Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research
  • Open Access

Rapid screening and identification of bioactive compounds specifically binding to beta 2-adrenoceptor from San-ao decoction using affinity magnetic fine particles coupled with high-performance liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry

  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1 and
  • 1Email author
Chinese Medicine201813:49

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13020-018-0207-8

©  The Author(s) 2018

  • Received: 20 July 2018
  • Accepted: 20 September 2018
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

San-ao decoction (SAD) has been widely used in Chinese medicine against respiratory diseases, such as asthma and rhinallergosis. The bioactive compounds for such pharmacological action remain unknown.

Methods

We developed a methodology to isolate the bioactive compounds of SAD. The assay involved the immobilization of beta 2-adrenoceptor (β2-AR) onto magnetic fine particles, the capture of target compounds by the immobilized receptor, the identification of the receptor bound compounds by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry.

Results

Vicenin, shaftoside, isoshaftoside, liquiritin apioside and isoliquiritin apioside were identified as β2-AR ligands in SAD extract. The binding of these compounds to β2-AR occurred on serine169, serine170 and phenylalanine256 of the receptor.

Conclusions

The developed methodology has high stability and specificity for recognizing and isolating target compounds. It is an alternative method for rapidly screening bioactive compounds of immobilized receptor from Chinese prescriptions.

Keywords

  • Affinity selection methods
  • Beta 2-adrenoceptor
  • Bioactive compounds
  • Magnetic fine particles
  • San-ao decoction

Background

Drug discovery involves identifying compounds that prevent or control diseases and play an important role in maintaining human health [1–3]. Despite increased investments in manpower, materials and financial resources for pharmaceutical research, the number of innovative drugs approved has declined during the last few decades [4, 5]. This is mainly due to the incompatibility between the increasing difficulties in drug discovery and the relatively low efficiency of the current lead screening methods. Efforts to create new, more efficient methodologies are urgently needed.

Natural products are the main source of virtually all medicinal preparations, and between 1981 and 2010, 34% of approved small molecule drugs were from natural products [6]. The impressive contribution of natural products to medicine, including traditional Chinese medicine, has promoted their use in driving drug discovery [7–9]. The classic approaches depend on the bioassay-guided screening of natural products, such as animal- and cell-based methods, have been continuously improved to utilize technological advances and achieve high throughput [10]. More recently, developed functional assays and phenotypic screens, such as cellular membrane affinity chromatography and computer-aided virtual screening technologies have received increasing attention [11–15]. In our previous work, beta 2-adrenoceptor (β2-AR) chromatography was established for the identification of bioactive compounds of the receptor [16]. This strategy has limitations of time-intensity and labor-intensity in preparation of chromatographic columns. The structure of β2-AR may misfold during the high pressure environment. Here, we established a bio-affinity technique by the utilization of magnetic material to remove the isolation and identification bottlenecks in identifying procedures [17–21]. Magnetic fine particle (MFP)-based ligand isolation methods are highly desirable because they utilize the unique properties of MFPs, such as convenient solid–liquid separation, high surface area and good biocompatibility [22–24]. Subsequently, with the molecular docking technology, we predicted the potential activity of bioactive compounds obtained from ligand capture [25].

San-ao decoction (SAD) is a basic prescription for treating respiratory diseases in Chinese practice. The formula is indexed in the Pharmacopoeia of the People’s Republic of China 2015, and consists of three herbs: Herba Ephedrae, Semen Armeniacae Amarum and Radix Glycyrrhizae. Pharmacologically, respiratory ailments are mainly mediated by the β2-AR, which belongs to the G-protein coupled receptor (GPCRs) superfamily [26, 27]. We hypothesized that SAD contains bioactive compounds that bind to β2-AR. In this work, we immobilized β2-AR onto MFPs to construct a new biologically relevant isolation material. The immobilized β2-AR MFPs were used to rapidly screen bioactive compounds of the receptor from SAD. The compounds of interest were subsequently isolated and identified by high-performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC–MS/MS). Molecular docking confirmed the binding between the bioactive compounds and β2-AR. The receptor-functionalized MFPs provide a convenient and effective strategy for isolating ligands from traditional Chinese medicines.

Methods

The Minimum Standards of Reporting Checklist contains details of the experimental design, and statistics, and resources used in this study (Additional file 1).

Chemicals and instruments

Ferric chloride hexahydrate (FeCl3·6H2O) (99%) and ferrous chloride tetrahydrate (FeCl2·4H2O) (99%) were purchased from Tianjin Tianli Chemical Reagents Ltd (Tianjin, China). Analytical-grade sodium hydroxide, trisodium citrate, ethanol and aqueous ammonia (25 wt%) were acquired from Shanghai Chem. Reagent Co. (shanghai, China). Reference standards of salbutamol (batch no. 100328–200703), terbutaline (batch no. 100273–201202) and shaftoside (batch no. 111912–201703) were purchased from the National Institutes for Food and Drug Control (Beijing, China). Vicenin (batch no. B21399), isoshaftoside (batch no. B21563), liquiritin apioside (batch no. B25831) and isoliquiritin apioside (batch no. B20987) were purchased from Shanghai yuanye Bio-Technology Co., Ltd (Shanghai, China). Herba Ephedra, Semen Armeniacae Amarum and Radix Glycyrrhizae were obtained at a local medicinal market and identified by Professor Xiao Chaoni in the College of Life Sciences of Northwest University.

