Skip to main content

Berberine improves negative symptoms and cognitive function in patients with chronic schizophrenia via anti-inflammatory effect: a randomized clinical trial

Abstract

Background

Based on the neuroinflammation hypothesis in schizophrenia and known anti-inflammatory effects of berberine, the aim of the present study is to investigate the efficacy of berberine in treating negative symptoms and cognitive deficits in adult patients with chronic schizophrenia.

Methods

Enrolled participants were randomized to receive berberine or placebo for 3 months. The Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS), Trail-making Test A (TMT-A), Trail-making Test B (TMT-B), and Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (HVLT) were used to evaluate the negative symptoms and cognitive function at four-time points (baseline, 1st, 2nd, and 3rd month). Serum levels of interleukin-1β (IL-1β), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) were used as inflammatory markers. 106 patients with per-protocol were analyzed, 56 in the experimental (berberine) group and 50 in the control (placebo) group.

Results

From baseline to month 3, patients receiving berberine demonstrated a decrease in total scores on clinical scales SANS, TMT-A and TMT-B and showed a serum level reduction of IL-1β, IL-6 and TNF-α comparing with patients in the control group (P < 0.05). There were positive correlations between the change of serum IL-1β level and the change of SANS (r = 0.210, P = 0.039), TMT-A (r = 0.522, P < 0.001), and TMT-B (r = 0.811, P < 0.001); between the change of serum IL-6 level and the change of TMT-A (r = 0.562, P < 0.001), and TMT-B (r = 0.664, P < 0.001); between the change of serum TNF-α level and the change of TMT-B (r = 0.472, P < 0.001) after berberine treatment.

Conclusions

Berberine is an anti-inflammatory agent that can potentially mitigate the negative symptoms and cognitive deficits in patients with schizophrenia.

Background

The negative symptoms and cognitive impairments are considered the core clinical features of schizophrenia which can be especially pronounced in patients at chronic stages of the illness. The negative symptoms can be manifested as avolition, anhedonia, affective blunting, alogia, and social withdrawal. The primary cognitive impairments refer to domains of attention and processing speed, executive function, and memory [1]. The negative symptoms and cognitive impairments are the leading causes of the high disability rate and substantial financial burdens of chronic schizophrenia as they synergistically impair patients’ social function and daily life [2, 3].

The negative symptoms and cognitive impairments are strongly correlated [4]. It has been hypothesized that these clinical features have overlaps at the pathophysiological level, clinical development, and prognosis [5]. Some scholars found about a 20% overlap of clinical features between these two syndromes [6]. For example, both involve impairments of attention, thinking logic, and the structure of the prefrontal cortex [1]. The hypofunction of glutamatergic neurons in the prefrontal cortex [7], decreased concentration of dopamine in the mesocortical system [1], and excessive expression of the histamine-3 receptor [8, 9] are considered as the common biochemical mechanisms shared by these two clinical domains.

Besides the above mechanisms, the pathophysiology of schizophrenia is strongly associated with neuroinflammation [12]. The dysimmunity and low chronic inflammation have gradually become the new potential targets of chronic schizophrenia [13]. It is reported that inflammatory markers from cellular to molecular levels have changed in chronic schizophrenia, which manifested via the increased active microglia, impaired astrocytes, and exaggerated expression of kinds of cytokines. Studies have demonstrated the critical role of inflammatory factors, including C-creative protein, IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, and interferon in neuroimmunology, neuroplasticity, neuroendocrine and signal transduction [14]. The research findings by far have shown the close relationships between these inflammatory factors and the psychosis symptoms, especially the catatonic behaviors [15], negative symptoms [16] and cognitive impairment [17].

Therefore, treating negative symptoms and addressing illness-associated cognitive impairments are important clinical goals. Over the past several decades of clinical research, there has been significant progress in providing a wide spectrum of medications to treat schizophrenia. However, recent meta-analyses converge on the notion that the acute efficacy of antipsychotics is modest [10], especially in attempts to treat cognitive impairments and negative symptoms. Theoretically, the atypical antipsychotics can improve these two clinical domains for their relatively low influence on dopamine receptors in the mesocortical system and the inhibiting effects on 5-hydroxytryptamine-2 receptors and histamine receptors [1]. However, the actual therapeutic effects of the atypical antipsychotics on negative symptoms and cognitive impairments are minimal [11]. In addition, the atypical antipsychotics also possess some adverse reactions such as metabolic syndrome, excessive sedation, postural hypotension, arrhythmia, dry mouth, constipation etc. [1].

In line with the neuroinflammation hypothesis, previous studies suggested that some antibiotics and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs including minocycline, aspirin, and celecoxib can ameliorate the negative symptoms and cognitive impairments of schizophrenia [18]. However, the clinical utility of these medications is limited due to the known adverse reactions such as dysbacteriosis, gastric mucosal lesion, and stomach bleeding. Therefore, there is an urgent need for new pharmacological agents with better side-effect profiles and improved efficacy.

