Skip to main content

Role of GRPR in Acupuncture Intervention in the “Itch-scratch Vicious Cycle” Spinal Circuit of Chronic Pruritus


Many previous studies have shown the potential antipruritic effect of acupuncture. This paper reviews the antipruritic mechanisms of acupuncture according to these aspects: sample characteristics, detail of intervention, and effects evaluation. The majority of research on acupuncture’s antipruritic effect has focused on primary afferents of the peripheral mechanism. Relatively few studies, however, have addressed the central mechanisms. Combination the latest research achievements of chronic itch, gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRPR) in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord may represent the first molecule identified that is dedicated to mediating the itch response and may provide an important therapeutic target for the treatment of chronic pruritic conditions. Therefore, GRPR may be a new target for acupuncture to relieve itch in the future and provide new ideas for acupuncture intervention in the mechanisms of the spinal level of the “itch-scratch vicious cycle” of chronic itch.


Itch is an unpleasant sensation inducing the irresistible impulse to scratch. Generally, pruritus is classified as acute or chronic, with chronic pruritus defined as an itch lasting more than six weeks. A fifth of the general population suffers from chronic pruritus at least once during their lifetime, and some populations with skin diseases experience it up to 100% [1]. In chronic cases, itchy skin with burning and stinging sensations [2] impairs patients' quality of life [3] and reduces their productivity [4], causing sleep disturbances [5]. Typically, prolonged intense itch results from an addictive “itch-scratch vicious cycle” [6, 7], potentiating damage to the skin and more itching.

Chronic pruritus can be caused by many conditions, including skin diseases, immune system diseases, nervous system disorders, or internal organ metabolic disorders [8]. Histamine-dependent itch in a few instances, antihistamine drug therapy is ineffective for the majority of chronic itch. There has been considerable advancement in the treatment of chronic pruritus through the development of biologics and κ-opioid receptor agonists (KORs). However, biologics are expensive and KOR agonists are fraught with risk [9]. It is possible to distinguish mechanical itch from chemical itch based on peripheral input, the latter being further divided into histaminergic and non-histaminergic. Gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRPR) as the G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR), is the first itch-specific receptor in the spinal cord of mice [10]. GRPR-expressing neurons are the key parts of itch information from the periphery to the brain [11], playing an important role in the spinal cord loop of chronic pruritus [12, 13], with other neuro mediators such as 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) involving “itch-scratch vicious cycle” in the process of chronic pruritus on the neural loop of spinal level [14]. GRPR as the core of itch transmission is an attractive target for antipruritic intervention [15]. The effect of acupuncture inhibits the GRPR expression preliminary confirmation received [41]. The purpose of this paper is to discuss the possible mechanism of acupuncture intervention at the spinal level of the “itch-scratch vicissitudes” from the perspective of GRPR regulation and release.

The mechanism of acupuncture treatment for chronic itch

Acupuncture has a long history of antipruritic effects as a traditional complementary and adjunctive therapy, with the related study first reported in 1984 [16]. Many types of researches have shown that acupuncture relieves pruritus while improving multidimensional quality of life issues such as mood, work, and life after the disease [17,18,19]. The mechanisms of acupuncture to cure chronic pruritus are unknown [20,21,22]. In atopic dermatitis patients, acupuncture decreased itch-evoked activation in the insula, putamen, premotor and prefrontal cortices [23]. After the integrated intervention (Including acupuncture), chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) patients exhibited reduced the left putamen, caudate, accumbens, and thalamus with resting state functional connectivity (rs-FC) [24]. Acupuncture enhanced positive functional connectivity of the putamen-the posterior part of the midcingulate cortex (pMCC) in against histamine-induced itch of healthy volunteers [25]. According to the literature, the mechanism of acupuncture for itch in the central mechanisms has been comparatively little studied, mainly about some brain regions in the patient [23]and microglia in the mouse spinal cord [26], therefore the mechanism of acupuncture used to treat simple itching above the spinal cord need more evidence. With the deepening of the studies on the animal mechanism of chronic pruritus “itch-scratch vicious cycle” in the spinal cord and central circuit, taking advantage of acupuncture’s ability to treat chronic pruritus “itch-scratch vicious cycle” makes it all possible.

Seven online databases were searched by two authors independently from inception to October 2022: PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wan Fang Database, China Science and Technology Journal Database (VIP), Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM). The literature searches were constructed around medical search headings (MeSH) for acupuncture and pruritus, and only animal studies were included. According to the needs of each database, the search strategies were made appropriate adjustments. The specific search strategies were listed in Additional file 1. A total of 9514 relevant studies were retrieved. A total of 3312 duplicated studies were removed, and 6202 studies were removed after screening titles and abstracts. One hundred and sixteen studies were excluded after reading the full text. Finally, 19 animal studies (27–45) were included. The specific study screening process and results are shown in Fig. 1. At present, most studies on the mechanism of acupuncture intervention on pruritus of animals used Sprague–Dawley (SD) rats or BALB/c mice as the itching model. The specific modeling methods and intervention details (points used, needle type, depth of insertion, needle insertion manipulation, needle stimulation (manual or electrical), needle retention time, and several treatment times) are shown in Table 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flow chart of search and selection process of included studies

Table 1 Summary information of itch modeling and needle details for acupuncture intervention