An AKTA10 low-pressure chromatographic system from GE Healthcare Life Sciences (Uppsala, Sweden) was utilized for β2-AR purification. Chromatographic analysis of the drugs were performed on an EClassical 3100 series apparatus (Dalian Elite Analytical Instruments Company, Dalian, China) equipped with an isocratic pump, a column oven and an ultraviolet–visible detector. Separation and identification of the bioactive compounds were carried out on an Agilent 1100 series of high-performance liquid chromatography (Santa Clara, CA, USA) coupled with an SL trap mass spectrometer (Waldbronn, Germany). The size distribution of MFPs was determined by dynamic light scattering (DLS) using a Malvern ZS ZEN 3600 system (Malvern, Worcestershire, UK).

Preparation of SAD

SAD was extracted by heat reflux [28]. Briefly, nine grams of each herb (Herba Ephedrae, Semen Armeniacae Amarum and Radix Glycyrrhizae) were weighed according to the Pharmacopoeia formula dosages. The mixture was decocted three times with 8 volumes of water (v/w) and 1.0 h for each time. The three filtrates were combined and concentrated to a certain volume via evaporation. Appropriate volumes of ethanol were added to the concentrated solution to give a final ethanol concentration of 80%. The mixture was stored for 12.0 h under an ambient atmosphere and was collected by filtration. The filtrate was concentrated to 1.0 g/mL under vacuum at 40 °C and stored at 4 °C for further experiments.

Synthesis of magnetic fine particles

Magnetic fine particles were synthesized by chemical coprecipitation based on the reaction of Fe3+ + Fe2+ + OH− → Fe3O4 [29]. We dissolved FeCl3·6H2O (10.812 g, 40 mM) and FeCl2·4H2O (3.9742 g, 20 mM) in 150 mL of distilled water. Oxygen was removed by a nitrogen stream for 1.0 h. An aliquot of 20 mL aqueous NaOH solution (8.0 g, 10 mM) was added to the mixture slowly and uniformly using a drop funnel. The solution was mechanically stirred for 1.0 h until the color turned black. The black solution was heated to 90 °C and then maintained at 90 °C for 1.0 h to ripen the particles. Decreasing the temperature to 25 °C, we collected the magnetic material using a magnet. The collected material was dispersed in 200 mL of 0.3 M sodium citrate solution and heated for 1.0 h at 80 °C. The solvent was removed after collecting the magnetic Fe3O4 FPs using a magnet. The Fe3O4 FPs were thoroughly rinsed with acetone and kept at 30 °C until all the solvent was removed. The dried Fe3O4 FPs were modified with aminopropyltriethoxysilane (APTES) to synthesize Fe3O4@NH2 FPs [30].

Preparation and purification of β 2-AR

His-tagged β2-AR was prepared and purified according to the methods in our previous work [31]. Briefly, genetically engineered bacteria (E. coli BL21 (DE3)-pET32a-β2-AR) were incubated in 50 mL of Luria–Bertani medium containing 100 μg/mL penicillin. When the OD value reached 0.4–0.6, isopropyl β-d-thiogalactopyranoside was added to the medium at a final concentration of 2.0 mM to induce the expression of the receptor. Ni-chelated Sepharose high-performance affinity column and Quaternary Sepharose Fast Flow column were utilized to purify β2-AR by sequential. The fraction of interest was collected by eluting the Ni-chelated Sepharose high-performance affinity column using 50% phosphate buffer (20 mM, containing 0.5 M NaCl and 0.5 M imidazole, pH 7.4). The purification of the collected fraction was performed on the Quaternary Sepharose Fast Flow column. The elution containing β2-AR was collected from the column by 20 mM phosphate buffer (containing 0.8 M NaCl, pH 7.4) with gradient elution ranging from 18 to 50%. The purity of β2-AR was measured by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). The fraction with greater than 90% purity was used for further investigation (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

SDS-PAGE analysis of β2-AR. Lane 1, collection from Quaternary Sepharose Fast Flow column gradiently eluted by 18–26% phosphate buffer; Lane 2, collection from Quaternary Sepharose Fast Flow column gradiently eluted by 26–40% phosphate buffer; Lane 3, protein molecular weight marker (the molecular weights from top to bottom were 116.0, 66.2, 45.0, 35.0, 25.0, 18.4 and 14.4 kDa, respectively); Lane 4, collection from Quaternary Sepharose Fast Flow column gradiently eluted by 40–50% phosphate buffer. The concentration of phosphate buffer was 20 mM with the presence of 0.8 M NaCl

