Skip to content
  • Research
  • Open Access

Protective effect of Phellinus linteus polysaccharide extracts against thioacetamide-induced liver fibrosis in rats: a proteomics analysis

  • 1,
  • 2,
  • 2,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 3 and
  • 1Email author
Chinese Medicine20127:23

https://doi.org/10.1186/1749-8546-7-23

©  Wang et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012

  • Received: 14 March 2012
  • Accepted: 9 October 2012
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

The hepatoprotective potential of Phellinus linteus polysaccharide (PLP) extracts has been described. However, the molecular mechanism of PLP for the inhibition of liver fibrosis is unclear. This study aims to investigate the molecular protein signatures involved in the hepatoprotective mechanisms of PLP via a proteomics approach using a thioacetamide (TAA)-induced liver fibrosis rat model.

Methods

Male Sprague–Dawley rats were divided into three groups of six as follows: Normal group; TAA group, in which rats received TAA only; and PLP group, in which rats received PLP and TAA. Liver fibrosis was induced in the rats by repeated intraperitoneal injections of TAA at a dose of 200 mg/kg body weight twice a week for 4 weeks. PLP was given orally at a dose of 50 mg/kg body weight twice a day from the beginning of the TAA treatment until the end of the experiment. The development of liver cirrhosis was verified by histological examination. Liver proteomes were established by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. Proteins with significantly altered expression levels were identified by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight/time of flight mass spectrometry and the differentially expressed proteins were validated by immunohistochemical staining and reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction.

Results

Histological staining showed a remarkable reduction in liver fibrosis in the rats with PLP treatment. A total of 13 differentially expressed proteins including actin, tubulin alpha-1C chain, preprohaptoglobin, hemopexin, galectin-5, glutathione S-transferase alpha-4 (GSTA4), branched chain keto acid dehydrogenase hterotetrameric E1 subunit alpha (BCKDHA), glutathione S-transferase mu (GSTmu); glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH); thiosulfate sulfurtransferase (TFT); betaine-homocysteine S-methyltransferase 1 (BHMT1); quinoid dihydropteridine reductase (QDPR); ribonuclease UK114 were observed between the TAA and PLP groups. These proteins are involved in oxidative stress, heme and iron metabolism, cysteine metabolism, and branched-chain amino acid catabolism.

Conclusion

The proteomics data indicate that P. linteus may be protective against TAA-induced liver fibrosis via regulation of oxidative stress pathways, heat shock pathways, and metabolic pathways for amino acids and nucleic acids.

Keywords

  • Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction
  • Liver Fibrosis
  • Induce Liver Fibrosis
  • Semiquantitative Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction
  • Branch Chain Keto Acid

Background

Most chronic liver diseases, including viral hepatitis (hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus), alcoholic liver disease, and biliary diseases[1], ultimately lead to liver fibrosis. Without effective treatments at an early stage, reversible liver fibrosis will lead to irreversible cirrhosis[2]. Oxidative stress may cause liver damage[3, 4], and reducing oxidative stress by supplementation with antioxidants is effective for preventing liver fibrogenesis[5]. However, evidence for the efficacy of antioxidants, such as vitamin E and superoxide dismutase, in the treatment of human liver fibrosis has not been established[6].

Phellinus linteus (Berk. et Curt.) Teng, an orange-colored mushroom, belongs to the Hymenochaetaceae Basidiomycetes and has been considered useful in preventing and treating liver fibrosis and liver cancers owing to its strong anti-inflammatory, antioxidative, antiangiogenic, and anticancer properties[7–10]. P. linteus has been used in Chinese medicine for the treatment of tumors, menstrual irregularities, and liver-related illnesses[11]. Several reports from Korea and Japan have demonstrated that intake of P. linteus for a long time may induce spontaneous regression of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with multiple metastases[12, 13]. Some in vivo and in vitro studies have also demonstrated that P. linteus exerts antitumor effects on hepatocellular carcinoma[14–16].

Over the last decade, accumulating evidence suggests that P. linteus may protect the liver against fibrosis via its antioxidative property. A study in 2002 demonstrated that an extract of P. linteus was able to suppress carbon tetrachloride-induced late liver fibrosis by reducing peroxidation products, restoring the activities of catalase and superoxide dismutase, and reviving the expression of aerobic respiration enzymes[11]. Shon et al.[11] demonstrated that a P. linteus polysaccharide (PLP) fraction was able to inhibit cytochrome P450 isozymes in the liver. Furthermore, a retinoic acid derivative isolated from P. linteus was reported to decrease transforming growth factor-beta-induced early liver fibrosis by downregulating reactive oxygen species generation and suppressing the expression of several proteins[11].

Although antioxidation is an important mechanism by which P. linteus suppresses liver fibrosis, the molecular mechanism of the antioxidative effect of P. linteus is still unclear. To date, studies on P. linteus-mediated protection of the liver against injury have only found a few target molecules[17]. With the development of proteomics technology, it is possible to cover the expression of more proteins acting within a biological context to investigate the cellular processes involved in disease pathogenesis with high-throughput and in a quantitative manner[18, 19].

In the present study, we aim to assess the hepatoprotective effects of P. linteus against thioacetamide (TAA)-induced liver fibrosis by high-resolution two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (2-DE) coupled with mass spectrometry technology.

Methods

Preparation of PLP

Sang Hwang 125 capsules containing a lyophilized hot water extract of wild-type P. linteus were donated by Dr. Frankie Chan (Amazing Grace Health Products Limited Partnership, Thailand). Each Sang Hwang capsule contained 400 mg of pure extracts from natural P. linteus. The polysaccharides and glucan contents of the P. linteus natural compound are 53–63% and 24%, respectively, as previously reported by us[20]. This natural compound has been shown to possess strong antioxidative and immunomodulatory properties[21]. PLP was prepared by dissolving 100 g of freeze-dried powder from Sang Hwang 125 capsules in 1 L of distilled water, followed by the addition of 2 L of ethanol (Merck, Germany) at −20°C. The precipitated polysaccharides were collected by centrifugation at 3000 × g for 1 h, dissolved in a small volume of distilled water, and lyophilized. The resulting powder was stored at −20°C until use.