Modeling methods

The role of acupuncture in the mechanisms of pruritus has mainly been studied in animal models of itching caused by pruritogens, or exploring acupuncture based on the current disease for relieving the degree of itching. Histamine, chloroquine, 5-HT, compound 48/80, ovalbumin (OVA), aluminum hydroxide (Al (OH)3)) and other drugs were mainly injected of drug-induced itching model in acupuncture research, histamine phosphate, chloroquine, and compounds 48/80 in used top 3. Histamine phosphate and compound 48/80 are used for constructing an animal model of histamine-dependent itch [46]. The chemical mediator histamine is present in both basophils and mast cells [47, 48]. Cells release histamine after degranulation to provoke itch when the body is stimulated by immunologic or nonimmunologic factors. Compound 48/80, a polymer of p-Methoxy-N-methylphenethylamine monomers, induce the release of several inflammatory factors and chemical mediator to elicit skin itch [49], in addition, to mimic more stably stable animal models of skin itch. Chloroquine as an antimalarial drug accompanied by cutaneous adverse reactions [50], was used to construct histamine-independent itch models. Based on a particular disease such as neurodermatitis, the animal model used the stress method of chronic mild unpredictability with local skin friction stimulation to study the mechanism of acupuncture for pruritus. Histamine, compound 48/80, and chloroquine are commonly used as pruritogenic agents with the intervention course in 1–3 days usually, other pruritogenic agents provoke itching model with the intervention course in 7–14 days. The allergic dermatitis model elicited by DNCB acetone solution [32] and the neurodermatitis model elicited by chronic mild unpredictable stress method and local skin friction [27] had long intervention courses in the 14–21 days. Compared to simple itching and scratching models, the acupuncture treatment course is shorter, and it is associated with itch-scratch discussed in a specific disease [51].

Acupuncture details

Acupuncture points used for the itch model shown in Table 1, include Quchi (LI11), Xuehai (SP10), Hegu (LI4), Zusanli (ST36), Tianjing (SJ10), Sanyinjiao (SP6), Neiguan (PC6), Qinglingyuan (SJ11), Baihui (GV20), Fengchi (GB20), Weizhong (BL40), Geshu (BL-17), Feishu (BL13), Zhiyin (BL67), localized itch. LI11 (14/19), SP10 (8/19), and LI4 (8/19) rank in the top 3 of acupoint selection. The electroacupuncture of sparse and dense waves as the main intervention make local tremor lightly, with a sparse wave of 2 Hz, a dense wave of 30 Hz/100 Hz/120 Hz, or sparse and dense waves of 416 Hz in 5–10/s, a current of 1–2 mA, the output voltage of 1–4 V. The single intervention time is usually 20 or 30 min, according to different design purposes, and the duration of treatment varies from 1 day to 3 weeks. On the time point of electroacupuncture intervention, several studies have constructed an itching model after electroacupuncture pretreatment to examine the potential mechanism of the treatment [39, 42]. The timepoint, duration, and course of non-electroacupuncture intervention are adjusted depending on the observation purposes and the differences of modeling methods, such as the observation of the antipruritic of immediate effect [28,29,30, 33, 36, 37].

Effect of acupuncture on itch symptoms

Acupuncture treatment of pruritus mainly focused on general state observation (emotional reactions, mental states, diet and sleep of status, fecal traits, and skin lesions in the local modeling area) and behavioral examination (most experiments preferred scratching symptoms). Some experiments focused on depressive behavior assay (open field test, sugar-water consumption test, food consumption measurement, and body mass change measurement, the tail-flicking time), skin wheal and optical density. The itch and scratching symptoms haven't been recorded by uniform standards, but most studies are conducted in quiet environments without humans for 30–60 min. The pruritic behavior was judged by the number of scratches: a complete scratching action was considered when the mice left the bottom of the box with their hind paws and scratched the skin until they dropped their hind paws or licked their hind paws, regardless of number of scratches during this period [52].

Based on Table 2, detection markers in studies of acupuncture treated pruritus mainly used peripheral mediators: amines, endogenous peptides, and prostaglandins. The nerve conduction of pruritic mediators plays an important role in pruritogenesis, mediators conducting pruritus by stimulating class C nerve fibers or via combination with receptors on cutaneous sensory nerve fibers [53], also having an important role in the “itch-scratch cycle” [54]. Positive expression of substance P in the epidermis and dermis of the skin, the sensory nerve fiber endings containing substance P have a bidirectional conduction function. One by activating Neurokinin-1(NK1) receptors on the unmyelinated C fibers conduct itch directly [55]; another by promoting the release of other pruritic mediators such as histamine, leukotrienes, β-endorphins, and inflammatory cytokines Interleukin(IL)-2 and IL-4 conduct itch indirectly [56]. Peripheral mediators such as histamine, prostaglandins, and inflammatory mediators can be involved in pruritic signal formation by activating Transient receptor potential vanilloid 1(TRPV1) expressed by c-nerve fibers and keratin-forming cells and mast cells, which generate and amplify pruritic signals and decrease the itch threshold [57]. The cytokines IL-2 and IL-4 also enhance pruritic neuronal excitability broadly to involve in pruritic pathway transmission [58]. Regarding sample collection except for serum and skin lesions, the spinal cord and medulla oblongata has been gradually considered, laying the experimental foundation for future studies to explore the mechanisms of acupuncture for pruritus at higher-hierarchical centers.

Table 2 Commonly used detection methods and indicators in animal mechanism research of acupuncture treatment of pruritus

In summary, studies on the mechanisms of acupuncture regulating the itch pathway focus on the periphery currently, and studies on the mechanisms of higher-hierarchical centers are gradually deepening, but related contents are not sufficient. Correlation research had suggested that electroacupuncture may inhibit itch signaling in the center by promoting the release of prednisolone (DYN) in the spinal cord, activating massive κ-receptors, which on the one hand diminished itch signaling in the center, on the other hand alleviating the stimulation on peripheral itchy nerves by suppressing the release of endogenous peptide receptor SP [31]. The latest studies were shown electroacupuncture through activating KOR in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord inhibiting GRPR expression to alleviate chronic pruritus [41]. Therefore, whether the modulatory effect of acupuncture on GRPR can inhibit the signaling in the “itch-scratch vicious cycle” to treat chronic pruritus will be a possible mechanism for the future treatment of chronic pruritus by complementary alternative medicine. In this paper, we will explore the possible mechanism of GRPR in acupuncture intervention in the “itch-scratch vicious cycle” from the spinal cord and above neural pathways of chronic pruritus, to provide new ideas for future acupuncture treatment of chronic pruritus “itch-scratch vicious cycle”.

