Development and validation of molecular markers for characterization of Boehmeria nivea var. nivea and Boehmeria nivea var. tenacissima

Abstract

Background

The root of Boehmeria spp (ramie) is a hepatoprotective Chinese herbal medicine. Medicinal properties vary between Boehmeria nivea var. nivea and Boehmeria nivea var. tenacissima, which are local species found in Taiwan. As commercial preparations may use either species, there is a need for a rapid and simple assay to identify variants for quality control.

Methods

Four methods were developed and tested for their applicability in differentiating the two species. These methods were random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD); sequence characterized amplified regions (SCAR); single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) and cleaved amplified polymorphic sequences (CAPS).

Results

Three RAPD markers were developed that produced unique bands in B. nivea var. tenacissima and B. nivea var. nivea. Based on sequenced RAPD bands, one SCAR marker was developed that produced a single DNA band in B. nivea var. nivea. Two SNP markers differentiated between B. nivea var. nivea and B. nivea var. tenacissima based on single nucleotide substitutions. A pair of CAPS oligonucleotides was developed by amplifying a 0.55-kb DNA fragment that exhibited species-specific digestion patterns with restriction enzymes Alf III and Nde I. Consistent results were obtained with all the four markers on all tested Boehmeria lines.

Conclusion

The present study demonstrates the use of the RAPD, SCAR, SNP and CAPS markers for rapid identification of two closely related Boehmeria species.

Background

The root of Boehmeria species (Urticaceae), namely Boehmeria nivea var. nivea is a hepatoprotective Chinese herbal medicine [1] as well as an antioxidant and anti-inflammatory agent [2]. Sancheti and colleagues have reported its glycosidase and cholinesterase inhibition properties as an anti-diabetic herb to lower blood glucose and cholesterol levels [3]. Compared to B. nivea var. nivea, B. nivea var. tenacissima is more hepatoprotective on hepatitis B-induced liver damage [4]. As commercial preparations may consist of one or the other variants, there is a need for rapid and simple assays to identify variants for the purpose of both commercial production and quality control. Whereas today's methods rely primarily on morphological observations, molecular genetics are a more precise tool, less susceptible to user bias.

Based on four molecular approaches, namely random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD), sequence characterized amplified region (SCAR), single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) and cleaved amplified polymorphic sequence (CAPS), we developed and evaluated a set of authentication techniques for the Boehmeria species and help conserve Chinese medicinal plants in Taiwan.

RAPD is a modified polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique involving multiple oligonucleotide primers. The resulting amplified DNA markers are random polymorphic segments with band sizes from 100 to 3000 bp depending upon the genomic DNA and the primer. SCARs are DNA fragments amplified by using specific 15-30 bp primers, designed from nucleotide sequences established in cloned RAPD fragments. By using longer PCR primers, SCARs have a higher rate of reproducibility than RAPDs. SNP analysis is more specific still but requires sequencing to identify the different nucleotides.

CAPS polymorphisms are differences in restriction fragment lengths caused by SNPs that create or abolish restriction endonuclease recognition sites in PCR amplicons. All of these markers are locus-specific with a wide range of applicability in gene mapping and marker-assisted selection [5–7]. This article describes the main results of the study.

Methods

Plant materials

Eight lines of B. nivea var. nivea and B. nivea var. tenacissima were collected from various locations of Taiwan and identified by one of the authors (TST), based on the criteria that B. nivea var. nivea has a white-grey color with obvious pubescence in their ventral leaf surface and B. nivea var. tenacissima has a light green-grey color [8]. Four collections, namely CY1 (Chi-Yi-1), CY2 (Chi-Yi-2), CY3 (Chi-Yi-3) and HCn (Hsin-Chu-n) belong to B. nivea var. tenacissima and the other four, namely HCd (Hsin-Chu-d), TC (Tai-Chung), CY (Chi-Yi) and TARI (Taiwan Agricultural Research Institute) are local variants of B. nivea var. nivea.