Animal experiments

Eight-week-old male Sprague–Dawley rats (weighing approximately 200 g) were obtained from Hallym University (Korea). All rats were kept in an animal house under a 12-h/12-h light/dark cycle, with controlled temperature and humidity and free access to food and water. After 1 week of acclimatization, the rats were arbitrarily divided into three groups: Normal group; TAA group, in which rats received TAA only; and PLP group, in which rats received PLP and TAA. TAA (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) was intraperitoneally injected at a dose of 200 mg/kg body weight twice a week for 4 weeks. PLP was given orally at a dose of 50 mg/kg body weight twice a day from the beginning of the TAA treatment until the end of the experiment. All rats were euthanized after 4 weeks by intraperitoneal injection of 200 mg/kg sodium pentobarbital (Sigma-Aldrich, USA). Dissection was carried out, and liver samples were fixed in 10% buffered formalin solution (Surgipath, Germany) for histological staining. Tissues from the same portion of the liver were collected from the TAA and PLP groups for the proteomics analysis.

The study protocol was approved by the Hallym University, South Korea. Animal care complied with institutional guidelines.

Histological examination of the liver

The fixed liver tissues were embedded in paraffin and sectioned at 5-μm thickness. For each liver sample, the stage of hepatic fibrosis was established. The liver sections were stained with Masson’s trichrome (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) and observed under NIKON model SE microscope (NIKON, Japan) to evaluate the degree of fibrosis.

Sample preparation for proteomics analysis

Liver samples were snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C for the proteomics analysis. The frozen liver tissue samples from the TAA and PLP groups were disrupted with a tissue teaser (Biospec Products, USA) in a lysis buffer containing 25 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA disodium salt, 1 mM dithiothreitol (DTT) (USB, USA), 1% (v/v) Triton X-100 (USB, USA), and 1% (v/v) Protease Inhibitor Cocktail Set III (Bio-Rad, USA). The superfluous salt in the extract was removed by incubation with 20% (w/v) trichloroacetic acid (TCA)-acetone solution and 20 mM DTT in acetone (Merck, Germany) for 4 hours at −40°C. The protein pellet was obtained by centrifugation at 15,800 × g for 30 min at 4°C. Excess TCA was removed by three washes with acetone containing 20 mM DTT. After air-drying, the protein pellet was resuspended in buffer comprising 7 M urea, 2 M thiourea, 100 mM DTT, 5% (v/v) glycerol, and 4% (w/v) 3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)dimethylammonio]-1-propanesulfonate (CHAPS) (USB, USA), and the resulting protein solution was stored at −80°C until 2-DE analysis. The protein concentration was determined by the Bradford assay (Bio-Rad, USA).

Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis

The 2-DE procedures were performed according to our previous study[22] with some modifications. The tissue samples were processed in duplicate and a total of 12 gels (six for the TAA group and six for the PLP group) were used. For the first-dimension electrophoresis, 100-μg protein samples were mixed with 350 μL of rehydration buffer comprising 9.5 M urea, 2% (w/v) CHAPS, 0.28% (w/v) DTT, 0.002% (w/v) bromophenol blue (USB, USA) and 1% (v/v) immobilized pH gradient buffer (pH 3–10) (Bio-Rad, USA), and then applied to an Ettan IPGphor 3 isoelectric focusing electrophoresis system (GE healthcare, USA). The samples were rehydrated for 7 h before isoelectric focusing with the following programs: (a) linear increase up to 500 V over 1 h; (b) holding at 500 V for 2 h; (c) linear increase up to 10,000 V over 4 h; (d) linear increase up to 10,000 V over 3 h; and (e) final hold at 10,000 V to reach a total of 120,000 V × h. The focused immobilized pH gradient gel strips were equilibrated for 15 min in a solution comprising 50 mM Tris–HCl, pH 8.8, 6 M urea, 30% (v/v) glycerol, 2% (w/v) sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) and 20 mM DTT, followed by incubation with the same buffer containing 20 mM iodoacetamide (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) for another 15 min. The second-dimension separation was performed by 12.5% SDS polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) at a constant current of 30 mA for 30 min, followed by a 60-mA current for the rest of the analysis until the bromophenol blue line reach the bottom of the gels.

Image acquisition and analysis

After the 2-DE, the gels were stained with SYPRO® Ruby Protein Stain (Bio-Rad, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The stained gels were scanned with a Molecular Imager PharosFX Plus System (Bio-Rad, USA) and analyzed by PDQuest 8.0 software (Bio-Rad, USA). Each expression level was calculated as the percentage volume (% vol), and exported for statistical analysis. The relative intensities of spots were used for comparison between the two groups, and only those spots with significant differences (≥ 1.5-fold increase or decrease; P < 0.05) were selected for protein identification.

Protein identification

Spots showing differential expression (P < 0.05) between the TAA and PLP groups were sent to the Genome Research Centre (The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong) for protein identification. The proteins were digested with sequencing grade modified trypsin (Promega, USA) and applied to matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time-of-flight/time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF/TOF) mass spectrometer analysis using a 4800 MALDI TOF/TOF Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, USA). Matches between the experimental data and mass values calculated from a candidate protein were carried out by Mascot search engine (Matrix Science, UK) that uses MS data to identify proteins from the NCBInr database with taxonomy limited to Rattus norvegicus. The database allowed up to one missed cleavage and the mass tolerance was set as 75 ppm peptide limited by fixed modification of carbamidomethyl and variable modification of oxidation, with monoisotopic values. Mascot reported the molecular weight search (MOWSE) score, which is calculated by −10 × log10 (P), where P is the probability that the observed match is a random event. The P value is limited by the size of the sequence database being searched (limited by taxonomy), the conditions, and the settings of trypsin digestion. Each calculated value that falls within a given mass tolerance of an experimental value counts as a match. The accepted threshold is that an event is significant if it would be expected to occur at random with a frequency of < 5%. In this study, a protein match with a score of > 71 was regarded as significant.