Role of GRPR in itch spinal cord loops

The 2007 study revealed that GRPR may be the first molecule dedicated to the regulation of pruritus sensation in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord [10], and subsequent studies found that, unlike the traditional spinal thalamic tract, GRPR nerve conduction pathways constitute a long-term marker line of pruritus sensation in the spinal cord [59]. GRPRs are activated by a variety of G Protein-Coupled Receptors (GPCRs) that conduct pruritic signals to induce scratching. Morphine is commonly used for pain relief but can induce pruritus, and studies have shown that morphine provokes itch by triggering the internalization of GRPR and mu-opioid receptor (MOR)-1D [60, 61]. Pruritus-specific output is increased by Gastrin-releasing peptide (GRP)-GRPR signaling mediated by 5-HT1A receptors [62]. Atopic dermatitis is caused by the activation of the GRP/GRPR pathway, which is mediated by IL-22 [63]. Although various neuropeptides such as substance P and B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) are related to GRPR in spinal pruritic signal propagation, the related pathways and their roles need to investigate further. However, recent studies suggested that both mechanical and chemical pruritus brought about by light touch can converge on spinal GRPR neurons transmitting to the center [64], so GRPR may be the integration point of various pruritic spinal pathways.

The “itch-scratch cycle” activates brain regions and spinal cord loops

Scratching is a vital factor in maintaining chronic pruritic symptoms and decreases the quality of life of patients [65]. Patients with chronic pruritus experience severe itching and a strong desire to scratch, and a vicious “itch-scratch cycle” can easily form as the affected individual struggles to resist the strong impulses of itching and scratching. This scratching often leads to tissue damage to constitute conscious self-harm [66], but in the chronic itching situation, the pleasure from scratching to relieve the itch is hedonic and activates the central reward system significantly. There are unmyelinated C nerve fibers in the skin that are responsible for itching. These fibers form synapses and are connected to the thalamus and parabrachial nucleus in the brain. After the pruritic signal reaches the thalamus and parabrachial nucleus, several areas in the brain are activated, including the prefrontal cortex (PFC), supplementary motor area (SMA), premotor cortex (PM), primary motor cortex, primary (SI) and secondary somatosensory cortex (SII), parietal cortex, cingulate cortex [67], precuneus, insula [66,67,68,69], basal ganglia, midbrain and cerebellum [70]. As shown in Table 3, brain regions closely associated with itch-scratch are closely linked.

Table 3 Brain regions closely related to itching and scratching circulation

Itch perception is regulated by multiple brain regions in central processing and further via efferent nerves trigger scratching as shown in Table 3. Three nodal findings emerged from studies on the chronic pruritic “itch-scratch cycle”: First, at the spinal cord level, the “itch-scratch vicious circle” principle indicates that when itching is felt, the pain from scratching the skin is transmitted to the brain through nerve cells in the spinal cord, interfering with the itch signal and temporarily suppressing the itching sensation. It's the pain that hides the itch. In this case, pain is activated with itch suppressed, since pain and itch are not identical, but they share a neural circuit in the same area of the brain. As a result of scratching, itch sensitivity is reduced, thus eliminating itch for a temporary period. At the same time, the organism releases 5-hydroxytryptamine to control pain due to the presence of the pain signal, while also activating GRPR neurons via 5-HT 1A receptors [10] to make the itch sensation more intense. The intense itch sensation elicits a new round of scratching and pain, which then goes into a cycle cycling week after week [59, 75] as shown in Fig. 2.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Itch provoking scratching caused pain and pruritus will be together transmitted to the center. Pain will be conveyed to the brain via spinal nerve cells, feedback to the periphery to reduce itching. Itch through 5-HT receptor activation GRPR + neurons and spinal projection neurons aggregated to excitatory synapses transferred to the brain, and the brain feedback to the periphery to aggravate itching causing a new “itch-scratch cycle”

Second, in 2019 deeper studies on the “itch-scratch vicious cycle” focused on the level above the spinal cord, including the ventral tegmental area (VTA) of the midbrain [6] and the periaqueductal gray (PAG) [76]. Sun Yangang’s group used histamine or chloroquine to provoke the sensation of itching in mice. At the same time, a group of neurons around the periaqueductal gray of mice was traced using neuronal activity labeled molecules, and the neural activity in this brain region was recorded during scratching in mice, finding the electrical activity in this region to be enhanced significantly. Further studies identified a molecular feature shared by this group of neurons that they produce a neuropeptide called tachykinin 1 (Tac1). Mice scratching behavior was obviously reduced when Tac1 neurons were killed or suppressed. In contrast, direct stimulation of these neurons, even without stimulation by pruritogenic agents such as histamine or chloroquine, caused intense scratching behavior in mice spontaneously through the neurons in the downstream link of the spinal cord neural circuit that transfers itch information [76]. Hu’s team, with the help of experimental technical tools at the neural loop level and transgenic mouse models, have explained deeply the role of different types of neurons in the ventral tegmental area of the midbrain reward in the information processing of different signaling pathways of itch, and the results have deepened the understanding of the mechanisms of the central loop of itch perception. Through optogenetic manipulation and conditioned place preference or conditioned place aversion experiments, two types of neurons in the VTA brain region were confirmed to regulate two different components of itch perception, glutamatergic and gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-ergic neurons that mediate the aversion induced by pruritogenic agents and dopaminergic neurons that mediate the pleasure the following scratching. Finally, VTA neurons were found to play similar roles in animal models of chronic pruritus. The findings provide a new perspective on the neural loop mechanism underlying the "itch-scratch-healing scratch cycle" and provide a theoretical and scientific basis for gaining a deeper understanding of the principles of the higher central of itch perception.