Berberine is an alkaloid chemical extracted from the traditional Chinese medicine coptis chinensis (Huanglian) or cortex phellodendri (Huangbai). They are widely used in China as an antidiarrheal drug with its non-specific anti-inflammatory effects, affordability, and safety. There are several relevant clinical trials that used berberine in schizophrenic patients, however, these studies focused on berberine application in preventing the metabolic disturbances resulted from antipsychotic treatment [19, 20]. It has been reported that berberine improved the cognitive impairments resulting from diabetes for its neuroprotection effects in animal experiments [21]. Studies on animal models also found berberine’s positive effects on depressive-like behavior [22]. It is believed that the core mechanism of this efficacy lies in its normalization of the pro-inflammatory factors [23]. To verify this hypothesis and explore for a new therapeutic targets, in this study we aimed (i) to determine the efficacy of berberine on negative symptoms and cognitive impairments in patients with chronic schizophrenia; (ii) and measure berberine anti-inflammatory effects via IL-1β, IL-6 and TNF-α markers.

Methods

Study design

Between January 2020 and December 2021, a randomized, 3-month, open-label, and parallel-group trial was conducted at three hospitals: Kangci Hospital of Jiaxing, Second Specialized Hospital of Hegang, and Second People’s Hospital of Tongxiang, and Second People’s Hospital of Taizhou.

Patients who met the diagnostic criteria for schizophrenia according to the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (Tenth Edition) (ICD-10) and the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) were eligible for this trial. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) at least 10 years duration of schizophrenia [24]; (2) a minimum required severity of negative symptoms defined as a score of ≥ 3 on at least two of the five global rating items (items 7, 12, 16, 21 or 24) of Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) [25], (selecting patients that have negative symptoms as a dominant clinical feature); (3) no obvious positive symptoms defined as a score of < 3 on each of the four global rating items (items 7, 19, 25 and 34) of Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms (SAPS) [26]; (4) Hamilton Depression Scale-17 Items (HAMD-17) score ≤ 7 [27], and Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA) ≤ 7 [28] (to exclude patients with symptoms of depression and anxiety); (5) participants aged 16 to 60 years with sufficient fluency in Chinese language to complete study procedures. Exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) cognitive impairments or negative symptoms due to other diseases; (2) patients receiving first-generation antipsychotics due to the possibility of drug-induced negative symptoms [29, 30]; (3) history of neurologic diseases; (4) any other serious mental illness other than schizophrenia as a primary diagnosis; (5) participants with clear inflammatory conditions due to infection, autoimmune diseases or other reasons; (6) or any other unstable medical diagnosis; (7) contraindications of berberine.

Using a computer-generated random allocation sequence, all participants were assigned to the experimental group (receiving berberine) or control group (receiving placebo tablet) in 1:1 ratio. The dosage of berberine was determined as 300 mg three times a day according to previous study conducted by Li et al. [31]. Placebo tablet was composed of amylodextrin and food coloring substance that has the same size, shape, mass, and color as berberine tablet. What needed to be pointed out was that our trial was performed on the basis of these enrolled patients’ previous therapy, especially the atypical antipsychotics.

This trial was approved by the ethics committees of the Kangci Hospital of Jiaxing, Second Specialized Hospital of Hegang, Second People’s Hospital of Tongxiang, and Second People’s Hospital of Taizhou. The clinical trial registration number is ChiCTR2000035542. All patients or their legal guardians provided written informed consent on trial participation.

Clinical assessment of negative symptoms

The severity of negative symptoms was rated with SANS [25] which includes 25 items divided into five sub-scales; these aimed to evaluate separately apathy, poverty of thought, abulia, lack of interest and social interaction, and attention dysfunction. Each item is rated on an ordinal scale from 0 to 5, corresponding to the normal, suspicious, mild, moderate, obvious, and severe states, respectively. There are three common ways to calculate SANS scores. One is the summation of all items, resulting in a score ranging from 0–120; the second is the total score of five global rating items (item 7, 12, 16, 21 or 24) resulting in scores ranging from 0–25; the last is the sub-scores of five global rating items which determine the severity of apathy, poverty of thought, abulia, lack of interest and social interaction, and attention dysfunction, respectively. Higher scores indicate more severe negative symptoms. The subtype of schizophrenia that mainly manifested with negative symptoms is defined as a score of ≥ 3 on at least two of the five global rating items. All three assessment methods were reported in this study [25].

Cognitive function assessment

The Trail-making Test A (TMT-A) was used to assess the attention and processing speed. This test consists of 25 consecutive numbers randomly arranged on an A4 page. Subjects are asked to draw a line that connects numbers in a sequence from 1 to 25 within 150 s. The total time (in seconds) spent to complete the task is recorded as the score. A TMT-A score ≥ 72.5 s is considered as having impairment in attention and processing speed [32].