Immobilization of β 2-AR

As illustrated in Fig. 2, the purified β2-AR was immobilized on the surface of Fe3O4@NH2 FPs. In this case, we suspended 0.5 g of Fe3O4@NH2 FPs in 50 mL acetonitrile containing 0.5 g N,N′-carbonyldiimidazole. The mixture was stirred for 6.0 h to activate the fine particles. After the removal of acetonitrile, the activated Fe3O4@NH2 FPs were resuspended in 20 mM phosphate buffer and mixed with 10 mL of 0.24 mg/mL purified β2-AR. The solution was mechanically stirred for 3.0 h at 4 °C to accomplish the reaction between the receptor and the imidazole residue on the Fe3O4@NH2 FPs. The modified Fe3O4@β2-AR FPs were collected using a magnet, while the unbound β2-AR was removed. The obtained Fe3O4@β2-AR FPs were suspended in 1% glycine solution and stirred for 30 min to quench the unreacted imidazole groups. The final Fe3O4@β2-AR FPs were collected and washed three times with phosphate buffer. DLS was used to determine the size distribution of the Fe3O4@β2-AR FPs.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

The scheme for the immobilization of β2-AR on the surface of Fe3O4 FPs. The structure of the compound was created using Chemdraw software. The blue ellipsoid represented β2-AR

Bioactivity of the immobilized β 2-AR

Salbutamol and terbutaline are both specific agonists of β2-AR. They have similar structures such as meta-hydroxyl group, phenyl ring and N-terminus. Because of the same binding sites, salbutamol can be competitively displaced by terbutaline without any influence on the protein structure. Using the selective β2-AR agonists salbutamol and terbutaline as probes, the bioactivity of Fe3O4@β2-AR FPs was investigated by displacement experiments. Fifty milligrams of Fe3O4@β2-AR FPs were incubated in 200 μL of salbutamol (10 μg/mL) and gently shaken for 30 min. The unbound salbutamol was discarded after collecting the fine particles using a magnet. The result Fe3O4@β2-AR/salbutamol FPs were rinsed twice with 1.0 mL ammonium acetate buffer (10 mM, pH 7.4) and incubated with 100 μL competitive agent (terbutaline, 2.0 μg/mL) for 30 min to release the bound salbutamol [32]. The supernatant was collected after the fine particles were sequestered by a magnet. A similar procedure was performed with a control group of Fe3O4@NH2 FPs, The drug concentration in the collected solution was determined by HPLC using an Agilent C8 column (5 μm, 4.6 × 150 mm) with a mobile phase of 10% (v/v) methanol/water containing 0.1% (v/v) formic acid, a flow rate of 0.6 mL/min and a detection wavelength of 276 nm.

Screening of bioactive compounds in SAD

An aliquot of 50 mg Fe3O4@β2-AR FPs was suspended in 200 μL of 0.2 g/mL SAD extract. This suspension was gently shaken for 30 min at room temperature. Following the removal of solvent, we washed the fine particles twice using 1.0 mL of 10 mM ammonium acetate. Bioactive compounds bound to the immobilized receptor were collected by treating the cleaned fine particles with 100 μL terbutaline (0.01 mg/mL) as a competitor. Terbutaline, a strong β2-AR binder, has capacity to target all the three types of binding sites of β2-AR [33]. As a result of competitive interaction, terbutaline can fully displace the potential ligands from the receptor. Simultaneously, this strategy is capable of probing the exact binding sites of the bound ligands inspired by the competitive displacement.

The released bioactive compounds were further separated and identified by HPLC–MS/MS with electrospray ionization (HPLC–ESI–MS/MS). An Agilent TC-C18 column (5 μm, 4.6 × 250 mm) was used with 40% (v/v) methanol/0.1% (v/v) formic acid as mobile phase. The flow rate was 0.6 mL/min and the column temperature was 30 °C. The nebulizing gas pressure was set at 50 psi. The flow rate and temperature of the dry gas were 10.0 L/min and 350 °C, respectively. Mass spectra were acquired in negative mode with scan range of 50–1000 amu.

Molecular docking

The crystal structure of β2-AR was constructed by homologous modeling according to a previous work that utilized the methylated β2-AR–Fab complex (PDB ID: 3KJ6) as the template. The structures of vicenin, shaftoside, isoshaftoside, liquiritin apioside and isoliquiritin apioside were created by ChemDraw Ultra 8.0 software (PerkinElmer Inc., Waltham, MA, USA), and was converted to pdbqt format using Chem3D Ultra 8.0 software (PerkinElmer Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) followed by MM2 energy minimization. Diverse receptor–ligand complexations were generated by AutoDock 4.2 which was downloaded from the Scripps Research Institute website (La Jolla, CA, USA). A grid box size of 62 × 56 × 50 points in the x, y and z directions was built to locate the receptor ligand binding domain. The grid center was set at x = 0.644, y = − 2.121 and z = − 7.094, which was large enough to accommodate the three known types of binding sites in β2-AR.