Third, the addictive ‘itch-scratch cycle” exacerbates dermatitis and pruritus while also activating reward mechanisms in the central system. The reward system, including the ventral tegmental area (VTA), the nucleus ambiguous (NAc), and the striatum, is essential for brain processing of both addiction and itch [70]. Recent studies in 2021 identified VTA-NAc GABAergic neurons that promote reward-reinforcing behaviors through cholinergic interneurons (CINs) projecting directly to the ventral nucleus accumbens shell (vNAcSh), deepening the understanding of the neuromodulatory interactions between VTA and NAc and furthering the study of addiction mechanisms, providing a new direction for the study of the neural circuit mechanism of brain regions in the acupuncture treatment of "itch-scratch vicious cycle".

GRPR is a new target of acupuncture for chronic itch by inhibiting the “Itch-Scratch Vicious Cycle”

The possible mechanisms of acupuncture in the treatment of chronic itch based on the spinal cord and above are still at a blank stage, but recent studies have shown that GRPR plays a key role in the conduction process of spinal cord neural pathways in chronic pruritus, and the modulatory effect of acupuncture on GRPR has been initially confirmed. In this paper, we review the studies of the animal mechanism of acupuncture for chronic pruritus, and take the role of GRPR in the “itch-scratch vicious cycle” of chronic pruritus treated by acupuncture as a breakthrough, to provide a possible protocol for acupuncture in the treatment of chronic pruritus to curb the “itch-scratch vicious cycle”.

Spinal cord level

Gastrin-releasing peptide (GRP) in the dorsal root ganglion of the spinal cord serves as an intermediate link between the peripheral and central “itch-scratch cycle” [77]. GRPR plays an important role in the regulation of itch sensation in the dorsal spinal cord [12, 78]. GRPR is specifically expressed in a small subset of peptidergic dorsal root ganglion neurons, whereas expression of its receptor GRPR is restricted to the dorsal layer I of the spinal cord. Knockout the GRPR gene of mice, itch symptoms are reduced in either histamine-dependent (histamine, 5-HT, compound 48/80) pruritus or non-dependent (protease-activated receptor 2, chloroquine) pruritus. In the future, basic acupuncture research design will be characterized by new technologies, new targets, and multidisciplinary cross-fertilization [79]. Mechanistic studies of acupuncture for chronic pruritus were first performed to validate acupuncture modulation of GRPR, and further adding an intrathecal injection of bombesin-sap to ablate GRPR reverse validation of the role of GRPR neurons in regulating the "itch-scratch vicious cycle" of chronic pruritus. Regarding pruritus model construction, histamine-dependent and non-histamine-dependent pruritus models can be constructed separately using different pruritogenic agents to meet the integrity of the experimental design and to explore the mechanism of acupuncture effect in multi-targets and multi-pathways.

Above the spinal cord

In the reward system above the spinal cord, the “itch-scratch cycle” focuses on the PAG and VTA brain regions. PAG region as an evolutionarily conserved structure is only activated by both itch and cold pain stimulation [80, 81]. In a human brain imaging study, PAG of the midbrain was activated during noxious cold stimulation to suppress histamine-induced itch [81]. Results of the studies on histamine-induced itch showed significantly stronger neural coupling between the right postcentral insula and the PAG during pruritus [82]. It was shown that initiative scratching is accompanied by higher pleasure and leads to more pronounced deactivation of the anterior cingulate cortex and insula, the process including significant involvement of the reward system such as the midbrain VTA, together with the mechanism of PAG deactivation in the midbrain, suggesting the modulatory effect of pruritus contrary to the mechanisms known to inhibit pain [80]. And one study identified a new population of inhibitory neurons called LJA5 in the mice brainstem that can receive inputs from sensory and stress areas including PAG [83]. It is not difficult to conclude that PAG is activated during itch and is involved in the “itch-scratch cycle” based on the above findings. Sun Yangang’s group found that glutamatergic neurons expressing Tac1 in the lateral and ventral lateral midbrain periaqueductal gray matter (l/vlPAG) facilitated the “itch-scratch cycle”, removing GRPR spinal neurons could inhibit scratching behavior caused by activation of Tac1-expressing neurons [76]. Whether the modulatory effect of acupuncture on GRPR can inhibit the activity of Tac1-expressing neurons to regulate the state of higher central PAG brain regions, improving the “itch-scratch cycle” and exerting antipruritic effects is a new target for future acupuncture treatment of chronic itch.

During the study of reward mechanisms, the VTA remains the focus of research on the “itch-scratch cycle” and the different neurons of the VTA include dopamine (DA) and GABA neurons [6]. The projections of DA neurons to the striatum, and the striatal circuitry connecting the striatum to the striatum, constitute key components of the brain's reward and reinforcement circuits so changes in VTA activity are significantly associated with scratch-induced pleasure in humans. According to a recent imaging study, the VTA dopamine neurons involved in itch relief reward are similar to those involved in scratch-induced pleasurable behavior in the human midbrain [84]. Glutamatergic and GABAergic neurons mediate aversion induced by itch-causing agents [6], and recent studies have found that GRPR neurons receive local spontaneous excitatory inputs delivered by glutamate and inhibitory inputs from GABA and that all GRPR neurons receive tonic currents induced by glycine and GABA [85]. Therefore, whether GRPR + can play a regulatory role in acupuncture inhibition of the “itch-scratch cycle” by interfering with GABAergic neurons in the VTA deserves further investigation in the future. Previous studies on the “itch-scratch cycle” were mainly based on the thalamic tract of the spinal cord, and the pathway of the occurrence mechanism is shown in Fig. 3. In Fig. 4, the new GRPR marker line and related brain regions demonstrate how acupuncture might interfere with the scratching cycle.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Previous studies of itch pathway have focused on the spinal cord level. Peripheral pruritic mediators stimulate mast cells degranulation in the skin releasing histamine, and histamine-sensitive unmyelinated nerve endings conduct nerve impulses to the posterior horn of the spinal cord, through the spinal thalamic tract to the thalamus, feed backing to the somatosensory cortex pruritus

Fig. 4
figure 4

A Peripheral-Gastrin releasing peptide-Periaqueductal gray/Ventral tegmental area: Peripheral pruritic mediators activate GRPR + neurons in the superficial layer of the spinal dorsal horn by releasing GRP, nerve impulses uploaded to the VTA and PAG brain regions to feedback itching to the body cortex. B Acupuncture treatment of chronic pruritus and scratching cycle possible mechanism: Acupuncture treatment reducing the expression of GRPR in the spinal cord, desensitizing the itch-signaling pathways to VTA and PAG brain regions to relieve chronic itch

Summary and future directions

Acupuncture is a safe and effective treatment for pruritus. Increasing understanding of pruritus calls for further investigation into acupuncture’s antipruritic mechanism. Based on the analysis of the studies on acupuncture antipruritics, this paper concluded that GRPR+ is the main target of acupuncture for itch relief. It will provide a good research direction for antipruritic mechanism for acupuncture.

