscle actin

ALT:

Alanine aminotransferase

AMPK:

AMP-activated protein kinase

AST:

Aspartate aminotransferase

ATF6:

Activated transcription factor 6

BCL-2:

B-cell lymphoma 2

BiP:

Immunoglobin-binding protein

BP:

Biological process

BSA:

Bovine serum albumin

CASP12:

Caspase 12

CC:

Cellular component

CCl4 :

Carbon tetrachloride

CHOP:

C/EBP homologous protein

DAPI:

4′,6-Diamino-2-phenylindole

DEG:

Differentially-expressed gene

ECM:

Extracellular matrix

ELISA:

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

ERS:

Endoplasmic reticulum stress

FADD:

Fas-associating protein with a novel death domain

GO:

Gene Ontology

H&E:

Haematoxylin and eosin

HA:

Hemagglutinin

HPCs:

Hepatic parenchymal cells

HSCs:

Hepatic stellate cells

HYP:

Hydroxyproline

IFC:

Immunofluorescence

IHC:

Immunohistochemistry

i.p.:

Intraperitoneal

IRE1:

Inositolase 1

IV-C:

Type IV collagen

KEGG:

Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes

LN:

Laminin

LC:

Light chain

LW:BW:

Liver-to-body weight ratio

MAPK:

Mitogen-activated protein kinase

MF:

Molecular function

MMP9:

Matrix metalloproteinase 9

PBS:

Phosphate-buffered saline

PC-III:

Procollagen III

PERK:

Protein kinase R-like ER kinase

PI3K/AKT:

Phosphoinositide 3-kinase/Akt

PPAR:

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors

PPI:

Protein–protein interaction

qPCR:

Quantitative PCR

RNA-seq:

RNA sequencing

TBST:

Tris-buffered saline with Tween-20

TEM:

Transmission electron microscopy

TIMP1:

Tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 1

TRAIL:

TNF related apoptosis inducing ligand

TUNEL:

Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labelling

UHPLC- QTOF-MS:

Ultra-high performance liquid chromatography with quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry

ULK1:

Unc-51-like autophagy-activating kinase 1

UPR:

Unfolded protein response

YQRG:

Yiqi Rougan decoction

References

  1. Elpek GÖ. Cellular and molecular mechanisms in the pathogenesis of liver fibrosis: an update. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20(23):7260–76.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Campana L, Iredale JP. Regression of liver fibrosis. Semin Liver Dis. 2017;37(1):1–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bataller R, Brenner DA. Liver fibrosis. J Clin Invest. 2005;115(2):209–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Asrani SK, Devarbhavi H, Eaton J, Kamath PS. Burden of liver diseases in the world. J Hepatol. 2019;70(1):151–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Harris R, Harman DJ, Card TR, Aithal GP, Guha IN. Prevalence of clinically significant liver disease within the general population, as defined by non-invasive markers of liver fibrosis: a systematic review. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;2(4):288–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Caballería L, Pera G, Arteaga I, et al. High prevalence of liver fibrosis among European adults with unknown liver disease: a population-based study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;16(7):1138-1145.e5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dong S, Su SB. Advances in mesenchymal stem cells combined with traditional Chinese medicine therapy for liver fibrosis. J Integr Med. 2014;12(3):147–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Iwaisako K, Jiang C, Zhang M, et al. Origin of myofibroblasts in the fibrotic liver in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111(32):E3297–305.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Mederacke I, Hsu CC, Troeger JS, et al. Fate tracing reveals hepatic stellate cells as dominant contributors to liver fibrosis independent of its aetiology. Nat Commun. 2013;4:2823.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Reeves HL, Friedman SL. Activation of hepatic stellate cells—a key issue in liver fibrosis. Front Biosci. 2002;7:d808–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Walter P, Ron D. The unfolded protein response: from stress pathway to homeostatic regulation. Science. 2011;334(6059):1081–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Li X, Wang Y, Wang H, Huang C, Huang Y, Li J. Endoplasmic reticulum stress is the crossroads of autophagy, inflammation, and apoptosis signaling pathways and participates in liver fibrosis. Inflamm Res. 2015;64(1):1–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Malhi H, Kaufman RJ. Endoplasmic reticulum stress in liver disease. J Hepatol. 2011;54(4):795–809.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Seki E, Schwabe RF. Hepatic inflammation and fibrosis: functional links and key pathways. Hepatology. 2015;61(3):1066–79.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Brenner C, Galluzzi L, Kepp O, Kroemer G. Decoding cell death signals in liver inflammation. J Hepatol. 2013;59(3):583–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lee BH, Hsu WH, Hsu YW, Pan TM. Suppression of dimerumic acid on hepatic fibrosis caused from carboxymethyl-lysine (CML) by attenuating oxidative stress depends on Nrf2 activation in hepatic stellate cells (HSCs). Food Chem Toxicol. 2013;62:413–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hernández-Gea V, Friedman SL. Autophagy fuels tissue fibrogenesis. Autophagy. 2012;8(5):849–50.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Parzych KR, Klionsky DJ. An overview of autophagy: morphology, mechanism, and regulation. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2014;20(3):460–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhao CQ, Zhou Y, Ping J, Xu LM. Traditional Chinese medicine for treatment of liver diseases: progress, challenges and opportunities. J Integr Med. 2014;12(5):401–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Wang Z, Gerstein M, Snyder M. RNA-Seq: a revolutionary tool for transcriptomics. Nat Rev Genet. 2009;10(1):57–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Chen X, Long L, Cheng Y, et al. Qingda granule attenuates cardiac fibrosis via suppression of the TGF-β1/Smad2/3 signaling pathway in vitro and in vivo. Biomed Pharmacother. 2021;137:111318.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhou Y, Wu R, Cai FF, et al. Xiaoyaosan decoction alleviated rat liver fibrosis via the TGFβ/Smad and Akt/FoxO3 signaling pathways based on network pharmacology analysis. J Ethnopharmacol. 2021;264:113021.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Tsuchida T, Friedman SL. Mechanisms of hepatic stellate cell activation. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;14(7):397–411.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Xia SW, Wang ZM, Sun SM, et al. Endoplasmic reticulum stress and protein degradation in chronic liver disease. Pharmacol Res. 2020;161:105218.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Puche JE, Saiman Y, Friedman SL. Hepatic stellate cells and liver fibrosis. Compr Physiol. 2013;3(4):1473–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Paridaens A, Raevens S, Devisscher L, et al. Modulation of the unfolded protein response by tauroursodeoxycholic acid counteracts apoptotic cell death and fibrosis in a mouse model for secondary biliary liver fibrosis. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18(1):214.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Ichimura Y, Kirisako T, Takao T, et al. A ubiquitin-like system mediates protein lipidation. Nature. 2000;408(6811):488–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Jung CH, Jun CB, Ro SH, et al. ULK-Atg13-FIP200 complexes mediate mTOR signaling to the autophagy machinery. Mol Biol Cell. 2009;20(7):1992–2003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Ma X, Zhang W, Jiang Y, Wen J, Wei S, Zhao Y. Paeoniflorin, a natural product with multiple targets in liver diseases-A mini review. Front Pharmacol. 2020;11:531.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Lee PJ, Woo SJ, Jee JG, Sung SH, Kim HP. Bisdemethoxycurcumin Induces apoptosis in activated hepatic stellate cells via cannabinoid receptor 2. Molecules. 2015;20(1):1277–92.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Kong D, Zhang Z, Chen L, et al. Curcumin blunts epithelial-mesenchymal transition of hepatocytes to alleviate hepatic fibrosis through regulating oxidative stress and autophagy. Redox Biol. 2020;36:101600.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Nagappan A, Kim JH, Jung DY, Jung MH. Cryptotanshinone from the Salvia miltiorrhiza bunge attenuates ethanol-induced liver injury by activation of AMPK/SIRT1 and Nrf2 signaling pathways. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;21(1):265.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Chen Y, Zhou Z, Mo Q, Zhou G, Wang Y. Gallic acid attenuates dimethylnitrosamine-induced liver fibrosis by alteration of Smad phosphoisoform signaling in rats. BioMed Res Int. 2018;2018:1682743.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Lv T, Yao XX. Comparison of protocatechuic aldchyde in Radix Salvia miltiorrhiza and corresponding pharmacological sera from normal and fibrotic rats by high performance liquid chromatography. World J Gastroenterol. 2006;12(14):2195–200.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Li GS, Jiang WL, Tian JW, Qu GW, Zhu HB, Fu FH. In vitro and in vivo antifibrotic effects of rosmarinic acid on experimental liver fibrosis. Phytomed. 2010;17(3–4):282–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Zhu J, Wang R, Xu T, et al. Salvianolic acid A attenuates endoplasmic reticulum stress and protects against cholestasis-induced liver fibrosis via the SIRT1/HSF1 pathway. Front Pharmacol. 2018;9:1277.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Rutherford A, Chung RT. Acute liver failure: mechanisms of hepatocyte injury and regeneration. Semin Liver Dis. 2008;28(2):167–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Toosi AE. Liver fibrosis: causes and methods of assessment. A review. Rom J Intern Med. 2015;53(4):304–14.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Kanta J, Dooley S, Delvoux B, Breuer S, D’Amico T, Gressner AM. Tropoelastin expression is up-regulated during activation of hepatic stellate cells and in the livers of CCl(4)-cirrhotic rats. Liver. 