Results

Morphological characterization of immobilized β 2-AR

The sizes of control Fe3O4@NH2 FPs and Fe3O4@β2-AR FPs were analyzed by DLS with intensity-weighted size distributions (Fig. 3). Both the two types of particles displayed a relatively uniform size distribution, with average sizes of 236.7 nm and 278.3 nm, respectively.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Size distributions of Fe3O4@NH2 FPs and Fe3O4@β2-AR FPs with dynamic light scattering. a Fe3O4@NH2 FPs. b Fe3O4@β2-AR FPs

To determine whether the immobilization of β2-AR on Fe3O4 FPs covalent bonds, we analyzed the Fe3O4@β2-AR FPs by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) after complete rinse of the particles. Figure 4 depicted the representative spectra of Fe3O4, sodium citrate solution-modified Fe3O4, APTES-modified Fe3O4 and Fe3O4@β2-AR FPs. The FT-IR adsorption band at 575 cm−1 corresponded to Fe–O bond vibrations in iron oxide. The strong absorption band at 3417 cm−1 was produced by O–H bond stretching on the Fe3O4 surface. The absorption peak at 1396 cm−1 was the typical absorption peak of carboxylate, providing an evidence for the presence of –COOH on the Fe3O4 surface. Taking together, the citrate modification of Fe3O4 was occurred through chemical reaction rather than physical interactions. The spectrum of Fe3O4-APTES FPs displayed two broad bands at 3441 cm−1 and 1630 cm−1 due to N–H stretching and NH2 bending modes of free NH2 group. The strong absorbance observed at 3441 cm−1 was attributed to hydrogen bond formation. These results demonstrated that the immobilization of β2-AR was accomplished by covalent reaction rather than physical absorption.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4

FT-IR spectra of FPs. (1) Fe3O4 FPs. (2) Sodium citrate solution-modified Fe3O4 FPs. (3) APTES-modified Fe3O4 FPs. (4) Fe3O4@β2-AR FPs

Bioactivity of immobilized β 2-AR

The bioactivity of Fe3O4@β2-AR FPs was evaluated using salbutamol as a probe. A denaturing buffer solution (10 mM glycine–HCl, pH 2.0) was used to release the bound drug from the particles. The amounts of salbutamol adsorbed on the control and Fe3O4@β2-AR NPs surfaces were determined to be 3 ± 1 and 52 ± 2 ng, respectively. The adsorption of metoprolol and prazosin (selective antagonists of β1-AR and α1-AR, respectively) on Fe3O4@β2-AR FPs was examined under the same conditions. The amounts of the two antagonists on the Fe3O4@β2-AR were 2 ± 1 and 3 ± 1 ng. On the basis of the pharmacological properties of the drugs, we concluded that the Fe3O4@β2-AR FPs have the bioactivity of recognizing specific ligands of the immobilized receptor. The stability of the immobilized β2-AR was investigated by measuring the amount of adsorbed salbutamol over 2 weeks. The relative standard deviation (RSD) of the content of the absorbed salbutamol was 2.1% (Table 1), indicating that immobilized β2-AR was stable for at least 2 weeks.
Table 1

Stability investigation of the immobilized β2-AR MFPs

Times (day)

Salbutamol binding contents (ng)

Relative standard deviation (RSD)

1

58

2.1%

3

56

7

57

10

54

14

53

The binding contents of salbutamol were determined by denaturing the receptor using 10 mM glycine–HCl (pH 2.0) and releasing the drug into solution

Competitive displacement of ligands bound on immobilized β 2-AR

Competitive experiments were performed to prevent false positives which were generated by non-specific binding. Salbutamol was used as a ligand while terbutaline served as a competitive agent. The competitive displacement procedure consisted of three steps: loading, washing, and displacing. In the loading step, we added 200 μL salbutamol (10 μg/mL) to the suspension of Fe3O4@β2-AR FPs. Incubating the result suspension for 30 min, we collected the Fe3O4@β2-AR FPs with bound salbutamol by a magnet while discarded the free drug in the supernatant. In the second step, we rinsed the Fe3O4@β2-AR FPs by ammonium acetate (10 mM, pH 7.4) to remove non-specific binders on the immobilized receptor. In the final step, we incubated the suspension of the clean particles with 2.0 μg/mL terbutaline for 30 min. This aimed to release the bound ligand from the receptor by competitive displacement. Figure 5a showed the chromatograms of salbutamol and terbutaline reference standards. Under the desired conditions, the two drugs were totally separated without any inference. This condition was subsequently utilized to content of the two drugs during the displacement procedure. Figure 5b displayed the chromatograms of salbutamol in the solution post-incubation with control and Fe3O4@β2-AR FPs. Compared with the original solution, a clear loss of salbutamol was observed in the supernatant after the incubation with Fe3O4@β2-AR FPs. This loss raised from the specific binding of potential ligand onto the immobilized receptor. Figure 5c exhibited the chromatograms of salbutamol in the solution that was utilized to rinse control and Fe3O4@β2-AR FPs. The control particles gave no peaks on the chromatograms, while the Fe3O4@β2-AR FPs resulted in a weak peak after the same rinsing treatment to control particles. The presence of this peak is expected because there will be a continuous ligand-dissociation/ligand-association from/with the ligand–protein complex at equilibrium [17]. As anticipated, this weak peak disappeared when we rinsed the particles for five times. Considering the speed of the whole methodology, we intended to use two times rinsing for further experiment since the weak peak had little influence on the determination of salbutamol in displacement procedure and was easy to be subtracted. Figure 5d depicted the chromatograms of salbutamol after incubating the Fe3O4@β2-AR FPs with terbutaline (competitive agent) solution. Two intensive peaks were observed at 12.2 min and 13.1 min in the chromatogram. Using the reference standards, we identified the two peaks as salbutamol and terbutaline. This result indicated that terbutaline has the capacity to competitively displace the bound salbutamol on the particles. The method is feasible to be utilized for screening potential ligand and simultaneously probing the exact binding sites of the ligand on the receptor.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5