Western blot analysis for validation of differentially expressed proteins

Western blot analysis was employed to validate the proteomic data. Liver protein extracts were mixed with sample buffer (62.5 mM Tris–HCl, pH 6.8, 25% (v/v) glycerol, 2% (w/v) SDS, 350 mM DTT, and 0.01% (w/v) bromophenol blue) at a ratio of 1:1 and incubated in boiling water for 5 min. Aliquots of the samples (30 mg of protein) were separated by electrophoresis in 12.5% SDS-PAGE gels at constant voltage (120 V) and then transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (GE Healthcare, USA) using a TE77 PWR Semi-dry Transfer Unit (GE Healthcare, USA). The membranes were blocked with 5% (w/v) non-fat dry milk in phosphate buffer saline overnight at 4°C. The membrane was incubated with primary antibodies: anti-haptoglobin (1:1000), anti-hemopexin (1:1000;), anti-hemoglobin (1:1000), anti-GSTA4 (1:500), and anti-GSTmu (1:1000) (Abcam, USA) for one hour and then incubated with their corresponding secondary horseradish peroxidase-conjugated antibodies (Bio-Rad, USA) for another one hour. The blots were washed five times with 0.05% Tween-20 in phosphate buffer saline between steps. Proteins were detected with an enhanced chemiluminescence system (GE Healthcare, USA) and the band intensity was measured with the Quantity One software (Bio-Rad, USA).

Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction

Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was employed to verify the differentially expressed proteins identified by the proteomics analysis. Total RNA was extracted from liver samples in the TAA and PLP groups using TRIzol® (Invitrogen, USA). Aliquots of the total RNA (5 μg) were reverse-transcribed with Super Script III (Invitrogen, USA) in the presence of oligodeoxythymidylic acid primers (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. PCR was performed with an iCycler Thermal Cycler (Bio-Rad, USA). cDNA (0.5 μL) were used for each PCR amplification in a total reaction volume of 15 μL using iQ SYBR Green Super Mix (Bio-Rad, USA), and all reactions were performed in duplicate. A total of 11 genes were examined, including ribonuclease UK114, hemopexin, preprohaptoglobin, glutathione S-transferase alpha-4 (Gsta4), branched chain keto acid dehydrogenase heterotetrameric E1 subunit alpha (Bckdha), glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (Gapdh), haptoglobin, thiosulfate sulfurtransferase (Tft), betaine-homocysteine S-methyltransferase 1 (Bhmt1), quinoid dihydropteridine reductase (Qdpr), and dihydrofolate reductase (Dhfr) because they showed significantly different expression levels in the 2-DE proteomics analysis, plus ubiquitin C as an internal control. The primers in Table1 were used for the PCR with mentioned annealing temperature. The amplification was initiated by 4 min denaturation at 94°C for 1 cycle, followed by 30 cycles at 94°C for 30 s, specially annealing temperature of each gene for 30 s, and 72°C for 1 min using a Bio-Rad Icycler PCR thermocycler 96 well thermal thermo cycler (Bio-Rad, USA). After the last cycle of amplification, samples were incubated for 7 min at 72°C. The PCR products were examined in 1% agarose gels stained with 0.01% SYBR® Safe DNA Gel Stain (Invitrogen, USA) and analyzed using Quantity One software (Bio-Rad, USA).
Table 1

Primers used for the PCR analyses

Gene

Primer sequence (5’-3’)

Fragment size (bp)

Annealing temperature (°C)

Preprohaptoglobin

F1: TGCCTATCTGCCTGCCTTC

316

58

R2: GTGTCCTCCTCCGTGTCAT

Hemopexin

F: AAGCCAGACTCAGATGTAA

479

55

R: AAGCAGTAGTAGCGTTCA

Gsta4

F: GGACCTGATGATGATGATTATC

446

54

R: TATCTTGCCTCTGGAATGC

Bckdha

F: AGCGTCACTTCGTCACCATT

547

60

R: GCCTTCTCCTGTTCCTCATCC

Bhmt

F: CAGACACCTTCCTACCTCAG

281

52

R: CAGTTCACACCGACAATGG

Dhfr

F: CTTGACGGCACTCTAAGC

304

52

R: CTCCTTGTGGTGGTTCCT

Qdpr

F: GATGTGGTGGAGAATGAAGAGG

241

56

R: AGTGGCTAGAGATGGTGGATG

Gapdh

F: CATGACCACAGTCCATGCCATC

451

60

R: CACCCTGTTGCTGTAGCCATATTC

Uk114

F: GCATGTCGTCAATAATCAGA

443

54

R: CTCCAGAGTCAGCATCAG

Tft

F: GGTTCATCAGGTGCTCTATCG

311

58

R: CCAGGTCGTCTCCATCGTATA

Ubiquitin C

F: TGGAGGTCGAGCCCAGTGTTA

105

58

R: CCCAAGAACAAGCACAAGAAGGGCT

1F: Forword.

2R: Reverse.

Statistical analysis

All data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). The significance of differences in data between the groups was determined by one-way analysis of variance followed by the Tukey test for equality of variances using SPSS 17.0 (IBM, USA). Differences were considered statistically significant at P < 0.05.