Firstly, concerning the spinal cord and above, GRPR+ may play a significant role in acupuncture regulating the “itch-scratch vicious cycle” to alleviate pruritus symptoms. Secondly, as the PAG- and VTA-based reward centers in the “itch-scratch vicious cycle” of chronic pruritus being studied in greater depth, it will be a major target for future acupuncture treatment of chronic pruritus. Thirdly, the GRPR is an intermediary link in the regulation of the “itch-scratch vicious cycle” by higher centers such as PAG and VTA, to provide a new research pathway for possible mechanisms of acupuncture.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.



Gastrin-releasing peptide receptor


Ventral tegmental area


Periaqueductal gray matter


κ-Opioid receptors


G protein-coupled receptor




Chronic spontaneous urticaria


Resting state functional connectivity


Connectivity of the putamen-the posterior part of the midcingulate cortex





Al (OH)3):

Aluminum hydroxide




































Transient receptor potential vanilloid 1


Substance P



PGE2 :

Prostaglandin E2


Ionized calcium-binding adapter molecule 1




Cannabinoid receptors type


Tumor necrosis factor-α




Mu-opioid receptor


Gastrin-releasing peptide


B-type natriuretic peptide


Prefrontal cortex


Supplementary motor area


Premotor cortex


Ventrolateral periaqueductal gray


Anterior cingulate cortex-dorsomedial striatum


Primary motor cortex


Middle cingulate cortex


Caudate nucleus


Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex


Posterior cingulate cortex


Tachykinin 1


Gamma-aminobutyric acid


Nucleus ambiguous


Cholinergic interneurons


Ventral nucleus accumbens shell


Lateral and ventral lateral midbrain periaqueductal gray matter




  1. Weisshaar E, Szepietowski JC, Dalgard FJ, Garcovich S, Gieler U, Gimenez-Arnau AM, Lambert J, Leslie T, Mettang T, Misery L, et al. European S2k guideline on chronic pruritus. Acta Derm Venereol. 2019;99(5):469–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cevikbas F, Lerner EA. Physiology and pathophysiology of itch. Physiol Rev. 2020;100(3):945–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Misery L, Brenaut E, Le Garrec R, Abasq C, Genestet S, Marcorelles P, Zagnoli F. Neuropathic pruritus. Nat Rev Neurol. 2014;10(7):408–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wollenberg A, Nakahara T, Maari C, Peris K, Lio P, Augustin M, Silverberg JI, Rueda MJ, DeLozier AM, Pierce E, et al. Impact of baricitinib in combination with topical steroids on atopic dermatitis symptoms, quality of life and functioning in adult patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis from the BREEZE-AD7 Phase 3 randomized trial. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2021;35(7):1543–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Simpson EL, Guttman-Yassky E, Margolis DJ, Feldman SR, Qureshi A, Hata T, Mastey V, Wei W, Eckert L, Chao J, et al. Association of inadequately controlled disease and disease severity with patient-reported disease burden in adults with atopic dermatitis. JAMA Dermatol. 2018;154(8):903–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Su XY, Chen M, Yuan Y, Li Y, Guo SS, Luo HQ, Huang C, Sun W, Li Y, Zhu MX, et al. Central processing of itch in the midbrain reward center. Neuron. 2019;102(4):858-72.e5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bin Saif GA, Papoiu AD, Banari L, McGlone F, Kwatra SG, Chan YH, Yosipovitch G. The pleasurability of scratching an itch: a psychophysical and topographical assessment. Br J Dermatol. 2012;166(5):981–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Yosipovitch G, Rosen JD, Hashimoto T. Itch: from mechanism to (novel) therapeutic approaches. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2018;142(5):1375–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Toyama S, Tominaga M, Takamori K. Treatment options for troublesome itch. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2022;15(8):1022.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Sun YG, Chen ZF. A gastrin-releasing peptide receptor mediates the itch sensation in the spinal cord. Nature. 2007;448(7154):700–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Chen ZF. A neuropeptide code for itch. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2021;22(12):758–76.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Liu X, Wang Y, Tao T, Zeng L, Wang D, Wen Y, Li Y, Zhao Z, Tao A. GRPR/extracellular signal-regulated kinase and NPRA/extracellular signal-regulated kinase signaling pathways play a critical role in spinal transmission of chronic itch. J Invest Dermatol. 2021;141(4):863–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Liu X, Wang D, Wen Y, Zeng L, Li Y, Tao T, Zhao Z, Tao A. Spinal GRPR and NPRA contribute to chronic itch in a murine model of allergic contact dermatitis. J Invest Dermatol. 2020;140(9):1856–66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Barry DM, Munanairi A, Chen ZF. Spinal mechanisms of itch transmission. Neurosci Bull. 2018;34(1):156–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Li C, Xu Y, Liu H, Cai H, Jiang Y, Xu HE, Yin W. Molecular recognition of itch-associated neuropeptides by bombesin receptors. Cell Res. 2022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Belgrade MJ, Solomon LM, Lichter EA. Effect of acupuncture on experimentally induced itch. Acta Derm Venereol. 1984;64(2):129–33.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Pfab F, Huss-Marp J, Gatti A, Fuqin J, Athanasiadis GI, Irnich D, Raap U, Schober W, Behrendt H, Ring J, et al. Influence of acupuncture on type I hypersensitivity itch and the wheal and flare response in adults with atopic eczema—a blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover trial. Allergy. 2010;65(7):903–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kang S, Kim YK, Yeom M, Lee H, Jang H, Park HJ, Kim K. Acupuncture improves symptoms in patients with mild-to-moderate atopic dermatitis: a randomized, sham-controlled preliminary trial. Complement Ther Med. 2018;41:90–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Pfab F, Kirchner MT, Huss-Marp J, Schuster T, Schalock PC, Fuqin J, Athanasiadis GI, Behrendt H, Ring J, Darsow U, et al. Acupuncture compared with oral antihistamine for type I hypersensitivity itch and skin response in adults with atopic dermatitis: a patient- and examiner-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover trial. Allergy. 2012;67(4):566–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Tang Y, Cheng S, Wang J, Jin Y, Yang H, Lin Q, Xu S, Hui L, Yin Q, Yang Y, et al. Acupuncture for the treatment of itch: peripheral and central mechanisms. Front Neurosci. 2021;15: 786892.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Jiao R, Yang Z, Wang Y, Zhou J, Zeng Y, Liu Z. The effectiveness and safety of acupuncture for patients with atopic eczema: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acupunct Med. 2020;38(1):3–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ophir D, Elad Y. Effects of steam inhalation on nasal patency and nasal symptoms in patients with the common cold. Am J Otolaryngol. 1987;8(3):149–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Napadow V, Li A, Loggia ML, Kim J, Schalock PC, Lerner E, Tran TN, Ring J, Rosen BR, Kaptchuk TJ, et al. The brain circuitry mediating antipruritic effects of acupuncture. Cerebral Cortex. 2014;24(4):873–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wang Y, Fang J, Song P, Bao Y, Song W, Liu J, Lang C, Jorgenson K, Jung M, Shen D, et al. The dysfunction of the cerebellum and its cerebellum-reward-sensorimotor loops in chronic spontaneous urticaria. Cerebellum. 2018;17(5):507–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Min S, Kim KW, Jung WM, Lee MJ, Kim YK, Chae Y, Lee H, Park HJ. Acupuncture for histamine-induced itch: association with increased parasympathetic tone and connectivity of putamen-midcingulate cortex. Front Neurosci. 2019;13:215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lin JG, Lee YC, Tseng CH, Chen DY, Shih CY, MacDonald I, Hung SY, Chen YH. Electroacupuncture inhibits pruritogen-induced spinal microglial activation in mice. Brain Res. 2016;1649(Pt A):23–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Tianming. M, Ran. L, Guijun. L. experimental study on the effect of acupuncture at Baihui and Fengchi on substance P in rats model with neurodermatitis. J Liaoning Univ Tradit Chin Med. 2019. p. 177–80.