To accommodate elderly participants with limited knowledge of English alphabet, the Chinese version of Trail-making Test B (TMT-B) was used to assess the executive function. The Chinese version of TMT-B consists of 25 numbers enclosed in 13 circles (from ) and 12 squares (from ), which are randomly arranged on an A4 page. Subjects were asked to draw a line to connect numbers in circles and squares (e.g. ) within 300 s. The time spent in accomplishing the task (in seconds) is recorded as the test score. The TMT-B score ≥ 135.5 s is considered as having impairment in executive function [32].

The time difference (TMT-B minus TMT-A) was used to assess the disturbance variable which indicated the ability of diversion from one target to another. The greater difference in scores between two tasks indicates a greater disturbance variable and worse diversion ability [32].

The Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (HVLT) score consists of total learning score and recognition score. We only chose the part of the total learning score to reveal patients’ immediate memory. The HVLT includes 12 nouns and the individuals are required to recall the nouns immediately with no limitation on sequence after the examiner reads these words out loud. The time interval of each noun read by the examiner is 2 s. This procedure is repeated three times, and the number of correct recalls is recorded as the total score (ranging from 0 to 36). The total learning score of HVLT ≤ 21.5 is considered as having impairment in immediate memory functioning [33].

Inflammatory factors

For each participant, a total of 5 mL venous blood was obtained following 6-h fasting. Blood samples were incubated until complete coagulation; next centrifuged for 10 min at 3500 r/min. The resultant serum was used directly for subsequent assays. Serum levels of IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α were determined using enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (Enzyme-linked Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) according to the manufacturer’s protocol.

Primary and secondary study outcomes

The between-group difference of SANS was considered as primary outcome for the present study. Other clinical measures were used as secondary outcomes. Of note, the results of the study outcomes had no impact on the clinical decision regarding the diagnostic status of study participants. All the outcome measures were assessed or determined at baseline and each month after treatment (month 1, month 2, and month 3).

Statistical analysis

The sample size calculation assumed a therapeutic effect of 10 and a standard deviation (SD) of 12 in SANS [34]; factoring a significance level of 5% and study power of 80%, with drop-out rate of 20%, the present analysis required at least 42 participants in each study group. Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS v25.0 (IBM SPSS, Armonk, NY). Quantitative data were expressed as mean (SD), and categorical variables were expressed as frequency (%). The per-protocol analysis was chosen for this study. Given that the data were normally distributed (Kolmogorov–Smirnov tests), thus the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients were analyzed using the t-test and Chi-squared test; between-group differences were examined using the independent-samples t-test; repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to evaluate the changes in outcome measures across the treatment (month 3 minus baseline). The Pearson correlation analysis was used to analyze the correlations between the changes of inflammation markers’ concentrations and those of clinical outcome measures after treatment (month 3 minus baseline) in the experimental group. Multiple linear regression was used to analyze the influence factors, with the change of the total score of SANS, TMT-A and TMT-B as dependent variables (month 3 minus baseline), changes of IL-1β, IL-6 and TNF-α as independent variables (month 3 minus baseline), and the age, sex, education, duration of illness and duration of treatment as covariates. P values < 0.05 were considered indicative of statistical significance, and mean differences (MD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were also listed.

Results

Demographic and clinical characteristics

Among the 157 participants who presented for eligibility assessment, 134 qualified for the study per inclusion criteria, allocating 67 participants for either treatment or placebo study group. During the treatment, 11 patients in the experimental group and 17 patients in the control group withdrew from the trial before its completion due to adverse reactions, poor compliance with treatment, or other reasons (loss of contact, newly emerging physical conditions, and fluctuation of psychiatric symptoms). Therefore 106 participants completed the study. Data from 56 patients who received berberine and 50 patients who received placebo were included in the final analyses. The flow diagram of patient enrollment is provided in Fig. 1. The demographic and clinical features of the patients who completed the trial were summarized in Table 1. The two groups had no statistical differences regarding the demographic or clinical characteristics at baseline (all P > 0.05).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flow diagram of the study subjects

Table 1 Demographic and clinical characteristics of the participants who completed the study

Negative symptoms

The total score of SANS was significantly lower in patients who received berberine compared to placebo at the 2nd and 3rd month of treatment (MD − 8.18, 95% CI − 15.42 to − 0.94, t = − 2.215, P = 0.029; MD − 10.06, 95% CI − 17.30 to − 2.82, t = − 2.722, P = 0.008; respectively). The total score of five global rating items of SANS was significantly lower in patients who received berberine compared to placebo at the 3rd month of treatment (MD − 2.32, 95% CI − 4.07 to − 0.57, t = − 2.597, P = 0.011). As per each subscale of SANS, the score of attention dysfunction was significantly lower in patients who received berberine compared to placebo at the 2nd and 3rd of treatment (MD − 0.63, 95% CI − 1.14 to − 0.12, t = − 2.438, P = 0.016; MD − 1.03, 95% CI − 1.53 to − 0.53, t = − 4.006, P < 0.001; respectively); while there were no significant differences at the score of apathy, poverty of thought, abulia, and lack of interest and social interaction (all P > 0.05). From baseline to month 3, there was a significant group × time effect in the total score of SANS between the two groups (F = 3.887; P = 0.015). The details were listed in Table 2.