Results

Histological assessment of liver fibrosis

TAA treatment of rats for 4 weeks resulted in liver fibrosis, which was characterized by alterations in the quality of the hepatic extracellular matrix (Figure1B&C), compared with the livers of rats in the Normal group (Figure1A). Extended collagen deposition and large septa of the hepatic lobules were observed after 4 weeks of TAA treatment (Figure1B). In addition, lymphoid infiltration was observed around the central and portal veins in the TAA-treated livers. PLP treatment markedly reduced the severity of the fibrosis and inflammation induced by TAA (Figure1C).
Figure 1
Figure 1

Photomicrographs of rat livers. The livers were sectioned at 5-μm thickness and the sections were stained with Masson’s trichrome. A: Normal group. B: TAA group. C: PLP group. Extended collagen deposition and large septa of the hepatic lobules are observed in the TAA-treated liver (B) compared with the normal liver (A). In addition, lymphoid infiltration is observed around the central and portal veins in the TAA-treated liver. PLP treatment markedly reduces the severity of the fibrosis and inflammation induced by TAA (C).

Identification of protein spots on 2-DE gels

On each 2-DE gel, nearly 1000 individual protein spots were detected, and 13 spots with notable changes found by the PDQuest software between the PLP and TAA groups were identified by MS (Figure2, Table2). The proteins with increased expression levels in the PLP group compared with the TAA group included actin cytoplasmic 2, tubulin alpha-1C chain, galectin-5, BCKDHA, DHFR, preprohaptoglobin, GSTA4, QDPR, GAPDH, and TFT. The proteins with decreased expression levels in the PLP group compared with the TAA group were hemopexin, ribonuclease UK114, and BHMT1.
Figure 2
Figure 2

Representative 2-DE gel maps of the liver proteomes of rats in the TAA (A) and PLP (B) groups.

Table 2

Differentially expressed liver proteins between the TAA-induced liver fibrosis rats in the PLP and TAA groups

Spot No.1

Protein name

GenInfo identifier2

Protein score3

Expression quantity (×102) TAA

Expression quantity (×102) PLP

Expression change (PLP/TAA)

P

pI 4

Mr(kDa)4

1011

actin, cytoplasmic 2

gi|4501887

65

62.6 ± 24.5

97.1 ± 13.0

1.6

0.012

5.31

42.1

1619

tubulin alpha-1C chain

gi|58865558

254

29.4 ± 13.0

55.4 ± 14.0

1.9

0.014

4.96

50.6

3802

hemopexin

gi|122065203

262

100.5 ± 34.1

61.4 ± 15.4

−1.6

0.028

7.58

52.0

5011

galectin-5

gi|785053

120

11.5 ± 9.5

75.3 ± 44.9

6.5

0.028

6.95

15.5

5514

Bckdha protein

gi|59808237

88

41.3 ± 9.1

61.0 ± 11.5

1.5

0.008

6.4

37.6

7113

dihydrofolate reductase

gi|18426814

100

49.3 ± 14.7

73.8 ± 14.0

1.5

0.015

6.77

21.7

7126

Glutathione S-transferase alpha-4

gi|157820217

67

15.1 ± 7.6

28.9 ± 11.3

1.9

0.033

6.77

25.6

7203

preprohaptoglobin

gi|204657

75

54.8 ± 20.6

92.5 ± 16.2

1.7

0.005

7.16

30.4

8005

ribonuclease UK114

gi|47168636

159

172.2 ± 69.2

78.9 ± 45.1

−2.2

0.020

7.79

14.4

8110

quinoid dihydropteridine reductase, isoform CRA_c

gi|149047263

135

83.7 ± 22.3

128.5 ± 25.5

1.5

0.009

9.69

27.9

8207

betaine-homocysteine S-methyltransferase 1

gi|13540663

142

128.6 ± 42.6

65.1 ± 12

−2.0

0.006

8.02

45.4

8305

glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase

gi|8393418

130

141.6 ± 69.1

225.8 ± 44.3

1.6

0.035

8.14

36.1

9308

thiosulfate sulfurtransferase

gi|57528682

256

63.8 ± 15.7

99.7 ± 22.8

1.6

0.010

7.71

33.6

1Spot no.: automatically assigned by the PDQuest software.

2GenInfo identifier: sequence identification number assigned by GenBank.

3Protein score: generated by the MS identification system.

4Mr and pI: relative molecular mass (Mr) and isoelectric point (pI) generated by the MS system.

Western blot analysis for validation of differentially expressed proteins in the proteomics analysis

Owning to the limitations of anti-rat protein antibodies, many of the identified differentially expressed proteins could not be measured by western blot analysis. Haptoglobin, hemopexin, heat-shock protein 70 (HSP70), and GSTA4 were successfully measured and used to validate the results obtained in the proteomic analysis. The western blot results were in general agreement with the differentially expressed proteins obtained in the proteomic analysis. As shown in Figure3, the level of hemopexin (P = 0.049) was lower and the levels of haptoglobin (P = 0.042) and GSTA4 (P = 0.040) were much higher in the PLP group compared with the TAA group. The levels of hemoglobin (P = 0.047) and HSP70 (P = 0.041) were higher in the PLP group than in the TAA group. GSTmu did not show a significant difference in the western blot analysis.
Figure 3
Figure 3

Western blot measurements of the haptoglobin, hemopexin, GSTA4, hemoglobin, HSP70, and GSTmu expression levels in the TAA-induced fibrotic livers with and without PLP treatment. The protein expression levels are presented as means ± SD (N = 6). *P < 0.05 vs. the TAA group.

Quantitative RT-PCR for gene expression analysis

To investigate whether the expression changes of the identified proteins occurred at the transcriptional level, we determined the mRNA expression changes of these proteins by semiquantitative RT-PCR. As shown in Figure4, the mRNA expression of many of the identified genes changed in a similar tendency as their protein expression change showed in 2D proteomic results, suggesting that the effects of P. linteus were exerted at the protein expression level, i.e. focused on the translation and post-translation steps. Haptoglobin, BCKDHA, and BHMT showed significant differences between the TAA and PLP groups.
Figure 4
Figure 4

Semiquantitative RT-PCR analyses of the effects of PLP on the gene expression changes of significantly altered proteins during TAA-induced liver fibrosis. The mRNA expression levels are presented as means ± SD (N = 6). *P < 0.05,**P < 0.01 vs. the TAA group.