  28. Yiding. Z, Chanjuan. Y, Xiaoning Y. Effect of acupuncture on expression of 5-HT and its receptors in mice with histamine-induced pruritus. Mod JIntegr Tradit Chin Western Med. 2018. p. 2983–5+9.

  29. Yi-ding. Z, Chan-juan. Y, Wen-bin. L. Effect of acupuncture on the expression of β-EP in medulla oblongata in pruritus mice model. Shanghai J Acupuncture Moxibustion. 2018. p. 689–94.

  30. Yi-ding. Z, Chan-juan. Y, Dan. S, Wen-bin. L, Xiao-ning. Y. Effects of acupuncture on expression of 5-HT neurons in medulla oblongata and 5-HTR2B on Mice Models with Chloroquine-induced Pruritus. Chin J Inform Traditi Chin Med. 2017. p. 56–9.

  31. Li. J, Changcai. X, Jianpeng. H, Wenbin. F. Anti-pruritic effect of electroacupuncture in mice with atopic dermatitis pruritus model and its effect on prednisolone and substance P. Chin J Gerontol. 2016. p. 3874–7.

  32. Li. J, Jianhua. L, Jianpeng. H, Changcai. X, Wenbin. F. Anti-itch effect and immunomodulatory mechanism of electroacupuncture in a mouse model of allergic contact dermatitis. Chin J Gerontol. 2016. p. 3615–8.

  33. Chao. L, Yuan. W, Bin. X, Zhi. Y. Effect of electroacupuncture at Quchi ( LI11) or Xuehai ( SP10) on compound 48/80-induced scratching behavior in mice. Lishizhen Med Mater Med Res. 2014.

  34. Hong-liang. Z, Yang. Z, Qi-xiu. W, Yi-guo. C. Effect of Electroacupuncture on HA and PGE2 of Type I Hypersensitive Rats. Journal of Clinical Acupuncture and Moxibustion. 2014. p. 45–7.

  35. Yang. Z, Hongliang. Z, Qixiu. W, Yiguo. C. Influence of electroacupuncture on SP and MC of type I hypersensitive rats. J Liaoning Univ Tradit Chin Med. 2014. p. 197–8.

  36. Yuan. W, Zong-xiang. T, Bin. X. Effects of electroacupuncture at Quchi ( LI 11 ) and Xuehai ( SP 10 ) on compound48/80-induced pruritus model of mice. China J Tradit Chin Med Pharm. 2014. p. 117–20.

  37. Yi-ming. F, Hai-tao. Z, Guang-fu. Y, Chuan-you. L, Li-qiang. R. Effect of electro acupuncture on experimental cutaneous pruritus in rats. Acupunct Res. 2006.

  38. Qixiu. W, Yang. Z, Hongliang. Z, Yiguo. C. The random parallel control study on the influence of type I allergic inflammationrats’il-4、Ifn-Γ expression level treated by electric acupuncture Tianjing Qinglengyuan And Zhiyin Prick Bleeded. J Prac Tradit Chin Inter Med. 2013.

