Open Access

Identifying roles of “Jun-Chen-Zuo-Shi” component herbs of QiShenYiQi formula in treating acute myocardial ischemia by network pharmacology

  • Leihong Wu1,
  • Yi Wang1,
  • Zheng Li2,
  • Boli Zhang2,
  • Yiyu Cheng1 and
  • Xiaohui Fan1Email author
Chinese Medicine20149:24

https://doi.org/10.1186/1749-8546-9-24

Received: 21 February 2014

Accepted: 15 September 2014

Published: 16 September 2014

Abstract

Background

The role of “Jun-Chen-Zuo-Shi” (also known as “sovereign-minister-assistant-courier”) component herbs of Chinese medicine is not fully understood. This study aims to test the “Jun-Chen-Zuo-Shi” rule with the QiShenYiQi formula (QSYQ) on treating acute myocardial ischemia (AMI) by a network pharmacology approach.

Methods

An Acute Myocardial Ischemia (AMI) specific Organism Disturbed Network (AMI-ODN), was constructed by integrating data of disease-associated genes, protein-protein interaction and microarray experiments. A network-based index, Network Recovery Index for Organism Disturbed Network (NRI-ODN), was developed to measure the therapeutic efficacy of QSYQ and its ingredients, i.e., the ability to recover disturbed AMI network model back to normal state.

Results

The whole formula of QSYQ got a NRI-ODN score of 864.48, which outperformed all individual herbs. Additionally, the primary component herbs, Radix Astragalus membranaceus and Radix Salvia miltiorrrhiza showed NRI-DON score of 680.27 and 734.31 respectively, which meant a better performance to recover disturbed AMI network than the supplementary component herbs, Panax notoginseng and Dalbergia sissoo did (545.76 and 584.88, respectively).

Conclusion

AMI-ODN model and NRI-ODN identified the possible roles of “Jun-Chen-Zuo-Shi” component herbs of QSYQ in treating AMI at molecular network and pathway level.

Introduction

Abnormalities in molecular pathways and their interactions have been observed in human diseases [1, 2]. Multiple components simultaneously act on multi-targets, such as in the antiretroviral triple cocktail therapy for acquired immunodeficiency syndrome [3], has been considered in drug development. Chinese medicine (CM), featured as ‘multiple ingredients and multiple targets’ [4], is based on “Jun-Chen-Zuo-Shi” (also known as “sovereign-minister-assistant-courier”) rule, which explains the complex actions of a CM such as Indigo naturalis to treat promyelocytic leukemia [5]. However, the “Jun-Chen-Zuo-Shi” rule has not been fully understood and demonstrated in pharmacological science.

Network pharmacology revealed some complicated relationships between diseases and CM [610]. In a previous study, we developed network recovery index (NRI) to systemically evaluate drug efficacy by a microarray data annotated biological network [11]. NRI is a quantitative index to measure the ability of a drug to recover perturbed biological network. The NRI measured the synergistic drug efficacy of SHENMAI injection consisting of Red ginseng and Radix Ophiopogonis in treating acute myocardial ischemia (AMI) [11].

QiShenYiQi (QSYQ) was a CM prescription for treating ischemic heart disease, while QI-SHEN-YI-QI Dropping Pill was approved by the China Food and Drug Administration (CFDA) in 2003 [12]. QSYQ comprises Radix Astragalus membranaceus (referred later as Astragalus), Radix Salvia miltiorrrhiza (referred later as Salvia), Panax notoginseng (referred later as Notoginseng) and Dalbergia odorifera T. Chen (referred later as Dalbergia). These herbs constitute the QSYQ formula based upon the principle rule of “Jun-Chen-Zuo-Shi”, where Astragalus serves as the sovereign, Salvia serves as the minister, Notoginseng serves as the assistant, and Dalbergia serves as the courier [12, 13]. QSYQ exhibited a protective effect comparable to aspirin in preventing myocardial infarction as tested in a double-blind randomized controlled trial [14], QSYQ also significantly reduced infarct size of heart with LAD ligation and increased the density of vessel in ischemic heart in rats [15]. QSYQ could regulate the expressions of proteins associated with energy metabolism in ischemic myocardium of rats [16].