Chromatograms of terbutaline and salbutamol in the collected supernatant from Fe3O4@NH2 FPs (black curve) and Fe3O4@β2-AR FPs (red curve) of the competitive displacement. a Terbutaline and salbutamol standards. b Loading salbutamol to Fe3O4@β2-AR FPs. c Washing unbound salbutamol by ammonium acetate. d Displacing the bound salbutamol from Fe3O4@β2-AR FPs by terbutaline

Screening bioactive compounds of β 2-AR from SAD

The total ion current chromatogram of the SAD extract and the eluted bioactive compounds specifically bound to β2-AR were illustrated in Fig. 6a, b. Compared with the chromatogram of SAD extract, we observed five intensive peaks after treating the Fe3O4@β2-AR FPs with SAD extract. No other peaks in SAD extract were detected in the same sample. These results demonstrated the immobilized receptor has the specificity to capture its ligands from complex matrices. The five peaks were identified by MS/MS analysis and the comparison with mass spectrometric behaviors of reference standards (Fig. 7). The peaks at 26.4 min showed an [M−H]− ion with m/z 593.0, which produced daughter ions at m/z 503.1, 473.2 and 353.8. This peak was identified as vicenin due to their identical mass patterns. The peaks at 29.2 min and 29.8 min gave same father ion of m/z 563.0 [M−H]−. This ion generated daughter ions of m/z 503.1, 473.2, 443.5, 383.5 and 353.6. Compared with the retention time and mass behavior of reference standards, we attributed this peak to shaftoside and isoshaftoside. The peaks at 32.9 min and 33.4 min generated the same quasi-molecular ion [M−H]− of m/z 549.0, which gave main fragment ions of m/z 417.0, 297.0 and 255.0. Inspired by previous report and the mass patterns of reference standards, we identified the two peaks as liquiritin apioside and isoliquiritin apioside [34, 35]. In addition, we observed several puny peaks in Fig. 6b. At present, we failed to identify these peaks ascribed to lack of corresponding reference standards and their low intensity which was far away from the requirement of MS/MS analysis.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6

Total ion current chromatograms of SAD extract and the bioactive compounds screened from the prescription. a SAD extract. b Bioactive compounds screened from SAD

Fig. 7
Fig. 7

Total ion current chromatograms of the reference standards of vicenin, shaftoside, isoshaftoside, liquiritin apioside and isoliquiritin apioside

The interaction between the five compounds and β2-AR was investigated using molecular docking. As displayed in Fig. 8, serine (Ser) 169, Ser170 and phenylalanine (Phe)256 were found to be the main binding sites of vicenin, shaftoside, isoshaftoside, liquiritin apioside and isoliquiritin apioside to β2-AR. The driving force of this interaction was the formation of hydrogen bonds between the receptor and the drug.
Fig. 8
Fig. 8

Two-dimensional overview of docking complexations of ligand/β2-AR. a Vicenin, b shaftoside, c isoshaftoside, d liquiritin apioside, e isoliquiritin apioside

Discussion

This was aimed to develop a rapid methodology that enables us to screen the ligands of GPCRs. Development of such methodologies is challenging due to the instability of the receptors when they were removed from their native environment. As illustrated in the scheme of Fig. 9, His-tagged β2-AR was first immobilized onto Fe3O4@NH2 FPs to achieve an affinity selection supporter. Owning to the large surface area and high biocompatibility of the particles, this immobilization improved the stability of β2-AR. The Fe3O4@β2-AR FPs were used to select bioactive compounds binding to the receptor in a complex prescription. The bound compounds were released from the receptor by competitive displacement using a specific agonist. Finally, HPLC–MS/MS was used to identify the compounds that were released from the Fe3O4@β2-AR FPs. Such procedure is attractive since the recognition and isolation of the target compounds are achieved at the same time.
Fig. 9
Fig. 9