DNA extraction was performed according to the method described by Arasl et al.[9]. Briefly, 100 mg fresh leaves were ground in liquid nitrogen and transferred to tubes containing 5 mL CTAB/PVPP extraction buffer which consisted of 0.1 M Tris HCl, 1 M NaCl, 20 mM EDTA, 1% hexadecyl trimethylammonium bromide (CTAB; w/vol) and 1% polyvinylpolypyrrolidone (PVPP; w/vol). The mixture was incubated at 65°C for 20 minutes and extracted with an equal volume of chloroform/isoamylalcohol (24:1). After centrifugation (8,000×g, Sigma 3-18 K, Germany) for 5 minutes, the supernatant was transferred to a clean tube and precipitated with two volumes of precipitation buffer (50 mM Tris HCl, 4 mM NaCl, 10 mM EDTA and 1% CATB) at 10, 000×g for 20 minutes. The pellet was re-suspended in 350 μL 1.2 M NaCl and incubated with 10 mg/mL RNase at 37°C for 30 minutes. After extraction with an equal volume of chloroform/isoamylalcohol (24:1), the DNA pellet was re-precipitated with ice-cold isopropanol, washed with 70% ethanol, vacuum dried and dissolved in 200 μL TE buffer.

RAPD

RAPD reactions [10] were carried out in a final volume of 25 μL containing 1 unit Taq DNA polymerase, 100 μM dNTP mixture, 10 mM Tris HCl, 1.5 mM MgCl₂, 1.0 μM primer and 10-20 ng template DNA. Amplification was performed in a PCR machine (Thermocycler 2100, PerkinElmer, USA) at 94°C for two minutes followed by 40 cycles of 30 seconds at 94°C, 40 seconds at 36°C, 45 seconds at 72°C and a final stage of five minutes at 72°C. The amplification products were maintained at 4°C and resolved in 1.5% agarose gel followed by ethidium bromide staining and visualization with UV light for photography. The amplified DNA fragments, RP-S343-1.1, RP-S343-0.9 and RP-S62-0.6 were used for oligonucleotide design (Table 1). To avoid sequences that would produce internal secondary structures, we checked primers with Oligo 6 software (National Sciences, USA)

Table 1 Primers used for marker analysis

SCAR

Three pairs of oligonucleotides were used in the SCAR assays [11], namely forward oligonucleotide SR-S343-F1 and the three reverse oligonucleotides SR-S343-R1, SR-S343-R2 and SR-S343-R3 (Table 1). The SCAR reaction was performed with an initial denaturation step at 95°C for five minutes, followed by 35 cycles of 94°C for two minutes, 60°C for one minute, 72°C for one minute and a 10-minute final extension at 72°C.

PCR fragments were cloned with TA cloning technology using pGEM-T-Easy vectors (Promega, USA) and used to transform the Escherichia coli strain XL-2 Blue (Stratagene, USA). DNA sequence analysis was carried out with the BLAST sequence analysis programs at the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) [12]. Alignments were edited with the online ClustalW program from DNA Data Bank of Japan [13].

SNP

A sequence from a RAPD DNA fragment, namely RP-S62-0.6, was chosen for SNP detection. The procedures were performed according to the manufacturer's instructions [14] with one modification, i.e. the mixture solution was diluted 1:8 with magnesium buffer (400 mM Tris pH 9 and 10 mM MgCl₂). Each reaction contained 0.5 μL of the SNaPshot™ Multiplex Ready Reaction Mix (Applied Biosystems, USA), 2.0 μL of PCR product, 1.0 μL of extension primers and water up to 10 μL. Thermal cycling and post-extension were run on an ABI Prism 3100 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, USA).