Table 2 Assessments of negative symptoms and cognitive function, and serum levels of inflammation markers

Cognitive function

Concerning the attention and processing speed, the score of TMT-A was significantly lower in patients who received berberine compared to placebo at the 2nd and 3rd month of treatment (MD − 9.66, 95% CI − 18.81 to − 0.51, t = − 2.070, P = 0.041; MD − 10.64, 95% CI − 19.56 to − 1.72, t = − 2.338, P = 0.021; respectively). From baseline to month 3, there was a significant group × time effect in the score of TMT-A between the two groups (F = 3.317; P = 0.028). There were no significant differences between two groups in executive functioning (the score of TMT-B) at each time point (all P > 0.05), but there was a significant group × time effect in the score of TMT-B between the two groups (F = 3.054; P = 0.037) from baseline to month 3. Concerning the ability of diversion from one target to another, there were no significant differences at each time point in the time difference (TMT-B minus TMT-A) (all P > 0.05). As to immediate memory, there were also no significant differences at each time point in the score of HVLT (all P > 0.05). The details were listed in Table 2.

Inflammatory factors

At 1, 2 and 3 months of treatment, the serum level of IL-1β was significantly lower in patients who received berberine compared to placebo (MD − 8.25, 95% CI − 15.75 to − 0.75, t = − 2.155, P = 0.033; MD − 9.41, 95% CI − 16.67 to − 2.15, t = − 2.541, P = 0.013; MD − 13.71, 95% CI − 20.78 to − 6.64, t = − 3.802, P < 0.001; respectively). Similar effects were identified for IL-6 marker as berberine treatment group showed significantly lower serum levels as compared to placebo group (MD -5.39, 95% CI − 10.05 to − 0.73, t = − 2.265, P = 0.026; MD − 6.28, 95% CI − 10.85 to − 1.71, t = − 2.693, P = 0.008; MD − 8.10, 95% CI − 13.32 to − 3.88, t = − 3.762, P < 0.001; respectively). The serum level of TNF-α was significantly lower in patients who received berberine compared to placebo at the 2nd and 3rd month of treatment (MD − 6.12, 95% CI − 11.60 to − 0.64, t = − 2.189, P = 0.031; MD − 10.89, 95% CI − 16.28 to − 5.50, t = − 3.963, P < 0.001; respectively). From baseline to month 3, there were significant group × time effects in the serum level of IL-1β, IL-6 and TNF-α between the two groups (F = 6.556, P < 0.001; F = 8.326, P < 0.001; F = 5.282, P < 0.003; respectively). The details were listed in Table 2.

Associations between inflammatory factors and negative symptoms and cognitive function

The correlations between the changes of serum inflammatory factors’ concentrations and those of clinical measures (month 3 minus baseline) in the experimental were displayed in Table 3. With respect to negative symptoms, there was a significant positive correlation between the change of serum IL-1β level and the change of total score of SANS (r = 0.210, P = 0.039). With respect to the attention and processing speed, there were significant positive correlations between the change of serum IL-1β level and the change of score of TMT-A (r = 0.522, P < 0.001); between the change of serum IL-6 level and the change of score of TMT-A (r = 0.562, P < 0.001). With respect to executive function, there was a significant positive correlation between the change of serum IL-1β level and the change of score of TMT-B (r = 0.811, P < 0.001); between the change of serum IL-6 level and the change of score of TMT-B (r = 0.664, P < 0.001); between the change of serum TNF-α level and the change of score of TMT-B (r = 0.472, P < 0.001). With respect to the ability of diversion from one target to another, there was a significant positive correlation between the change of serum IL-1β level and the change of time difference (TMT-B minus TMT-A) (r = 0.289, P = 0.031). Regarding the immediate memory evaluation, there were no significant correlations between the changes of serum levels of inflammatory factors and the change of score of HVLT (all P > 0.05). The Pearson correlation analysis showed that there were no significant correlations between the changes of serum levels of inflammatory factors and those of clinical outcome measures (month 3 minus baseline) in the control group (all P > 0.05).

Table 3 Correlations between the changes of inflammatory factors’ concentrations and those of clinical measures after treatment (month 3 minus baseline) in the experimental group

Patients in the berberine group were analyzed by multiple linear regression (Table 4). With respect to the negative symptoms assessed by the total score of SANS (model R2 = 0.267, F = 4.378, P = 0.017), the change of serum IL-1β level (month 3 minus baseline) were the independent influencing factors (b = 0.112, P = 0.036). With respect to the attention and processing speed assessed by TMT-A (model R2 = 0.442, F = 5.531, P = 0.007), the changes of serum IL-1β and IL-6 levels (month 3 minus baseline) were the independent influencing factors (b = 0.567, P < 0.001; b = 0.593, P < 0.001; respectively). With respect to the executive function assessed by TMT-B (model R2 = 0.681, F = 5.9608, P = 0.005), the changes of serum IL-1β, IL-6 and TNF-α (month 3 minus baseline) were the independent influencing factors (b = 0.983, P < 0.001; b = 0.720, P < 0.001; b = 0.317, P = 0.014; respectively).