This study aims to test the “Jun-Chen-Zuo-Shi” rule of QSYQ in treating AMI by a network pharmacology approach. We developed a network pharmacology based approach, NRI- organism disturbed network (ODN), to investigate the compatibility law of CM formula from both molecule network and pathway level. Firstly, ODN was constructed with disease-related genes, gene expression data and protein-protein interaction (PPI) information to determine the disease systematic influences on the biological network. By combining topology analysis on the ODN and recovery regulation analysis, the gene nodes were weighted by both their topology attributes and recovery ability in regulation of gene expression.

Methods

Study workflow

A study workflow was shown in Figure 1. The AMI-ODN was constructed with AMI-related genes and related PPIs. The network was then annotated with gene expression data. Genes with recovery regulation trend would be evaluated and highlighted (as blue nodes) in the network. NRI-ODN score was used to evaluate the drug efficacy of QSYQ and its component herbs. Additionally, efficient recovery genes (ERGs) from AMI-ODN by QSYQ and its component herbs were calculated, and pathway enrichment analysis with KEGG pathway database was applied to these genes to investigate enriched biological pathways.
Figure 1

Study workflow. Three kinds of information were collected, including AMI-related genes, PPIs information and microarray data to construct the AMI-ODN. The genes in AMI-ODN network were further annotated with recovery regulation of drugs, to visually reveal the recover status of drug on the AMI-ODN. The efficacy of QSYQ and its component herbs were then measured by NRI-ODN, a network based index to evaluating overall recovery ability. On the other side, pathway enrichment analysis was applied on ERGs of QSYQ and its component herbs. As a result, we demonstrated the synergistic effect of QSYQ on treating AMI from molecule network and pathway level.

Rat experiment

Male Sprague-Dawley rats (220-250 g) were purchased from Zhejiang Experimental Animal Center (China). The animal experiments were performed according to guidelines of the Animal Ethics Review Committees of Zhejiang University. AMI Rat model was produced through the occlusion of the left anterior descending coronary artery according to Yamaguchi et al.[17, 18]. The detailed procedure of rat experiment was described by Hong et al.[16]. Sham-operated rats with no ligation suture served as control group (Control). Surviving animals were arbitrarily divided into acute myocardial ischemia group (AMI) and QSYQ-treated group, Astragalus -treated group, Salvia-treated group, Notoginseng-treated group and Dalbergia-treated group. Each group included at least 8 rats for calculating a weight ratio of infarct heart tissue calculation and 3 rats for microarray experiments. Instead of using dropping pills, QSYQ extracts, composed by extracts of Astragalus, Salvia, Notoginseng and Dalbergia, was used in this study to investigate the “Jun-Chen-Zuo-Shi” rule. The dosage of QSYQ and each component herb extracts used in this work was listed as follows: Astragalus extracts (105.7 mg/kg/day), Salvia extracts (84.9 mg/kg/day), Notoginseng extracts (9.4 mg/kg/day), and volatile oil extracted from Dalbergia (4.7 μL/kg/day). Rats in Control and AMI groups were administered with saline. After treatment for 7 days, rats were sacrificed. The border between infarct and non-infarct left ventricle area in rat heart were harvested to extract mRNA.

RNA extraction and microarray experiments

Total RNA was extracted and purified by TRIZol Reagent (Invitrogen, USA) and RNeasy Mini kit (QIAGEN, Germany). An Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer and electrophoresis in 2% (v/v) agarose gels were used for quality assessment of RNA. Only RNA samples with RNA integrity numbers (RINs) over 7.0 and 28SrRNA/18S rRNA greater than 0.7 were used for further microarray experiments. Whole genome microarray analysis was performed using Affymetrix rat Genome 230 2.0 chips (Affymetrix, USA) in accordance with the manufacturer’s protocol. Spike-in control transcripts were monitored to verify hybridization integrity.

ODN model construction

AMI related gene information is collected from gene knowledgebase such as CHD@ZJU [19] and RGD [20], and the PPI relationships of these genes are collected from public PPI databases HPRD [21] and BioGRID [22], to construct the AMI-ODN. Then, expression value of AMI-related genes is obtained from microarray experiments. Expression value is firstly used as a filter, only genes with considerable intensity and significant expression changes (measured by fold change, equation 1) will be considered in the final AMI-ODN. If a gene had multiple corresponding probes, the largest (in absolute) fold change among all probes was used.
FC = LogE disease LogE control
(1)

where FC indicates the Fold Change, LogEdisease indicates the Log2 expression value of disease group, and LogEcontrol indicates the Log2 expression value of control group.