CAPS

CAPS analyses were performed according to published methods [15]. The RP-S62-0.6 DNA fragment was amplified from the eight Boehmeria lines with primers CP-S62-f and CP-S62-r. DNA fragments were digested with restriction enzymes (i.e. Afl III, Bsr FI, Msp I, Drd I and Nde I) and separated on a 1.5% agarose gel for polymorphism detection.

Quality control

A mixture of DNA was used to identify the basis of all the markers for quality control. Samples contained DNA from both B. nivea var. nivea and B. nivea var. tenacissima in the ratios of 9:1, 8:2, 7:3, 6:4, 5:5, 4:6, 3:7, 2:8 and 1:9 respectively.

Results and Discussion

RAPD markers for quick screening

Out of a set of 100 RAPD primers, two primers, namely S343 and S62, produced clear reproducible unique patterns easily distinguishable from one another (Figure 1A and Figure 1B) and were selected for further investigation. The RAPD marker S343 produced two polymorphic bands of 1.1 kb and 0.9 kb unique to the B. nivea var. nivea and B. nivea var. tenacissima species, respectively, while the S62 RAPD marker produced one polymorphic band of 0.6 kb in B. nivea var. tenacissima but none in B. nivea var. nivea. The unique bands were amplified, cloned and sequenced. No significantly related genes were found in the GenBank database.

Figure 1

RAPD fingerprint patterns generated with primer S343 and S62. A RAPD profile generated with primer S343. The unique banding patterns are indicated by arrows. Representative samples of both species are shown on the top of lanes. The numbers on the left indicate the size of DNA standards. M: DNA markers. B RAPD profile generated with primer S62.

RAPD analysis is fast and economical [16] as long as suitable primers are available. In the present study, only two primers out of 100 species-specific patterns were easily visualized in electrophoresis.

Conversion of RAPD into SCAR and SNP

The SCAR reaction generated a unique band with B. nivea var. nivea DNA but no unique band with B. nivea var. tenacissima (Figure 2). SCAR analysis with primers developed from cloned variant-specific RAPD bands is highly specific. We identified three SCAR profiles with single bands easily visualized on agarose gels (Figure 2). As SCAR primers are sequence-specific, this method is less complex and more sensitive than RAPD. SCAR appears to be the method of choice for the characterization of mixtures of both Boehmeria variants in commercial herbal preparations.

Figure 2

SCAR band patterns of B. nivea var. tenacissima and B. nivea var. nivea. SCAR profiles of Boehmeria DNA fragments generated with primers SR-S343-F1, SR-S343-R1, SR-S343-R2 and SR-S343-R3. Representative samples of both species are shown on the top of lanes. The numbers on the left indicate the size of DNA standards. M: DNA markers; NC: negative control.

The 0.6-kb RAPD fragment that generated from primer S62 was sequenced to identify species-specific SNPs. By using the SNaPshot as identification tools, the primers Sn-S62-f and Sn-S62-r indicated single nucleotide replacements of guanine to adenine and cytosine to guanine in B. nivea var. nivea and B. nivea var. tenacissima, respectively (Figure 3).

Figure 3

Electropherogram of SNP markers for polymorphisms between B. nivea var. tenacissima and B. nivea var. nivea. The primer-extension reactions were performed by SNapshot with primers SNP-S62-a and SNP-S62-b, respectively. Polymorphisms between B. nivea var. tenacissima and B. nivea var. nivea are demonstrated by peaks with different colors (A = green, C = black and G = blue) at known locations. Orange peaks indicate positions of the LIS internal size standard (GeneScanTM-120).

Only a fraction of the recommended SNaPshot mixtures was used in this study because the quality of SNP detection can be maintained using only one eighth of the recommended amounts of the reagents.