Table 4 Analysis of factors related to the changes (month 3 minus baseline) of negative symptoms and cognitive function in the experimental group

Adverse reactions to berberine

Safety analyses included all enrolled patients (n = 134). Adverse reactions induced by previous therapy such as antipsychotics were not reported. The most frequent adverse reactions to berberine were nausea (5 cases), mild stomach pain (7 cases), and constipation (2 case), which were resolved with time and tolerated well by the participants. However, a total of 5 patients that started berberine treatment trial had to discontinue due to adverse reactions.

Discussion

Results from our 3-month trial showed that compared to placebo, berberine treatment improved negative symptoms, as indicated by a reduction in SANS scores (including the total score of SANS and sum of five global rating items of SANS). However, regarding the subclinical clusters of negative symptoms, the attention dysfunction became the only one to be improved after berberine treatment rather than apathy, poverty of thought, abulia, and lack of interest and social interaction. With respect to cognitive function, attention and processing speed and executive function were the two cognitive metrics that showed improvements following berberine treatment. It was worth mentioning that Kern et al.’s study considered processing speed and working memory (one component of executive function) as the most severely impaired cognitive domains in patients with schizophrenia [35]. Both negative symptoms and cognitive functioning improvements coincided with significant decrease in serum inflammatory markers, IL-1β, IL-6 and TNF-α.

There were more positive outcomes according to correlation analysis such as the positive correlations between changes of inflammatory markers (IL-1β, IL-6 and TNF-α) and changes of negative symptoms and those of attention and processing speed and executive function after berberine administration. The results of multiple linear regression analysis showed that the changes of inflammatory markers (IL-1β, IL-6 and TNF-α) were the influence factors of negative symptoms and cognitive domains of attention and processing speed and executive function.

There has been an elevation in research interest in studying neuroinflammation in schizophrenia. The inflammatory cytokines in peripheral blood can penetrate the blood brain barrier to continue the inflammatory cascade in the central nervous system (CNS) [36]. It is reported that the inflammatory cytokines have closer correlations with the negative symptoms and cognitive impairments rather than positive symptoms [37, 38]. Preclinical studies using animal models consistently demonstrated that overexpression of IL-1β and IL-6 can inhibit hippocampus-dependent learning and memory functioning [39, 40]. As to the negative symptoms, previous reports showed a positive correlation between IL-6 levels and the severity of attention deficit and psychomotor retardation [41, 42]. Furthermore, the injection of IL-1β and TNF-α can lead to social withdrawal and anhedonia [43]. And some scholars even considered TNF-α as a specific inflammatory marker related to the negative symptoms [44].

Several clinical studies have proved berberine’s anti-inflammatory effects [45]. It down-regulates the expression of pro-inflammatory factors through inhibiting nuclear factor-kappaB and signaling pathways of mitogen-activated protein kinase [46, 47]. However, its clinical utility for treating neurological and psychiatric illnesses has been only recently identified. There have been several animal experiments to explore the improvement effects of berberine on cognitive impairments resulting from diabetes [21], Alzheimer’s disease [48], Huntington’s disease [49], cerebral vascular disorder [50], and schizophrenia [51]. A handful of clinical trials with schizophrenic patients showed that berberine could improve information processing speed, working memory, and social cognition [52]. For example, another animal study demonstrated the beneficial effects of berberine on depression-like behavior in a rat diabetes model [22]. The results of the present study are in consonance with a recent clinical report by Li et al. Their study also suggested that berberine may improve negative symptoms in patients with schizophrenia via anti-inflammatory action as the negative symptoms improvements coincided with significant decrease in serum inflammatory markers including IL-6 and C-creative protein [31]. However, Lie et al. reported negative subscale of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) to evaluate negative symptoms, which had fewer items (7 items) than SANS (24 items) and didn’t list the concrete types of negative symptoms compared to SANS. To add value to the previous report we also explored the efficacy of berberine on the cognitive impairments in schizophrenia.

Both clinical and animal studies converge on the notion that salutary effects of berberine are exerted due to anti-inflammatory action. Besides the mechanism of anti-inflammation, recent studies found that berberine could get across the brain-blood barrier without any chemical modification [23] and accumulate in the hippocampus to improve cognitive function via lowering the activity of prolyl oligopeptidase and cholinesterase [53]. Accumulated berberine in the hippocampus could further up-regulate the expression of brain-derived neurotrophic factor [22] and ameliorate oxidative stress [54]. The exact mechanism of action of berberine in treating psychiatric illnesses remains to be fully understood. It can be hypothesized that berberine accumulation in CNS can inhibit the activity of monoamine oxidase A [55] in adrenergic neurons and monoamine oxidase B [56] in serotonergic neurons to enhance levels of DA. These neurochemical changes may likely account for clinical improvements in negative symptoms in patients with schizophrenia.