  39. Yeom M, Ahn S, Jang SY, Jang JH, Lee Y, Hahm DH, Park HJ. Acupuncture attenuates comorbid anxiety- and depressive-like behaviors of atopic dermatitis through modulating neuroadaptation in the brain reward circuit in mice. Biol Res. 2022;55(1):28.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Ge WQ, Zhan-Mu OY, Chen C, Zhang H, Wang XY, Liu X, Li L, Lan YY, Li CN, Sun JC, et al. Electroacupuncture reduces chronic itch via cannabinoid CB1 receptors in the ventrolateral periaqueductal gray. Front Pharmacol. 2022;13: 931600.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Li HP, Wang XY, Chen C, Li JJ, Yu C, Lin LX, Yu ZE, Jin ZY, Zhu H, Xiang HC, et al. 100 Hz electroacupuncture alleviated chronic itch and GRPR expression through activation of kappa opioid receptors in spinal dorsal horn. Front Neurosci. 2021;15: 625471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Ye YS, Pan AZ, Zhen Y, Kang MR, Zhang B, Yi WM. Antipruritic effects of electroacupuncture on morphine-induced pruritus model mice through the TLR2/4-MyD88-NF-κB pathway. NeuroReport. 2019;30(5):331–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Lee YC, Lin CH, Hung SY, Chung HY, Luo ST, MacDonald I, Chu YT, Lin PL, Chen YH. Manual acupuncture relieves bile acid-induced itch in mice: the role of microglia and TNF-α. Int J Med Sci. 2018;15(9):953–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Jung DL, Lee SD, Choi IH, Na HS, Hong SU. Effects of electroacupuncture on capsaicin-induced model of atopic dermatitis in rats. J Dermatol Sci. 2014;74(1):23–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Han JB, Kim CW, Sun B, Kim SK, Lee MG, Park DS, Min BI. The antipruritic effect of acupuncture on serotonin-evoked itch in rats. Acupunct Electrother Res. 2008;33(3–4):145–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Mengxue R, Guangyan W, Xing G, Jianfeng S, Hongli L. Comparison of rat itch model induced by different pruritogens. J Army Med Univ. 2021;43(16):1527–34.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Wernersson S, Pejler G. Mast cell secretory granules: armed for battle. Nat Rev Immunol. 2014;14(7):478–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Kabashima K, Nakashima C, Nonomura Y, Otsuka A, Cardamone C, Parente R, De Feo G, Triggiani M. Biomarkers for evaluation of mast cell and basophil activation. Immunol Rev. 2018;282(1):114–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Carraway RE, Cochrane DE, Granier C, Kitabgi P, Leeman E, Singer EA. Parallel secretion of endogenous 5-hydroxytryptamine and histamine from mast cells stimulated by vasoactive peptides and compound 48/80. Br J Pharmacol. 1984;81(2):227–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Liu Q, Tang Z, Surdenikova L, Kim S, Patel KN, Kim A, Ru F, Guan Y, Weng HJ, Geng Y, et al. Sensory neuron-specific GPCR Mrgprs are itch receptors mediating chloroquine-induced pruritus. Cell. 2009;139(7):1353–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Jang Y, Lee WJ, Hong GS, Shim WS. Red ginseng extract blocks histamine-dependent itch by inhibition of H1R/TRPV1 pathway in sensory neurons. J Ginseng Res. 2015;39(3):257–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Shimada SG, LaMotte RH. Behavioral differentiation between itch and pain in mouse. Pain. 2008;139(3):681–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Yang H, Chen W, Zhu R, Wang J, Meng J. Critical players and therapeutic targets in chronic itch. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(17):9935.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Mack MR, Kim BS. The itch-scratch cycle: a neuroimmune perspective. Trends Immunol. 2018;39(12):980–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Costa SK, Starr A, Hyslop S, Gilmore D, Brain SD. How important are NK1 receptors for influencing microvascular inflammation and itch in the skin? Studies using Phoneutria nigriventer venom. Vascul Pharmacol. 2006;45(4):209–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Linxue H, Li L. Advances in the study of neurophysiological mechanisms of dermatogenic chronic pruritus. Chin J Dermatovenereol Integrated Tradit West Med. 2015;14(04):265–9.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Lázár J, Szabó T, Marincsák R, Kovács L, Blumberg PM, Bíró T. Sensitization of recombinant vanilloid receptor-1 by various neurotrophic factors. Life Sci. 2004;75(2):153–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Guo CJ, Grabinski NS, Liu Q. Peripheral mechanisms of itch. J Invest Dermatol. 2022;142(1):31–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Sun YG, Zhao ZQ, Meng XL, Yin J, Liu XY, Chen ZF. Cellular basis of itch sensation. Science. 2009;325(5947):1531–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Liu XY, Liu ZC, Sun YG, Ross M, Kim S, Tsai FF, Li QF, Jeffry J, Kim JY, Loh HH, et al. Unidirectional cross-activation of GRPR by MOR1D uncouples itch and analgesia induced by opioids. Cell. 2011;147(2):447–58.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Wang Z, Jiang C, Yao H, Chen O, Rahman S, Gu Y, Zhao J, Huh Y, Ji RR. Central opioid receptors mediate morphine-induced itch and chronic itch via disinhibition. Brain. 2021;144(2):665–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Zhao ZQ, Liu XY, Jeffry J, Karunarathne WK, Li JL, Munanairi A, Zhou XY, Li H, Sun YG, Wan L, et al. Descending control of itch transmission by the serotonergic system via 5-HT1A-facilitated GRP-GRPR signaling. Neuron. 2014;84(4):821–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Lou H, Lu J, Choi EB, Oh MH, Jeong M, Barmettler S, Zhu Z, Zheng T. Expression of IL-22 in the skin causes Th2-biased immunity, epidermal barrier dysfunction, and pruritus via stimulating epithelial Th2 cytokines and the GRP pathway. J Immunol. 2017;198(7):2543–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Chen S, Gao XF, Zhou Y, Liu BL, Liu XY, Zhang Y, Barry DM, Liu K, Jiao Y, Bardoni R, et al. A spinal neural circuitry for converting touch to itch sensation. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):5074.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Wahlgren CF. Itch and atopic dermatitis: an overview. J Dermatol. 1999;26(11):770–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Leknes SG, Bantick S, Willis CM, Wilkinson JD, Wise RG, Tracey I. Itch and motivation to scratch: an investigation of the central and peripheral correlates of allergen- and histamine-induced itch in humans. J Neurophysiol. 