The details of AMI-ODN construction were as follows. (1) In the step of gene collection, two public databases, CHD@ZJU (Version 1.0; includes 660 coronary heart disease related genes) [19] and Rat Genome Database (RGD; totally 366 genes are reported to be related with myocardial ischemia) [20] cardiovascular portal, were used. By integrating these two database, 820 unique genes are found. (2) In the step of gene filtering, AMI group averaged Log2 normalized intensity (aver_Log2 > 5) and absolute value of fold change between AMI and control group (abs_FC > 0.2) were used as thresholds to identify considerably and significantly altered expression of AMI-related genes. (3) In the step of PPI information collection, PPIs were collected from two PPI database, HPRD (included 41327 human PPIs with supporting literature evidences) [21] and BioGRID (contained 209838 PPIs) [22]. Only the PPIs that involve AMI-related genes as both source and target genes were used. (4) Finally, the qualified AMI related genes and PPIs were used to construct a AMI-related PPI network by Cytoscape [23], and the AMI-ODN was defined as the biggest sub-network (the giant component).

NRI-ODN and efficiency of recovery regulation

Network recovery index (NRI) was previously proposed by our group to determine the drug efficacy of CM [11] and was measured according to equation 2a. The recovery regulation and regulation level are measured according to equation 2b and equation 2c. In equation 2c, LogE represents Log2 normalized intensity of experimental group, and equation 2b represents the ratio of genes with ability to recover the AMI network to normal states. NRI indicates the network recovery index, RR indicates recovery regulation, and RL indicates the regulation level.
NRI = RR all + RR up + RR down
(2a)
RR = num RL > 0 N
(2b)
RL = LogE drug LogE disease LogE control LogE disease
(2c)

The nodes with positive regulation level contribute equally to the final NRI score. The topology and efficiency of recovery regulation are not considered in this study. However, the topology of node described the biological importance of the gene node to the whole ODN, such as the nodes with high degrees in a biological network are probably more important genes in the biological system. On the other hand, the efficiency of recovery regulation (EoR) also could quantitatively indicate the drug ability to recover altered gene expression.

RR was optimized and replaced by RR-ODN to measure the nodes recovery ability by considering their topology and EoR, as equation 3a. The topology weight was the degree centrality of node, which represented the number of directly connected neighboring nodes. The nodes with EoR < 0 (regulation level >2 or <0) would not be used to calculate RR-ODN calculation. Finally the NRI-ODN was measured according to equation 3b.
RR ODN = W topo * Eo R positive
(3a)
NRI ODN = RRODN all + RRODN up + RRODN down
(3b)

where W indicates the topology weight parameter, RRODN indicates the new recovery regulation index in NRI-ODN.

EoR was the efficiency of a drug to recover disturbed gene as defined in equation 4. 50% EoR would mean that the drug could recover the gene dysregulation by half (7.5) or 50% over-regulated the gene expression (12.5); 100% EoR would mean that the drug could fully recover the gene expression from disease to control state (10). In this study, EoR ≥ 50% was used as a threshold of identify efficient recovery regulated genes (ERGs).
EoR = 100 % 100 % RL
(4)

Pathway enrichment analysis

Pathway enrichment analysis with KEGG pathway database [24] was applied on ERGs of QSYQ and its component herbs, in which the ERGs was defined as the genes with EoR > 50%. By using ArrayTrack [24], an enriched pathway represented those pathways which had a Fisher P value <0.05. Only the pathways of cellular processes and environmental information processes were considered.

Results

The weight ratio of infarcted heart tissue

Therapeutic effects of QSYQ treatment and each individual component treatment were evaluated by the weight ratio of infarcted heart tissue. As shown in Figure 2, the AMI injury was quantitatively evaluated for each group by the weight ratios between infarcted zone and the whole tissue. The QSYQ showed efficacy on treating AMI by significantly reducing the weight ratio of infarcted heart tissue (P = 0.002), with a lower P value than any of its component. Among four component herbs, Astragalus and Salvia also showed significant effect on treating AMI (P = 0.02 and 0.01, respectively), but Notoginseng and Dalbergia showed insignificant effects (P > 0.1).
Figure 2

Statistics of the weight ratio of infarcted heart tissue in rat experiments. QSYQ reduced the weight ratio of infarcted heart tissue more significantly than its component herbs, i.e., Astragalus, Salvia, Notoginseng and Dalbergia, did.