The results of the present study should be interpreted in light of several key limitations. Our clinical trial was conducted on a small sample size with a relatively short follow-up period. We examined a narrow range of peripheral inflammatory cytokines, but data from direct cerebral inflammatory markers could have added interpretative value in advanding our understanding of the therapeutic action of berberine. Another important limitation to consider is the fact that the study participants did not receive a uniform antipsychotic treatment before entering the clinical trial with berberine as an adjunctive treatment agent. However, the outcomes of our trial support the application of berberine as an adjuvant drug to improve the negative symptoms and cognitive impairments in patients with chronic schizophrenia. Future studies should replicate these findings on larger sample size.

Conclusions

Results of the current study showed that berberine mitigated the negative symptoms and cognitive deficits in patients with chronic schizophrenia. This treatment regimen is safe and may work through anti-inflammatory effect. Therefore, it may be a valuable complementary and an alternative therapeutic option for chronic schizophrenia with residual negative symptoms and cognitive deficits.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and analyzed in the present study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

SANS:

Assessment of negative symptoms

TMT-A:

Trail-making Test A

TMT-B:

Trail-making Test B

HVLT:

Hopkins Verbal Learning Test

IL-1β:

Interleukin-1β

IL-6:

Interleukin-6

TNF-α:

Tumor necrosis factor-α

MD:

Mean differences

CI:

Confidence interval

CNS:

Central nervous system

DA:

Dopamine

References

  1. Hao W, Lu L. Psychiatry. Beijing: People’s Medical Publishing House; 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Weber S, Scott JG, Chatterton ML. Healthcare costs and resource use associated with negative symptoms of schizophrenia: a systematic literature review. Schizophr Res. 2022;241:251–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gutiérrez-Rojas L, González-Domenech PJ, Junquera G, Halverson TF, Lahera G. Functioning and happiness in people with schizophrenia: analyzing the role of cognitive impairment. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18:7706.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Buchanan RW, Javitt DC, Marder SR, Schooler NR, Gold JM, McMahon RP, et al. The cognitive and negative symptoms in schizophrenia trial (CONSIST): the efficacy of glutamatergic agents for negative symptoms and cognitive impairments. Am J Psychiatry. 2007;164:1593–602.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kaneko K. Negative symptoms and cognitive impairments in schizophrenia: two key symptoms negatively influencing social functioning. Yonago Acta Med. 2018;61:91–102.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Foussias G, Agid O, Fervaha G, Remington G. Negative symptoms of schizophrenia: clinical features, relevance to real world functioning and specificity versus other CNS disorders. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2014;24:693–709.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Osborne AL, Solowij N, Babic I, Lum JS, Newell KA, Huang XF, et al. Effect of cannabidiol on endocannabinoid, glutamatergic and GABAergic signalling markers in male offspring of a maternal immune activation (poly I:C) model relevant to schizophrenia. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2019;95: 109666.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Rapanelli M, Pittenger C. Histamine and histamine receptors in Tourette syndrome and other neuropsychiatric conditions. Neuropharmacology. 2016;106:85–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Haig GM, Bain E, Robieson W, Othman AA, Baker J, Lenz RA. A randomized trial of the efficacy and safety of the H3 antagonist ABT-288 in cognitive impairment associated with schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 2014;40:1433–42.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Haddad PM, Correll CU. The acute efficacy of antipsychotics in schizophrenia: a review of recent meta-analyses. Ther Adv Psychopharmacol. 2018;8:303–18.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Kaar SJ, Natesan S, McCutcheon R, Howes OD. Antipsychotics: mechanisms underlying clinical response and side-effects and novel treatment approaches based on pathophysiology. Neuropharmacology. 2020;172: 107704.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Monji A, Kato TA, Mizoguchi Y, Horikawa H, Seki Y, Kasai M, et al. Neuroinflammation in schizophrenia especially focused on the role of microglia. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2013;42:115–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ansari Z, Pawar S, Seetharaman R. Neuroinflammation and oxidative stress in schizophrenia: are these opportunities for repurposing? Postgrad Med. 2022;134:187–99.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Na KS, Jung HY, Kim YK. The role of pro-inflammatory cytokines in the neuroinflammation and neurogenesis of schizophrenia. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2014;48:277–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rogers JP, Pollak TA, Blackman G, David AS. Catatonia and the immune system: a review. Lancet Psychiatry. 2019;6:620–30.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Dunleavy C, Elsworthy RJ, Upthegrove R, Wood SJ, Aldred S. Inflammation in first-episode psychosis: the contribution of inflammatory biomarkers to the emergence of negative symptoms, a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2022;146:6–20.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Adamowicz DH, Shilling PD, Palmer BW, Nguyen TT, Wang E, Liu C, et al. Associations between inflammatory marker profiles and neurocognitive functioning in people with schizophrenia and non-psychiatric comparison subjects. J Psychiatr Res. 2022;149:106–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Çakici N, van Beveren NJM, Judge-Hundal G, Koola MM, Sommer IEC. An update on the efficacy of anti-inflammatory agents for patients with schizophrenia: a meta-analysis. Psychol Med. 2019;49:2307–19.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Pu Z, Sun Y, Jiang H, Hou Q, Yan H, Wen H, et al. Effects of berberine on gut microbiota in patients with mild metabolic disorders induced by olanzapine. Am J Chin Med. 2021;49:1949–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Li M, Liu Y, Qiu Y, Zhang J, Zhang Y, Zhao Y, et al. The effect of berberine adjunctive treatment on glycolipid metabolism in patients with schizophrenia: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Psychiatry Res. 2021;300: 113899.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhang JH, Zhang JF, Song J, Bai Y, Deng L, Feng CP, et al. Effects of berberine on diabetes and cognitive impairment in an animal model: the mechanisms of action. Am J Chin Med. 2021;49:1399–415.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhang JH, Yang HZ, Su H, Song J, Bai Y, Deng L, et al. Berberine and ginsenoside Rb1 ameliorate depression-like behavior in diabetic rats. Am J Chin Med. 2021;49:1195–213.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Shayganfard M. Berberine: is a promising agent for mental disorders treatment? Curr Mol Pharmacol. 2022. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874467215666220509213122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Rek-Owodziń K, Tyburski E, Plichta P, Waszczuk K, Bielecki M, Wietrzyński K, et al. The relationship between cognitive functions and psychopathological symptoms in first episode psychosis and chronic Schizophrenia. J Clin Med. 2022;11:2619.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Andreasen NC. The Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS): conceptual and theoretical foundations. Br J Psychiatry Suppl. 1989:49–58.