2002;22(3):220–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Atta HM. Reversibility and heritability of liver fibrosis: implications for research and therapy. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21(17):5138–48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Fallatah HI, Akbar HO, Fallatah AM. Fibroscan compared to FIB-4, Apri, and AST/ALT ratio for assessment of liver fibrosis in Saudi patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepat Mon. 2016;16(7):e38346.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Abdel-Moneim AM, Al-Kahtani MA, El-Kersh MA, Al-Omair MA. Free radical-scavenging, anti-inflammatory/anti-fibrotic and hepatoprotective actions of taurine and silymarin against CCl4 induced rat liver damage. PLOS ONE. 2015;10(12):e0144509.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Konerman MA, Mehta SH, Sutcliffe CG, et al. Fibrosis progression in human immunodeficiency virus/hepatitis C virus coinfected adults: prospective analysis of 435 liver biopsy pairs. Hepatology. 2014;59(3):767–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Neuman MG, Cohen LB, Nanau RM. Hyaluronic acid as a non-invasive biomarker of liver fibrosis. Clin Biochem. 2016;49(3):302–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Kim YO, Popov Y, Schuppan D. Optimized mouse models for liver fibrosis. Methods Mol Biol. 2017;1559:279–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. García L, Hernández I, Sandoval A, et al. Pirfenidone effectively reverses experimental liver fibrosis. J Hepatol. 2002;37(6):797–805.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Hemmann S, Graf J, Roderfeld M, Roeb E. Expression of MMPs and TIMPs in liver fibrosis-a systematic review with special emphasis on anti-fibrotic strategies. J Hepatol. 2007;46(5):955–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Bravo R, Parra V, Gatica D, et al. Endoplasmic reticulum and the unfolded protein response: dynamics and metabolic integration. Int Rev Cell Mol Biol. 2013;301:215–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Sovolyova N, Healy S, Samali A, Logue SE. Stressed to death-mechanisms of ER stress-induced cell death. Biol Chem. 2014;395(1):1–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Hager L, Li L, Pun H, et al. Lecithin:cholesterol acyltransferase deficiency protects against cholesterol-induced hepatic endoplasmic reticulum stress in mice. J Biol Chem. 2012;287(24):20755–68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Hollien J. Evolution of the unfolded protein response. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2013;1833(11):2458–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Frakes AE, Dillin A. The UPRER: sensor and coordinator of organismal homeostasis. Mol Cell. 2017;66(6):761–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Zhan C, Liu W, Zhang F, Zhang X. Microcystin-LR triggers different endoplasmic reticulum stress pathways in the liver, ovary, and offspring of zebrafish (Danio rerio). J Hazard Mater. 2020;386:121939.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Behnke J, Feige MJ, Hendershot LM. BiP and its nucleotide exchange factors Grp170 and Sil1: mechanisms of action and biological functions. J Mol Biol. 2015;427(7):1589–608.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Loeuillard E, El Mourabit H, Lei L, Lemoinne S, Housset C, Cadoret A. Endoplasmic reticulum stress induces inverse regulations of major functions in portal myofibroblasts during liver fibrosis progression. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis. 2018;1864(12):3688–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Liu C, Wang G, Chen G, et al. Huangqi decoction inhibits apoptosis and fibrosis, but promotes Kupffer cell activation in dimethylnitrosamine-induced rat liver fibrosis. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2012;12:51.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Friedman SL. Mechanisms of hepatic fibrogenesis. Gastroenterology. 2008;134(6):1655–69.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Morishima N, Nakanishi K, Takenouchi H, Shibata T, Yasuhiko Y. An endoplasmic reticulum stress-specific caspase cascade in apoptosis Cytochrome c-independent activation of caspase-9 by caspase-12. J Biol Chem. 2002;277(37):34287–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Xie Q, Khaoustov VI, Chung CC, et al. Effect of tauroursodeoxycholic acid on endoplasmic reticulum stress-induced caspase-12 activation. Hepatology. 2002;36(3):592–601.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Oyadomari S, Mori M. Roles of CHOP/GADD153 in endoplasmic reticulum stress. Cell Death Differ. 2004;11(4):381–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Wu J, Kaufman RJ. From acute ER stress to physiological roles of the Unfolded Protein Response. Cell Death Differ. 2006;13(3):374–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Liu Y, Yao W, Xu J, et al. The anti-inflammatory effects of acetaminophen and N-acetylcysteine through suppression of the NLRP3 inflammasome pathway in LPS-challenged piglet mononuclear phagocytes. Innate Immun. 2015;21(6):587–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Oh SH, Yun KJ, Nan JX, Sohn DH, Lee BH. Changes in expression and immunolocalization of protein associated with toxic bile salts-induced apoptosis in rat hepatocytes. Arch Toxicol. 2003;77(2):110–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Demirbilek S, Tas E, Gurunluoglu K, et al. Fluvastatin reduced liver injury in rat model of extrahepatic cholestasis. Pediatr Surg Int. 2007;23(2):155–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Yang H, Li TW, Ko KS, Xia M, Lu SC. Switch from Mnt-Max to Myc-Max induces p53 and cyclin D1 expression and apoptosis during cholestasis in mouse and human hepatocytes. Hepatology. 2009;49(3):860–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Dikic I, Elazar Z. Mechanism and medical implications of mammalian autophagy. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2018;19(6):349–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Men R, Wen M, Dan X, et al. Nogo-B: A potential indicator for hepatic cirrhosis and regulator in hepatic stellate cell activation. Hepatol Res. 2015;45(1):113–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Debacq-Chainiaux F, Boilan E, Moutier J, Weemaels G, Toussaint O. p38(MAPK) in the senescence of human and murine fibroblasts. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2010;694:126–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Zhang YP, Yao XX, Zhao X. Interleukin-1 beta up-regulates tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinase-1 mRNA and phosphorylation of c-jun N-terminal kinase and p38 in hepatic stellate cells. World J Gastroenterol. 2006;12(9):1392–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. Hung JH, Su IJ, Lei HY, et al. Endoplasmic reticulum stress stimulates the expression of cyclooxygenase-2 through activation of NF-kappaB and pp38 mitogen-activated protein kinase. J Biol Chem. 2004;279(45):46384–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Hernández-Gea V, Hilscher M, Rozenfeld R, et al. Endoplasmic reticulum stress induces fibrogenic activity in hepatic stellate cells through autophagy. J Hepatol. 2013;59(1):98–104.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. Huang HL, Hsieh MJ, Chien MH, Chen HY, Yang SF, Hsiao PC. Glabridin mediate caspases activation and induces apoptosis through JNK1/2 and p38 MAPK pathway in human promyelocytic leukemia cells. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(6):e98943.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. Hardie DG. AMP-activated protein kinase: an energy sensor that regulates all aspects of cell function. Genes Dev. 2011;25(18):1895–908.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. Xie X, Xu X, Sun C, Yu Z. Protective effects of cilostazol on ethanol-induced damage in primary cultured hepatocytes. Cell Stress Chaperones. 2018;23(2):203–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the National Natural Science Foundation of China for the financial support. We would like to thank Editage (www.editage.cn) for English language editing.