AMI-ODN construction

By integrating gene information from CHD@ZJU and RGD, 820 AMI related genes were found. Fold change >0.2 and average Log2 normalized intensity >5 were then used to find significant expressed and changed genes in the microarray experiments, and PPIs among these genes were found from HPRD and BioGRID databases. As a result, 623 PPI interactions among 324 AMI related genes were used to construct the AMI-related PPI network. The biggest sub-network contained 281 genes and 616 PPI relationships, which were then defined as the AMI-ODN (Figure 3a).
Figure 3

Recovery regulation of QSYQ and its components on AMI-ODN. (a) The AMI-ODN contained 281 nodes and 616 edges. Node was annotated with its expression fold changes between AMI and control group, red indicated up-regulation and green indicated down-regulation. (b) Recovery regulation of QSYQ on AMI-ODN. Nodes in AMI-ODN with recovery regulation were colored in blue, indicating that QSYQ could recover this gene node from disease to control state. Grey nodes represented a negative regulation level. (c) Recovery regulation of Astragalus, Salvia, Notoginseng and Dalbergia on AMI-ODN.

We calculated the regulation level of QSYQ on the AMI-ODN, and annotated the node color to show the recovery status (Figure 3b). The genes with positive regulation, indicating recovered regulation, were colored in blue. The regulation levels of component herbs were also visualized as shown in Figure 3c. Apparently, QSYQ could affect most of the nodes in the ODN which was disturbed in the disease state.

Evaluating efficacy and synergistic effect of QSYQ

The NRI-ODN was then measured to quantitatively evaluate the drug efficacy of QSYQ and its component herbs (Table 1). For instance, the RR-ODN of QSYQ for all network, significantly down-regulated nodes and significantly up-regulated nodes were 513.03, 78.45 and 273.00, respectively. The score of NRI-ODN of QSYQ was 864.48, which showed better recovery performance compare to its components. Among the four component herbs, Salvia showed the highest NRI-ODN (734.31) which was slightly higher than that of Astragalus (680.27), whereas Notoginseng (545.76) and Dalbergia (584.88) showed relatively lower NRI-ODN scores. According to the “Jun-Chen-Zuo-Shi” rule, Astragalus (Sovereign) and Salvia (Minister) were expected to recover disturbed network better than Notoginseng (Assistant) and Dalbergia (Courier) did, which was accordance to the NRI-ODN result.
Table 1

NRI-ODN results of QSYQ and its component herbs

 

QSYQ

Astragalus

Salvia

Notoginseng

Dalbergia

RR-ODN (All)

513.03

399.40

432.18

318.14

362.31

RR-ODN (Down)

78.45

74.59

80.96

48.50

76.77

RR-ODN (Up)

273.00

206.28

221.17

179.12

145.81

NRI-ODN

864.48

680.27

734.31

545.76

584.88

P value

1.84E-12**

1.82E-04**

2.45E-06**

0.185

0.042*

**Extremely significant (<0.01).

*significant (<0.05).

A permutation test was performed to check whether QSYQ and its component herbs recovered ODN network more significantly than any random permutation in ODN with a normal distribution. The NRI-ODN of each permutation was calculated and repeated 10000 times. As a result, the average value of permutated NRI-ODN was 471.96, and the standard deviation was 55.64 in 10000 repetitions. The P value of NRI-ODN of QSYQ and its component herbs was calculated from the permutation test (Table 1). Astragalus and Salvia showed a highly significant recovery from a disturbed network (P < 0.01), and Dalbergia showed a significant recovery (P < 0.05), while the recovery of Notoginseng on ODN was not statistically significant (P = 0.18).

The effect of fold change threshold on NRI-ODN calculation

In NRI-ODN calculation, the up-regulated and down-regulated genes were identified by fold changes. The effect of fold change thresholds on the RR-ODN calculation was investigated. In Figure 4, the x-axis represented the threshold of fold change. For instance, x = 0.1 is the threshold to identify the up-regulated genes with fold change >0.1 and the down-regulated genes with fold changes < -0.1. In particular, x = 0 meant the same as RR-ODNall. The y-axis was the total significantly regulated RR-ODN score which contributed by both up-regulated and down-regulated genes. The green line represented the RR-ODN of QSYQ, and the orange, red, blue and purple lines represented the RR-ODN of Astragalus, Salvia, Notoginseng and Dalbergia, respectively. The overall RR-ODN of QSYQ and its component herbs were consistent when fold change threshold <1. The performance of QSYQ was more effective than any individual component herb. The performances of Astragalus and Salvia were equivalent and significantly better than performances of Notoginseng and Dalbergia. When fold change threshold was set >1, there were fewer genes (only 34 genes remained with fold change >1) which RR-ODN result was seriously influenced by any single node’s performance. Therefore, fold change =0.5 was used as the threshold to identify significantly regulated genes. In this study, 169 significantly regulated genes were found.
Figure 4