  26. Grot S, Giguère C, Smine S, Mongeau-Pérusse V, Nguyen DD, Preda A, et al. Converting scores between the PANSS and SAPS/SANS beyond the positive/negative dichotomy. Psychiatry Res. 2021;305: 114199.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Leentjens AF, Verhey FR, Lousberg R, Spitsbergen H, Wilmink FW. The validity of the Hamilton and Montgomery-Asberg depression rating scales as screening and diagnostic tools for depression in Parkinson’s disease. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2000;15:644–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Beneke M. Methodological investigations of the Hamilton anxiety scale. Pharmacopsychiatry. 1987;20:249–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Karamatskos E, Mulert C, Lambert M, Naber D. Subjective well-being of patients with schizophrenia as a target of drug treatment. Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 2012;13:1490–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ansell BR, Dwyer DB, Wood SJ, Bora E, Brewer WJ, Proffitt TM, et al. Divergent effects of first-generation and second-generation antipsychotics on cortical thickness in first-episode psychosis. Psychol Med. 2015;45:515–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Li M, Qiu Y, Zhang J, Zhang Y, Liu Y, Zhao Y, et al. Improvement of adjunctive berberine treatment on negative symptoms in patients with schizophrenia. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2022;272:633–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Wei M, Shi J, Li T, Ni J, Zhang X, Li Y, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of the Chinese version of the trail-making test for screening cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018;66:92–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Shi J, Tian J, Wei M, Miao Y, Wang Y. The utility of the Hopkins verbal learning test (Chinese version) for screening dementia and mild cognitive impairment in a Chinese population. BMC Neurol. 2012;12:136.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Basavaraju R, Ithal D, Thanki MV, Ramalingaiah AH, Thirthalli J, Reddy RP, et al. Intermittent theta burst stimulation of cerebellar vermis enhances fronto-cerebellar resting state functional connectivity in schizophrenia with predominant negative symptoms: a randomized controlled trial. Schizophr Res. 2021;238:108–20.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Kern RS, Gold JM, Dickinson D, Green MF, Nuechterlein KH, Baade LE, et al. The MCCB impairment profile for schizophrenia outpatients: results from the MATRICS psychometric and standardization study. Schizophr Res. 2011;126:124–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. D’Mello C, Swain MG. Immune-to-brain communication pathways in inflammation-associated sickness and depression. Curr Top Behav Neurosci. 2017;31:73–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Howes OD, McCutcheon R. Inflammation and the neural diathesis-stress hypothesis of schizophrenia: a reconceptualization. Transl Psychiatry. 2017;7: e1024.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Fan X, Pristach C, Liu EY, Freudenreich O, Henderson DC, Goff DC. Elevated serum levels of C-reactive protein are associated with more severe psychopathology in a subgroup of patients with schizophrenia. Psychiatry Res. 2007;149:267–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Mostaid MS, Dimitrakopoulos S, Wannan C, Cropley V, Weickert CS, Everall IP, et al. An Interleukin-1 beta (IL1B) haplotype linked with psychosis transition is associated with IL1B gene expression and brain structure. Schizophr Res. 2019;204:201–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Sparkman NL, Buchanan JB, Heyen JR, Chen J, Beverly JL, Johnson RW. Interleukin-6 facilitates lipopolysaccharide-induced disruption in working memory and expression of other proinflammatory cytokines in hippocampal neuronal cell layers. J Neurosci. 2006;26:10709–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Leffa DT, Caye A, Santos I, Matijasevich A, Menezes A, Wehrmeister FC, et al. Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder has a state-dependent association with asthma: The role of systemic inflammation in a population-based birth cohort followed from childhood to adulthood. Brain Behav Immun. 2021;97:239–49.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Belge JB, Van Diermen L, Sabbe B, Moens J, Morrens M, Coppens V, et al. Improvement of psychomotor retardation after electroconvulsive therapy is related to decreased IL-6 levels. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2021;105: 110146.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Dantzer R, O’Connor JC, Freund GG, Johnson RW, Kelley KW. From inflammation to sickness and depression: when the immune system subjugates the brain. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008;9:46–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Goldsmith DR, Haroon E, Miller AH, Addington J, Bearden C, Cadenhead K, et al. Association of baseline inflammatory markers and the development of negative symptoms in individuals at clinical high risk for psychosis. Brain Behav Immun. 2019;76:268–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Yarmohammadi F, Hayes AW, Karimi G. The therapeutic effects of berberine against different diseases: a review on the involvement of the endoplasmic reticulum stress. Phytother Res. 2022;36:3215.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Wu J, Luo Y, Deng D, Su S, Li S, Xiang L, et al. Coptisine from Coptis chinensis exerts diverse beneficial properties: a concise review. J Cell Mol Med. 2019;23:7946–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Jia L, Liu J, Song Z, Pan X, Chen L, Cui X, et al. Berberine suppresses amyloid-beta-induced inflammatory response in microglia by inhibiting nuclear factor-kappaB and mitogen-activated protein kinase signalling pathways. J Pharm Pharmacol. 2012;64:1510–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Ye C, Liang Y, Chen Y, Xiong Y, She Y, Zhong X, et al. Berberine improves cognitive impairment by simultaneously impacting cerebral blood flow and β-amyloid accumulation in an APP/tau/PS1 mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Cells. 2021;10:1161.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Ahmed T, Gilani AU, Abdollahi M, Daglia M, Nabavi SF, Nabavi SM. Berberine and neurodegeneration: a review of literature. Pharmacol Rep. 2015;67:970–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Tian Y, Zheng Y, Wang Q, Yan F, Tao Z, Zhao F, et al. Berberine ameliorates cognitive impairment by regulating microglial polarization and increasing expression of anti-inflammatory factors following permanent bilateral common carotid artery occlusion in rats. CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets. 2022;21:869–79.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Ghotbi Ravandi S, Shabani M, Bashiri H, Saeedi Goraghani M, Khodamoradi M, Nozari M. Ameliorating effects of berberine on MK-801-induced cognitive and motor impairments in a neonatal rat model of schizophrenia. Neurosci Lett. 2019;706:151–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Jia Q, Li J, Zhang J, Liu Y, Zhao Y, Li M, et al. A randomized double blind study of the effect of berberine on improvement of cognitive ability in patients with schizophrenia. Chin Ment Health J. 2016;30:677–82.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Sobolova K, Hrabinova M, Hepnarova V, Kucera T, Kobrlova T, Benkova M, et al. Discovery of novel berberine derivatives with balanced cholinesterase and prolyl oligopeptidase inhibition profile. Eur J Med Chem. 2020;203: 112593.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Alorabi M, Cavalu S, Al-Kuraishy HM, Al-Gareeb AI, Mostafa-Hedeab G, Negm WA, et al. Pentoxifylline and berberine mitigate diclofenac-induced acute nephrotoxicity in male rats via modulation of inflammation and oxidative stress. Biomed Pharmacother. 2022;152: 113225.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Kong LD, Cheng CH, Tan RX. Monoamine oxidase inhibitors from rhizoma of Coptis chinensis. Planta Med. 2001;67:74–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Tao C, Hu SQ, Chen J, Chen YJ, Sun KH, Cui GZ, et al. Highly efficient synthesis and monoamine oxidase B inhibitory profile of demethyleneberberine, columbamine and palmatine. Neurochem Int. 2020;139: 104807.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Medjaden Inc. for scientific editing of this manuscript. We also thank professor Donghong Cui for the quality control of this article.

Funding

This study was supported by the Key Subject funds of Tongxiang (No. 201901012).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

ZP: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Software, Writing -original draft; HW: Investigation, Methodology, Writing—review & editing; HJ: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Supervision, Resources, Writing—review & editing; QH and HY: Project administration, Resources; DC: Validation. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hongxia Jiang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This trial was approved by the ethics committees of the Kangci Hospital of Jiaxing, Second Specialized Hospital of Hegang, Second People’s Hospital of Tongxiang, and Second People’s Hospital of Taizhou. All patients or their legal guardians provided written informed consent on trial participation.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pu, Z., Wen, H., Jiang, H. et al. Berberine improves negative symptoms and cognitive function in patients with chronic schizophrenia via anti-inflammatory effect: a randomized clinical trial. Chin Med 18, 41 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13020-023-00746-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13020-023-00746-4

Keywords