Discussion

The present study demonstrates that a natural product derived from P. linteus was able to protect against liver fibrosis induced in rats by chronic insult with TAA. The histopathological data clearly showed a reduction in collagen accumulation in the liver with PLP treatment. The present study thus supports the earlier findings that P. linteus possesses the capability to suppress liver injury[17, 23] and exhibits strong and specific inhibitory activities to reduce peroxidation products and increase antioxidant enzymes in the liver[17, 23].

By using a 2-DE gel proteomics approach, we identified 13 differentially expressed hepatic proteins in the TAA-induced liver fibrosis rats in response to PLP treatment. Of these, 10 proteins showed increased expression and three proteins showed reduced expression, and the expression changes ranged from ±1.5-fold to ±2.5-fold (Figure5). When these proteins are categorized according to their biochemical and physiological functions, we found associations with oxidative responses, molecular chaperones, heme and iron metabolism, cysteine metabolism, branched-chain amino acid metabolism, energy metabolism, and glutathione metabolites (Table3). Among these 13 proteins, the regulation of hemopexin, preprohaptoglobin, GSTA4, BHMT, BCKDHA, QDPR, DHFR, and galectin-5 expression could be important in the protective effects of P. linteus against liver fibrosis.
Figure 5
Figure 5

Effects of PLP on the expression changes of significantly altered proteins involved in TAA-induced liver fibrosis (PLP/TAA).

Table 3

Major biofunctions of the identified proteins

Protein name

Subcellular location

Major functions

Anti-oxidant effects

  

hemopexin

Extracellular region

The highest binding affinity for heme, iron metabolism

preprohaptoglobin

Extracellular region

The highest binding affinity for hemoglobin

glutathione S-transferase alpha-4 (GSTA4)

Cytoplasm

GSH-related detoxification

betaine-homocysteine S-methyltransferase 1 (BHMT1)

Cytoplasm

cysteine metabolism and GSH synthesis regulation

Bckdha protein

Mitochondrion matrix

Branched-chain amino acids catabolism

Liver amelioration

  

dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR)

Cytoplasm

Synthesis of nucleic acid precursors

quinoid dihydropteridine reductase (QDPR)

Cytoplasm. Synaptosome

Tetrahydrobiopterin recycle, amino acid metabolism

glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH)

Cytoplasm. Nucleus.

Glucose metabolism, initiation of apoptosis

ribonuclease UK114

Mitochondrion. Cytoplasm. Nucleus. Peroxisome

Translational inhibition

galectin-5

Cytoplasm Cell surface of rat reticulocytes and erythrocytes

Erythrocyte differentiation and reticulocyte maturation

The proteomic data showed that the expression of preprohaptoglobin was 1.7-fold higher while that of hemopexin was 1.6-fold lower in the PLP group compared with the TAA group. The expression changes of these two proteins were validated by western blot analysis (Figure3). The increase in hemopexin and decrease in haptoglobin are potential markers for fibrosis because of their involvement in the regulation of liver iron homeostasis[24]. The aspect of whether the protective effect of PLP against the TAA-induced liver fibrosis occurred via the regulation of iron homeostasis cannot be concluded in the present study, because the liver and serum iron concentrations were not determined. In a previous study, chelation of ferrous ions by P. linteus was described, and PLP was able to protect hepatocytes against iron overload-mediated oxidative stress[21]. Iron homeostasis regulation has been suggested as a potential PLP treatment target in liver fibrosis[25].

Glutathione (GSH) plays an important role in cellular detoxification, because it effectively scavenges free radicals and other reactive oxygen species. In GSH-related antioxidative detoxification, glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) play central role; GSTA4 plays a role in the cellular defense against oxidative stress and lipid oxidation during liver injury[26]. Dwivedi et al.[27] demonstrated that mGSTA4 null (−/−) mice showed much quicker and greater carbon tetrachloride-induced hepatotoxicity than wild-type (+/+) mice. In the present study, the expression of GSTA4 was 1.9-fold higher in the PLP group than in the TAA group, and the change was confirmed by western blot analysis. The upregulated expression of GSTA4 might protect the liver against the injury and oxidative stress induced by TAA. However, the western blot analysis did not show a significant change in GSTmu between the PLP and TAA groups. These results could arise through non-specificity of the antibody for GSTmu or because GSTA4 was likely to be regulated by P. linteus.

The expression of BHMT was 2-fold lower in the PLP group than in the TAA group, suggesting that homocysteine was inclined to be converted to cysteine in the transsulfuration reaction, generating more cysteine for GSH synthesis. P. linteus may promote the accumulation of substrates for GSH synthesis, cysteine and glutamate[28], by regulating the expression levels of BHMT and BCKDHA[29]. BHMT reduces the conversion of homocysteine to cysteine by catalyzing the remethylation of homocysteine back to methionine[30].

Branched-chain amino acid (BCAA) catabolism is an important intercellular source of glutamate[31]. The branched-chain α-keto acid dehydrogenase (BCKD) complex is the rate-limiting enzyme for the whole BCAA catabolism. The Bckdha gene encodes the E1 α subunit of the BCKD[32]. The expression of BCKDHA was 1.5-fold higher in the PLP group than in the TAA group, suggesting that more glutamate was generated for GSH synthesis in the PLP group.