The RR-ODN with top N genes (ranged from 1 to 281) sorted by absolute fold changes. The x-axis represents number of genes and y-axis represents RR-ODN of QSYQ and its component herbs. QSYQ showed the better RR-ODN than its individual component herbs. Among four component herbs, Astragalus and Salvia showed higher RR-ODN than Notoginseng and Dalbergia, in accordance with their primary roles in QSYQ.

Pathway enrichment analysis

ERGs were defined by EoR > 50%. There were 131, 90, 111, 76 and 89 ERGs in the ODN for QSYQ, Astragalus, Salvia, Notoginseng and Dalbergia, respectively. Pathway enrichment analysis was conducted on the effective regulation recovery genes of QSYQ and its component herbs. The number of significant enriched pathway (Fisher’s p-value <0.05) of QSYQ was significantly more than its component herbs, Salvia, Notoginseng and Dalbergia (Table 2). However, Astragalus had more enriched pathways than QSYQ did.
Table 2

Number of enriched pathways of QSYQ and its component herbs

 

QSYQ

Astragalus

Salvia

Notoginseng

Dalbergia

Number of ERGs

131

90

111

76

89

Cellular processes

11

14

7

10

8

Environmental information processes

5

4

6

3

4

Total biological pathways

16

18

13

13

12

Overlapped pathways

--

10

10

8

5

The numbers of overlapping pathways between QSYQ and a component herb including Astragalus, Salvia, Notoginseng, and Dalbergia were 10, 10, 8 and 5, respectively. The result indicated that Salvia and Notoginseng acted on p53 pathways whereas Astragalus and Dalbergia did not. It suggested that the effect of QSYQ on p53 signaling pathway was attributed to Salvia and Notoginseng. Detailed pathway information of QSYQ and its component herbs were provided in Table 3.
Table 3

Enriched pathway results of QSYQ and its component herbs

Pathway Name

KEGG ID

QSYQ

Salvia

Astragalus

Notoginseng

Dalbergia

Complement and coagulation cascades

hsa04610

1

1

1

1

1

Cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction

hsa04060

1

1

1

1

1

MAPK signaling pathway

hsa04010

1

1

1

1

1

Chemokine signaling pathway

hsa04062

1

1

1

1

0

Focal adhesion

hsa04510

1

1

1

0

1

Adipocytokine signaling pathway

hsa04920

1

1

1

0

0

Endocytosis

hsa04144

1

1

0

1

1

TGF-beta signaling pathway

hsa04350

1

1

0

1

0

p53 signaling pathway

hsa04115

1

1

0

1

0

ECM-receptor interaction

hsa04512

1

1

0

0

0

Vascular smooth muscle contraction

hsa04270

1

0

1

1

0

Apoptosis

hsa04210

1

0

1

0

0

PPAR signaling pathway

hsa03320

1

0

1

0

0

Toll-like receptor signaling pathway

hsa04620

1

0

1

0

0

Cell adhesion molecules

hsa04514

1

0

0

0

0

Regulation of actin cytoskeleton

hsa04810

1

0

0

0

0

Out of 16 pathways, three of them, as complement and coagulation cascades, cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction and MAPK signaling pathway, were enriched in QSYQ and all its four component herbs. On the other hand, two pathways, i.e., cell adhesion molecules and regulation of actin cytoskeleton, were specially enriched by QSYQ, which might imply novel function of component combination.

As shown in Table 3, all enriched pathways of Notoginseng and Dalbergia were at least enriched in either Astragalus or Salvia, which suggested that Notoginseng and Dalbergia might play roles as Zuo (assistants) that would not bring new pathway regulation into QSYQ, but to enforce regulating effects of Astragalus and Salvia enriched pathways.