Schematic overview of Fe3O4@β2-AR FPs-based ligand screening method. The Fe3O4@β2-AR FPs were synthesized by immobilizing the receptor onto Fe3O4@NH2 using N,N′-carbonyldiimidazole as a linking reagent. The bioactive compounds bound to β2-AR were achieved by incubating the particles with desired samples and were isolated by a magnet. The bound compounds were released into solution by competitive displacement after the particles were totally rinsed. The compounds released from the particles were analyzed by LC–MS/MS to pursue their structures

Morphological characterization of the immobilized β2-AR demonstrated that both the types of particles displayed a relatively uniform size distribution. Compared with Fe3O4@NH2 FPs, the Fe3O4@β2-AR FPs produced a size growth of 41.6 nm. We attributed this growth to the immobilization of β2-AR based on the size of the receptor [36]. The hydroxyl content of the Fe3O4 FPs was determined to be 384 ± 6.94 μmol/g by acid–base titration. After amino group modification, the hydroxyl content decreased to 43.18 ± 3.21 μmol/g due to reversible Schiff base formation, confirming the covalent modification of Fe3O4 FPs by APTES. This change became more significant when APTES-modified FPs were treated with β2-AR, providing a proof of chemical immobilization of the receptor on the particle surface. The molecular weight of the purified protein was determined to be 66.5 kDa by SDS-PAGE. According to this result, we identified the purified protein to be β2-AR. The quantity of immobilized β2-AR was determined by the bicinchoninic acid assay. A calibration curve with a regression equation of y = (0.825 ± 0.025)x − (0.0127 ± 0.002) and a correlation coefficient of 0.996 was plotted using bovine serum albumin as the reference standard. Using this curve, the amount of β2-AR immobilized on the particle surface was determined to be 8.439 ± 0.784 nmol/g. Compared with the immobilization using silica gel as a supporter [37], we declared that the current method was beneficial to achieve a uniform, high density and stable immobilization of the receptor.

Affinity magnetic materials are primarily limited by false positive and false negative results. False positives are caused by nonspecific ligand adsorption, while false negatives are caused by excessive washing steps or manipulation. Considering the mentioned competitive displacement results, we concluded that flushing ligand- Fe3O4@β2-AR FPs two times with ammonium acetate was optimal during the washing step. This buffer was compatible with the receptor, and was effective to remove nonspecifically bound moieties and remain high speed without false positive and false negative results.

As a common prescription, SAD is mainly utilized for relieving cough and asthma symptoms in practice [38]. Pharmacological investigation showed that the treatment of asthma with SAD mainly involves the vasodilatations of bronchial vascular smooth muscle, where β2-AR is the main drug target [39, 40]. These studies indicated that the five compounds were the main bioactive compounds for asthma treatment through mediating β2-AR signal pathway. Molecular docking results aligned with a previous report states that three sites contribute to the binding of an agonist to β2-AR. The sites included an aspartate residue on the third domain, two serine residues on the fifth domain and two phenylalanine residues [41]. The agreement of our results with the report confirms the feasibility of Fe3O4@β2-AR FPs in screening bioactive compounds of the receptor from complex matrices including traditional Chinese medicine.

Conclusions

In this work, we synthesized Fe3O4@β2-AR FPs to fish out bioactive compounds of the receptor from SAD. Bioactive compounds in SAD that targeted β2-AR were identified as vicenin, shaftoside, isoshaftoside, liquiritin apioside and isoliquiritin apioside by LC–MS/MS. The compound–receptor interactions occurred at Ser169, Ser170, and Phe256. These results indicated that the affinity magnetic particles have the ability to recognize and separate the target compounds plus the probe of their exact binding site on the receptor. This is probably constitute an effective and rapid method for separating and identifying ligands of GPCRs from complex system such as traditional Chinese medicine.

Abbreviations

APTES: 

aminopropyltriethoxysilane

β 2-AR: 

beta 2-adrenoceptor

DLS: 

dynamic light scattering

Fe3O4@NH2 FPs: 

Fe3O4 fine particles coupled with NH2

Fe3O4@β 2-AR FPs: 

Fe3O4 fine particles coupled with the beta 2-adrenoceptor

GPCRs: 

G protein-coupled receptors

MFPs: 

magnetic fine particles

OD: 

optical density

SAD: 

San-ao decoction

FT-IR: 

Fourier transform infrared

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

FF and HS carried out the screening experiments and wrote the manuscript, XC and JL analyzed the data, JW performed the molecular docking, QL thoroughly revised the manuscript, YZ conceived of the study, contributed to the design and interpretation of the research. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

The dataset supporting the conclusions of this article is included within the article.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Funding

We thank for the financial support from the National Natural Sciences Foundation of China (Nos. 21775119, 21705126 and 81702832), the Postdoctoral Science Foundation of China (No. 2017M620467).