Several proteins that showed higher expression in the PLP group are involved in amino acid metabolism and nucleic acid metabolism. These include BCKDHA (1.5-fold), QDPR (1.6-fold), and DHFR (1.5-fold). In clinical treatment of liver diseases, supplementation with BCAAs is considered useful to relieve protein malnutrition[33, 34]. QDPR is an enzyme that takes part in the tetrahydrobiopterin recycling pathway, and tetrahydrobiopterin is the precursor of phenylalanine and tyrosine[35]. The higher expression of QDPR in the PLP group suggests that PLP may expedite protein and nucleic acid synthesis in the fibrotic liver. DHFR is important for regulating the cellular amount of tetrahydrofolate, which is essential for purine and thymidylate synthesis[36, 37]. The higher expression of DHFR in the PLP group indicates that PLP may aid in the regeneration of liver injury. The expression of ribonuclease UK114, a translational inhibitor mostly present in the liver and kidney, was 2.2-fold lower in the PLP group, meeting the requirement for protein synthesis for liver regeneration. In a clinical study, downregulation of ribonuclease UK114 was observed in human hepatocellular carcinoma[38].

GAPDH catalyzes a step of glycolysis. The expression of GAPDH was 1.6-fold higher in the PLP group, suggesting a higher energy requirement for liver amelioration. Several studies have illustrated that GAPDH may work in non-metabolic processes, such as transcription regulation[39] and apoptosis initiation[40, 41]. This may be another reason for the upregulation of GAPDH in the PLP group.

Galectins comprise a family of evolutionarily conserved glycan-binding proteins that take part in acute and chronic inflammation[42, 43]. Galectin-5 contributes to erythrocyte differentiation and reticulocyte maturation, but its function in liver injury remains unclear[44, 45]. The much higher expression of galectin-5 in the PLP group suggests that PLP may promote erythropoiesis, inflammation regulation, and liver regeneration.

Based on the proteomics data, we propose that the antioxidant pathway, iron metabolism pathway, and metabolic regulation of amino acids and nucleic acids are a few key networks involved in the hepatoprotective effect of PLP against TAA (Figure6). Our western blot analyses further indicated that the PLP-mediated protection against TAA-induced hepatic injury involves the heat shock pathway. HSP70 has a crucial cytoprotective function mediated by its function as a molecular chaperone. A high level of HSP70 is a stress marker for liver injury[46, 47]. The aspect of whether the reduced level of HSP70 represented a less inflammatory state of the TAA-treated liver with PLP treatment awaits confirmation by functional proteomics analyses in future studies.
Figure 6
Figure 6

Proposed mechanistic pathways for the protective effect of PLP against TAA-induced liver fibrosis in rats. Liver proteins with significant expression changes detected by the 2-DE proteomics analysis are used to construct the possible pathways. These include the antioxidant system, iron metabolism regulation pathways (haptoglobin, hemopexin), and amino acid and nucleic acid metabolic pathways (homocysteine, BHMT, GSTA4). Upward arrowheads indicate upregulation or increasing, and downward arrowheads indicate downregulation or decreasing. BCAAs: branched-chain amino acids; BCKAs: branched-chain α-keto acids; BC acyl-CoA: branched-chain acyl-CoA.

Conclusion

The present study has demonstrated that PLP can protect rats against TAA-induced liver fibrosis in at least two possible ways: 1) protection of the liver against oxidative stress, especially by scavenging of iron-related free radicals; and 2) regulation of the metabolism of amino acids and nucleic acids for liver amelioration. Our findings provide novel molecular mechanisms for the protective effects of P. linteus against liver fibrosis.

Abbreviations

PLP: 

Phellinus linteus polysaccharide

TAA: 

Thioacetamide

2-DE: 

Two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis

MALDI-TOF/TOF MS: 

Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time-of-flight/time-of-flight mass spectrometry

RT-PCR: 

Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction

GSTA4: 

Glutathione S-transferase alpha-4

BCKDHA: 

Branched chain keto acid dehydrogenase heterotetrameric E1 subunit alpha

GSTmu: 

Glutathione S-transferase mu

GAPDH: 

Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase

TFT: 

Thiosulfate sulfurtransferase

BHMT1: 

Betaine-homocysteine S-methyltransferase 1

QDPR: 

Quinoid dihydropteridine reductase

DTT: 

Dithiothreitol

TCA: 

Trichloroacetic acid

CHAPS: 

3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)dimethylammonio]-1-propanesulfonate

SDS: 

Sodium dodecyl sulfate

PAGE: 

Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis

MOWSE: 

Molecular weight search

DHFR: 

Dihydrofolate reductase

HSP70: 

Heat shock protein 70

GSH: 

Glutathione

GSTs: 

Glutathione S-transferases

BCAA: 

Branched-chain amino acid

BCKD: 

Branched-chain α-keto acid dehydrogenase.

Declarations

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by grants from the Chinese Medicine fund and the general research funding of the University of Hong Kong. We acknowledge Dr. Frankie Chan of The Amazing Grace Health Products Limited Partnership of Thailand for providing the P. linteus sample.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Food and Nutrition Division, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong,SAR, China
(2)
Department of Physiology, College of Medicine, Hallym University, 39 Hallymdaehak-gil,Gangwon-do, Chuncheon, 200-702, South Korea
(3)
Plant Research International, Department of Bioscience, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands

References

  1. Fung KT, Fung J, Lai CL, Yuen MF: Etiologies of chronic liver diseases in Hong Kong. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007, 19: 659-664. 10.1097/MEG.0b013e3281ace0b7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bataller R, Brenner DA: Liver fibrosis. J Clin Invest. 2005, 115: 209-218.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Jaeschke H: Reactive oxygen and mechanisms of inflammatory liver injury: Present concepts. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011, 26: 173-179.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Tsukamoto H, Rippe R, Niemela O, Lin M: Roles of oxidative stress in activation of Kupffer and Ito cells in liver fibrogenesis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1995, 10 (Suppl 1): S50-S53.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Gebhardt R: Oxidative stress, plant-derived antioxidants and liver fibrosis. Planta Med. 2002, 68: 289-296. 10.1055/s-2002-26761.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Ismail RS, El-Megeid AA, Abdel-Moemin AR: Carbon tetrachloride-induced liver disease in rats: the potential effect of supplement oils with vitamins E and C on the nutritional status. Ger Med Sci. 2009, 7: Doc05-PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Zhu T, Kim SH, Chen CY: A medicinal mushroom: Phellinus linteus. Curr Med Chem. 2008, 15: 1330-1335. 10.2174/092986708784534929.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Matsuba S, Matsuno H, Sakuma M, Komatsu Y: Phellinus linteus Extract Augments the Immune Response in Mitomycin C-Induced Immunodeficient Mice. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2008, 5: 85-90. 10.1093/ecam/nem001.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Park HJ, Han ES, Park DK: The ethyl acetate extract of PGP (Phellinus linteus grown on Panax ginseng) suppresses B16F10 melanoma cell proliferation through inducing cellular differentiation and apoptosis. J Ethnopharmacol. 2010, 132: 115-121. 10.1016/j.jep.2010.07.052.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Lee YS, Kim YH, Shin EK, Kim DH, Lim SS, Lee JY, Kim JK: Anti-angiogenic activity of methanol extract of Phellinus linteus and its fractions. J Ethnopharmacol. 2010, 131: 56-62. 10.1016/j.jep.2010.05.064.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Dai YC, Zhou LW, Cui BK, Chen YQ, Decock C: Current advances in Phellinus sensu lato: medicinal species, functions, metabolites and mechanisms. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2010, 87: 1587-1593. 10.1007/s00253-010-2711-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Kojima H, Tanigawa N, Kariya S, Komemushi A, Shomura Y, Sawada S, Arai E, Yokota Y: A case of spontaneous regression of hepatocellular carcinoma with multiple lung metastases. Radiat Med. 2006, 24: 139-142. 10.1007/BF02493281.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Nam SW, Han JY, Kim JI, Park SH, Cho SH, Han NI, Yang JM, Kim JK, Choi SW, Lee YS: Spontaneous regression of a large hepatocellular carcinoma with skull metastasis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005, 20: 488-492. 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2005.03243.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Huang H-Y, Chieh S-Y, Tso TK, Chien T-Y, Lin H-T, Tsai Y-C: Orally administered mycelial culture of Phellinus linteus exhibits antitumor effects in hepatoma cell-bearing mice. J Ethnopharmacol. 2011, 133: 460-466. 10.1016/j.jep.2010.10.015.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Li YG, Ji DF, Zhong S, Zhu JX, Chen S, Hu GY: Anti-tumor effects of proteoglycan from Phellinus linteus by immunomodulating and inhibiting Reg IV/EGFR/Akt signaling pathway in colorectal carcinoma. Int J Biol Macromol. 2011, 48: 511-517. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2011.01.014.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Huang GJ, Yang CM, Chang YS, Amagaya S, Wang HC, Hou WC, Huang SS, Hu ML: Hispolon suppresses SK-Hep1 human hepatoma cell metastasis by inhibiting matrix metalloproteinase-2/9 and urokinase-plasminogen activator through the PI3K/Akt and ERK signaling pathways. J Agric Food Chem. 2010, 58: 9468-9475. 10.1021/jf101508r.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Shon YH, Nam KS: Inhibition of cytochrome P450 isozymes in rat liver microsomes by polysaccharides derived from Phellinus linteus. Biotechnol Lett. 2003, 25: 167-172. 10.1023/A:1021935922722.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Duncan MW, Hunsucker SW: Proteomics as a Tool for Clinically Relevant Biomarker Discovery and Validation. Exp Biol Med. 2005, 230: 808-817.Google Scholar
  19. Park KS, Kim H, Kim NG, Cho SY, Choi KH, Seong JK, Paik YK: Proteomic analysis and molecular characterization of tissue ferritin light chain in hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2002, 35: 1459-1466. 10.1053/jhep.2002.33204.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Song W, Van Griensven LJLD: Pro- and Antioxidative Properties of Medicinal Mushroom Extracts. Int J Med Mushrooms. 2008, 10: 315-324. 10.1615/IntJMedMushr.v10.i4.30.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Kozarski M, Klaus A, Niksic M, Jakovljevic D, Helsper JPFG, Van Griensven LJLD: Antioxidative and immunomodulating activities of polysaccharide extracts of the medicinal mushrooms Agaricus bisporus, Agaricus brasiliensis, Ganoderma lucidum and Phellinus linteus. Food Chem. 2011, 129: 1667-1675. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2011.06.029.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Jiang P, Siggers JL, Ngai HH, Sit WH, Sangild PT, Wan JM: The small intestine proteome is changed in preterm pigs developing necrotizing enterocolitis in response to formula feeding. J Nutr. 2008, 138: 1895-1901.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Song KS, Cho SM, Lee JH, Kim HM, Han SB, Ko KS, Yoo ID: B-lymphocyte-stimulating polysaccharide from mushroom Phellinus linteus. Chem Pharm Bull(Tokyo). 1995, 43: 2105-2108. 10.1248/cpb.43.2105.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Cheung KJ, Tilleman K, Deforce D, Colle I, Van Vlierberghe H: The HCV serum proteome: a search for fibrosis protein markers. J Viral Hepat. 2009, 16: 418-429. 10.1111/j.1365-2893.2009.01083.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Liu J, Wang JY, Wei LM, Lu Y, Jin H: Effects of Fuzheng Huayu Decoction on plasma proteome in cirrhosis: preliminary experimental study with rats. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2007, 87: 1272-1275.