In Table 3, vascular smooth muscle contraction, apoptosis, PPAR signaling pathway and Toll-like receptor signaling pathway are enriched by Astragalus but not Salvia. Among them, vascular smooth muscle contraction reflected the roles of vascular smooth muscle cell (VSMC) to regulate the blood flow and pressure [25]. PPAR signaling pathway was highly correlated with lipids metabolism and adipocyte differentiation. These two enriched pathways might indicate the Astragalus would play roles on energy metabolism to relieve the blood flow dysregulation caused by acute myocardial ischemia. Apoptosis and Toll-like receptor signaling pathway were correlated with cell death and immune system [26, 27], which implied potential roles of Astragalus on these biological functions. Astragalus regulated BCL-2 protein family (such as BCL-2 and BAX), which was critical in apoptosis and correlated with p53 and TGF-beta signaling pathway [28]. Astragalus also reduced expression of BAX in heart failure rats and increase Bcl-2 expression by Astragaloside IV, a main component in Astragalus [29, 30].

On the other side, endocytosis, TGF-beta signaling pathway, p53 signaling pathway and ECM-receptor interaction were enriched by Salvia but not Astragalus. Activation of TGF-beta signaling pathway was found in the infarcted myocardium with potential effects on repression of inflammatory genes and mediating resolution of the inflammatory infiltrate TGF-beta also mediates events in the pathogenesis of hypertrophic and dilative ventricular remodeling [31]. P53 signaling pathway was induced by stress signals, such as DNA damage, oxidative stress, and was correlated with apoptosis and cell cycle arrest [32]. The enrichment of TGF-beta signaling pathway and p53 signaling pathway indicated the Salvia might play important roles in apoptosis, which was also regulated by Astragalus.

Furthermore, Astragalus, Salvia and Notoginseng could regulate Chemokine signaling pathway together, which was highly correlated with inflammation processes [33]. In all, the QSYQ might gain enhanced drug effect by regulating apoptosis and inflammation related pathways together.

Discussions

In this study, we integrated AMI-related gene and its expression data, with PPI information to construct AMI-ODN model, and further applied the network model to reveal the compatibility law of QSYQ on treating AMI. In particular, the network recover ability of QSYQ and its component herbs were quantitatively measured by NRI-ODN to demonstrate that the synergistic efficacy of QSYQ on treating AMI. Among four component herbs, Astragalus and Salvia showed stronger recovery ability than Notoginseng and Dalbergia, which was also conformed to the “Jun-Chen-Zuo-Shi” rule of QSYQ.

The primary roles of Astragalus and Salvia in QSYQ were further validated at pathway level. By pathway enrichment analysis, Astragalus and Salvia could regulate more pathways and play special roles on unique pathways, such as Astragalus could regulate energy metabolism to relieve the blood flow caused by myocardial ischemia. The combination of Astragalus and Salvia could also enhance the regulating ability of important biological processes, such as apoptosis and inflammation system.

The successful application of network-based approaches on QSYQ was more sensitive than traditional, phenotype-based evaluating method, such as the weight of infarcted zones. More importantly, the synergistic effect and contribution of drug efficacy could now be evaluated from a molecule network and pathway level, which was further related to its underlying “multi-target, multi-processes” mechanisms.

ODN modeling and evaluation with NRI-ODN score were suitable for studying high-throughput data and complex diseases which involved multiple genes. It might have limited performance for orphan diseases. ODN modeling was independent of chemical structures, and suitable for discovering the similar and distinct effects between CM and chemical drugs.

Conclusion

AMI-ODN model and NRI-ODN identified the possible roles of “Jun-Chen-Zuo-Shi” component herbs of QSYQ in treating AMI at molecular network and pathway level.

Abbreviations

AMI: 

Acute myocardial ischemia

AMI-ODN: 

Acute myocardial ischemia organism disturbed network

CM: 

Chinese medicine

EoR: 

Efficiency of recovery regulation

ERG: 

Efficient recovery regulated genes

NRI: 

Network recovery index

NRI-ODN: 

Network recovery index for organism disturbed network

ODN: 

Organism disturbed network

QSYQ: 

QiShenYiQi formula

RL: 

Regulation level

RR: 

Recovery regulation

RR-ODN: 

Recovery regulation for organism disturbed network.