Funding

This research was supported by the National NaturalScience Foundation of China (No. 81573860). The funding body did not participate in the design of the study, collection, analysis, interpretation of data, or in writing the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chongqing Medical University, No. 1 Medical College Road, Yuzhong District, Chongqing, 400016, China

    Yu Xiong, Jinyuan Hu, Chen Xuan, Jiayu Tian, Kaiyue Tan, Zhiwei Chen, Yan Luo, Xuqin Du, Junxiong Cheng, Lanyue Zhang & Wenfu Cao

  2. Chongqing Key Laboratory of Traditional Chinese Medicine for Prevention and Cure of Metabolic Diseases, Chongqing, 400016, China

    Yu Xiong, Jinyuan Hu, Chen Xuan, Jiayu Tian, Kaiyue Tan, Zhiwei Chen, Yan Luo, Xuqin Du, Junxiong Cheng, Lanyue Zhang & Wenfu Cao

  3. Department of Combination of Chinese and Western Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400016, China

    Wenfu Cao

  4. Department of Kidney Disease, Chongqing Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Chongqing, 400021, China

    Yan Luo

Authors
  1. Yu Xiong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jinyuan Hu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Chen Xuan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jiayu Tian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Kaiyue Tan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Zhiwei Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Yan Luo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Xuqin Du
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Junxiong Cheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Lanyue Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Wenfu Cao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

YX and W-FC conceived and designed this research. YX performed experiments, data analysis, and wrote the manuscript. J-YH, J-YT, and CX assisted in the experiments and provided data. K-YT, YL, J-XC, and L-YZ assisted in data analysis. Z-YC and X-QD revised the manuscript, and W-FC supervised the experiments. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wenfu Cao.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent for participate

The animal study was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of Chongqing Medical University (2021034).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

Detailed information of YQRG-compounds were obtained by MS/MS.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xiong, Y., Hu, J., Xuan, C. et al. Transcriptome analysis reveals the molecular mechanism of Yiqi Rougan decoction in reducing CCl4-induced liver fibrosis in rats. Chin Med 16, 142 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13020-021-00552-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13020-021-00552-w

Keywords

Chinese Medicine

ISSN: 1749-8546

Contact us