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Key Laboratory of Resource Biology and Biotechnology in Western China, Ministry of Education, College of Life Sciences, Northwest University, Xi’an, 710069, China

References

  1. Lam W, Bussom S, Guan FL, Jiang ZL, Zhang W, Gullen EA, et al. The four-herb Chinese medicine PHY906 reduces chemotherapy-induced gastrointestinal toxicity. Sci Transl Med. 2010;2(45):45–59.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Itokawa H, Morris-Natschke SL, Akiyama T, Lee KH. Plant-derived natural product research aimed at new drug discovery. J Nat Med. 2008;62(3):263–80.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Tu Y. The discovery of artemisinin (qinghaosu) and gifts from Chinese medicine. Nat Med. 2011;17(10):1217–20.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Berube G. An overview of molecular hybrids in drug discovery. Expert Opin Drug Discov. 2016;11(3):281–305.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Zhao XF, Zheng XH, Fan TP, Li ZJ, Zhang YY, Zheng JB. A novel drug discovery strategy inspired by traditional medicine philosophies. Science. 2015;347(6219):S38–9.Google Scholar
  6. Newman DJ, Cragg GM. Natural products as sources of new drugs over the 30 years from 1981 to 2010. J Nat Prod. 2012;75(3):311–35.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Li LJ, Zhou XW, Li N, Miao S, Lv JX, Xu ZC. Herbal drugs against cardiovascular disease: traditional medicine and modern development. Drug Discov Today. 2015;20(9):1074–86.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Jiang WY. Therapeutic wisdom in traditional Chinese medicine: a perspective from modern science. Discov Med. 2005;5(29):455.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Yuan R, Lin Y. Traditional Chinese medicine: an approach to scientific proof and clinical validation. Pharmacol Ther. 2000;86(2):191–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Bagdas D, Muldoon PP, Alsharari S, Carroll FI, Negus SS, Damaj MI. Expression and pharmacological modulation of visceral pain-induced conditioned place aversion in mice. Neuropharmacology. 2016;102:236–43.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Zhao XF, Li Q, Bian LJ, Zheng XH, Zheng JB, Zhang YY, et al. Using immobilized G-protein coupled receptors to screen bioactive traditional Chinese medicine compounds with multiple targets. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2012;70(11):549–52.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Wang J, Li F, Zeng KZ, Li Q, Zhao XF, Zheng XH. Bioactive compounds of Shuang–Huang–Lian prescription and an insight into its binding mechanism by β 2-adrenoceptor chromatography coupled with site-directed molecular docking. J Sep Sci. 2017;40(22):4357–65.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Ciesla L, Moaddel R. Comparison of analytical techniques for the identification of bioactive compounds from natural products. Nat Prod Rep. 2016;33(10):1131–45.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Zhuo RJ, Liu H, Liu NN, Wang Y. Ligand fishing: a remarkable strategy for discovering bioactive compounds from complex mixture of natural products. Molecules. 2016;21(11):1516.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Chen CYC. TCM Database@Taiwan: the world’s largest traditional Chinese medicine database for drug screening in silico. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(1):e15939.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Li ZH, Gao HY, Li JY, Zhang YJ. Identification of bioactive compounds in Shaoyao-Gancao decoction using β 2-adrenoceptor affinity chromatography. J Sep Sci. 2017;40(12):2558–64.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Wubshet SG, Brighente IMC, Moaddel R, Staerk D. Magnetic ligand fishing as a targeting tool for HPLC-HRMS-SPE-NMR: alpha-glucosidase inhibitory ligands and alkylresorcinol glycosides from Eugenia catharinae. J Nat Prod. 2015;78(11):2657–65.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Wang Z, Li XQ, Chen MH, Liu F, Han C, Kong L, et al. A strategy for screening of α-glucosidase inhibitors from Morus alba root bark based on the ligand fishing combined with high-performance liquid chromatography mass spectrometer and molecular docking. Talanta. 2018;180:337–45.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Moaddel R, Marszall MP, Bighi F, Yang Q, Duan X, Wainer IW. Automated ligand fishing using human serum albumin-coated magnetic beads. Anal Chem. 2007;79(14):5414–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Yang ZZ, Zhang YF, Sun LJ, Wang Y, Gao XM, Cheng YY. An ultrafiltration and high performance liquid chromatography coupled with diode array detector and mass spectrometry approach for screening and characterizing thrombin inhibitors from Rhizoma Chuanxiong. J Chromatogr B. 2017;1061–1062:421–9.Google Scholar
  21. Qing LS, Xue Y, Zheng Y, Xiong J, Liao X, Ding LS, et al. Ligand fishing from Dioscorea nipponica extract using human serum albumin functionalized magnetic nanoparticles. J Chromatogr B. 2010;1217(28):4663–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Jönsson PE. Superparamagnetism and spin glass dynamics of interacting magnetic nanoparticle systems. Adv Chem Phys. 2003;128(128):191–248.Google Scholar