Declarations

Acknowledgement

The research was financially supported by National Basic Research Program of China (No. 2012CB518405), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81373893) and the Foundation of Zhejiang Educational Committee (No. Y201018967). The authors also appreciate Ling Zhang (Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China) for her help with rat experiment and Huasheng Xiao (National Engineering Center for Biochip at Shanghai, China) for performing the microarray testing.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Pharmaceutical Informatics Institute, College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang University
(2)
State Key Laboratory of Modern Chinese Medicine, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine

References

  1. Barabasi AL, Gulbahce N, Loscalzo J: Network medicine: a network-based approach to human disease. Nat Rev Genet. 2011, 12 (1): 56-68. 10.1038/nrg2918.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Yang J, Li Z, Fan X, Cheng Y: A Three Step Network Based Approach (TSNBA) to finding disease molecular signature and key regulators: a case study of IL-1 and TNF-Alpha stimulated inflammation. PLoS One. 2014, 9 (4): e94360-10.1371/journal.pone.0094360.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Clercq ED: Perspectives of non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) in the therapy of HIV-1 infection. Farmaco. 1999, 54 (2): 26-45.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Xiao S, Luo K, Wen X, Fan X, Cheng Y: A pre-classification strategy for identification of compounds in traditional Chinese medicine analogous formulas by high-performance liquid chromatography-Mass spectrometry. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2014, 92: 82-89.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Wang L, Zhou GB, Liu P, Song JH, Liang Y, Yan XJ, Xu F, Wang BS, Mao JH, Shen ZX, Chen SJ, Chen Z: Dissection of mechanisms of Chinese medicinal formula Realgar-Indigo naturalis as an effective treatment for promyelocytic leukemia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008, 105 (12): 4826-4831. 10.1073/pnas.0712365105.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Li S, Zhang B, Jiang D, Wei Y, Zhang N: Herb network construction and co-module analysis for uncovering the combination rule of traditional Chinese herbal formulae. BMC Bioinformatics. 2010, 11 (Suppl 11): S6-10.1186/1471-2105-11-S11-S6.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Li S, Zhang B, Zhang N: Network target for screening synergistic drug combinations with application to traditional Chinese medicine. BMC Syst Biol. 2011, 5 (Suppl 1): S10-10.1186/1752-0509-5-S1-S10.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Liang X, Li H, Li S: A novel network pharmacology approach to analyse traditional herbal formulae: the Liu-Wei-Di-Huang pill as a case study. Mol Biosyst. 2014, 10 (5): 1014-1022. 10.1039/c3mb70507b.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Wang L, Li Z, Shao Q, Li X, Ai N, Zhao X, Fan X: Dissecting active ingredients of Chinese medicine by content-weighted ingredient-target network. Mol Biosyst. 2014, 10 (7): 1905-1911. 10.1039/c3mb70581a.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Wang L, Li Z, Zhao X, Liu W, Liu Y, Yang J, Li X, Fan X, Cheng Y: A network study of chinese medicine xuesaitong injection to elucidate a complex mode of action with multicompound, multitarget, and multipathway. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2013, 2013: 652373-PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Wu L, Wang Y, Nie J, Fan X, Cheng Y: A network pharmacology approach to evaluating the efficacy of Chinese medicine using genome-wide transcriptional expression data. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2013, 2013: 8-Google Scholar
  12. Zhang YF, Shi PY, Yao H, Shao Q, Fan XH: Metabolite profiling and pharmacokinetics of herbal compounds following oral administration of a cardiovascular multi-herb medicine (Qishen Yiqi Pills) in rat. Curr Drug Metab. 2012, 13 (5): 510-523. 10.2174/1389200211209050510.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Li X, Wu L, Liu W, Jin Y, Chen Q, Wang L, Fan X, Li Z, Cheng Y: A network pharmacology study of Chinese medicine QiShenYiQi to reveal its underlying multi-compound, multi-target, multi-pathway mode of action. PLoS One. 2014, 9 (5): e95004-10.1371/journal.pone.0095004.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Shang H, Dai G, Hang J, Xiang Y, Wang Y, Zhang J, Du W, Mao J, Yao C, Weng W, Wen TC: Myocardial infarction secondary prevention study (MISPS). Geriatr Cardiol. 2006, 3 (2): 116-119.Google Scholar