Conversion of SNP sites into CAPS

Sequence analysis of the S62-amplified fragments revealed several point mutations between the two Boehmeria species. Two of these mutation sites were selected for the CAPS assay, providing a total amount of five possible altered restriction enzyme sites (i.e. Afl III, Bsr FI, Msp I, Drd I and Nde I) between B. nivea var. nivea and B. nivea var. tenacissima (Figure 4). The modification of the sequencing protocol did not reduce the accuracy of the sequencing reaction required to identify species-specific SNPs. By digestion of the 0.55 kb RAPD fragments, i.e. Ca-Afl-0.55 and Ca-Nde-0.55 that amplified from the S62 primer and cut with Afl III and Nde I, we produced DNA fragments with predicted sizes of 0.30 kb and 0.25 kb for CAPS markers Ca-Afl-0.30 and Ca-Afl-0.25, and 0.35 kb and 0.20 kb for CAPS markers Ca-Drd-0.35 and Ca-Drd-0.20 that could be easily visualized. The species-specific patterns of CAPS markers digested with restriction enzyme Afl III and Nde I are shown in Figure 5. The CAPS markers clearly distinguished between the two Boehmeria species.

Figure 4

Primer design for CAPS markers. A 0.55-kb fragment was amplified from the eight Boehmeria lines with primers CP-S62-f (5'-CTGAGGCGGGAGCTAGGATTTCAACTAA-3') and CP-S62-r (5'-GGGGGAAGTAGTGCAGCACATGAATATA-3'). For the CAPS analysis, the restriction enzymes that generate polymorphic patterns were found by the dCAPS Finder 2.0 software (http://helix.wustl.edu/dcaps/dcaps.html). Five restriction enzymes (i.e. Afl III, Bsr FI, Msp I, Drd I and Nde) were used.

Figure 5

Fragments of CAPs markers digested with Afl III and Nde I. A CAPS profile generated by digestion with restriction enzyme Afl III. Representative samples of each Boehmeria lines are shown on top of the lanes. The numbers on the left indicate the size of DNA standards. M: DNA markers. B CAPS profile generated by digestion with restriction enzyme Nde I.

Potential applications in quality control

To test the applicability of the markers, we selected CAPS analysis to trace the identification of components in preparations containing mixtures of DNA from both Boehmeria species. The results (Figure 6) indicated a shift in the electrophoretic patterns corresponding to the increasing and decreasing amounts of DNA from either species. The results confirmed the association of the Ca-Drd-0.55, Ca-Afl-0.30 and Ca-Afl-0.25 markers to B. nivea var. nivea and the Ca-Afl-0.55, Ca-Drd-0.35 and Ca-Drd-0.20 CAPS markers to B. nivea var. tenacissima.

Figure 6

Quality control of admixed DNA samples. A Quality test of CAPS markers. Digestion pattern with restriction enzyme Afl III of the CAPS profile generated by admixed DNA samples from both B. nivea var. tenacissima (CY1) and B. nivea var. nivea (HCd) in the ratios of 9:1, 8:2, 7:3, 6:4, 5:5, 4:6, 3:7, 2:8 and 1:9. Representative samples of the DNA ratio between B. nivea var. tenacissima (CY1) and B. nivea var. nivea (HCd) were shown on top of the lanes. M: DNA markers. B Quality control of CAPS markers generated from restriction enzyme digestion with DNA samples from both B. nivea var. nivea (HCd) and B. nivea var. tenacissima (CY1) in the ratios of 9:1, 8:2, 7:3, 6:4, 5:5, 4:6, 3:7, 2:8 and 1:9. The digestion was performed with restriction enzyme Drd I.

Based on known SNPs, CAPS is a suitable strategy for the analysis of mixed samples. The present study identified the Boehmeria species in a sample and characterized the relative amounts of one species vs. another in a single sample. While CAPS may be used as a rapid analysis kit for Boehmeria-based preparation compared with the time-consuming RFLP analysis, however it is rather laborious and requires the use of restriction enzymes.

Conclusion

The present study demonstrates the usefulness of the RAPD, SCAR, SNP and CAPS markers for rapid identification of variants between two closely related Boehmeria species. In particular, CAPS would be a suitable strategy for the analysis of mixed samples.