  23. Zhou Q, Li ZQ, Shuang CD, Li AM, Zhang MC, Wang MQ. Efficient removal of tetracycline by reusable magnetic microspheres with a high surface area. Chem Eng J. 2012;210(6):350–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Yang Y, Zhang W, Yang F, Zhou B, Zeng DH, Zhang N, et al. Ru nanoparticles dispersed on magnetic yolk-shell nanoarchitectures with Fe3O4 core and sulfoacid-containing periodic mesoporous organosilica shell as bifunctional catalysts for direct conversion of cellulose to isosorbide. Nanoscale. 2018;10(5):2199–206.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Song HP, Chen J, Hong JY, Hao HP, Qi LW, Lu J, et al. A strategy for screening of high-quality enzyme inhibitors from herbal medicines based on ultrafiltration LC–MS and in silico molecular docking. Chem Commun. 2015;51(8):1494–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Johnson M. Beta2-adrenoceptors: mechanisms of action of beta2-agonists. Paediatr Respir Rev. 2001;2(1):57–62.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Liu GX, Wang P, Li Q, Wang J, Sun ZY, Zhao XF, et al. Confirming therapeutic target of protopine using immobilized β 2-adrenoceptor coupled with site-directed molecular docking and the target-drug interaction by frontal analysis and injection amount-dependent method. J Mol Recognit. 2017;30(7):e2613.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Ma CH, Qian YF, Fan XS, Shang EX, Yao X, Ma SP. Using UPLC–Q-TOF–MS to analyze the chemical changes between traditional and dispensing granule decoctions of San-Ao-Tang. J Chromatogr Sci. 2014;52(4):277–92.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Yang D, Hu JH, Fu SK. Controlled synthesis of magnetite-silica nanocomposites via a seeded sol-gel approach. J Phys Chem C. 2009;113(18):7646–51.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Can K, Ozmen M, Ersoz M. Immobilization of albumin on aminosilane modified superparamagnetic magnetite nanoparticles and its characterization. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2009;71(1):154–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Zhao XF, Li Q, Xiao CN, Zhang YJ, Bian LJ, Zhao XF, et al. Oriented immobilisation of histidine-tagged protein and its application in exploring interactions between ligands and proteins. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2014;406(12):2975–85.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Marszall MP, Bucinski A. A protein-coated magnetic beads as a tool for the rapid drug-protein binding study. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2010;52(3):420–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Sun ZY, Wang J, Li Q, Zhao MM, Zhang YY, Xiong XY, et al. A fast affinity extraction methodology for rapid screening of bioactive compounds specifically binding to beta2-adrenergic receptor from Xie-Bai-San. Med Chem Res. 2017;26(10):1–10.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Li ZH, Liu T, Liao J, Ai N, Fan XH, Cheng YY. Deciphering chemical interactions between Glycyrrhizae Radix and Coptidis Rhizoma by liquid chromatography with transformed multiple reaction monitoring mass spectrometry. J Sep Sci. 2017;40(6):1254–65.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Ren LL, Xue XY, Zhang FF, Xu Q, Liang XM. High performance liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry analysis of protoberberine alkaloids in medicine herbs. J Sep Sci. 2007;30(6):833–42.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Zeng KZ, Li Q, Wang J, Yin GW, Zhang YJ, Xiao CN, et al. One-step methodology for the direct covalent capture of GPCRs from complex matrices onto solid surfaces based on the bioorthogonal reaction between haloalkane dehalogenase and chloroalkanes. Chem Sci. 2018;9(2):446–56.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Li Q, Bian LJ, Zhao XF, Gao XK, Zheng JB, Li ZJ, et al. Immobilised histidine tagged β 2-adrenoceptor oriented by a diazonium salt reaction and its application in exploring drug–protein interaction using ephedrine and pseudoephedrine as probes. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(4):e94955.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Ma CH, Ma ZQ, Fu Q, Ma SP. Pharmacokinetic properties of ephedrine, amygdalin and glycyrrhizic acid after oral gavage of San-Ao-decoction in beagle dogs using a UPLC-MS method. Anal Methods. 2013;5(8):2119–25.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Fang R, Cui Q, Sun J, Duan X, Ma X, Wang W, et al. PDK1/Akt/PDE4D axis identified as a target for asthma remedy synergistic with beta(2)-AR agonists by a natural agent arctigeni. Allergy. 2015;70(12):1622–32.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Walker JKL, Defea KA. Role for β-arrestin in mediating paradoxical beta(2)-AR and PAR(2) signaling in asthma. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2014;16:142–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Sorianoursua MA, Trujilloferrara JG, Correabasurto J, Vilar S. Recent structural advances of β 1 and β 2 adrenoceptors yield keys for ligand recognition and drug design. J Med Chem. 2013;56(21):8207–23.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2018

Advertisement

Chinese Medicine

ISSN: 1749-8546

Contact us