2007;97(1):415–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Desbordes G, Li A, Loggia ML, Kim J, Schalock PC, Lerner E, Tran TN, Ring J, Rosen BR, Kaptchuk TJ, et al. Evoked itch perception is associated with changes in functional brain connectivity. NeuroImage Clinical. 2015;7:213–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Papoiu AD, Emerson NM, Patel TS, Kraft RA, Valdes-Rodriguez R, Nattkemper LA, Coghill RC, Yosipovitch G. Voxel-based morphometry and arterial spin labeling fMRI reveal neuropathic and neuroplastic features of brain processing of itch in end-stage renal disease. J Neurophysiol. 2014;112(7):1729–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Ishiuji Y, Coghill RC, Patel TS, Oshiro Y, Kraft RA, Yosipovitch G. Distinct patterns of brain activity evoked by histamine-induced itch reveal an association with itch intensity and disease severity in atopic dermatitis. Br J Dermatol. 2009;161(5):1072–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Ishiuji Y. Addiction and the itch-scratch cycle. What do they have in common? Exp Dermatol. 2019;28(12):1448–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Lu YC, Wang YJ, Lu B, Chen M, Zheng P, Liu JG. ACC to dorsal medial striatum inputs modulate histaminergic itch sensation. J Neurosci. 2018;38(15):3823–39.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Mochizuki H, Papoiu ADP, Nattkemper LA, Lin AC, Kraft RA, Coghill RC, Yosipovitch G. Scratching induces overactivity in motor-related regions and reward system in chronic itch patients. J Invest Dermatol. 2015;135(11):2814–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Ishiuji Y, Coghill RC, Patel TS, Dawn A, Fountain J, Oshiro Y, Yosipovitch G. Repetitive scratching and noxious heat do not inhibit histamine-induced itch in atopic dermatitis. Br J Dermatol. 2008;158(1):78–83.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Schneider G, Ständer S, Burgmer M, Driesch G, Heuft G, Weckesser M. Significant differences in central imaging of histamine-induced itch between atopic dermatitis and healthy subjects. Eur J Pain. 2008;12(7):834–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Chen XJ, Sun YG. Central circuit mechanisms of itch. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):3052.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Gao ZR, Chen WZ, Liu MZ, Chen XJ, Wan L, Zhang XY, Yuan L, Lin JK, Wang M, Zhou L, et al. Tac1-expressing neurons in the periaqueductal gray facilitate the itch-scratching cycle via descending regulation. Neuron. 2019;101(1):45-59.e9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. Mu D, Deng J, Liu KF, Wu ZY, Shi YF, Guo WM, Mao QQ, Liu XJ, Li H, Sun YG. A central neural circuit for itch sensation. Science (New York, NY). 2017;357(6352):695–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. Kiguchi N, Ding H, Park SH, Mabry KM, Kishioka S, Shiozawa Y, Alfonso Romero-Sandoval E, Peters CM, Ko MC. Functional roles of neuromedin B and gastrin-releasing peptide in regulating itch and pain in the spinal cord of non-human primates. Biochem Pharmacol. 2022;198: 114972.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. Wang WH, Wang HF. Global centennial research and the internationalization of acupuncture and moxibustion: in the perspective of SCI database (1921–2020). Zhongguo Zhen Jiu. 2021;41(12):1410–4.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Papoiu AD, Nattkemper LA, Sanders KM, Kraft RA, Chan YH, Coghill RC, Yosipovitch G. Brain’s reward circuits mediate itch relief. A functional MRI study of active scratching. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(12): e82389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Mochizuki H, Tashiro M, Kano M, Sakurada Y, Itoh M, Yanai K. Imaging of central itch modulation in the human brain using positron emission tomography. Pain. 2003;105(1–2):339–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. van de Sand MF, Menz MM, Sprenger C, Büchel C. Nocebo-induced modulation of cerebral itch processing—an fMRI study. Neuroimage. 2018;166:209–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Agostinelli LJ, Mix MR, Hefti MM, Scammell TE, Bassuk AG. Input-output connections of LJA5 prodynorphin neurons. J Comp Neurol. 2020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Mochizuki H, Tanaka S, Morita T, Wasaka T, Sadato N, Kakigi R. The cerebral representation of scratching-induced pleasantness. J Neurophysiol. 2014;111(3):488–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Freitag FB, Ahemaiti A, Jakobsson JET, Weman HM, Lagerstrom MC. Spinal gastrin releasing peptide receptor expressing interneurons are controlled by local phasic and tonic inhibition. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):16573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


Not applicable.


This study was supported by the Central Guidance for Local Projects (NO. 2022ZYD0101), National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.82004487), Innovation Team and Talents Cultivation Program of the National Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine (No. ZYYCXTD-D-202003), and National Key R&D Program of China(No.2019YFC1709001).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



JJL, JG, and SY conceived the review and drafted the manuscript. XML formed the analysis and interpretation of data. SY revised the review, SY will monitor each procedure of the review and approve the final version to be submitted. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sha Yang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

All authors consent to publish.

Competing interests

We confirm that this manuscript has not been published by other journals. All authors have approved the manuscript and agree with its submission to this journal. The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

Search strategy.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, Jj., Li, X., Guo, J. et al. Role of GRPR in Acupuncture Intervention in the “Itch-scratch Vicious Cycle” Spinal Circuit of Chronic Pruritus. Chin Med 18, 2 (2023).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • GRPR
  • Acupuncture
  • Chronic pruritus
  • Itch-scratch
  • Spinal circuit
  • Ventral tegmental area (VTA)
  • Periaqueductal gray matter (PAG)