  15. Zhang L, Wang Y, Yu L, Liu L, Qu H, Wang Y, Gao X, Zhang B, Cheng Y: QI-SHEN-YI-QI accelerates angiogenesis after myocardial infarction in rats. Int J Cardiol. 2009, 143 (1): 105-109.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Hong C, Wang Y, Lou J, Liu Q, Qu H, Cheng Y: Analysis of myocardial proteomic alteration after Qishenyiqi formula treatment in acute infarcted rat hearts. Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi. 2009, 34 (8): 1018-1021.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Pfeffer MA, Pfeffer JM, Fishbein MC, Fletcher PJ, Spadaro J, Kloner RA, Braunwald E: Myocardial infarct size and ventricular function in rats. Circ Res. 1979, 44 (4): 503-512. 10.1161/01.RES.44.4.503.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Yamaguchi F, Sanbe A, Takeo S: Cardiac sarcoplasmic reticular function in rats with chronic heart failure following myocardial infarction. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1997, 29 (2): 753-763. 10.1006/jmcc.1996.0319.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Wu L, Li X, Yang J, Liu Y, Fan X, Cheng Y: CHD@ZJU: a knowledgebase providing network-based research platform on coronary heart disease. Database. 2013, 2013: bat047-PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Dwinell MR, Worthey EA, Shimoyama M, Bakir-Gungor B, DePons J, Laulederkind S, Lowry T, Nigram R, Petri V, Smith J, Stoddard A, Twigger SN, Jacob HJ: The Rat Genome Database 2009: variation, ontologies and pathways. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37 (Database issue): D744-D749.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Keshava Prasad TS, Goel R, Kandasamy K, Keerthikumar S, Kumar S, Mathivanan S, Telikicherla D, Raju R, Shafreen B, Venugopal A, Balakrishnan L, Marimuthu A, Banerjee S, Somanathan DS, Sebastian A, Rani S, Ray S, Kishore CJH, Kanth S, Ahmed M, Kashyap MK, Mohmood R, Ramachandra YL, Krishna V, Rahiman BA, Mohan S, Ranganathan P, Ramabadran S, Chaerkady R, Pandey A: Human protein reference database–2009 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37 (Database issue): D767-D772.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Stark C, Breitkreutz BJ, Reguly T, Boucher L, Breitkreutz A, Tyers M: BioGRID: a general repository for interaction datasets. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006, 34 (Database issue): D535-D539.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Smoot ME, Ono K, Ruscheinski J, Wang PL, Ideker T: Cytoscape 2.8: new features for data integration and network visualization. Bioinformatics. 2011, 27 (3): 431-432. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq675.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Fang H, Harris SC, Su Z, Chen M, Qian F, Shi L, Perkins R, Tong W: ArrayTrack: An FDA and public genomic tool. Methods Mol Biol. 2009, 563: 379-398. 10.1007/978-1-60761-175-2_20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Bohr DF, Webb RC: Vascular smooth muscle function and its changes in hypertension. Am J Med. 1984, 77 (4A): 3-16.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Akira S, Takeda K, Kaisho T: Toll-like receptors: critical proteins linking innate and acquired immunity. Nat Immunol. 2001, 2 (8): 675-680. 10.1038/90609.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Krijnen PAJ, Nijmeijer R, Meijer CJLM, Visser CA, Hack CE, Niessen HWM: Apoptosis in myocardial ischaemia and infarction. J Clin Pathol. 2002, 55 (11): 801-811. 10.1136/jcp.55.11.801.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Chiarugi V, Magnelli L, Cinelli M: Complex interplay among apoptosis factors: RB, p53, E2F, TGF-beta, cell cycle inhibitors and the bcl2 gene family. Pharmacol Res. 1997, 35 (4): 257-261. 10.1006/phrs.1997.0140.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Gui D, Guo Y, Wang F, Liu W, Chen J, Chen Y, Huang J, Wang N: Astragaloside IV, a novel antioxidant, prevents glucose-induced Podocyte Apoptosis In Vitro and In Vivo. PLoS One. 2012, 7 (6): e39824-10.1371/journal.pone.0039824.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Zhao Z, Wang W, Wang F, Zhao K, Han Y, Xu W, Tang L: Effects of Astragaloside IV on heart failure in rats. Chin Med. 2009, 4: 6-10.1186/1749-8546-4-6.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Bujak M, Frangogiannis NG: The role of TGF-β Signaling in Myocardial Infarction and Cardiac Remodeling. Cardiovasc Res. 2007, 74 (2): 184-195. 10.1016/j.cardiores.2006.10.002.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Kuerbitz SJ, Plunkett BS, Walsh WV, Kastan MB: Wild-type p53 is a cell cycle checkpoint determinant following irradiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1992, 89 (16): 7491-7495. 10.1073/pnas.89.16.7491.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Keane MP, Strieter RM: Chemokine signaling in inflammation. Crit Care Med. 2000, 28 (4): N13-N26.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Wu et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement