Skip to main content

Fecal medicines used in traditional medical system of China: a systematic review of their names, original species, traditional uses, and modern investigations

Abstract

In China, the medical use of fecal matter (fresh fecal suspension or dry feces) can be dated back to the fourth century, approximately 1700 years ago. In long-term clinical practice, Chinese doctors have accumulated unique and invaluable medical experience in the use of fecal materials. In view of their good curative effect and medicinal potential, fecal medicines should be paid much attention. This study aimed to provide the first comprehensive data compilation of fecal medicines used in various Chinese traditional medical systems by bibliographic investigation of 31 medicine monographs and standards. A total of 54 fecal medicines were found to be used in 14 traditional Chinese medical systems. Their names, original species, medicinal forms, and traditional uses were described in detail. These fecal medicines were commonly used to treat gastrointestinal, nervous system, skin, and gynecological diseases. Commonly used fecal medicines include Wu-Ling-Zhi, Jiu-Fen and Hei-Bing-Pian. The information summarized in this study can provide a good reference for the development and utilization of fecal medicines. Further studies are necessary to prove their medicinal value, identify their active ingredients, and elucidate their mechanisms of action so that more people can accept these special medicines.

Background

Traditional medicines have been used for prevention and treatment of diseases for thousands of years in China. In recent decades, they have attracted worldwide attention due to their reliable therapeutic efficacy and low side effects. During the long-term struggle against diseases, ancient Chinese doctors found that some unexpected materials, such as human or animal feces, could also effectively treat diseases. In China, the medical use of fecal matter (fresh fecal suspension or dry feces) has a long history. During the Eastern Jin dynasty (ad 300–400 years), “Zhou Hou Bei Ji Fang”, a well-known monograph of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) written by Hong Ge, recorded a case of treating patients with food poisoning or severe diarrhea by ingesting human fecal suspension (known as yellow soup or Huang-Long decoction) [1]. During the Tang dynasty, Yutuo Ningma Yundan Gongbu compiled a world-famous book of Tibetan medicine called “The Four Medical Tantras”, which recorded that digestive diseases can be treated with the processed product of the feces of Sus scrofa (Hei-Bing-Pian in Chinese) [2]. Later, the “Compendium of Materia Medica” (a masterpiece of herbalism written by Shizhen Li during the Ming dynasty) described a series of prescriptions for treating diarrhea, rheumatism, jaundice, fever, and pain using fresh fecal suspension or dry feces [3]. In addition, “Jing Zhu Materia Medica” written by Danzeng Pengcuo Dimaer in the nineteenth century recorded that Hei-Bing-Pian and the dry feces of Gypaetus barbatus or Aegypius monachus (Jiu-Fen in Chinese) are commonly used to treat dyspepsia and gastric ulcer [4]. These records indicate that fecal medicines are widely used and occupy an important position in Chinese traditional medical systems.

In long-term clinical practice, Chinese doctors have accumulated unique experience in the use of fecal medicines. For example, the dry feces of Trogopterus xanthipes (Wu-Ling-Zhi in Chinese) is often used to treat blood stasis, swelling and aching due to traumatic injury [5]. Jiu-Fen is good at treating gastrointestinal diseases, such as dyspepsia, weak gastrointestinal function and gastric ulcer. Hei-Bing-Pian can treat diseases, such as indigestion, diarrhea and distending pain in the stomach [6]. These traditional medication experiences are undoubtedly valuable assets and can provide a reference for modern drug development. However, documents on the traditional use of fecal medicines are scattered and lack systematic collation.

In this review, we comprehensively collect and summarize the names, origins, and treated diseases of fecal medicines that have been used in some Chinese traditional medical systems, including TCM, Tibetan ethnic medicine (EM), Oroqen EM, Kazak EM, Uygur EM, Mongolian EM, Nu EM, Yao EM, Wa EM, Tujia EM, Korean EM, Jino EM, Hani EM, and Dai EM. In addition, we review the most frequently used fecal medicines in terms of their origins, traditional uses, chemical constituents, and pharmacological activities. Such information can provide a good reference for their development and utilization. These fecal medicines may be a valuable gift from Chinese traditional medicine to the world and has potential as drug candidates for the treatment of some chronic diseases, such as gastrointestinal diseases.

Methods

We have manually searched 31 related medicine monographs and drug standards, such as “Zhou Hou Bei Ji Fang”, “Compendium of Materia Medica”, “Jing Zhu Materia Medica”, “Dictionary of Chinese Ethnic Medicine”, “Drug Standards of Tibetan Medicine”, “Lan Liu Li”, “Pharmacopoeia of the People’s Republic of China”, and “Chinese Tibetan Materia Medica”, to obtain the information about the names, origins, traditional uses, and treated diseases of fecal medicines. In addition, we have searched the online Chinese literature databases (i.e., Wan fang and CNKI) and international English databases (i.e., PubMed, ISI Web of Science and Google Scholar), using their vernacular or Latin names as keywords, to obtain their chemical constituents and biological effects.

Results

This review recorded 54 fecal medicines that have been used in 14 Chinese traditional medical systems. Their names, original species, medicinal forms, and treated diseases are presented in Tables 1 and 2. These 54 medicines mainly originate from the feces of 56 animals. Among medicinal forms used, dry feces is the most frequently used (66.67%), followed by processed feces (29.63%) and fresh fecal juice (3.70%). In addition, we found that these 54 fecal medicines are mainly used to treat gastrointestinal (37.04%), nervous system (22.22%), skin (22.22%), ophthalmic (18.52%), and gynecological diseases (16.67%).

Table 1 Fecal medicines used in the traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) system
Table 2 Fecal medicines used in other traditional ethnic medicine (EM) systems in China

Fecal medicines used in the TCM system

Traditional Chinese medicine is the most representative traditional medical system in China. It has a long history of more than 2500 years. In recent decades, TCM has attracted global attention due to its reliable therapeutic efficacy. Generally, TCM uses herbs, animals or minerals to treat diseases. In long-term clinical practices, animal feces have been found to be effective in treating some specific diseases under the guidance of TCM theory. As early as the Eastern Jin dynasty, human fecal juice (i.e., yellow soup) has been used by TCM practitioners to treat severe diarrhea [1]. At present, some fecal medicines are still used in the clinical practice of TCM. In the 2015 edition of Chinese Pharmacopoeia [7], 18 preparations have been found to contain fecal medicines (Table 5). For example, “Shi-Xiang-Zhi-Tong Powder” and “Tong-Jing Pills” contain Wu-Ling-Zhi, and “Huang-Lian-Yang-Gan Pills” contains Ye-Ming-Sha (dry feces of some kinds of bats).

In the present study, a bibliographic investigation of TCM monographs and drug standards revealed 14 kinds of fecal medicines that are commonly used in the TCM system. They mainly come from the feces of 22 animals and are widely used to treat dysmenorrhea, amenorrhea, abdominal mass, diarrhea, and blurred vision. Additional information on these 14 medicines is provided in Table 1. Wu-Ling-Zhi is the most representative fecal medicine in the TCM system (Fig. 1). Therefore, its traditional uses, chemical constituents and pharmacological activities are described in detail in the subsequent sections.

Fig. 1
figure 1

The commonly used fecal medicines in traditional medical system of China (a Ye-Ming-Sha; b Wu-Ling-Zhi; c Can-Sha; d Jiu-Fen; e Hei-Bing-Pian)

The dry feces of Trogopterus xanthipes (Wu-Ling-Zhi in Chinese)

Wu-Ling-Zhi (Fig. 1b), also named as Goreishi or Trogopterorum faeces, is one of the commonly used fecal medicines. It derives from the dry feces of Trogopterus xanthipes. Wu-Ling-Zhi was first recorded in the classic Chinese medicinal book “Kai Bao Ben Cao” compiled in the Song Dynasty [8]. Its traditional uses were described in several TCM monographs and drug standards. For example, “Ben Cao Jing Shu” recorded that Wu-Ling-Zhi had a good therapeutic effect on stabbing pain caused by blood stasis [9]. In addition, the Chinese Pharmacopoeia 1990 edition recorded that Wu-Ling-Zhi had good effects of promoting blood circulation, removing blood stasis and relieving pain, and was usually used to treat the stabbing pain in the chest and hypochondrium, dysmenorrhea, amenorrhea, swelling and aching due to traumatic injury, postpartum blood stasis, and snake bites.

So far, some chemical constituents categorized as terpenoids, flavonoids, lignans, sterols, and esters have been isolated from Wu-ling-zhi. The chemical structures of representative compounds are shown in Fig. 2. Numata et al. [10] found that the feces of T. xanthipes contain several cytotoxic triterpenes, namely, pomolic acid, 3-O-cis-p-coumaroyltormentic acid, 2α-hydroxyursolic acid, and jacoumaric acid. Subsequently, they isolated three new ursane-type triterpenes (i.e., goreishic acids I, II and III) from the feces of T. xanthipes in 1990 [11]. In addition, 19 diterpenoids including three new isopimarane diterpenoids (trogopteroids A–C) and four new aromatic diterpenoids (trogopteroids D–G) were isolated from the feces of T. xanthipes [12]. Yang et al. [13] also isolated two new diterpenoids (wulingzhic acid A and wulingzhic acid B) from the feces of T. xanthipes. Additionally, the isolation and structural elucidation of flavonoids in Wu-Ling-Zhi were done by Yang et al. [14]. Seven flavonoids such as kaempferol 3-O-α-l-(4″E-p-coumaroyl)-rhamnoside, hinokiflavone, afzelin, and quercitrin were found. In 2012, four new neolignans were obtained from the ethyl acetate fraction of methanol extract of Wu-Ling-Zhi [15]. Subsequently, they also isolated neolignans that had been reported before from its methanolic extract and named trogopterins A–C [16]. Moreover, Yang et al. [17] isolated four new fatty acid esters from the feces of T. xanthipes. Currently, it was reported that dihydrositosterol, epifriedelanol, 5-methoxy-7-hydroxycoumarin, β-sitosterol, ursolic acid, protocatechuic acid, and daucosterol were also isolated from Wu-Ling-Zhi [18, 19]. Moreover, some volatile compounds identified by capillary gas chromatography combined mass spectrometry were also found in Wu-ling-zhi, such as dodecanoic acid, alpha-cedrol, tetradecanoic acid, and benzaldehyde [20].

Fig. 2
figure 2

Chemical structures of representative compounds isolated from Wu-Ling-Zhi and Hei-Bing-Pian

At present, there are some studies involving the quality control of Wu-Ling-Zhi. Yerigui et al. [21] quantified five bile acids (i.e., cholic acid, deoxycholic acid, lithocholic acid, ursodeoxycholic acid, and taurocholic acid) in Wu-Ling-Zhi by using ultra high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Jiao et al. [22] established a thin layer chromatography (TLC) method for qualitative identification of Wu-Ling-Zhi, and developed a high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method to simultaneously quantify three active ingredients (protocatechuic acid, hinokiflavone and amentoflavone) in Wu-Ling-Zhi. Recently, Chen et al. also established the quality standard of Wu-Ling-Zhi. They qualitatively and quantitatively analyzed quercetin, kaempferol and amentoflavone in Wu-Ling-Zhi by TLC and HPLC, respectively [23]. These results can provide important reference for the quality control of Wu-Ling-Zhi.

Moreover, it is worth pointing out that extracts or chemical constituents obtained from the Wu-Ling-Zhi have been proved to possess a wide spectrum of pharmacological activities, such as anti-inflammatory, anti-cerebral ischemia, anti-gastric ulcer, and antithrombin effects. The basic pharmacological data of Wu-Ling-Zhi extracts and some isolated compounds are shown in Tables 3 and 4. Kim et al. [24] reported that Wu-Ling-Zhi extract could reduce lipopolysaccharide-induced NO and cytokines production. Wang et al. [25] found that the ethyl acetate extract of Wu-Ling-Zhi showed obvious inhibitory effects on xylene-induced ear swelling in mice and carrageenan-induced paw swelling in rats (400 mg/kg, ip), and it could also significantly inhibit the proliferation of granulation tissue in mice (800 mg/kg, ip). These findings indicated that Wu-Ling-Zhi has obvious anti-inflammatory effect. Furthermore, the ethyl acetate extract of Wu-Ling-Zhi was also found to be able to protect gastric mucosa and prevent experimental gastric ulcer by inhibiting gastric acid secretion [26]. It was reported that the aqueous extract of Wu-Ling-Zhi could significantly prolong the survival time of mice with incomplete cerebral ischemia, reduce the brain water content, brain index and malondialdehyde (MDA) level, and increase superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity in rats, indicating that Wu-Ling-Zhi has good protective effect against cerebral ischemia [27]. Moreover, the aqueous extract of Wu-Ling-Zhi could down-regulate the expression of intercellular adhesion molecule-1 in experimental atherosclerotic rats and reduce the degree of vascular endothelial lesions, which may account for the anti-arteriosclerosis inflammatory effects of Wu-Ling-Zhi [28]. Currently, several compounds isolated from Wu-Ling-Zhi, such as 3-O-α-l-(2″E,4″E-di-p-coumaroyl)-rhamnoside, bis(7-hydroxyheptyl) decanedioate and bis(7-hydroxyheptyl) octanedioate, were found to have significant antithrombin activity [14, 17]. Besides, a recent study showed that Wu-Ling-Zhi could trigger caspase dependent apoptosis in breast cancer cells (MCF-7 cells) [29].

Table 3 Pharmacological activities and mechanisms of some compounds isolated from Wu-Ling-Zhi and Hei-Bing-Pian
Table 4 Basic pharmacological data of commonly used fecal medicines mentioned in the article

Fecal medicines used in other traditional ethnic medicine systems in China

In addition to the TCM system, there are other traditional medical systems in China, such as Tibetan, Mongolian, Uygur, Tujia, Kazak, Yao, Korean, and Dai ethnic medicines. These ethnic medical systems have their own unique theories in the use of natural medicines. Therefore, it is also important to collect information about fecal medicines from these ethnic medical systems.

Traditional Tibetan medicine (TTM) is a representative ethnic medicine in China, and it has a unique fundamental theory, namely three elements theory consisting of “rLung”, “mKhris-pa” and “Badkan” [30]. In TTM system, the use of fecal medicines has a long history. The earliest Tibetan medicine monograph that recorded fecal medicines is “The Four Medical Tantras” [2]. Later, in the seventeenth century, famous “Tibetan Medical Thangka of The Four Medical Tantras” [31] was published by Sde-srid-sangs-rgyas-rgya-mtsho, which vividly depicted some commonly used fecal medicines in the form of wall chart (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

The Tibetan medical Thangka of “The Four Medical Tantras” vividly depicts some feces medicines and their origin animals (a Tetrao urogallus; b Gallus gallus domesticus; c Pica pica; d Columba livia domestica; e Passer montanus; f Aegypius monachus; g Equus caballus orientalis; h Equus asinus; i Homo sapiens; j Bos taurus domesticus; k Canis lupus; l Sus scrofa; m Canis lupus familiaris; n Rattus rattus; o Lepus oiostolus)

In this study, we found that the feces of 41 animals were used as medicines for the treatment of various diseases in 13 ethnic medical systems. More information on these medicines is provided in Table 2. Among them, the dry feces of Gypaetus barbatus or Aegypius monachus and the processed product of the feces of Sus scrofa are representative fecal medicines in Chinese ethnic medicine systems. Their traditional uses, chemical constituents and pharmacological activities have been described in detail in the following sections.

The dry feces of Gypaetus barbatus or Aegypius monachus (Jiu-Fen in Chinese)

The dry feces of G. barbatus or A. monachus, known as Jiu-Fen in Chinese, is a commonly used Tibetan medicine (Fig. 1d). It has the functions of strengthening stomach and promoting digestion. Jiu-Fen is used in the traditional Tibetan system of medicine for the treatment of dyspepsia, gastrointestinal dysfunction, gastric ulcer, and intestinal cancer in the past few decades [4, 6]. In addition, the “Jing Zhu Materia Medica” recorded that Jiu-Fen can be used to treat mental illness [4]. Nowadays, Jiu-Fen is frequently used in the clinical practice of TTM by combining other herbs. According to our statistics, there are 32 preparations containing Jiu-Fen in some monographs and drug standards of Tibetan medicine [6, 32,33,34,35]. The representative prescriptions include “Shi-Wei-Jiu-Fen Powder”, “Er-Shi-Jiu-Wei-Neng-Xiao Powder” and “Jian-Hua-Mu-Xiang Pills” (Table 5). The “Tibetan Medicine Standards” recorded that “Shi-Wei-Jiu-Fen Powder” can strengthen stomach and promote digestion [6]. Consequently, it is usually used to treat gastrointestinal diseases such as dyspepsia.

Table 5 Representative prescriptions containing fecal medicines recorded in official drug standards

The use of Jiu-Fen in the traditional Tibetan system of medicine has a long history, but modern research on the chemical composition, quality control and pharmacodynamic evaluation of Jiu-Fen has not yet been carried out. Therefore, further studies are needed to prove its medicinal values in gastrointestinal diseases treatment, identify active compounds and elucidate the underlying mechanisms with the help of modern chemistry and pharmacology methods.

The processed product of the feces of Sus scrofa (Hei-Bing-Pian in Chinese)

The processed product of the feces of Sus scrofa (wild boar), known as Hei-Bing-Pian (Chinese name), is a widely used Tibetan and Mongolian medicine in China (Fig. 1e). Its processing method was recorded in the “Chinese Materia Medica for Tibetan Medicine”: firstly, the dry feces of Sus scrofa is put into a ceramic jar, and yellow mud (adding a small amount of salt) is used to seal the ceramic jar. Secondly, the ceramic jar is calcined with fire until it turns gray outside. Then, the black matter is taken out from the ceramic jar, which is Hei-Bing-Pian [36]. In traditional Tibetan system of medicine, Hei-Bing-Pian is described as pungent in flavor and hot in nature. It is commonly used for the treatment of dyspepsia, gallbladder diseases, stomachache, and plague [6]. According to our statistics, there are 14 Tibetan medicine preparations containing Hei-Bing-Pian in official drug standards. The representative prescriptions include “Shi-Wei-Hei-Bing-Pian Powder”, “Shi-Yi-Wei-Jin-Se Pills” and “Shi-Wu-Wei-Zhi-Xie-Mu Powder” (Table 5). The “Drug Standards of Tibetan Medicines” recorded that “Shi-Wei-Hei-Bing-Pian Pills” is usually used to treat stomach and gallbladder diseases, such as dyspepsia, anorexia, jaundice, gallstones and nausea [35].

It has been reported that Hei-Bing-Pian contains a variety of inorganic elements, such as Fe, Ca, Zn, K, Cu, Mn, Co, Ti, and Mg. At present, the contents of these elements in Hei-Bing-Pian have been determined by using atomic absorption spectrometry or spectrophotometry [37, 38]. The elements with high levels are Ca (18,570 μg/g), K (11,625 μg/g), Mg (9975 μg/g), and Fe (7800 μg/g). Furthermore, two bile acids (i.e., cholic acid and taurocholic acid) were detected and quantified in Hei-Bing-Pian by using ultra high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry method [21]. Besides, Chang et al. [39] developed a spectrophotometric method to determine the absorption force of Hei-Bing-Pian on tartrazine, and used this adsorption force as an indicator to control the quality of Hei-Bing-Pian.

Modern pharmacological study has demonstrated that Hei-Bing-Pian can prevent mucosal damage caused by experimental colitis in rats. Compared with the model group, the high and low doses of Hei-Bing-Pian can significantly reduce the damage of colonic mucosa congestion, hyperplasia and ulcer (p < 0.05), and significantly increase the levels of superoxide dismutase (SOD) and glutathione (GSH) [40]. Cai et al. [41] reported the effect of Hei-Bing-Pian on the intestinal smooth muscle function of animals. It was found that Hei-Bing-Pian had no obvious effect on normal isolated ileum, and could not antagonize the inhibitory effect of atropine, adrenaline and promethazine on isolated ileum smooth muscle. However, it could significantly inhibit histamine-induced ileal smooth muscle excitation, and the inhibition rate was 25%. Moreover, in vivo studies showed that Hei-Bing-Pian could inhibit the contraction effect of pilocarpine on ileal smooth muscle. These results indicate that the effect of Hei-Bing-Pian on intestinal smooth muscle is related to the cholinergic M receptor and histamine receptor. Bai et al. [42] found that Hei-Bing-Pian could significantly accelerate gastric emptying in rats and promote the propulsive speed of activated carbon in the small intestine of mice. Moreover, the high dose of Hei-Bing-Pian could significantly promote the healing of chronic gastritis caused by acetic acid, and had obvious protective effect on gastric mucosal injury induced by cold stress. Besides, in order to make better use of Hei-Bing-Pian, its long-term toxic effects have been studied by Li et al. The results showed that, after 12 weeks of administration of Hei-Bing-Pian, there were no significant changes in body weight, blood biochemical parameters, histopathology, and several organ indexes (e.g., heart, liver, spleen, kidney, and thymus) in rats, compared with the control group, which indicated that Hei-Bing-Pian has no potential toxicity [43]. The basic pharmacological data of Hei-Bing-Pian and its ingredients are shown in Tables 3 and 4.

Similarities and differences of fecal medicines related to treated diseases in Chinese traditional medical systems

Every traditional medical system in China has its own unique theory or medication experience. Therefore, the same fecal medicines are used in different medical systems, and their therapeutic uses may be different. A detailed comparison of these differences would help researchers and traditional medical practitioners to better understand the indications of fecal medicines and promote their development and utilization. In this study, we compared the similarities and differences of therapeutic uses of Wu-Ling-Zhi and Hei-Bing-Pian in different traditional medical systems, including TCM, Tibetan EM, Korean EM, Dai EM, Yao EM, Tujia EM, Nu EM, and Mongolian EM. Additional details are provided in Table 6. The results indicate that Wu-Ling-Zhi is commonly used to treat amenorrhea and dysmenorrhea in most traditional medical systems. However, its therapeutic uses also have some obvious differences in different medical systems. For example, in the Tibetan EM, Wu-Ling-Zhi can be used to treat stomachache, whereas in the Mongolian EM, it is mainly used to treat diarrhea, gout and itching. Moreover, Wu-Ling-Zhi can treat cold, whooping cough and fever in the Nu EM. Hei-Bing-Pian has the same therapeutic use in TCM and Tibetan EM systems. It is widely used in both systems to treat dyspepsia, biliary diseases, plague and distending pain in the stomach. There is no difference in the therapeutic use of Hei-Bing-Pian in the two medical systems.

Table 6 Similarities and differences of fecal medicines related to treated diseases in Chinese traditional medical systems

Conclusion and future perspectives

Chinese traditional medicine is an important part of the world’s medical system. In long-term clinical practice, ancient Chinese doctors have accumulated invaluable experience in the use of fecal medicines. As shown in Tables 1 and 2, some fecal medicines have been found to be effective in treating amenorrhea, dysmenorrhea dyspepsia, diarrhea, fever, and stomachache. These traditional medication knowledge are valuable assets. Currently, some fecal medicines (e.g., Wu-Ling-Zhi, Jiu-Fen and Hei-Bing-Pian) are still used in clinical practice. A total of 76 preparations containing fecal medicines were recorded in the latest official drug standards (Table 5). Extensive clinical application demonstrates the role and value of fecal medicines in Chinese medical systems. Moreover, Wu-Ling-Zhi extracts and its chemical constituents have been proved to possess a wide spectrum of biological activities, such as anti-inflammatory, anticoagulative and antioxidant effects (Tables 3 and 4). Some possible molecular mechanisms have also been revealed. The results of these modern pharmacological studies provide some evidences to prove the scientific nature of fecal medicines. However, most fecal medicines still lack experimental evidences. For example, Jiu-Fen is a commonly used Tibetan medicine. However, so far, no biological activities or active ingredients have been reported for this drug. Therefore, in order to better develop and utilize these fecal medicines, more in vivo pharmacological studies and even clinical evaluations should be performed to prove their scientific and medicinal value.

Fortunately, an in-depth study of gut microbiota has provided an opportunity to interpret the scientific connotation of some traditional fecal medicines, such as the yellow soup. This soup is a fresh fecal suspension of Homo sapiens commonly used to treat food poisoning, severe diarrhea, heat toxins, and unconsciousness due to high fever. Zhang et al. [44, 45] believe that the efficacy of yellow soup is mainly caused by the gut microbiota from fresh fecal water, and its principle for treating diseases is similar to the fecal microbiota transplantation method of modern medicine. Therefore, reconstructing the gut microbiota of patients may be the mechanism of action of fresh fecal medicines for treating diseases.

However, most fecal medicines are derived from dry feces (e.g., Wu-Ling-Zhi) or processed products (e.g., Hei-Bing-Pian). During drying and processing, these fecal medicines lose the living microbiota. Therefore, their mechanisms for treating diseases may be different from fresh feces. Feces are intestinal excretions of humans or animals. The chemical constituents in feces are mainly derived from the host or dietary metabolites. These metabolites may be the key active constituents of fecal medicinal materials. For example, the terpenoids, flavonoids and lignans contained in Wu-Ling-Zhi are closely related to the foods eaten by Trogopterus xanthipes (e.g., Platycladus orientalis leaves, Pinus tabulaeformis bark, and peach kernels). These diet-derived metabolites may be the pharmacologically active ingredients of Wu-Ling-Zhi. Moreover, some bile acids (e.g., deoxycholic acid, lithocholic acid and taurocholic acid) have been found in Wu-Ling-Zhi and Hei-Bing-Pian [21]. These bile acids are the final metabolites of cholesterol under the common metabolism of liver and gut microbiota. Bile acids are endocrine-signaling molecules that regulate metabolic processes, including glucose, lipid and energy homeostasis, by regulating gut microbiota or activating bile acid receptors, such as the farnesoid X receptor (FXR) and G protein-coupled bile acid receptor 1 [46,47,48]. Distrutti et al. [49] reported that bile acids-activated receptors are targets for maintaining intestinal integrity. Gadaleta et al. [50] found that FXR activation could prevent chemically induced intestinal inflammation with an improvement of colitis symptoms and inhibition of epithelial permeability. In addition, bile acids can also regulate cardiovascular functions via receptor-dependent and -independent mechanisms [51]. These findings provide a rationale to explore the mechanisms of Hei-Bing-Pian and Wu-Ling-Zhi in the treatment of gastrointestinal and cardiovascular diseases, respectively.

With the continuous development of science and technology, some unique but sometimes incomprehensible drugs in traditional medical systems will gradually be recognized. In this study, we provide the first comprehensive data compilation of fecal medicines used in Chinese traditional medical systems. The information recorded in ancient monographs and drug standards, such as original species, traditional uses and indications, can provide a good reference for the development and utilization of fecal medicines. In view of the current research status of fecal medicines, future research may focus on the following aspects: (1) applying multidisciplinary methods to further prove their effectiveness and medicinal value, (2) revealing their active ingredients associated with clinical efficacy using phytochemical and pharmacodynamic methods, and (3) elucidating the mechanisms of action of fecal medicines based on gut microbiota or receptor-mediated signaling pathways.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

TCM:

traditional Chinese medicine

TTM:

traditional Tibetan medicine

EM:

ethnic medicine

References

  1. Ge H. Zhou Hou Bei Ji Fang. Tianjing: Tianjin Science and Technology Press; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Yutuo YDGB. The Four Medical Tantras. Shanghai: Shanghai Scientific and Technical Publishers; 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Li SZ. Compendium of Materia Medica. Beijing: People’s Medical Publishing House; 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dimaer DZPC. Jing Zhu Materia Medica. Shanghai: Shanghai Scientific and Technical Publishers; 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chinese Pharmacopoeia Commission. Pharmacopoeia of the People’s Republic of China, Part 1. 1990th ed. Beijing: People’s Medical Publishing House; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Health Bureau of Tibet, Qinghai, Sichuan, Gansu, Yunnan, Xinjiang. Tibetan medicine standards. Xining: Qinghai People’s Publishing Press; 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chinese Pharmacopoeia Commission. Pharmacopoeia of the People’s Republic of China, Part 1. 2015th ed. Beijing: The Medicine Science and Technology Press of China; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lu DX. Kai Bao Ben Cao. Hefei: Anhui Science and Technology Press; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Liao XY. Sheng Nong Ben Cao Jing Shu. Beijing: Traditional Chinese Medicine Classics Publishing House; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Numata A, Yang P, Takahashi C, Fujiki R, Nabae M, Fujita E. Cytotoxic triterpenes from a Chinese medicine, Goreishi. Chem Pharm Bull. 1989;37(3):648–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Numata A, Takahashi C, Miyamoto T, Yoneda M, Yang PM. New triterpenes from a Chinese medicine, Goreishi. Chem Pharm Bull. 1990;38(4):942–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhao J, Zhu H, Zhou X, Yang T, Wang Y, Su J, et al. Diterpenoids from the feces of Trogopterus xanthipes. J Nat Prod. 2010;73(5):865–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Yang NY, Tao WW, Zhu M, Duan JA, Jiang JG. Two new isopimarane diterpenes from the feces of Trogopterus xanthipes. Fitoterapia. 2010;81(5):381–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Yang NY, Tao WW, Duan JA. Antithrombotic flavonoids from the faeces of Trogopterus xanthipes. Nat Prod Res. 2010;24(19):1843–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Baek S, Shim S. Isolation and structure determination of four new neolignans from Trogopterorum faeces. Planta Med. 2012;78(11):323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Baek S, Xia X, Min BS, Park C, Shim SH, Trogopterins A-C. Three new neolignans from feces of Trogopterus xanthipes. Beilstein J Org Chem. 2014;10:2955–62.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Yang NY, Tao WW, Duan JA, Guo JM, Cao LL. Four new fatty acid esters from the feces of Trogopterus xanthipes. Lipids. 2009;44(9):849–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Li Q, Lu YR, Lu XZ, Tao Y. Studies on the chemical constituents of faces Trogopterus. China J Chin Mater Med. 1999;34(8):514–6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Yang DM, Su SW, Li X, Zhu TR. Study on bioactive constituents from the extracts of Trogopterus xanthipes Milne-Edwards. Acta Pharm Sin. 1987;22(10):756–60.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Wei Y, Zhang X, Huang AJ. Analysis of the volatile components in trogopterorum feces by capillary gas chromatography and gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. Chin J Anal Chem. 2001;29(2):195–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Yerigui, Wu XH, Wang XJ, Ma CM. Quantification of bile acids in traditional animal medicines and their preparations using ultra high-performance liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry in the multiple reaction monitoring mode. Anal Sci. 2016;32(5):499–503.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Jiao Y. Study on quality control method of faeces trogopterori. Shengyang: Shenyang Pharmaceutical University; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Chen XQ, Jia WJ, Zhou ZL, Li H, Nan F, She L. Study on the quality standard of Faeces trogopterori. Northwest Pharm J. 2019;34(4):469–73.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kim BJ, Ham KW, Park KB, Kim DH, Jo BY, Cho CR, et al. Inhibitory effect of extract of trogopterorum faeces on the production of inflammatory mediaters. Korea J Herbol. 2009;24(3):153–60.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wang SJ, Song LY, Liu YL, Zhang XY, Xu XS, Yu L. Study on anti-inflammatory effect of Wu-Ling-Zhi. J Shenyang Coll Pharm. 1994;11(1):49–53.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Wang XW, Liu WZ, Shao YB. Comparative study on the protective effect of the extract of feces trogopterus on gastric mucosa. Yunnan J Tradit Chin Med Mater Med. 2003;25(1):30–1.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Bu SM, Jia MH, Qu YB. Protective action of Trogopterus xanthipes nightsoil on the cerebral ischemia in mice and rats. J Shanxi Univ. 2000;23(3):257–9.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Tang XG, Huang WQ, Jiang LK. Study on anti-inflammatory effect of faces trogopterus in experiment alarterosclerotic rats. Pharmacol Clin Chin Mater Med. 2009;25(1):35–8.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Song YR, Kim JE, Yang SJ, Park KM, Jung SJ, Cho SH. Effects of trogopterorum faeces on the apoptostic cell death in breast cancer cells. J Korean Obstet Gynecol. 2015;28(1):46–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Li Q, Li HJ, Xu T, Du H, Huan Gang CL, Fan G, et al. Natural medicines used in the traditional tibetan medical system for the treatment of liver diseases. Front Pharmacol. 2018;9:29–45.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Disi SJJC. Tibetan medical Thangka of The Four Medical Tantras. Lasa: The Tibet people’s Publishing House; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Mao JZ. The treasure house of Tibetan medicine prescription. Lanzhou: Gansu Ethnic Publishing House; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Wu HC. The annotation of commonly used Tibetan patent drug. Xining: Qinghai people’s Publishing House; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Wang BQ. National standards for Tibetan Medicine, vol. 1–3. Beijing: Chinese Medical Audio-Visual Publishing House; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Chinese Pharmacopoeia Commission. Drug standards of Tibetan medicines. Beijing: Ministry of Health of the People’s Republic of China; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Editorial Board of Chinese Herbalism. Chinese herbalism for Tibetan medicine. Shanghai: Shanghai Scientific and Technical Publishers; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Cui Y, Yi R, Weng H, Zhao YY. Determination of trace Titanium in Hei-Bing-Pian of by spectrophotometric method. J Inner Mongolia Univ Natl. 2008;23(5):517–8.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Zhao YY, Ba T, Zhao YQ. Determination and pharmacodynamic analysis of iron and other inorganic elements in Mongolian Medicine Heibingpian and its Formulas. J Med Pharm Chin Minor. 2000;6(1):46–7.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Chang L, Dong M, Liu J. Study on quality control of Hei-Bing-Pian. J Med Pharm Chin Minor. 2016;16(12):31–2.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Lin J, Chang L, Bai YF, Qi MY. Effect research of Hei-bing-pian of special Mongolia herbal for experimental colitis in rats. J Med Pharm Chin Minor. 2009;22(4):40–2.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Cai F, Chen GR, Bai YF. Effect of Hei-bing-pian on intestinal smooth muscle function in animals. J Med Pharm Chin Minor. 2008;37(3):59–60.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Bai YF, Qiqige, Feng GQ. Effect of Hei-bing-pian from Mongolian medicine on gastrointestinal function of animals. J Med Pharm Chin Minor. 2005;11:125–6.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Li RP, Chang L, Bai YF. Long-term toxicity of Mongolian medicine Hei-bing-pian on rats. J Med Pharm Chin. 2011;37(4):53–4.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Zhang FM, Luo WS, Shi Y, Fan ZN, Ji GZ. Should we standardize the 1,700 year old fecal microbiota transplantation? Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107(11):1755.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Zhang FM, Cui BT, He XX, Nie YQ, Wu KC, Fan DM, et al. Microbiota transplantation: concept, methodology and strategy for its modernization. Protein Cell. 2018;9(5):462–73.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Khurana S, Raufman JP, Pallone TL. Bile acids regulate cardiovascular function. Clin Transl Sci. 2011;4(3):210–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Stefano F, Andrea M, Giuseppe P, Sabrina C. Bile acid activated receptors: targeting TGR5 and farnesoid-X-receptor in lipid and glucose disorders. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2009;30(11):570–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Jia W, Xie G, Jia W. Bile acid-microbiota crosstalk in gastrointestinal inflammation and carcinogenesis. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;15(2):111–21.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Distrutti E, Santucci L, Cipriani S, Renga B, Schiaroli E, Ricci P, et al. Bile acid activated receptors are targets for regulation of integrity of gastrointestinal mucosa. J Gastroenterol. 2015;50(7):707–19.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Gadaleta RM, van Erpecum KJ, Oldenburg B, Willemsen ECL, Renooij W, Murzilli S, et al. Farnesoid X receptor activation inhibits inflammation and preserves the intestinal barrier in inflammatory bowel disease. Gut. 2011;60(4):463–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Molinaro A, Wahlström A, Marschall HU. Role of bile acids in metabolic control. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2018;29(1):31–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Editorial Board of Chinese Herbalism. Chinese Materia Medica. Shanghai: Shanghai Science and Technology Press; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Editorial Board of Animal medicinal materials of China. Medicinal animal annals of China. Tianjing: Tianjin Science and Technology Press; 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Zhang L. Beng Jing Feng Yuan. Beijing: China Press of Traditional Chinese Medicine; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Nanjing University of TCM. The dictionary of traditional chinese medicine. Shanghai: Shanghai Science and Technology Press; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  56. The Company of Chinese Medicinal Materials. Chinese traditional medicine resources annals. Beijing: The Science Publishing Company; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Deng ML, Gao SX. The medicinal animal of China. Changchun: Jilin People’s Publishing House; 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Tao HJ. Ming Yi Bie Lu. Beijing: People’s Medical Publishing House; 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Luo DS. Chinese Tibetan Materia Medica. Beijing: Ethnic Publishing House; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Jia MR, Zhang Y. Dictionary of Chinese ethnic medicine. Beijing: China Medical Science Press; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Editorial Board of Chinese Herbalism. Chinese Materia Medica-Uighur medicine. Shanghai: Shanghai Science and Technology Press; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Editorial Board of Chinese Herbalism. Chinese Materia Medica-Mongolian medicine. Shanghai: Shanghai Scientific and Technical Publishers; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Qin XY, Luo YJ, Gao ZG. Yao ethnic medicinals in China. Beijing: Nationalities Publishing House; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Zhu GH, Du J, Zhang JM. Tujia minority medicine. Beijing: Publishing House of Ancient Chinese Medical Books; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Tudan CR. Medical encyclopedia of China—Tibetan medicine. Shanghai: Shanghai Scientific and Technical Publishers; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Disi SJJC. Lan Liu Li. Shanghai: Shanghai Scientific and Technical Publishers; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Jia MR, Li XW. The annals of Chinese ethnic medicine. Beijing: China Medical Science Press; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Fogo AS, Antonioli E, Calixto JB, Campos AH. Tormentic acid reduces vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation and survival. Eur J Pharmacol. 2009;615(1):50–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Kim IT, Ryu S, Shin JS, Choi JH, Park HJ, Lee KT. Euscaphic acid isolated from roots of Rosa rugosa inhibits LPS-induced inflammatory responses via TLR4-mediated NF-κB inactivation in RAW 264.7 macrophages. J Cell Biochem. 2012;113(6):1936–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Jiang X, Li T, Liu RH. 2α-hydroxyursolic acid inhibited cell proliferation and induced apoptosis in MDA-MB-231 human breast cancer cells through the p38/MAPK signal transduction pathway. J Agric Food Chem. 2016;64(8):1806–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Schinella G, Aquila S, Dade M, Giner R, del Carmen Recio M, Spegazzini E, et al. Anti-inflammatory and apoptotic activities of pomolic acid isolated from Cecropia pachystachya. Planta Med. 2008;74(3):215–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Woźniak Ł, Skąpska S, Marszałek K. Ursolic acid—a pentacyclic triterpenoid with a wide spectrum of pharmacological activities. Molecules. 2015;20(11):20614–41.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Li CH, Yang ZF, Zhai CY, Qiu WW, Li DL, Yi ZF, et al. Maslinic acid potentiates the anti-tumor activity of tumor necrosis factor α by inhibiting NF-κB signaling pathway. Mol Cancer. 2010;9(1):73–86.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Rodríguez JA, Theoduloz C, Yáñez T, Becerra J, Schmeda-Hirschmann G. Gastroprotective and ulcer healing effect of ferruginol in mice and rats: assessment of its mechanism of action using in vitro models. Life Sci. 2006;78(21):2503–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Li SP, Zhang QY, Li PW. Protective effects of epifriedelinol in a rat model of traumatic brain injury assessed with histological and hematological markers. Transl Neurosci. 2018;9(1):38–42.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. Shim SY, Lee SG, Lee M. Biflavonoids isolated from Selaginella tamariscina and their anti-inflammatory activities via ERK 1/2 signaling. Molecules. 2018;23(4):926–38.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. Su CF, Yang CB, Gong M, Ke YY, Yuan PP, Wang XL, et al. Antidiabetic activity and potential mechanism of amentoflavone in diabetic mice. Molecules. 2019;24(11):2184–98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  78. Hee KJ, Minjeong K, Min KJ, Kyung LM, Jun SS, Young PK. Afzelin suppresses proinflammatory responses in particulate matter-exposed human keratinocytes. Int J Mol Med. 2019;43(6):2516–22.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Hu XT, Ding C, Zhou N, Xu C. Quercetin protects gastric epithelial cell from oxidative damage in vitro and in vivo. Eur J Pharmacol. 2015;754:115–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Jang J, Kim SM, Yee SM, Kim EM, Lee EH, Choi HR, et al. Daucosterol suppresses dextran sulfate sodium (DSS)-induced colitis in mice. Int Immunopharmacol. 2019;72:124–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Loizou S, Lekakis I, Chrousos GP, Moutsatsou P. β-sitosterol exhibits anti-inflammatory activity in human aortic endothelial cells. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2010;54(4):551–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Cao JS. Anti-inflammatory actions of cholic acid and its effect on pharmacology and histology of respiratory system. Hohhot: Inner Mongolia Agricultural University; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  83. Chen X, Mellon RD, Yang L, Dong H, Oppenheim JJ, Howard OMZ. Regulatory effects of deoxycholic acid, a component of the anti-inflammatory traditional Chinese medicine Niuhuang, on human leukocyte response to chemoattractants. Biochem Pharmacol. 2002;63(3):533–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Martínez Moya P, Romero Calvo I, Requena P, Hernández Chirlaque C, Aranda CJ, González R, et al. Dose-dependent antiinflammatory effect of ursodeoxycholic acid in experimental colitis. Int Immunopharmacol. 2013;15(2):372–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  85. Li PF, Xue Y, Guan H. Study on anti-inflammatory effect of taurocholic acid. J Inner Mongolia Agric Univ. 2007;28(1):1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  86. Cheng ZA, Li QM, Wang XW. Effect of faeces trogopterori extract on experimental gastric ulcer and gastric secretion in rat. J Sun Yat-sen Univ. 1997;18(1):47–50.

    Google Scholar 

  87. Chen C, Wang FQ, Xiao W, Xia ZN, Hu G, Wan JB, et al. Effect on platelet aggregation activity: extracts from 31 Traditional Chinese Medicines with the property of activating blood and resolving stasis. J Tradit Chin Med. 2017;37(1):64–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Wang SJ, Liu YL, Song LY, Wang M, Zhu Y, Wang AH. A pharmacological study on anti-platelet aggregation of WEFT. J Shenyang Coll Pharm. 1994;11(4):246–9.

    Google Scholar 

  89. Zhai QL. The neuro-protective effects of water extract of faces trogopterori on transient MCAO rats. Biomed Res. 2016;27(3):972–6.

    Google Scholar 

  90. Chinese Pharmacopoeia Commission. Drug standards of Mongolian medicine. Beijing: Ministry of Health of the People’s Republic of China; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  91. Lende AB, Kshirsagar AD, Deshpande AD, Muley MM, Patil RR, Bafna PA, et al. Anti-inflammatory and analgesic activity of protocatechuic acid in rats and mice. Inflammopharmacology. 2011;19(5):255–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Chinese Pharmacopoeia Commission. Drug standards of Uygur medicine. Urumqi: XinJiang Medical Science and Technology Publishing House; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This research was support by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2017YFC1703900) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81874370).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

HD, T-TK: conducted the research, collected the data, and wrote the paper; SQ, TX: collected, organized, and analyzed the data; C-L GH: collected the Tibetan fecal medicines; and YZ, GF: conceived and designed the study. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gang Fan.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Du, H., Kuang, Tt., Qiu, S. et al. Fecal medicines used in traditional medical system of China: a systematic review of their names, original species, traditional uses, and modern investigations. Chin Med 14, 31 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13020-019-0253-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13020-019-0253-x

Keywords