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Hubatsch I, Ridderstrom M, Mannervik B: Human glutathione transferase A4-4: an alpha class enzyme with high catalytic efficiency in the conjugation of 4-hydroxynonenal and other genotoxic products of lipid peroxidation. Biochem J. 1998, 330 (Pt 1): 175-179.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Dwivedi S, Sharma R, Sharma A, Zimniak P, Ceci JD, Awasthi YC, Boor PJ: The course of CCl4 induced hepatotoxicity is altered in mGSTA4-4 null (−/−) mice. Toxicology. 2006, 218: 58-66. 10.1016/j.tox.2005.10.012.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Wu G, Fang YZ, Yang S, Lupton JR, Turner ND: Glutathione metabolism and its implications for health. J Nutr. 2004, 134: 489-492.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Li F, Feng Q, Lee C, Wang S, Pelleymounter LL, Moon I, Eckloff BW, Wieben ED, Schaid DJ, Yee V, Weinshilboum RM: Human betaine-homocysteine methyltransferase (BHMT) and BHMT2: common gene sequence variation and functional characterization. Mol Genet Metab. 2008, 94: 326-335. 10.1016/j.ymgme.2008.03.013.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Bose N, Momany C: Crystallization and preliminary X-ray crystallographic studies of recombinant human betaine-homocysteine S-methyltransferase. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2001, 57: 431-433. 10.1107/S0907444900020576.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Chuang DT, Chuang JL, Wynn RM: Lessons from genetic disorders of branched-chain amino acid metabolism. J Nutr. 2006, 136: 243S-249S.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Fekete G, Plattner R, Crabb DW, Zhang B, Harris RA, Heerema N, Palmer CG: Localization of the human gene for the El alpha subunit of branched chain keto acid dehydrogenase (BCKDHA) to chromosome 19q13.1----q13.2. Cytogenet Cell Genet. 1989, 50: 236-237. 10.1159/000132768.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Marchesini G, Marzocchi R, Noia M, Bianchi G: Branched-chain amino acid supplementation in patients with liver diseases. J Nutr. 2005, 135: 1596S-1601S.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Holecek M: Three targets of branched-chain amino acid supplementation in the treatment of liver disease. Nutrition. 2010, 26: 482-490. 10.1016/j.nut.2009.06.027.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Dianzani I, de Sanctis L, Smooker PM, Gough TJ, Alliaudi C, Brusco A, Spada M, Blau N, Dobos M, Zhang HP, Yang N, Ponzone A, Armarego WL, Cotton RG: Dihydropteridine reductase deficiency: physical structure of the QDPR gene, identification of two new mutations and genotype-phenotype correlations. Hum Mutat. 1998, 12: 267-273. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-1004(1998)12:4<267::AID-HUMU8>3.0.CO;2-C.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Park JK, Jeong DH, Park HY, Son KH, Shin DH, Do SH, Yang HJ, Yuan DW, Hong IH, Goo MJ, Lee HR, Ki MR, Ishigami A, Jeong KS: Hepatoprotective effect of Arazyme on CCl4-induced acute hepatic injury in SMP30 knock-out mice. Toxicology. 2008, 246: 132-142. 10.1016/j.tox.2008.01.006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Musch MW, Kapil A, Chang EB: Heat shock protein 72 binds and protects dihydrofolate reductase against oxidative injury. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2004, 313: 185-192. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2003.11.096.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Chong CL, Huang SF, Hu CP, Chen YL, Chou HY, Chau GY, Shew JY, Tsai YL, Chen CT, Chang C, Chen ML: Decreased expression of UK114 is related to the differentiation status of human hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008, 17: 535-542. 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-0506.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Kondo S, Kubota S, Mukudai Y, Nishida T, Yoshihama Y, Shirota T, Shintani S, Takigawa M: Binding of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase to the cis-acting element of structure-anchored repression in ccn2 mRNA. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2011, 405: 382-387. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2011.01.034.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Hara MR, Agrawal N, Kim SF, Cascio MB, Fujimuro M, Ozeki Y, Takahashi M, Cheah JH, Tankou SK, Hester LD, Ferris CD, Hayward SD, Snyder SH, Sawa A: S-nitrosylated GAPDH initiates apoptotic cell death by nuclear translocation following Siah1 binding. Nat Cell Biol. 2005, 7: 665-674. 10.1038/ncb1268.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Lee SY, Kim JH, Jung H, Chi SW, Chung SJ, Lee CK, Park BC, Bae KH, Park SG: Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate, a glycolytic intermediate, prevents cells from apoptosis by lowering S-nitrosylation of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2012, 22: 571-573. 10.4014/jmb.1110.10010.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Liu FT, Rabinovich GA: Galectins: regulators of acute and chronic inflammation. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2010, 1183: 158-182. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05131.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Henderson NC, Mackinnon AC, Farnworth SL, Poirier F, Russo FP, Iredale JP, Haslett C, Simpson KJ, Sethi T: Galectin-3 regulates myofibroblast activation and hepatic fibrosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006, 103: 5060-5065. 10.1073/pnas.0511167103.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Barres C, Blanc L, Bette-Bobillo P, Andre S, Mamoun R, Gabius HJ, Vidal M: Galectin-5 is bound onto the surface of rat reticulocyte exosomes and modulates vesicle uptake by macrophages. Blood. 2010, 115: 696-705. 10.1182/blood-2009-07-231449.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Rabinovich GA, Vidal M: Galectins and microenvironmental niches during hematopoiesis. Curr Opin Hematol. 2011, 18: 443-451. 10.1097/MOH.0b013e32834bab18.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Sakisaka S, Koga H, Sasatomi K, Ohishi M, Kawaguchi T, Harada M, Taniguchi E, Uchimura Y, Ueno T, Sata M, Tanikawa K: Ursodeoxycholic acid reduces expression of heat shock proteins in primary biliary cirrhosis. Liver. 2000, 20: 78-87. 10.1034/j.1600-0676.2000.020001078.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Gosnell JE, Wong CB, Kumwenda ZL, Welch WJ, Harris HW: Extracellular Matrix Regulates the Hepatocellular Heat Shock Response. J Surg Res. 2000, 91: 43-49. 10.1006/jsre.2000.5901.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Wang et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement

Chinese Medicine

ISSN: 1749-8546

Contact us